Article published In:
Scientific Study of LiteratureVol. 5:2 (2015) ► pp.171–177
The implicit erasure of “literary experience” in empirical studies of literature
Comment on “The Scientific study of literary experience: Sampling the state of the art” by Arthur Jacobs
References
Bornstein, R.F
(2011) Toward a process-focused model of test score validity: Improving psychological assessment in science and practice. Psychological Assessment, 23(2), 532–544. 
Campbell, D.T., & Fiske, D.W
(1959) Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 561, 81–105.
Dennett, D.C
(1991) Consciousness explained. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.
Hutzler, F
(2014) Reverse inference is not a fallacy per se: Cognitive processes can be inferred from functional imaging data. NeuroImage, 841, 1061–1069.
Jacobs, A
. (in press 2016) The scientific study of literary experience: Sampling the state of the art. Scientific Study of Literature, 5(2).
Kane, M.T
(2001) Current concerns in validity theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 381, 319–342.
Kuiken, D., & Douglas, S
. (in press 2016) Identifying aspects of absorption that facilitate aesthetic response. In F. Hakemulder, M. Kuijpers, E. Tan, M. Doicaru, & K. Balin (Eds.), The handbook of narrative absorption. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kuiken, D., & Miall, D.S
(2001) Numerically aided phenomenology: Procedures for investigating categories of experience. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research [On-line Journal], 2(1). Retrieved from [URL]
Kuperberg, G.R
(2007) Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax. Brain Research, 1146(5), 23–49.
Lutz, A., & Thompson, E
(2003) Neurophenomenology: Integrating subjective experience and brain dynamics in the neuroscience of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 10(9-10), 31–52.
Pedhazur, E.J., & Schmelkin, L.P
(2013) Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
Poldrack, R.A
(2011) Inferring mental states from neuroimaging data: From reverse inference to large-scale decoding. Neuron, 72(5), 692–697.
Sikora, S., Kuiken, D., & Miall, D.S
(2011) Expressive reading: A phenomenological study of readers’ experience of Coleridge’s “The rime of the ancient mariner.” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(3), 258–268.
Zahavi, D
(2007) Killing the straw man: Dennett and phenomenology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(1-2), 21–43.
Cited by
Cited by 10 other publications
Bruhn, Mark J.
Guy, Josephine M, Kathy Conklin & Jennifer Sanchez-Davies
2018. Literary stylistics, authorial intention and the scientific study of literature: A critical overview. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 27:3 ► pp. 196 ff. 
Jacobs, Arthur M.
2016. The scientific study of literary experience and neuro-behavioral responses to literature. Scientific Study of Literature 6:1 ► pp. 164 ff.
Jacobs, Arthur M., Berenike Herrmann, Gerhard Lauer, Jana Lüdtke & Sascha Schroeder
2020. Sentiment Analysis of Children and Youth Literature: Is There a Pollyanna Effect?. Frontiers in Psychology 11
Jacobs, Arthur M., Jana Lüdtke, Arash Aryani, Burkhard Meyer-Sickendieck & Markus Conrad
2016. Mood-empathic and aesthetic responses in poetry reception. Scientific Study of Literature 6:1 ► pp. 87 ff.
Jacobs, Arthur M. & Roel M. Willems
2018. The Fictive Brain: Neurocognitive Correlates of Engagement in Literature. Review of General Psychology 22:2 ► pp. 147 ff.
Kuijpers, Moniek M.
2021. Chapter 12. Postscript. In Style and Reader Response [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 36], ► pp. 217 ff.
Mangen, Anne, Anne Charlotte Begnum, Anežka Kuzmičová, Kersti Nilsson, Mette Steenberg & Hildegunn Støle
2018. Empathy and literary style. Orbis Litterarum 73:6 ► pp. 471 ff.
Nenadić, Filip, Dušan Vejnović & Slobodan Marković
2019. Subjective experience of poetry: Latent structure and differences between experts and non-experts. Poetics 73 ► pp. 100 ff.
van Krieken, Kobie, Hans Hoeken & José Sanders
2017. Evoking and Measuring Identification with Narrative Characters – A Linguistic Cues Framework. Frontiers in Psychology 8
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 february 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.