Article published in:
Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 5:2 (2015) ► pp. 178182


Dixon, P., & Bortolussi, M.
(2012) The puzzle of memory for literary text. Fictions, 11, 25–40.Google Scholar
Green, M.C., & Brock, T.C.
(2000) The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, A.
(2016) The scientific study of literary experience: Sampling the state of the art. Scientific Study of Literature, 5(2). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, D., Phillips, L., Gregus, M., Miall, D.S., Verbitsky, M., & Tonkonogy, A.
(2004) Locating self-modifying feelings within literary reading. Discourse Processes, 38(2), 267–286. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Postman, L., & Senders, V.L.
(1946) Incidental learning and generality of set. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36, 153–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reichle, E.D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D.L., & Rayner, K.
(1998) Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105(1), 125–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silverberg, L.I.
(2003) Bibliotherapy: The therapeutic use of didactic and literary texts in treatment, diagnosis, prevention, and training. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, 103(3), 131–135.Google Scholar
Verleger, R.
(1988) Event-related potentials and cognition: A critique of the context updating hypothesis and an alternative interpretation of P3. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11(3), 343–356. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, S.P.
(2007) So who is the little lady who started this great war. [Web page] Retrieved from: http://​www​.lincolnstudies​.com​/?p​=338.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 12 other publications

Hugentobler, Katharina Gloria & Jana Lüdtke
2021. Micropoetry Meets Neurocognitive Poetics: Influence of Associations on the Reception of Poetry. Frontiers in Psychology 12 Crossref logo
Jacobs, Arthur M.
2016. The scientific study of literary experience and neuro-behavioral responses to literature. Scientific Study of Literature 6:1  pp. 164 ff. Crossref logo
Jacobs, Arthur M., Berenike Herrmann, Gerhard Lauer, Jana Lüdtke & Sascha Schroeder
2020. Sentiment Analysis of Children and Youth Literature: Is There a Pollyanna Effect?. Frontiers in Psychology 11 Crossref logo
Jacobs, Arthur M. & Annette Kinder
2017. “The Brain Is the Prisoner of Thought”: A Machine-Learning Assisted Quantitative Narrative Analysis of Literary Metaphors for Use in Neurocognitive Poetics. Metaphor and Symbol 32:3  pp. 139 ff. Crossref logo
Jacobs, Arthur M., Jana Lüdtke, Arash Aryani, Burkhard Meyer-Sickendieck & Markus Conrad
2016. Mood-empathic and aesthetic responses in poetry reception. Scientific Study of Literature 6:1  pp. 87 ff. Crossref logo
Jacobs, Arthur M., Sarah Schuster, Shuwei Xue & Jana Lüdtke
2017. What’s in the brain that ink may character ….. Scientific Study of Literature 7:1  pp. 4 ff. Crossref logo
Jacobs, Arthur M. & Roel M. Willems
2018. The Fictive Brain: Neurocognitive Correlates of Engagement in Literature. Review of General Psychology 22:2  pp. 147 ff. Crossref logo
Kuijpers, Moniek M.
2021.  In Style and Reader Response [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 36],  pp. 217 ff. Crossref logo
Mangen, Anne, Anne Charlotte Begnum, Anežka Kuzmičová, Kersti Nilsson, Mette Steenberg & Hildegunn Støle
2018. Empathy and literary style. Orbis Litterarum 73:6  pp. 471 ff. Crossref logo
Nenadić, Filip, Dušan Vejnović & Slobodan Marković
2019. Subjective experience of poetry: Latent structure and differences between experts and non-experts. Poetics 73  pp. 100 ff. Crossref logo
van Krieken, Kobie, Hans Hoeken & José Sanders
2017. Evoking and Measuring Identification with Narrative Characters – A Linguistic Cues Framework. Frontiers in Psychology 8 Crossref logo
Xue, Shuwei, Arthur M. Jacobs & Jana Lüdtke
2020. What Is the Difference? Rereading Shakespeare’s Sonnets —An Eye Tracking Study. Frontiers in Psychology 11 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.