Article published in:
Transdisciplinary Approaches to Literature and Empathy
Edited by Paul Sopčák, Massimo Salgaro and J. Berenike Herrmann
[Scientific Study of Literature 6:1] 2016
► pp. 641
References
Bal, P. M., & Veltkamp, M.
(2013) How does fiction reading influence empathy? An experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e55341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Batson, D.
(2009) These things called empathy: Eight related but distinct phenomena. In J. Decety & W. Ickes (Eds.), Social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 3–16). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., and Plumb, I.
(2001) The ‘reading the mind in the eyes’ test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 42(2), 241–251. pmid:11280420. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L. W.
(2008) Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Battistelli, P. & Farneti, A.
(2015) When the theory of mind would be very useful. Front. Psychol. 6:1449. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benedetto, S., Carbone, A., Drai-Zerbib, V., Pedrotti, M. & Baccino, T.
(2014) Effects of luminance and illuminance on visual fatigue and arousal during digital reading. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 112–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benedetto, S., Drai-Zerbib, V., Pedrotti, M., Tissier, G. & Baccino, T.
(2013) E-readers and visual fatigue. PloS one, 8(12):e83676. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bernaerts, L., Caracciolo, M., Herman, L., & Vervaeck, B.
(2014) The storied lives of non-human narrators. Narrative, 22(1), 68–93. http://​doi​.org/ Crossref
Bernhardt, B. C., & Singer, T.
(2012) The neural basis of empathy. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 35, 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boven, L. van & Loewenstein, G.
(2003) Social projection of transient drive states. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(9): 1159–1168. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, M.
Brück, C., Kreifelts, B., Gößling-Arnold, C., Wertheimer, J. & Wildgruber, D.
(2014) Inner voices: The cerebral representation of emotional voice cues described in literary texts. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9, 1819–1827. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bruin de, L., Strijbos, D. & Slors, M.
(2014) Situating emotions: From embodied cognition to mindreading. Topoi, 33(1), 173–184. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bugnyar, T., Reber, S.A., & Buckner, C.
(2016) Ravens attribute visual access to unseen competitors. Nature Communications 7. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burke, M.
(2011) Literary reading, cognition and emotion: An exploration of the oceanic mind. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2013) The rhetorical neuroscience of style: On the primacy of style elements during literary discourse processing. Journal of Literary Semantics, 42(2), 199–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) The neuroaesthetics of prose fiction: Pitfalls, parameters and prospects. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9(442). http://​dx​.doi​.org/ Crossref
(2016) The oceanic literary reading mind: An impression. In S. Groes (Ed.), Memory in the twenty-first century: New critical perspectives from the arts, humanities, and sciences (pp. 119–124). Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burke, M. & Bon E.
(forthcoming). The location and means of literary reading. In S. Csábi Ed. Expressive minds and artistic creations: Studies in cognitive poetics (pp.) Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Call, J., & Tomasello, M.
(2008) Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later. Trends in cognitive sciences, 12(5), 187–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caracciolo, M.
(2014a) Beyond other minds: Fictional characters, mental simulation, and ‘unnatural’ experiences. Journal of Narrative Theory, 44(1), 29–53. http://​doi​.org/ Crossref
(2014b) The experientiality of narrative: An enactivist approach. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Catmur, C., Walsh, V., & Heyes, C. M.
(2007) Sensorimotor learning configures the human mirror system. Current Biology, 17, 1527–1531. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chapelle Wojciehowski, H., & Gallese, V.
(2011) How stories make us feel: Toward an embodied narratology. California Italian Studies, 2(1). Retrieved from http://​www​.escholarship​.org​/uc​/item​/3jg726c2
Chartrand, T. L. & Bargh, J. A.
(1999) The chameleon effect: The perception-behaviour link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6): 893–910. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chase, J & Reynolds J.
(2014) Analytic versus continental: Arguments on the methods and value of philosophy. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Y., Lin, C. P., Liu, H. L., Hsu, Y. Y., Lim, K. E., Hung, D., & Decety, J.
(2007) Expertise modulates the perception of pain in others. Current Biology, 17(19), 1708–1713. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chow, H. M., Mar, R. A., Xu, Y., Liu, S., Wagage, S., & Braun, A. R.
(2015) Personal experience with narrated events modulates functional connectivity within visual and motor systems during story comprehension. Human Brain Mapping, 36(4), 1494–1505. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coplan, A.
(2011) Understanding empathy: Its features and effects. In A. Coplan & P. Goldie (Eds.) Empathy: Philosophical and psychological perspectives, (pp. 3–18). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coplan, A., and Goldie, P.
(2011) Introduction. In A. Copland & P. Goldie (Eds.), Empathy: Philosophical and psychological perspectives, (pp. ix–xlvii). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cuff, B. M. P., Brown, S., J. Taylor, L. & Howat, D. J.
(2016).Empathy: A review of the concept. Emotion Review, 8(2), 144–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cupchik, G. C., Oatley, K., & Vorderer, P.
(1998) Emotional effects of reading excerpts from short stories by James Joyce. Poetics, 25(6), 363–377. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Currie, G.
(2010) Narratives and narrators: A philosophy of stories. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Empathy for objects. In A. Coplan & P. Goldie (Eds.), Empathy: Philosophical and psychological perspectives (pp. 82–95). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, V., Aunger, R., & Rabie, T.
(2004) Evidence that disgust evolved to protect from risk of disease. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B. (suppl.), 271, S131–S133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davis, M.
(1983) Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113–126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L.
(2004) The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3(2), 71–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, A.
(2013) Executive functions. The Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, A., & Lee, K.
(2011) Interventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4 to 12 years old. Science, 333(6045), 959–964. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Djikic, M., Oatley, K., & Moldoveanu, M. C.
(2013) Reading other minds: Effects of literature on empathy. Scientific Study of Literature, 3(1), 28–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Engen, H. G., & Singer, T.
(2013) Empathy circuits. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 23(2), 275–282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Esrock, E. J.
(2004) Embodying literature. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 11(5–6), 79–89.Google Scholar
Frith, C. D., & Frith, U.
(2006) The neural basis of mentalizing. Neuron, 50(4), 531–534. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, H. L., & Frith, C. D.
(2003) Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(2), 77–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gerlach, J., & Buxmann, P.
(2011) Investigating the acceptance of electronic books: The impact of haptic dissonance on innovation adoption. Proceedings from ECIS (European Conference on Information Systems), Helsinki, FI.Google Scholar
Hardy-Vallée, B. & Payette, N.
(2009) Beyond the brain: Embodied, situated and distributed cognition: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Harris, P. L., de Rosnay, M., & Pons, F.
(2005) Language and children’s understanding of mental states. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(2), 69–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hein, G., & Singer, T.
(2008) I feel how you feel but not always: The empathic brain and its modulation. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 18(2), 153–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herbert, B. M., & Pollatos, O.
(2012) The body in the mind: On the relationship between interoception and embodiment. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(4), 692–704. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heyes, C.
(2010) Mesmerising mirror neurons. NeuroImage, 51, 789–791. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hollan, D.
(2012) Emerging issues in the cross-cultural study of empathy. Emotion Review, 4(1),70–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ickes, W.
(2003) Everyday mind reading: Understanding what other people think and feel. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Immordino-Yang, M. H., Christodoulou, J. A., & Singh, V.
(2012) Rest is not idleness implications of the brain’s default mode for human development and education. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(4), 352–364. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Immordino-Yang, M. H., McColl, A., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A.
(2009) Neural correlates of admiration and compassion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(19), 8021–8026. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R.
(1991) The big five inventory. Technical report, University of California, Berkley.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. R.
(2013) Transportation into literary fiction reduces prejudice against and increases empathy for Arab-Muslims. Scientific Study of Literature, 3(1), 77–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jajdelska, E., Butler, C., Kelly, S., McNeill, A., & Overy, K.
(2010) Crying, moving, and keeping it whole: What makes literary description vivid? Poetics Today, 31(3), 433–463. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kang, Y.-Y., Wang, M.-J. & Lin, R.
(2009) Usability evaluation of e-books. Displays, 30(2):49–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keen, S.
(2006) A theory of narrative empathy. Narrative, 14(3), 207–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Empathy and the novel. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keysers, C., & Gazzola, V.
(2007) Integrating simulation and theory of mind: From self to social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(5), 194–196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keysers, C., Kaas, J. H., & Gazzola, V.
(2010) Somatosensation in social perception. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(6), 417–428. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keysers, C., Meffert, H., & Gazzola, V.
(2014) Reply: Spontaneous versus deliberate vicarious representations: different routes to empathy in psychopathy and autism. Brain, 137, 1–4. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E.
(2013) Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science 18, 342, 6156, 377–380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kimmel, M.
(2011) From text-linguistics to literary actants – The force dynamics of (emotional) vampirism. Language and Cognition, 3(2), 235–282. http://​doi​.org/ Crossref
Kiverstein, J. & Clark, A.
(2009) Introduction: Mind embodied, embedded, enacted: One church or many? Topoi, 28(1),1–7. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kretzschmar, F., Pleimling, D., Hosemann, J., Füssel, S., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. & Schlesewsky, M.
(2013) Subjective impressions do not mirror online reading effort: Concurrent EEG-eyetracking evidence from the reading of books and digital media. PloS one, 8(2):e56178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kögler, H. H. & Stueber, K. R.
(2000) Introduction: Empathy, simulation, and interpretation in the philosophy of social science. In H. H. Kögler & K. R. Stueber (Eds.), Empathy and agency: The problem of understanding in the human sciences (pp. 1–61). Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Koopman, E.
(2015) Empathic reactions after reading: The role of genre, personal factors and affective responses. Poetics, 50, 62–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kross, E. & Ayduk, O.
(2009) Boundary conditions and buffering effects: Does depressive symptomatology moderate the effectiveness of distanced-analysis on facilitating adaptive self-reflection? Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 923–927. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kross, E., Ayduk, O., & Mischel, W.
(2005) When asking ‘why’ does not hurt. Distinguishing rumination from reflective processing of negative emotions. Psychological Science, 16(9), 709–715. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kross, E., Duckworth, A., Ayduk, O., Tsukayama, E., & Mischel, W.
(2011) The effect of self-distancing on adaptive versus maladaptive self-reflection in children. Emotion, 11(5), 1032–1039. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuzmičová, A.
(2012) Presence in the reading of literary narrative: A case for motor enactment. Semiotica, 189 (1/4), 23–48. http://​doi​.org/ Crossref
(2014) Literary narrative and mental imagery: A view from embodied cognition. Style, 48(3), 275–293.Google Scholar
LeDoux, J. E.
(1998) The emotional brain. New York: Phoenix.Google Scholar
Luhrmann, T.
(2011) Toward an anthropological theory of mind. Suomen Antropologi: Journal of the Finnish Anthropological Society, 36(4), 5–69.Google Scholar
Mangen, A., & Kuiken, D.
(2014) Lost in an iPad: Narrative engagement on paper and tablet. Scientific Study of Literature, 4(2), 150–177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., Hirsh, J., dela Paz, J, & Peterson, J. B.
(2006) Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 694–712. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., & Peterson, J. B.
(2009) Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes. Communications, 34, 407–428 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mattar, A. A., & Gribble, P. L.
(2005) Motor learning by observing. Neuron, 46(1), 153–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mellmann, K.
(2010) Objects of ‘empathy’: Characters (and other such things) as psycho-poetic effects. In J. Eder, F. Jannidis, & R. Schneider (Eds.) Characters in fictional worlds: Understanding imaginary beings in literature, film, and other media (pp. 416–441). New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Miall, D. S.
(2011) Enacting the other: Towards an aesthetics of feeling in literary reading. In P. Goldie & E. Schellekens (Eds.), The aesthetic mind: Philosophy and psychology (pp. 285–298). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D.
(1999) What is literariness? Three components of literary reading. Discourse Processes, 28(2), 121–138. http://​doi​.org/ Crossref
Mitchell, J. P., Macrae, C. N., & Banaji, M. R.
(2006) Dissociable medial prefrontal contributions to judgments of similar and dissimilar others. Neuron, 50(4), 655–663. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nijhof A. D. & Willems, R. M.
(2015) Simulating fiction: Individual differences in literature comprehension revealed with fMRI. PLoS ONE 10(2): e0116492. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M.
(2010) Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
O'Regan, J. K. & Noë, A.
(2001) A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 939–973. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ochsner, K. N., Ray, R. R., Hughes, B., McRae, K., Cooper, J. C., Weber, J., & Gross, J. J.
(2009) Bottom-up and top-down processes in emotion generation common and distinct neural mechanisms. Psychological science, 20(11), 1322–1331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Papies, E. K., Barsalou, L. W., & Custers, R.
(2012) Mindful attention prevents mindless impulses. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 3(3) 291–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pavarini, G., de Hollanda Souza, D., & Hawk, C. K.
(2012) Parental practices and theory of mind development. Journal of Child Family Studies. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petkov, C. I & Belin, P.
(2013) Silent reading: Does the brain ‘hear’ both speech and voices? Current Biology, 23(4), R155–R156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poulet, G.
(1969) Phenomenology of reading. New Literary History, 1(1), 53–68. http://​doi​.org/ Crossref
Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L.
(2004) The mirror-neuron system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 27, 169–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rowlands, M.
(2010) The new science of the mind: From extended mind to embodied phenomenology: Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saxbe, D. E., Yang, X. F., Borofsky, L. A., & Immordino-Yang, M. H.
(2013) The embodiment of emotion: Language use during the feeling of social emotions predicts cortical somatosensory activity. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 8(7), 806–812. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scarry, E.
(2001) Dreaming by the book. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schilhab, T.
(2015a) Re-live and learn e Interlocutor-induced elicitation of phenomenal experiences in learning offline. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology. http://​dx​.doi​.org/ Crossref
(2015b) Doubletalk – the biological and social acquisition of language. Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schilhab, T. S.
(2015c) Words as cultivators of others minds. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1690. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schooler, J. W., Smallwood, J., Christoff, K., Handy, T. C., Reichle, E. D., & Sayette, M. A.
(2011) Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling and the wandering mind. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(7), 319–326.Google Scholar
Shahaeian, A., Peterson, C. C., Slaughter, V., & Wellman, H. M.
(2011) Culture and the sequence of steps in theory of mind development. Developmental Psychology, 47(5), 1239–1247. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. & Aharon-Peretz, J.
(2007) Dissociable prefrontal networks for cognitive and affective theory of mind: A lesion study. Neuropsychologia, 45, 3054–3067. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shamay-Tsoory, S. G.
(2011) The neural bases for empathy. The Neuroscientist, 17(1), 18–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, S. L., Carlson, L. E., Astin, J. A., & Freedman, B.
(2006) Mechanisms of mindfulness. Journal of Clinical Psychology. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siegenthaler, E., Schmid, L., Wyss, M., & Wurtz, P.
(2012) LCD vs. e-ink: An analysis of the reading behaviour. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 5(5), 1–7.Google Scholar
Siegenthaler, E., Wurtz, P., Bergamin, P., & Groner, R.
(2011) Comparing reading processes on e-ink displays and print. Displays, 32(5), 268–273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sikora, S., Kuiken, D., & Miall, D. S.
(2010) An uncommon resonance: the influence of loss on expressive reading. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 28(2), 135–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Singer, T.
(2006) The neuronal basis and ontogeny of empathy and mind reading: Review of literature and implications for future research. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 855–863. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Singer, T., & Lamm, C.
(2009) The social neuroscience of empathy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156(1), 81–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Singer, T., Seymour, B., O’Doherty, J., Kaube, H., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D.
(2004) Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science, 303(5661), 1157–1162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, V., Peterson, C. C., & Mackintosh, E.
(2007) Mind what mother says: Narrative input and the theory of mind in typical children and those on the autism spectrum. Child Development, 78(3), 839–858. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stueber, K.
(2014) Empathy. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Stueber, K. R.
(2012) Varieties of empathy, Neuroscience and the narrativist challenge to the contemporary theory of mind debate. Emotion Review 4(1), 55–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waal de, F. B.
(2008) Putting the altruism back into altruism: the evolution of empathy. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 59, 279–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waal, de F. B.
(2009) The Age of empathy: Nature’s lessons for a kinder society. New York: Harmony Books.Google Scholar
Waal de, F. B., & Ferrari, P. F.
(2010) Towards a bottom-up perspective on animal and human cognition. Trends in cognitive sciences, 14(5), 201–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wachowicz, B., Lewandowska, K., Popek, A., Karwowski, W. and Marek, T.
(2016), Empathy and modern technology: A neuroergonomics perspective. Hum. Factors Man., 26: 266–284. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wallentin, M., Simonsen, A., & Nielsen, A. H.
(2013) Action speaks louder than words: Empathy mainly modulates emotions from theory of mind-laden parts of a story. Scientific Study of Literature, 3(1), 137–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C., Zhu, R. and Handy, T. C.
(2015) Experiencing haptic roughness promotes empathy. Journal of Consumer Psychology. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
White, R. E., & Carlson, S. M.
(2015) What would Batman do? Self‐distancing improves executive function in young children. Developmental science. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wicker, B., Keysers, C., Plailly, J., Royet, J.P., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G.
(2003) Both of us disgusted in my insula: The common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust. Neuron 40, 655–664. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Willems, R. M., & Casasanto, D.
(2011) Flexibility in embodied language understanding. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M.
(2002) Six views on embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4): 625–635. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Winkielman, P., & Schooler, J. W.
(2011) Splitting consciousness: Unconscious, conscious, and metaconscious processes in social cognition. European Review of Social Psychology, 22(1), 1–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zaki, J., & Ochsner, K. N.
(2012) The neuroscience of empathy: Progress, pitfalls and promise. Nature Neuroscience, 15(5), 675–680. Crossref[ p. 41 ]Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Consoli, Gianluca
2018. Preliminary steps towards a cognitive theory of fiction and its effects. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science 2:1-2  pp. 85 ff. Crossref logo
D’Adamo, Amedeo
2018.  In Empathetic Space on Screen,  pp. 3 ff. Crossref logo
Fernandez-Quintanilla, Carolina
2020. Textual and reader factors in narrative empathy: An empirical reader response study using focus groups. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 29:2  pp. 124 ff. Crossref logo
Gibbs, Raymond W. & Herbert L. Colston
2019. What psycholinguistic studies ignore about literary experience. Scientific Study of Literature 9:1  pp. 72 ff. Crossref logo
Kuzmičová, Anežka & Katalin Bálint
2019. Personal Relevance in Story Reading. Poetics Today 40:3  pp. 429 ff. Crossref logo
Mangen, Anne, Anne Charlotte Begnum, Anežka Kuzmičová, Kersti Nilsson, Mette Steenberg & Hildegunn Støle
2018. Empathy and literary style. Orbis Litterarum 73:6  pp. 471 ff. Crossref logo
Nikolajeva, Maria
2019. What is it Like to be a Child? Childness in the Age of Neuroscience. Children's Literature in Education 50:1  pp. 23 ff. Crossref logo
Oatley, Keith & Maja Djikic
2018. Psychology of Narrative Art. Review of General Psychology 22:2  pp. 161 ff. Crossref logo
Pianzola, Federico, Katalin Bálint & Jessica Weller
2019. Virtual reality as a tool for promoting reading via enhanced narrative absorption and empathy. Scientific Study of Literature 9:2  pp. 163 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 august 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.