The objective of this article is to review extant empirical studies of empathy in narrative reading in light of (a) contemporary literary theory, and (b) neuroscientific studies of empathy, and to discuss how a closer interplay between neuroscience and literary studies may enhance our understanding of empathy in narrative reading. An introduction to some of the philosophical roots of empathy is followed by tracing its application in contemporary literary theory, in which scholars have pursued empathy with varying degrees of conceptual precision, often within the context of embodied/enactive cognition. The presentation of empirical literary studies of empathy is subsequently contextualized by an overview of psychological and neuroscientific aspects of empathy. Highlighting points of convergence and divergence, the discussion illustrates how findings of empirical literary studies align with recent neuroscientific research. The article concludes with some prospects for future empirical research, suggesting that digitization may contribute to advancing the scientific knowledge of empathy in narrative reading.
(2013) How does fiction reading influence empathy? An experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e55341.
Batson, D.
(2009) These things called empathy: Eight related but distinct phenomena. In J. Decety & W. Ickes (Eds.), Social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 3–16). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., and Plumb, I.
(2001) The ‘reading the mind in the eyes’ test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 42(2), 241–251. pmid:11280420.
Barsalou, L. W.
(2008) Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 591, 617–645.
Battistelli, P. & Farneti, A.
(2015) When the theory of mind would be very useful. Front. Psychol. 61:1449.
Benedetto, S., Carbone, A., Drai-Zerbib, V., Pedrotti, M. & Baccino, T.
(2014) Effects of luminance and illuminance on visual fatigue and arousal during digital reading. Computers in Human Behavior, 411, 112–119.
Benedetto, S., Drai-Zerbib, V., Pedrotti, M., Tissier, G. & Baccino, T.
(2013) E-readers and visual fatigue. PloS one, 8(12):e83676.
Bernaerts, L., Caracciolo, M., Herman, L., & Vervaeck, B.
(2014) The storied lives of non-human narrators. Narrative, 22(1), 68–93. [URL]/
Bernhardt, B. C., & Singer, T.
(2012) The neural basis of empathy. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 351, 1–23.
Boven, L. van & Loewenstein, G.
(2003) Social projection of transient drive states. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(9): 1159–1168.
Brown, M.
(2015) Kindle vs. Fire: How to choose the right Amazon e-reader. Retrieved from [URL]
Brück, C., Kreifelts, B., Gößling-Arnold, C., Wertheimer, J. & Wildgruber, D.
(2014) Inner voices: The cerebral representation of emotional voice cues described in literary texts. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 91, 1819–1827.
Bruin de, L., Strijbos, D. & Slors, M.
(2014) Situating emotions: From embodied cognition to mindreading. Topoi, 33(1), 173–184.
(2011) Literary reading, cognition and emotion: An exploration of the oceanic mind. New York & London: Routledge.
Burke, M.
(2013) The rhetorical neuroscience of style: On the primacy of style elements during literary discourse processing. Journal of Literary Semantics, 42(2), 199–216.
Burke, M.
(2015) The neuroaesthetics of prose fiction: Pitfalls, parameters and prospects. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9(442). [URL]/
Burke, M.
(2016) The oceanic literary reading mind: An impression. In S. Groes (Ed.), Memory in the twenty-first century: New critical perspectives from the arts, humanities, and sciences (pp. 119–124). Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan,
Burke, M. & Bon E.
forthcoming). The location and means of literary reading. In S. Csábi Ed. Expressive minds and artistic creations: Studies in cognitive poetics pp. Oxford and New York Oxford University Press
Call, J., & Tomasello, M.
(2008) Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later. Trends in cognitive sciences, 12(5), 187–192.
Caracciolo, M.
(2014a) Beyond other minds: Fictional characters, mental simulation, and ‘unnatural’ experiences. Journal of Narrative Theory, 44(1), 29–53. [URL]/
Caracciolo, M.
(2014b) The experientiality of narrative: An enactivist approach. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Catmur, C., Walsh, V., & Heyes, C. M.
(2007) Sensorimotor learning configures the human mirror system. Current Biology, 171, 1527–1531.
Chapelle Wojciehowski, H., & Gallese, V.
(2011) How stories make us feel: Toward an embodied narratology. California Italian Studies, 2(1). Retrieved from [URL]
Chartrand, T. L. & Bargh, J. A.
(1999) The chameleon effect: The perception-behaviour link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6): 893–910.
Chase, J & Reynolds J.
(2014) Analytic versus continental: Arguments on the methods and value of philosophy. London: Routledge.
Cheng, Y., Lin, C. P., Liu, H. L., Hsu, Y. Y., Lim, K. E., Hung, D., & Decety, J.
(2007) Expertise modulates the perception of pain in others. Current Biology, 17(19), 1708–1713.
Chow, H. M., Mar, R. A., Xu, Y., Liu, S., Wagage, S., & Braun, A. R.
(2015) Personal experience with narrated events modulates functional connectivity within visual and motor systems during story comprehension. Human Brain Mapping, 36(4), 1494–1505.
Coplan, A.
(2011) Understanding empathy: Its features and effects. In A. Coplan & P. Goldie (Eds.) Empathy: Philosophical and psychological perspectives, (pp. 3–18). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coplan, A., and Goldie, P.
(2011) Introduction. In A. Copland & P. Goldie (Eds.), Empathy: Philosophical and psychological perspectives, (pp. ix–xlvii). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cuff, B. M. P., Brown, S., J. Taylor, L. & Howat, D. J.
(2016).Empathy: A review of the concept. Emotion Review, 8(2), 144–153.
Cupchik, G. C., Oatley, K., & Vorderer, P.
(1998) Emotional effects of reading excerpts from short stories by James Joyce. Poetics, 25(6), 363–377.
Currie, G.
(2010) Narratives and narrators: A philosophy of stories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Currie, G.
(2011) Empathy for objects. In A. Coplan & P. Goldie (Eds.), Empathy: Philosophical and psychological perspectives (pp. 82–95). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Curtis, V., Aunger, R., & Rabie, T.
(2004) Evidence that disgust evolved to protect from risk of disease. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B. (suppl.), 2711, S131–S133.
Davis, M.
(1983) Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 441, 113–126.
Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L.
(2004) The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3(2), 71–100.
Diamond, A.
(2013) Executive functions. The Annual Review of Psychology, 641, 135–168.
Diamond, A., & Lee, K.
(2011) Interventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4 to 12 years old. Science, 333(6045), 959–964.
(2013) Empathy circuits. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 23(2), 275–282.
Esrock, E. J.
(2004) Embodying literature. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 11(5–6), 79–89.
Frith, C. D., & Frith, U.
(2006) The neural basis of mentalizing. Neuron, 50(4), 531–534.
Gallagher, H. L., & Frith, C. D.
(2003) Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(2), 77–83.
Gerlach, J., & Buxmann, P.
(2011) Investigating the acceptance of electronic books: The impact of haptic dissonance on innovation adoption. Proceedings from ECIS (European Conference on Information Systems), Helsinki, FI.
Hardy-Vallée, B. & Payette, N.
(2009) Beyond the brain: Embodied, situated and distributed cognition: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Harris, P. L., de Rosnay, M., & Pons, F.
(2005) Language and children’s understanding of mental states. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(2), 69–73.
Hein, G., & Singer, T.
(2008) I feel how you feel but not always: The empathic brain and its modulation. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 18(2), 153–158.
Herbert, B. M., & Pollatos, O.
(2012) The body in the mind: On the relationship between interoception and embodiment. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(4), 692–704.
(2012) Emerging issues in the cross-cultural study of empathy. Emotion Review, 4(1),70–78.
Ickes, W.
(2003) Everyday mind reading: Understanding what other people think and feel. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
Immordino-Yang, M. H., Christodoulou, J. A., & Singh, V.
(2012) Rest is not idleness implications of the brain’s default mode for human development and education. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(4), 352–364.
Immordino-Yang, M. H., McColl, A., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A.
(2009) Neural correlates of admiration and compassion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(19), 8021–8026.
John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R.
(1991) The big five inventory. Technical report, University of California, Berkley.
Jajdelska, E., Butler, C., Kelly, S., McNeill, A., & Overy, K.
(2010) Crying, moving, and keeping it whole: What makes literary description vivid?Poetics Today, 31(3), 433–463.
Kang, Y.-Y., Wang, M.-J. & Lin, R.
(2009) Usability evaluation of e-books. Displays, 30(2):49–52.
Keen, S.
(2006) A theory of narrative empathy. Narrative, 14(3), 207–236.
Keen, S.
(2007) Empathy and the novel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Keysers, C., & Gazzola, V.
(2007) Integrating simulation and theory of mind: From self to social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(5), 194–196.
Keysers, C., Kaas, J. H., & Gazzola, V.
(2010) Somatosensation in social perception. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(6), 417–428.
Keysers, C., Meffert, H., & Gazzola, V.
(2014) Reply: Spontaneous versus deliberate vicarious representations: different routes to empathy in psychopathy and autism. Brain, 1371, 1–4.
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E.
(2013) Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science 18, 342, 6156, 377–380.
Kimmel, M.
(2011) From text-linguistics to literary actants – The force dynamics of (emotional) vampirism. Language and Cognition, 3(2), 235–282. [URL]/
Kiverstein, J. & Clark, A.
(2009) Introduction: Mind embodied, embedded, enacted: One church or many?Topoi, 28(1),1–7.
Kretzschmar, F., Pleimling, D., Hosemann, J., Füssel, S., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. & Schlesewsky, M.
(2013) Subjective impressions do not mirror online reading effort: Concurrent EEG-eyetracking evidence from the reading of books and digital media. PloS one, 8(2):e56178.
Kögler, H. H. & Stueber, K. R.
(2000) Introduction: Empathy, simulation, and interpretation in the philosophy of social science. In H. H. Kögler & K. R. Stueber (Eds.), Empathy and agency: The problem of understanding in the human sciences (pp. 1–61). Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Koopman, E.
(2015) Empathic reactions after reading: The role of genre, personal factors and affective responses. Poetics, 501, 62–79.
Kross, E. & Ayduk, O.
(2009) Boundary conditions and buffering effects: Does depressive symptomatology moderate the effectiveness of distanced-analysis on facilitating adaptive self-reflection?Journal of Research in Personality, 431, 923–927.
Kross, E., Ayduk, O., & Mischel, W.
(2005) When asking ‘why’ does not hurt. Distinguishing rumination from reflective processing of negative emotions. Psychological Science, 16(9), 709–715.
Kross, E., Duckworth, A., Ayduk, O., Tsukayama, E., & Mischel, W.
(2011) The effect of self-distancing on adaptive versus maladaptive self-reflection in children. Emotion, 11(5), 1032–1039.
Kuzmičová, A.
(2012) Presence in the reading of literary narrative: A case for motor enactment. Semiotica, 189 (1/4), 23–48. [URL]/
Kuzmičová, A.
(2014) Literary narrative and mental imagery: A view from embodied cognition. Style, 48(3), 275–293.
LeDoux, J. E.
(1998) The emotional brain. New York: Phoenix.
Luhrmann, T.
(2011) Toward an anthropological theory of mind. Suomen Antropologi: Journal of the Finnish Anthropological Society, 36(4), 5–69.
Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., Hirsh, J., dela Paz, J, & Peterson, J. B.
(2006) Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worldsJournal of Research in Personality, 401, 694–712.
Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., & Peterson, J. B.
(2009) Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes. Communications, 341, 407–428
Mattar, A. A., & Gribble, P. L.
(2005) Motor learning by observing. Neuron, 46(1), 153–160.
Mellmann, K.
(2010) Objects of ‘empathy’: Characters (and other such things) as psycho-poetic effects. In J. Eder, F. Jannidis, & R. Schneider (Eds.) Characters in fictional worlds: Understanding imaginary beings in literature, film, and other media (pp. 416–441). New York: De Gruyter.
Miall, D. S.
(2011) Enacting the other: Towards an aesthetics of feeling in literary reading. In P. Goldie & E. Schellekens (Eds.), The aesthetic mind: Philosophy and psychology (pp. 285–298). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D.
(1999) What is literariness? Three components of literary reading. Discourse Processes, 28(2), 121–138. [URL]/
Mitchell, J. P., Macrae, C. N., & Banaji, M. R.
(2006) Dissociable medial prefrontal contributions to judgments of similar and dissimilar others. Neuron, 50(4), 655–663.
Nijhof A. D. & Willems, R. M.
(2015) Simulating fiction: Individual differences in literature comprehension revealed with fMRI. PLoS ONE 10(2): e01164921.
Nussbaum, M.
(2010) Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
O'Regan, J. K. & Noë, A.
(2001) A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 939–973.
Ochsner, K. N., Ray, R. R., Hughes, B., McRae, K., Cooper, J. C., Weber, J., & Gross, J. J.
(2009) Bottom-up and top-down processes in emotion generation common and distinct neural mechanisms. Psychological science, 20(11), 1322–1331.
Papies, E. K., Barsalou, L. W., & Custers, R.
(2012) Mindful attention prevents mindless impulses. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 3(3) 291–299.
Pavarini, G., de Hollanda Souza, D., & Hawk, C. K.
(2012) Parental practices and theory of mind development. Journal of Child Family Studies.
Petkov, C. I & Belin, P.
(2013) Silent reading: Does the brain ‘hear’ both speech and voices?Current Biology, 23(4), R155–R156.
Poulet, G.
(1969) Phenomenology of reading. New Literary History, 1(1), 53–68. [URL]/
Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L.
(2004) The mirror-neuron system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 271, 169–192.
Rowlands, M.
(2010) The new science of the mind: From extended mind to embodied phenomenology: Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Saxbe, D. E., Yang, X. F., Borofsky, L. A., & Immordino-Yang, M. H.
(2013) The embodiment of emotion: Language use during the feeling of social emotions predicts cortical somatosensory activity. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 8(7), 806–812.
Scarry, E.
(2001) Dreaming by the book. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Schilhab, T.
(2015a) Re-live and learn e Interlocutor-induced elicitation of phenomenal experiences in learning offline. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology. [URL]/
Schilhab, T.
(2015b) Doubletalk – the biological and social acquisition of language. Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures.
Schilhab, T. S.
(2015c) Words as cultivators of others minds. Frontiers in Psychology, 61, 1690.
Schooler, J. W., Smallwood, J., Christoff, K., Handy, T. C., Reichle, E. D., & Sayette, M. A.
(2011) Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling and the wandering mind. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(7), 319–326.
Shahaeian, A., Peterson, C. C., Slaughter, V., & Wellman, H. M.
(2011) Culture and the sequence of steps in theory of mind development. Developmental Psychology, 47(5), 1239–1247.
Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. & Aharon-Peretz, J.
(2007) Dissociable prefrontal networks for cognitive and affective theory of mind: A lesion study. Neuropsychologia, 451, 3054–3067.
Shamay-Tsoory, S. G.
(2011) The neural bases for empathy. The Neuroscientist, 17(1), 18–24.
Shapiro, S. L., Carlson, L. E., Astin, J. A., & Freedman, B.
(2006) Mechanisms of mindfulness. Journal of Clinical Psychology.
Siegenthaler, E., Schmid, L., Wyss, M., & Wurtz, P.
(2012) LCD vs. e-ink: An analysis of the reading behaviour. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 5(5), 1–7.
Siegenthaler, E., Wurtz, P., Bergamin, P., & Groner, R.
(2011) Comparing reading processes on e-ink displays and print. Displays, 32(5), 268–273.
Sikora, S., Kuiken, D., & Miall, D. S.
(2010) An uncommon resonance: the influence of loss on expressive reading. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 28(2), 135–153.
Singer, T.
(2006) The neuronal basis and ontogeny of empathy and mind reading: Review of literature and implications for future research. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 301, 855–863.
Singer, T., & Lamm, C.
(2009) The social neuroscience of empathy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156(1), 81–96.
Singer, T., Seymour, B., O’Doherty, J., Kaube, H., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D.
(2004) Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science, 303(5661), 1157–1162.
Slaughter, V., Peterson, C. C., & Mackintosh, E.
(2007) Mind what mother says: Narrative input and the theory of mind in typical children and those on the autism spectrum. Child Development, 78(3), 839–858.
Stueber, K.
(2014) Empathy. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Stueber, K. R.
(2012) Varieties of empathy, Neuroscience and the narrativist challenge to the contemporary theory of mind debate. Emotion Review 4(1), 55–63.
Waal de, F. B.
(2008) Putting the altruism back into altruism: the evolution of empathy. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 591, 279–300.
Waal, de F. B.
(2009) The Age of empathy: Nature’s lessons for a kinder society. New York: Harmony Books.
Waal de, F. B., & Ferrari, P. F.
(2010) Towards a bottom-up perspective on animal and human cognition. Trends in cognitive sciences, 14(5), 201–207.
Wachowicz, B., Lewandowska, K., Popek, A., Karwowski, W. and Marek, T.
(2016), Empathy and modern technology: A neuroergonomics perspective. Hum. Factors Man., 261: 266–284.
(2003) Both of us disgusted in my insula: The common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust. Neuron 401, 655–664.
Willems, R. M., & Casasanto, D.
(2011) Flexibility in embodied language understanding. Frontiers in Psychology, 21, 116.
Wilson, M.
(2002) Six views on embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4): 625–635.
Winkielman, P., & Schooler, J. W.
(2011) Splitting consciousness: Unconscious, conscious, and metaconscious processes in social cognition. European Review of Social Psychology, 22(1), 1–35.
Zaki, J., & Ochsner, K. N.
(2012) The neuroscience of empathy: Progress, pitfalls and promise. Nature Neuroscience, 15(5), 675–680.
Cited by
Cited by 17 other publications
Bonasera, Carmen
2023. Exploring the potential of sentiment analysis for the study of negative empathy. Journal of Literary Semantics 52:2 ► pp. 163 ff.
Consoli, Gianluca
2018. Preliminary steps towards a cognitive theory of fiction and its effects. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science 2:1-2 ► pp. 85 ff.
Dahy, Faten Abdelaziz & Khaled Mostafa Karam
2021. Potentials of Empathetic Stimuli in Creative Nonfiction: Zimbardo’sThe Lucifer Effectand Danner’sTorture and Truth. English Studies 102:4 ► pp. 468 ff.
2018. Welcome to Dantean Space!: Empathy and Space in Singin’ in the Rain, Legally Blonde, the Pursuit of Happyness and Aliens. In Empathetic Space on Screen, ► pp. 3 ff.
Eekhof, Lynn S., Kobie van Krieken & Roel M. Willems
2022. Reading about minds: The social-cognitive potential of narratives. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 29:5 ► pp. 1703 ff.
Fernandez-Quintanilla, Carolina
2020. Textual and reader factors in narrative empathy: An empirical reader response study using focus groups. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 29:2 ► pp. 124 ff.
Pianzola, Federico, Giuseppe Riva, Karin Kukkonen & Fabrizia Mantovani
2021. Presence, flow, and narrative absorption: an interdisciplinary theoretical exploration with a new spatiotemporal integrated model based on predictive processing. Open Research Europe 1 ► pp. 28 ff.
Pianzola, Federico, Giuseppe Riva, Karin Kukkonen & Fabrizia Mantovani
2021. Presence, flow, and narrative absorption: an interdisciplinary theoretical exploration with a new spatiotemporal integrated model based on predictive processing. Open Research Europe 1 ► pp. 28 ff.
Salgaro, Massimo & Benjamin Van Tourhout
2018. Why Does Frank Underwood Look at Us? Contemporary Heroes Suggest the Need of a Turn in the Conceptualization of Fictional Empathy. Journal of Literary Theory 12:2 ► pp. 345 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.