Article published in:
Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 6:2 (2016) ► pp. 176207
References

References

Berlyne, D. E.
(1974) Studies in the new experimental aesthetics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bordwell, D.
(1985) Narration in the fiction film. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bortolussi, M., & Dixon, P.
(1996) The effects of formal training on literary perception. Poetics, 23, 471–487. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J.
(1994) Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25(1), 49–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 203 ]
Braun, I. K., & Cupchik, G. C.
(2001) Phenomenological and quantitative analyses of absorption in literary passages. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 19(1), 85–109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brecht, B.
(1976) Kleines organon fur das theater. Gesammelte werke (pp. 659–708). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H.
(2009) Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology, 12, 321–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Charmaz, K.
(2006) Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative research. London: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M.
(1990) Flow. The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J.
(1996) Inferring character from texts. Attribution theory and foregrounding theory. Poetics, 23, 335–361. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dissanayake, E.
(1992) Homo aestheticus. Where art comes from and why. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, P., Bortolussi, M., Twilley, L. C., & Leung, A.
(1993) Literary processing and interpretation. Towards empirical foundations. Poetics, 22(1), 5–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Erlich, V.
(1969) Russian Formalism: History, doctrine. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Fialho, O.
(2007) Foregrounding and refamiliarization: Understanding readers’ response to literary texts. Language and Literature, 16(2), 105–123. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gillham, B.
(2005) Research interviewing: The range of techniques. Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
Glazer, B. C., & Strauss, A. L.
(1967) The discovery of ground theory. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C.
(2000) The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Green, M., Brock, T., & Kaufman, G.
(2004) Understanding media enjoyment: The role of transportation into narrative worlds. Communication Theory, 14(4), 311–327. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hakemulder, F., & van Peer, W.
(2015) Empirical stylistics. In V. Sotirova (Ed.), A companion to stylistics (pp. 251–274). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hakemulder, F., Fialho, O., Bal, M.
(2016) What do we learn from literature? In Burke, M., Zyngier, S., & Fiahlo, O. (Eds.), Scientific Approaches to Literature in Learning Environments, Amsterdam: Benjamins. 19–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hakemulder, J.
(2004) Foregrounding and its effects on readers’ perception. Discourse Processes, 38(2), 193–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Tracing foregrounding in responses to film. Language and Literature, 16, 125–139. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoorn, J.
(1997) Electronical evidence for the anomaly theory of metaphor processing. A brief introduction. In S. Tötösy de Zepetnek, and I. Sywensky (Eds), The Systematic and empirical approach to literature and culture as theory and application (pp. 67–74). Edmonton: University of Alberta.Google Scholar
Iser, W.
(1970) Die Appelstruktur der texte. Unbestimmtheit als wirkungsbedingung literarischer prosa. (The appel structure of texts. Undeterminedness as condition for the effect of literary prose). Konstanz: UniversitätsverlagGoogle Scholar
[ p. 204 ]
(1980) Interaction between text and reader. In S. R. Suleiman & I. Crosman (Eds.), The reader in the text (pp. 106–119). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, A. & Lüdtke, J.
(in prep). Immersion into narrative and poetic worlds: A neurocognitive poetics perspective. In Hakemulder, F., Kuijpers, M., Balint, K., Tan, E., Doicaru, M. Handbook of Narrative Absorption. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Jacobs, A.M.
(2011) Neurokognitive Poetik: Elemente eines Modells des literarischen Lesens (Neurocognitive poetics: elements of a model of literary reading). In: Schrott, R., Jacobs, A.M (Eds). Gehirn und Gedicht: Wie wir unsere Wirklichkeiten konstruieren (Brain and Poem: How we construct realities) (pp. 492–524). München: Carl Hanser Verlag.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R.
(1960) Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In Sebeok, T.A. (Ed.) Style in language (pp. 350–377). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kätsyri, J., Kinnunen, T., Kusumoto, K., Oittinen, P., & Ravaja, N.
(2016) Negativity bias in media multitasking: The effects of negative social media messages on attention to television news broadcasts. Plos One, 11(5) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
King, S.
(2010) On writing. A memoir of the craft. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Kneepkens, E., & Zwaan, R.
(1994) Emotions and literary text comprehension. Poetics, 23, 125–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koopman, E. & Hakemulder, F.
(2015) Effects of literature on empathy and self-reflection: A theoretical-empirical framework. Journal of Literary Theory, 9(11): 79–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuijpers, M. & Hakemulder, F.
(in prep). The nature of emergent literary effect. Depth of understanding in reading literature.
Kuijpers, M. M.
(2014) Absorbing stories: The effects of textual devices on absorption and evaluative responses. (Unpublished PhD Disseration). Utrecht University,Google Scholar
Kuijpers, M., Hakemulder, F, Tan, E., Doicaru, M.
(2014) Exploring absorbing reading experiences: Developing and validating a self-report scale to measure story world absorption. Scientific Study of Literature, 4(1): 89–122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, D., Miall, D. S., & Sikora, S.
(2004) Forms of self-implication in literary reading. Poetics Today, 25(2), 171–203. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, D., Phillips, L., Gregus, M., Miall, D., Verbitsky, M. & Anna Tonkonogy, A.
(2004): Locating self-modifying feelings within literary reading, Discourse Processes, 38 (2), 267–286. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, K. M.
(2004) Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 14, 27–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, G., & Short, M.
(1981) Style in fiction. A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Levine, L.
(1990) Highbrow/ Lowbrow. The emergence of cultural hierarchy in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C.
(2002) Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 587–604. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miall, D. S.
(1995) Anticipation and feeling in literary response: A neuropsychological perspective. Poetics, 23(4), 275–298. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miall, D. S. & Kuiken, D.
(1994) Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect. response to literary stories. Poetics, 22(5), 389–407. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miall, D.S., Kuiken,D.
(1995) Aspects of literary response: A new questionnaire. Research in the Teaching of English, 29(1), 137–58.Google Scholar
[ p. 205 ]
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M.
(1994) Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, J.
(1964) Standard language and poetic language. In P.L. Garvin (Ed.), A Prague school reader on esthetics, literary structure, and style (pp. 17–30). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Oliver, M. B., & Raney, A. A.
(2011) Entertainment as pleasurable and meaningful. differentiating hedonic and eudaimonic motivations for entertainment consumption. Journal of Communication, 61.5, 984–1004. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Osgood, C., Suci, G., & Tannenbaum, P.
(1957) The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Payne, S.
(2007) Grounded theory. In E. Lyons, & A. Coyle (Eds.), Analysing qualitative data in psychology. (pp. 65–86). London: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ramachandran, V. & Hirstein, W.
(1999) The science of art. A neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(6–7), 15–51.Google Scholar
Rimmon-Kenan, S.
(1983) Narrative fiction: Contemporary poetics. London: Methuen. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sanford, A. J., & Emmott, C.
(2012) Mind, brain, and narrative. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sanford, A. J., Sanford, A. J., Molle, J., & Emmott, C.
(2006) Shallow processing and attention capture in written and spoken discourse. Discourse Processes, 42(2), 109–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schrott, R., & Jacobs, A. M.
(2011) Gehirn und Gedicht: Wie wir unsere Wirklichkeiten konstruieren. (Brain and Poem: How we construct realities). München: Hanser.Google Scholar
Seidman, I.
(2006) Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Shklovsky, V.
(1965) Art as technique. In L. T. Lemon, & M. J. Reiss (Eds.), Russian formalist criticism: Four essays (pp. 3–24). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Slater, M., & Wilbur, S.
(1997) A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): Speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and virtual environments, 6(6), 603–616. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, E.A.
(2012) Pulp sensations. In D. Glover & S. McCraken (Eds). The Cambridge companion to popular fiction (pp. 141–158). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, H.
(2009) The philosophy of style. Auckland: The Floating Press. (orig. 1852).Google Scholar
Stockwell, P.
(2002) Cognitive poetics: An introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tan, E. S.
(1996) Emotion and the structure of narrative film. Film as an emotion machine. Mahwah (NJ): Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Twain, M.
(2014) Fenimore Cooper’s literary offences. Auckland: The Floating Press. (orig. 1895).Google Scholar
Tynyanov, Y.
(1978) On literary evolution. In L. Matejka, & K. Pomorska (Eds.), Readings in Russian poetics. Formalist and Structuralist views. (pp. 66–78). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
van Peer, W.
(1986) Stylistics and psychology. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
van Peer, W., & Hakemulder, J.
(2006) Foregrounding. In K. Brown (Ed.), The Pergamon encyclopaedia of language and linguistics (pp. 546–551). Oxford: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 206 ]
van Peer, W., Hakemulder, J., Zyngier, S.
(2007) Lines on feeling: Foregrounding, aesthetic appreciation, and meaning. Language and Literature, 16 (2), 197–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wirth, W., Hover, M., & Schramm, H.
(2012) Beyond pleasure: Exploring the eudaimonic entertainment experience. Human Communication Research, 38(4), 406–428. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wundt, W.
Grundriss der psychologie (Outlines of psychology). Leibzig: Entgelmann.
Zyngier, S., Hakemulder, J., & van Peer, W.
(2007) Complexity and foregrounding. in the eye of the beholder? Poetics Today, 28(4), 653–682. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Bruhn, Mark J.
2018. Citation analysis. Scientific Study of Literature 8:1  pp. 77 ff. Crossref logo
Consoli, Gianluca
2018. Preliminary steps towards a cognitive theory of fiction and its effects. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science 2:1-2  pp. 85 ff. Crossref logo
Fialho, Olivia & Anezka Kuzmicova
2019. What is literature for? The role of transformative reading. Cogent Arts & Humanities 6:1 Crossref logo
Gibbs, Raymond W. & Herbert L. Colston
2019. What psycholinguistic studies ignore about literary experience. Scientific Study of Literature 9:1  pp. 72 ff. Crossref logo
Kuijpers, Moniek M. & Frank Hakemulder
2018. Understanding and Appreciating Literary Texts Through Rereading. Discourse Processes 55:7  pp. 619 ff. Crossref logo
Kuijpers, Moniek M., Frank Hakemulder, Katalin Bálint, Miruna M. Doicaru & Ed S. Tan
2017.  In Narrative Absorption [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 27],  pp. 29 ff. Crossref logo
Odağ, Özen & Margrit Schreier
2020.  In Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie [Springer Reference Psychologie, ],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Odağ, Özen & Margrit Schreier
2020.  In Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie,  pp. 461 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.