Article published In:
Scientific Study of LiteratureVol. 6:2 (2016) ► pp.176–207
Reconceptualizing foregrounding
Identifying response strategies to deviation in absorbing narratives
The experience of deviation is often referred to as foregrounding and contrasted with the experience of feeling absorbed in a narrative. However, instead of simply assuming that foregrounding and absorption are mutually exclusive, they should also be considered as co-occurring: being absorbed as a result of a deviating aspect of a story. In the present paper we examine the co-occurrence of responses by means of a data-driven qualitative approach. The analysis of interviews about absorbed experiences with written and cinematic fictional narratives focused on occurrences of and responses to perceived deviation. We identified seven strategies in response to deviation that may be described through three underlying dimensions: absorption, agency, and valence. Findings suggest that perceived deviation, rather than obstructing absorption, is associated with intense and meaningful engagement with narratives.
References (69)
Berlyne, D. E. (1974). Studies in the new experimental aesthetics. New York: Wiley.
Bordwell, D. (1985). Narration in the fiction film. London: Routledge.
Bortolussi, M., & Dixon, P. (1996). The effects of formal training on literary perception. Poetics, 231, 471–487. 
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25(1), 49–59.
Braun, I. K., & Cupchik, G. C. (2001). Phenomenological and quantitative analyses of absorption in literary passages. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 19(1), 85–109.
Brecht, B. (1976). Kleines organon fur das theater. Gesammelte werke (pp. 659–708). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2009). Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology, 121, 321–347.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative research. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow. The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.
Culpeper, J. (1996). Inferring character from texts. Attribution theory and foregrounding theory. Poetics, 231, 335–361.
Dissanayake, E. (1992). Homo aestheticus. Where art comes from and why. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Dixon, P., Bortolussi, M., Twilley, L. C., & Leung, A. (1993). Literary processing and interpretation. Towards empirical foundations. Poetics, 22(1), 5–33.
Erlich, V. (1969). Russian Formalism: History, doctrine. The Hague: Mouton.
Fialho, O. (2007). Foregrounding and refamiliarization: Understanding readers’ response to literary texts. Language and Literature, 16(2), 105–123.
Gillham, B. (2005). Research interviewing: The range of techniques. Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill Education.
Glazer, B. C., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of ground theory. Chicago: Aldine.
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721.
Green, M., Brock, T., & Kaufman, G. (2004). Understanding media enjoyment: The role of transportation into narrative worlds. Communication Theory, 14(4), 311–327.
Hakemulder, F., & van Peer, W. (2015). Empirical stylistics. In V. Sotirova (Ed.), A companion to stylistics (pp. 251–274). London: Continuum.
Hakemulder, F., Fialho, O., Bal, M. (2016). What do we learn from literature? In Burke, M., Zyngier, S., & Fiahlo, O. (Eds.), Scientific Approaches to Literature in Learning Environments, Amsterdam: Benjamins. 19–37.
Hakemulder, J. (2004). Foregrounding and its effects on readers’ perception. Discourse Processes, 38(2), 193–218.
(2007). Tracing foregrounding in responses to film. Language and Literature, 161, 125–139.
Hoorn, J. (1997). Electronical evidence for the anomaly theory of metaphor processing. A brief introduction. In S. Tötösy de Zepetnek, and I. Sywensky (Eds), The Systematic and empirical approach to literature and culture as theory and application (pp. 67–74). Edmonton: University of Alberta.
Iser, W. (1970). Die Appelstruktur der texte. Unbestimmtheit als wirkungsbedingung literarischer prosa. (The appel structure of texts. Undeterminedness as condition for the effect of literary prose). Konstanz: Universitätsverlag
(1980). Interaction between text and reader. In S. R. Suleiman & I. Crosman (Eds.), The reader in the text (pp. 106–119). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Jacobs, A. & Lüdtke, J. (in prep). Immersion into narrative and poetic worlds: A neurocognitive poetics perspective. In Hakemulder, F., Kuijpers, M., Balint, K., Tan, E., Doicaru, M. Handbook of Narrative Absorption. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Jacobs, A.M. (2011). Neurokognitive Poetik: Elemente eines Modells des literarischen Lesens (Neurocognitive poetics: elements of a model of literary reading). In: Schrott, R., Jacobs, A.M (Eds). Gehirn und Gedicht: Wie wir unsere Wirklichkeiten konstruieren (Brain and Poem: How we construct realities) (pp. 492–524). München: Carl Hanser Verlag.
Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In Sebeok, T.A. (Ed.) Style in language (pp. 350–377). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Kätsyri, J., Kinnunen, T., Kusumoto, K., Oittinen, P., & Ravaja, N. (2016). Negativity bias in media multitasking: The effects of negative social media messages on attention to television news broadcasts. Plos One, 11(5)
King, S. (2010). On writing. A memoir of the craft. New York: Scribner.
Kneepkens, E., & Zwaan, R. (1994). Emotions and literary text comprehension. Poetics, 231, 125–138.
Koopman, E. & Hakemulder, F. (2015). Effects of literature on empathy and self-reflection: A theoretical-empirical framework. Journal of Literary Theory, 9(11): 79–111.
Kuijpers, M. & Hakemulder, F. (in prep). The nature of emergent literary effect. Depth of understanding in reading literature.
Kuijpers, M. M. (2014). Absorbing stories: The effects of textual devices on absorption and evaluative responses. (Unpublished PhD Disseration). Utrecht University,
Kuijpers, M., Hakemulder, F, Tan, E., Doicaru, M. (2014) Exploring absorbing reading experiences: Developing and validating a self-report scale to measure story world absorption. Scientific Study of Literature, 4(1): 89–122.
Kuiken, D., Miall, D. S., & Sikora, S. (2004). Forms of self-implication in literary reading. Poetics Today, 25(2), 171–203.
Kuiken, D., Phillips, L., Gregus, M., Miall, D., Verbitsky, M. & Anna Tonkonogy, A. (2004): Locating self-modifying feelings within literary reading, Discourse Processes, 38 (2), 267–286.
Lee, K. M. (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 141, 27–50.
Leech, G., & Short, M. (1981). Style in fiction. A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Levine, L. (1990). Highbrow/ Lowbrow. The emergence of cultural hierarchy in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 587–604.
Miall, D. S. (1995). Anticipation and feeling in literary response: A neuropsychological perspective. Poetics, 23(4), 275–298.
Miall, D. S. & Kuiken, D. (1994). Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect. response to literary stories. Poetics, 22(5), 389–407.
Miall, D.S., Kuiken,D. (1995). Aspects of literary response: A new questionnaire. Research in the Teaching of English, 29(1), 137–58.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Mukařovský, J. (1964). Standard language and poetic language. In P.L. Garvin (Ed.), A Prague school reader on esthetics, literary structure, and style (pp. 17–30). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Oliver, M. B., & Raney, A. A. (2011). Entertainment as pleasurable and meaningful. differentiating hedonic and eudaimonic motivations for entertainment consumption. Journal of Communication, 61.5, 984–1004.
Osgood, C., Suci, G., & Tannenbaum, P. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.
Payne, S. (2007). Grounded theory. In E. Lyons, & A. Coyle (Eds.), Analysing qualitative data in psychology. (pp. 65–86). London: Sage.
Ramachandran, V. & Hirstein, W. (1999). The science of art. A neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(6–7), 15–51.
Rimmon-Kenan, S. (1983). Narrative fiction: Contemporary poetics. London: Methuen.
Sanford, A. J., & Emmott, C. (2012). Mind, brain, and narrative. Cambridge University Press.
Sanford, A. J., Sanford, A. J., Molle, J., & Emmott, C. (2006). Shallow processing and attention capture in written and spoken discourse. Discourse Processes, 42(2), 109–130.
Schrott, R., & Jacobs, A. M. (2011). Gehirn und Gedicht: Wie wir unsere Wirklichkeiten konstruieren. (Brain and Poem: How we construct realities). München: Hanser.
Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.
Shklovsky, V. (1965). Art as technique. In L. T. Lemon, & M. J. Reiss (Eds.), Russian formalist criticism: Four essays (pp. 3–24). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Slater, M., & Wilbur, S. (1997). A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): Speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and virtual environments, 6(6), 603–616.
Smith, E.A. (2012). Pulp sensations. In D. Glover & S. McCraken (Eds). The Cambridge companion to popular fiction (pp. 141–158). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Spencer, H. (2009) The philosophy of style. Auckland: The Floating Press. (orig. 1852).
Stockwell, P. (2002). Cognitive poetics: An introduction. London: Routledge.
Tan, E. S. (1996). Emotion and the structure of narrative film. Film as an emotion machine. Mahwah (NJ): Erlbaum.
Twain, M. (2014). Fenimore Cooper’s literary offences. Auckland: The Floating Press. (orig. 1895).
Tynyanov, Y. (1978). On literary evolution. In L. Matejka, & K. Pomorska (Eds.), Readings in Russian poetics. Formalist and Structuralist views. (pp. 66–78). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
van Peer, W. (1986). Stylistics and psychology. London: Croom Helm.
van Peer, W., & Hakemulder, J. (2006). Foregrounding. In K. Brown (Ed.), The Pergamon encyclopaedia of language and linguistics (pp. 546–551). Oxford: Elsevier.
van Peer, W., Hakemulder, J., Zyngier, S. (2007). Lines on feeling: Foregrounding, aesthetic appreciation, and meaning. Language and Literature, 16 (2), 197–213.
Wirth, W., Hover, M., & Schramm, H. (2012). Beyond pleasure: Exploring the eudaimonic entertainment experience. Human Communication Research, 38(4), 406–428.
Wundt, W. Grundriss der psychologie (Outlines of psychology). Leibzig: Entgelmann.
Zyngier, S., Hakemulder, J., & van Peer, W. (2007). Complexity and foregrounding. in the eye of the beholder? Poetics Today, 28(4), 653–682.
Cited by (21)
Cited by 21 other publications
Kuijpers, Moniek M., Massimo Lusetti, Piroska Lendvai & Simone Rebora
2024. Validation of the Story World Absorption Scale through annotation of online book reviews. Journal of Cultural Analytics 9:1 
Kuijpers, Moniek, Piroska Lendvai, Massimo Lusetti, Simone Rebora, Lina Ruh, Jonathan Tadres, Tina Ternes & Johanna Vogelsanger
2023. Absorption in Online Reviews of Books: Presenting the English-Language AbsORB Metadata Corpus and Annotation Guidelines. Journal of Open Humanities Data 9
Scapin, Giulia, Cristina Loi, Frank Hakemulder, Katalin Bálint & Elly Konijn
2023. The role of processing foregrounding in empathic reactions in literary reading. Discourse Processes 60:4-5 ► pp. 273 ff.
van de Ven, Inge
2023. ‘Gonna get you, baby!’ A qualitative-empirical study of attentional modulation in reading a short story. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 32:4 ► pp. 458 ff.
van de Ven, Inge
2024. Attentional modulation in literary reading: A theoretical‐empirical framework. Orbis Litterarum 79:2 ► pp. 184 ff.
van de Ven, Inge, Frank Hakemulder & Anne Mangen
2023. ‘TL;DR’ (Too Long; Didn’t Read)? Cognitive Patience as a Mode of Reading: Exploring Concentration and Perseverance. Scientific Study of Literature 12:1 ► pp. 68 ff.
Eekhof, Lynn S., Kobie van Krieken & Roel M. Willems
2022. Reading about minds: The social-cognitive potential of narratives. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 29:5 ► pp. 1703 ff.
Kuzmičová, Anežka, Markéta Supa, Jana Segi Lukavská & Filip Novák
2022. Exploring children's embodied story experiences: a toolkit for research and practice. Literacy 56:4 ► pp. 288 ff.
Mitchell, Alex
2022. Game Mechanics as Narrative Mode. In The Authoring Problem [Human–Computer Interaction Series, ], ► pp. 251 ff.
Sopcak, Paul & Don Kuiken
2022. The affective allure – a phenomenological dialogue with David Miall’s studies of foregrounding and feeling. Journal of Literary Semantics 51:2 ► pp. 75 ff.
Eekhof, Lynn S., Moniek M. Kuijpers, Myrthe Faber, Xin Gao, Marloes Mak, Emiel van den Hoven & Roel M. Willems
2021. Lost in a Story, Detached from the Words. Discourse Processes 58:7 ► pp. 595 ff.
Kukkonen, Karin
2021. Reading, Fast and Slow. Poetics Today 42:2 ► pp. 173 ff.
Vogrinčič Čepič, Ana & Marina Kotrla Topić
2021. ‘If you read at home, it's more relaxed, there are no limits’: Insights into domestic reading practices of Croatian and Slovenian university students. Literacy 55:3 ► pp. 181 ff.
Odağ, Özen & Margrit Schreier
2020. Qualitative Medienpsychologie. In Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie, ► pp. 461 ff.
Odağ, Özen & Margrit Schreier
2020. Qualitative Medienpsychologie. In Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie [Springer Reference Psychologie, ], ► pp. 1 ff.
Fialho, Olivia & Anezka Kuzmicova
2019. What is literature for? The role of transformative reading. Cogent Arts & Humanities 6:1 ► pp. 1692532 ff.
Gibbs, Raymond W. & Herbert L. Colston
2019. What psycholinguistic studies ignore about literary
experience. Scientific Study of Literature 9:1 ► pp. 72 ff.
Bruhn, Mark J.
Consoli, Gianluca
2018. Preliminary steps towards a cognitive theory of fiction and its effects. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science 2:1-2 ► pp. 85 ff.
Kuijpers, Moniek M. & Frank Hakemulder
2018. Understanding and Appreciating Literary Texts Through Rereading. Discourse Processes 55:7 ► pp. 619 ff.
Kuijpers, Moniek M., Frank Hakemulder, Katalin Bálint, Miruna M. Doicaru & Ed S. Tan
2017. Chapter 2. Towards a new understanding of absorbing reading experiences. In Narrative Absorption [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 27], ► pp. 29 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.