Non-fluent Aphasia in a Multilingual World

• List of Figures | p. xi
• List of Excerpts | p. xiii
• Abbreviations and Conventions | p. xv
• Acknowledgments | p. xvii
• Foreword by Michel Paradis | p. xix
• 1. Introduction | p. 1
• 1.1. The purpose of this book: Audience and goals
• 1.2. The types of patients that the book is based on
• 1.3. Additional sources of information
• 1.4. The plan of the book
• 1.5. Linguistics and aphasia
• 2. Describing and Comparing Languages | p. 12
• 2.1. Introduction: Why we need linguistic terminology
• 2.2. Grammar across the world's languages: The basic types of information conveyed by syntax and morphology
• 2.3. Typology and terminology: Common types of morphemes and syntactic structures
• 2.4. Pragmatics: Describing sentence types and their uses in conversation
• 2.5. Reasoning from linguistic typology: Extrapolating from available data to aphasia in languages not yet studied
• 2.6. How to read and use an interlinear morphemic transcription
• Recommended readings
• Exercises
• 3. Basic Properties of Agrammatic Narratives | p. 41
• 3.1. Introduction
• 3.2. How do we know what is normal? The need for control subjects
• 3.3. Getting patients to talk: Narrative elicitation
• 3.4. General properties of agrammatic narratives
• 3.5. Comparing elicitation materials
• 3.6. Potential intercultural problems
• 3.7. Chapter summary
• 4. The Grammar of Connected Agrammatic Speech | p. 71
• 4.1. Introduction
• 4.2. Major grammatical phenomena
• 4.3. Consequences and contrasts: Counterevidence to some popular descriptions and theories
• 5. Speech, Writing, and Oral Reading | p. 117
• 5.1. Introduction: Why should there be either differences or similarities across different types of language output?
• 5.2. Disturbances in spontaneous writing
• 5.3. Disturbances in reading aloud
• 5.4. Differences in degree of disturbance of writing and speech
• Exercise
• 6. Bilingual and Polyglot Aphasia
  Loraine K. Obler, Jose G. Centeno and Nancy Eng | p. 132
• 6.1. Introduction
• 6.2. Parallel and differential deficits
• 6.3. Causes for differential recovery
• 6.4. Special bilingual behaviors
• 6.5. Brain organization for bilingualism
• 6.6. Implications for diagnosis
• 7. Inventing Therapy for Aphasia
  Audrey Holland and Claire Penn | p. 144
• 7.1. Introduction: Cross-cultural and cross-linguistic issues
• 7.2. Treatment for agrammatism
• 7.3. Some concluding comments
• Appendices
• A. Foreign Accents (Non-native Phonetics) and Dysarthria | p. 156
• B. Language Families | p. 159
• C. Clinical Resources | p. 168
• Clinical Glossary | p. 172
• Linguistic Glossary | p. 176

Cited by 24 other publications

GAHL, SUSANNE

2023. Usage‐Based Approaches to Communication Disorders. In The Handbook of Usage‐Based Linguistics, ► pp. 393 ff.

Li, Jianan, Katinka Dijkstra & Rolf A. Zwaan

2023. Deictic shift in the production of direct and indirect speech. Language and Cognition ► pp. 1 ff.

Norvik, Monica I., Marianne Lind & Bård Uri Jensen

2022. Working with multilingual aphasia: attitudes and practices among speech and language pathologists in Norway. International Multilingual Research Journal 16:4 ► pp. 273 ff.

Kuzmina, Ekaterina & Brendan S. Weekes

2017. Role of cognitive control in language deficits in different types of aphasia. Aphasiology 31:7 ► pp. 765 ff.

Laakso, Minna & Sisse Godt

2016. Recipient participation in conversations involving participants with fluent or non-fluent aphasia. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 30:10 ► pp. 770 ff.

Fraser, Kathleen C., Jed A. Meltzer, Frank Rudzicz & Peter Garrard

2015. Linguistic Features Identify Alzheimer’s Disease in Narrative Speech. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 49:2 ► pp. 407 ff.

Ivanova, M.V., O.V. Dragoy, S.V. Kuptsova, A.S. Ulicheva & A.K. Laurinavichyute

2015. The contribution of working memory to language comprehension: differential effect of aphasia type. Aphasiology 29:6 ► pp. 645 ff.

KHORSI, AHMED

2013. On morphological relatedness. Natural Language Engineering 19:4 ► pp. 537 ff.

Eiesland, Eli Anne & Marianne Lind

2012. Compound nouns in spoken language production by speakers with aphasia compared to neurologically healthy speakers: An exploratory study. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 26:3 ► pp. 232 ff.

Roger, Peter & Chris Code

2011. Lost in translation? Issues of content validity in interpreter-mediated aphasia assessments. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 13:1 ► pp. 61 ff.

Wilkinson, Ray, Suzanne Beeke & Jane Maxim

2010. Formulating Actions and Events With Limited Linguistic Resources: Enactment and Iconicity in Agrammatic Aphasic Talk. Research on Language & Social Interaction 43:1 ► pp. 57 ff.

Lind, Marianne, Kristian Emil Kristoffersen, Inger Moen & Hanne Gram Simonsen

2009. Semi-spontaneous oral text production: Measurements in clinical practice. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 23:12 ► pp. 872 ff.

Beeke, Suzanne, Jane Maxim & Ray Wilkinson

2008. Rethinking agrammatism: Factors affecting the form of language elicited via clinical test procedures. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 22:4-5 ► pp. 317 ff.

Lorenzen, Bonnie & Laura L. Murray

2008. Bilingual Aphasia: A Theoretical and Clinical Review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 17:3 ► pp. 299 ff.

Beeke, Suzanne, Ray Wilkinson & Jane Maxim

2007. Grammar without sentence structure: A conversation analytic investigation of agrammatism. Aphasiology 21:3-4 ► pp. 256 ff.

Code, Chris, Nicole Muller, Jeremy Tree & Martin Ball

2006. Syntactic impairments can emerge later: Progressive agrammatic agraphia and syntactic comprehension impairment. Aphasiology 20:9 ► pp. 1035 ff.

Centeno, José G.

2005. Working With Bilingual Individuals With Aphasia: The Case of a Spanish-English Bilingual Client. Perspectives on Communication Disorders and Sciences in Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CLD) Populations 12:1 ► pp. 2 ff.

Centeno, José G.

2007. Canonical features in the inflectional morphology of Spanish-speaking individuals with agrammatic speech. Advances in Speech Language Pathology 9:2 ► pp. 162 ff.

Gitterman, Martin R.

2005. Aphasia in Multilingual Populations. In Clinical Sociolinguistics, ► pp. 219 ff.

Mavi˙ş, İlknur

2005. Language characteristics of fluent aphasic patients in Turkish. Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders 3:2 ► pp. 75 ff.

MÜLLER, NICOLE

2003. Multilingual communication disorders: exempla et desiderata. Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders 1:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Halliwell, John F.

2000. Korean agrammatic production. Aphasiology 14:12 ► pp. 1187 ff.

Hopper, Paul J.

1997. Discourse and the category ‘verb’ in English. Language & Communication 17:2 ► pp. 93 ff.

Menn, L., J. Niemi & E. Ahlsén

1996. Cross-linguistic studies of aphasia: Why and how. Aphasiology 10:6 ► pp. 523 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Main BIC Subject

Main BISAC Subject