Chapter published in:
Theories of Reading Development
Edited by Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton and Rauno K. Parrila
[Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15] 2017
► pp. 283306
Afflerbach, P. P.
(1990) The influence of prior knowledge on expert readers’ main idea construction strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 31–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, P. A., & Jetton, T. L.
(2000) Learning from text: A multidimensional and developmental perspective. Handbook of Reading Research, 3, 285–310.Google Scholar
Alexander, P. A., & Murphy, P. K.
(1998) Profiling the differences in students’ knowledge, interest, and strategic processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 435–447. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, P. A., Murphy, P. K., Woods, B. S., Duhon, K. E., & Parker, D.
(1997) College instruction and concomitant changes in students’ knowledge, interest, and strategy use: A study of domain learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 125–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, P. A.
the Disciplined Reading and Learning Research Laboratory (2012). Reading into the future: Competence for the 21st century. Educational Psychologist, 47, 1–22. Crossref
Anderson, R. C., & Freebody, P.
(1981) Vocabulary knowledge. In J. Guthrie (Ed.), Comprehension and Teaching: Research Reviews (pp. 77–117). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. C., & Pichert, J. W.
(1978) Recall of previously unrecallable information following a shift in perspective. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 1–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, L.
(1984) Spontaneous versus instructed use of multiple standards for evaluating comprehension: Effects of age, reading proficiency and type of standard. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 55, 289–311. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barth, A. E., Barnes, M., Francis, D., Vaughn, S., & York, M.
(2015) Inferential processing among adequate and struggling adolescent comprehenders and relations to reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 28, 587–609. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, P. J.
(2007) Recall in infancy: A neurodevelopmental account. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 142–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, P. J., & Lukowski, A. F.
(2010) The memory is in the details: Relations between memory for the specific features of events and long-term recall during infancy. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107, 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, P. J., & San Souci, P.
(2010) Going beyond the facts: Young children extend knowledge by integrating episodes. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107, 452–465. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beck, I. L., Perfetti, C. A., & McKeown, M. G.
(1982) Effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on lexical access and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 506–521. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beker, K., Jolles, D., Lorch, R. F. Jr., & van den Broek, P.
(2016) Learning from texts: Activation of information from previous texts during reading. Reading & Writing, 29, 1161–1178.Google Scholar
Bourg, T., Bauer, P. J., & van den Broek, P.
(1997) Building the bridges: The development of event comprehension and representation. In P. van den Broek, P. Bauer & T. Bourg (Eds.), Developmental spans in event comprehension and representation: Bridging fictional and actual events (pp. 385–407). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bråten, I., Britt, M. A., Strømsø, H. I., & Rouet, J.-F.
(2011) The role of epistemic beliefs in the comprehension of multiple expository texts: Towards an integrated model. Educational Psychologist, 46, 48–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cain, K.
(1999) Ways of reading: How knowledge and use of strategies are related to reading comprehension. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 293–309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cain, K., & Oakhill, J.
(2012) Reading comprehension development from seven to fourteen years: Implications for assessment. In J. P. Sabatini, E. E. Albro & T. O’Reilly (Eds.), Measuring up: Advances in how to assess reading ability (pp. 59–76). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Education.Google Scholar
Cain, K., Oakhill, J. V., Barnes, M. A., & Bryant, P. E.
(2001) Comprehension skill, inference-making ability, and their relation to knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 29, 850–859. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P.
(2004) Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 31–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Catts, H. W., Hogan, T. P., & Fey, M. E.
(2003) Subgrouping poor readers on the basis of individual differences in reading-related abilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 151–164 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cerdán, R., & Vidal-Abarca, E.
(2008) The effects of tasks on integrating information from multiple documents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 209–222. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chall, J. S., Jacobs, V. A., & Baldwin, L. E.
(1990) The reading crisis: Why poor children fall behind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.Google Scholar
Cook, A. E., & O’Brien, E. L.
(2014) Knowledge activation, integration, and validation during narrative text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 51, 26–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Compton, D. L., Appleton, A. C., & Hosp, M. K.
(2004) Exploring the Relationship Between Text‐Leveling Systems and Reading Accuracy and Fluency in Second‐Grade Students Who Are Average and Poor Decoders. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 19, 176–184. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Compton, D. L., Miller, A. C., Elleman, A. M., & Steacy, L. M.
(2014) Have we forsaken reading theory in the name of “quick fix” interventions for children with reading disability? Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 55–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cromley, J. G., & Azevedo, R.
(2007) Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 311–325. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A.
(1980) Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eason, S. H., Goldberg, L. F., Young, K. M., Geist, M. C., & Cutting, L. E.
(2012) Reader – text interactions: How differential text and question types influence cognitive skills needed for reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 515–528. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Stahl, S. A., & Willows, D. M.
(2001) Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 393–447. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Elbro, C., & Buch-Iversen, I.
(2013) Activation of background knowledge for inference making: effects on reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17, 435–452. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, F., & Patson, N.
(2007) The ‘good enough’ approach to language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1, 71–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferstl, E. C., Neumann, J., Bogler, C., & von Cramon, D. Y.
(2008) The extended language network: a meta‐analysis of neuroimaging studies on text comprehension. Human Brain Mapping, 29, 581–593. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fricke, S., Bowyer‐Crane, C., Haley, A. J., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J.
(2013) Efficacy of language intervention in the early years. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54, 280–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frishkoff, G. A., Perfetti, C. A., & Collins-Thompson, K.
(2010) Lexical quality in the brain: ERP evidence for robust word learning from context. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35, 376–403. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K.& Jenkins, J. R.
(2001) Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239–256. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gernsbacher, M. A.
(1990) Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Glenberg, A. M., Wilkinson, A. C., & Epstein, W.
(1982) The illusion of knowing: Failure in the self-assessment of comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 10, 597–602. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, S. R.
(1997) Learning from text: Reflections on the past and suggestions for the future. Discourse Processes, 23, 357–398. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Cognitive aspects of constructing meaning through and across multiple texts. In N. Shuart-Faris & D. Bloome (Eds.), Uses of intertextuality in classroom and educational research (pp. 317–351). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Google Scholar
Goldman, S. R., & Varma, S.
(1995) CAPping the construction-integration model of discourse comprehension. In C. A. Weaver, S. Mannes, & C. R. Fletcher, (Eds.) Discourse comprehension: Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch, (pp. 337–358). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Graesser, A. C., & Clark, L. F.
(1985) Structures and procedures of implicit knowledge. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., & Cai, Z.
(2004) Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 193–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hagoort, P., & Indefrey, P.
(2014) The neurobiology of language beyond single words. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 37, 347–362. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R.
(1976) Cohesion in English. London, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. J.
(1979) Four points to remember: A tetrahedral model of memory experiments. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. Craick (Eds.) Levels of Processing in Human Memory (pp. 429–446). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Kaakinen, J. K., & Hyönä, J.
(2005) Perspective effects on expository text comprehension: Evidence from think-aloud protocols, eyetracking and recall. Discourse Processes, 40, 239–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Karasinski, C., & Weismer, S. E.
(2010) Comprehension of inferences in discourse processing by adolescents with and without language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 1268–1279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kendeou, P.
(2015) A general inference skill. In E. J. O’Brien, A. E. Cook, & R. F. Lorch, Jr. (Eds.), Inferences during reading (pp. 160–181) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Validation and comprehension: An integrated overview. Discourse Processes, 51, 189–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kendeou, P., Bohn-Gettler, C., & Fulton, S.
(2011) What we have been missing: The role of goals in reading comprehension. In M. T. McCrudden, J. P. Magliano, & G. Schraw (Eds.), Text relevance and learning from text (pp. 375–394). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, IncGoogle Scholar
Kendeou, P., Bohn‐Gettler, C., White, M. J., & van den Broek, P.
(2008) Children’s inference generation across different media. Journal of Research in Reading, 31, 259–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kendeou, P., Muis, K. R., & Fulton, S.
(2011) Reader and text factors in reading comprehension processes. Journal of Research in Reading, 34, 365–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kendeou, P., & O’ Brien, E. J.
(2016) Prior knowledge: Acquisition and revision. In P. Afflerbach (Ed.), Handbook of individual differences in reading: Text and context (pp. 151–163) New York: Routledge Publishing.Google Scholar
Kendeou, P. & O’Brien, E. J.
(2014) The knowledge revision components (KReC) framework: Processes and mechanism. In D. N., Rapp & J. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences. (pp. 353–377). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kendeou, P., Smith, E. R., & O’Brien, E. J.
(2013) Updating during reading comprehension: why causality matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 39, 854–865.Google Scholar
Kendeou, P., Walsh, E., Smith, E. R., & O’Brien, E. J.
(2014) Knowledge revision processes in refutation texts. Discourse Processes, 51, 374–397. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kendeou, P., & van den Broek, P.
(2005) The effects of readers’ misconceptions on comprehension of scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 235–245. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1567–1577. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kendeou, P., van den Broek, P., White, M. J., & Lynch, J. S.
(2007) Comprehension in preschool and early elementary children: Skill development and strategy interventions. In D. S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 27–45). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(2009) Predicting reading comprehension in early elementary school: The independent contributions of oral language and decoding skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 765. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, O., Kendeou, P., van den Broek, P., White, M. J., & Kremer, K.
(2008) Cat, Rat, and Rugrats: Narrative comprehension in young children with Down Syndrome. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 20, 337–351. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W.
(1988) The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998) Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A.
(1978) Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J.
(1974) Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lemarié, J., Lorch, R. F., Jr Eyrolle, H., & Virbel, J.
(2008) SARA: A text-based and reader- based theory of signaling. Educational Psychologist, 43, 27–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linderholm, T., & van den Broek, P.
(2002) The effects of reading purpose and working memory capacity on the processing of expository text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 778. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y., Reichle, E. D., & Gao, D. G.
(2013) Using reinforcement learning to examine dynamic attention allocation during reading. Cognitive Science, 37, 1507–1540. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lorch, E. P., Berthiaume, K. S., Milich, R., & van den Broek, P.
(2007) Story comprehension impairments in children with ADHD. In K. Cain & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Cognitive bases of children’s language comprehension difficulties (pp. 128–156). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Lorch, E. P., Eastham, D., Milich, R., Lemberger, C. C., Sanchez, R. P., Welsh, R., & van den Broek, P.
(2004) Difficulties in comprehending causal relations among children with ADHD: The role of cognitive engagement. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113, 56–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lorch, E. P., Sanchez, R. P., van den Broek, P., Milich, R., Murphy, E. L., Lorch, R. F., Jr. & Welsh, R.
(1999) The relation of story structure properties to recall of television stories in young children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and non-referred peers. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27, 293–309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lorch, R. F., Jr., Lorch, E. P., & Klusewitz, M. A.
(1993) College students’ conditional knowledge about reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 239–252. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luna, B., Garver, K. E., Urban, T. E., Lazar, N. A., & Sweeney
(2004) Maturation of cognitive processes from late childhood to adulthood. Child Development, 75, 1357–1372. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, J. S., & van den Broek, P.
(2007) Understanding the glue of narrative structure: Children’s on-and off-line inferences about characters’ goals. Cognitive Development, 22, 323–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, J. S., van den Broek, P., Kremer, K. E., Kendeou, P., White, M. J., & Lorch, E. P.
(2008) The development of narrative comprehension and its relation to other early reading skills. Reading Psychology, 29, 327–365. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCrudden, M. T., Magliano, J. P., & Schraw, G.
(2011) Relevance in text comprehension. In M. T. McCrudden, J. P. Magliano & G. Schraw (Eds.), Text relevance and learning from text (pp. 1–17). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R.
(1992) Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99, 440–466. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McMaster, K. L., Espin, C. A., & van den Broek, P.
(2014) Making connections: Linking cognitive psychology and intervention research to improve comprehension of struggling readers. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29, 17–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McMaster, K. L., van den Broek, P., Espin, C. A., White, M. J., Rapp, D. N., Kendeou, P., Carlson, S.
(2012) Making the right connections: Differential effects of reading intervention for subgroups of comprehenders. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 100–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, D. S., & Kintsch, W.
(1996) Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22, 247–288. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J.
(2009) Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension. In B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 297–384). New York: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J.
(2012) Why does working memory capacity predict variation in reading comprehension? On the influence of mind wandering and executive attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 302–320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, B. J., & Poon, L. W.
(2001) Effects of structure strategy training and signaling on recall of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 141–159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myers, J. L., & O’Brien, E. J.
(1998) Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processes, 26, 131–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, W. E., Herman, P. A., & Anderson, R. C.
(1985) Learning words from context. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 233–253. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
National Reading Panel
(2000) Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Available: http://​www​.nichd​.nih​.gov​/publications​/nrp​/report​.cfm
Oakhill, J.
(1984) Inferential and memory skills in children’s comprehension of stories. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 31–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oakhill, J. V., & Cain, K.
(2012) The precursors of reading ability in young readers: Evidence from a four-year longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16, 91–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, E. J., & Myers, J. L.
(1999) Text comprehension: A view from the bottom up. In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 35–53). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
(2009) PISA 2009 assessment framework: Key competencies in reading, mathematics and science. Paris, France: OECD. Retrieved from http://​www​.oecd​.org​/pisa​/pisaproducts​/pisa2009assessmentframeworkkeycompetenciesinreadingmathematicsandscience​.htm
Pearson, P. D., & Hamm, D. N.
(2005) The assessment of reading comprehension: A review of practices – Past, present, and future. In S. G. Paris & S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children’s reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 13–69). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A.
(2007) Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Adlof, S. M.
(2012) Reading comprehension: A conceptual framework from word meaning to text meaning. In J. P. Sabatini, E. R. Albro & T. O’Reilly (Eds.), Measuring up: Advances in how to assess reading ability (pp. 3–20). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Education.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L.
(2001) The lexical bases of comprehension skill. In D. Gorfien (Ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection (pp. 67–86). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Pike, M., Barnes, M., & Barron, R. W.
(2010) The role of illustrations in children’s inferential comprehension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105, 243–255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prat, C. S., & Just, M. A.
(2011) Exploring the neural dynamics underpinning individual differences in sentence comprehension. Cerebral Cortex, 21, 1747–1760. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pressley, M., Graham, S., & Harris, K.
(2006) The state of educational intervention research as viewed through the lens of literacy intervention. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pressley, M., & McCormick, C.
(1995) Advanced educational psychology for educators, researchers, and policymakers. New York, NY: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Rawson, K. A., Dunlosky, J., & Thiede, K. W.
(2000) The rereading effect: Metacomprehension accuracy improves across reading trials. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1004–1010. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Redford, J. S., Thiede, K. W., Wiley, J., & Griffin, T. D.
(2012) Concept mapping improves metacomprehension accuracy among 7th graders. Learning and Instruction, 22, 262–270. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ross, M. E., Green, S. B., Salisbury-Glennon, J. D., & Tollefson, N.
(2006) College students’ study strategies as a function of testing: An investigation into metacognitive self-regulation. Innovative Higher Education, 30, 361–375. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rouet, J. F.
(2006) The skills of document use: From text comprehension to web-based learning. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Rouet, J. F., Vidal-Abarca, E., Bert-Erboul A. & Millogo, V.
(2001) Effects of information search tasks on comprehension of instructional texts. Discourse Processes, 21, 163–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sabatini, J., O’Reilly, T., Halderman, L. & Bruce, K.
(2014) Integrating scenario-based and component reading skill measures to understand the reading behavior of struggling readers. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29, 36–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schraw, G., Wade, S. E., & Kardash, C. A.
(1993) Interactive effects of text-based and task-based importance on learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 652–661. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sesma, H. W., Mahone, E. M., Levine, T., Eason, S. H., & Cutting, L. E.
(2009) The contribution of executive skills to reading comprehension. Child Neuropsychology, 15, 232–246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siegler, R. S.
(1996) Emerging Minds: The process of change in children’s thinking. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, M.
(2013) Validation in reading comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 361–366. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Snow, C. E.
(2002) Reading for understanding:Towards an R & D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
Snow, C. E., & Sweet, A. P.
(2003) Reading for comprehension. In A. P. Sweet & C. E. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension, (pp. 1–11). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E.
(1986) Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Storch, S. A., & Whitehurst, G. J.
(2002) Oral language and code-related precursors to reading: evidence from a longitudinal structural model. Developmental Psychology, 38, 934–947. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swanson, H. L., & O’Connor, R.
(2009) The role of working memory and fluency practice on the reading comprehension of students who are dysfluent readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 548–575. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tannenbaum, K. R., Torgesen, J. K., & Wagner, R. K.
(2006) Relationships between word knowledge and reading comprehension in third-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 381–398. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, E., & Bates, E.
(2003) Connectionism and dynamic systems: Are they really different? Developmental Science, 6, 378–391. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, J. G., & Myers, N. A.
(1985) Inferences and recall at ages four and seven. Child Development, 56, 1134–1144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, R., & van den Broek, P.
(1997) Automaticity and inference generation during reading comprehension. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 13, 165–181. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tilstra, J., & McMaster, K. L.
(2013) Cognitive processes of middle grade readers when reading expository text with an assigned goal. Learning and Individual Differences, 28, 66–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tilstra, J., McMaster, K., van den Broek, P., Kendeou, P., & Rapp, D. N.
(2009) Simple but complex: Components of the simple view of reading across grade levels. Journal of Research in Reading, 32, 383–401. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trabasso, T., Secco, T., & van den Broek, P.
(1984) Causal cohesion and story coherence. In H. Mandl, N. L. Stein & T. Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and comprehension of text (pp. 83–111). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Trabasso, T., & van den Broek, P.
(1985) Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 612–630. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trabasso, T., van den Broek, P., & Liu, L.
(1988) A model for generating questions that assess and promote comprehension. Questioning Exchange, 2, 25–38Google Scholar
Trabasso, T., van den Broek, P., & Suh, S. Y.
(1989) Logical necessity and transitivity of causal relations in stories. Discourse Processes, 12, 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Berkum, J. J. A.
(2009) The neuropragmatics of ‘simple’ utterance comprehension: An ERP review. In U. Sauerland, & K. Yatsushiro (Eds.), Semantics and pragmatics: From experiment to theory (pp. 276–316). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
van den Broek, P.
(1988) The effects of causal relations and hierarchical position on the importance of story statements. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1989) Causal reasoning and inference making in judging the importance of story statements. Child Development, 60, 286–297. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1990) Causal inferences maker: Towards a process model of inference generation in text comprehension. In D. A. Balota, G. B. F. d’Arcais & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 423–446). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(1994) Comprehension and memory of narrative texts: Inferences and coherence. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 539–588). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1997) Discovering the cement of the universe: The development of event comprehension from childhood to adulthood. In P. van den Broek, P. J. Bauer & T. Bourg (Eds.), Developmental spans in event comprehension and representation: Bridging fictional and actual events (pp. 321–342). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(2010) Using texts in science education: Cognitive processes and knowledge representation. Science, 328, 453–456. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van den Broek, P., Beker, K., & Oudega, M.
(2015) Inference generation in text comprehension: Automatic and strategic processes in the construction of a mental representation. In E. J. O’Brien, A. Cook & R. F. Lorch (Eds.), Inferences during reading (pp. 99–121). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van den Broek, P., Bohn-Gettler, C., Kendeou, P., Carlson, S., & White, M. J.
(2011) When a reader meets a text: The role of standards of coherence in reading comprehension. In M. T. McCrudden, J. P. Magliano & G. Schraw (Eds.), Text relevance and learning from text (pp. 123–139). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
van den Broek, P., Fletcher, C. R., & Risden, K.
(1993) Investigations of inferential processes in reading: A theoretical and methodological integration. Discourse Processes, 16, 169–180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van den Broek, P., Helder, A., & van Leijenhorst, L.
(2013) Sensitivity to Structural Centrality: Developmental and individual differences in reading comprehension skills. In M. A. Britt, S. R. Goldman & J.-F. Rouet (Eds.), Reading: From words to multiple texts (pp. 132–146). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
van den Broek, P., & Kendeou, P.
(2008) Cognitive processes in comprehension of science texts: The role of co-activation in confronting misconceptions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 335–351. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Building coherence in web-based and other non-traditional reading environments; Cognitive opportunities and challenges. In J. J. Spiro, M. Deschryver, M. S. Hagerman, P. Morsink & P. Thompson (Eds.), Reading at a crossroads? Disjunctures and continuities in current conceptions and practices (pp. 104–114) New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
van den Broek, P., Kendeou, P., Lousberg, S., & Visser, G.
(2011) Preparing for reading comprehension: Fostering text comprehension skills in preschool and early elementary school children. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4, 259–268.Google Scholar
van den Broek, P., Lorch, R. F., Linderholm, T., & Gustafson, M.
(2001) The effects of readers’ goals on inference generation and memory for texts. Memory & Cognition, 29, 1081–1087. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van den Broek, P., Lorch, E. P., & Thurlow, R.
(1996) Children’s and adults’ memory for television stories: The role of causal factors, story‐grammar categories, and hierarchical level. Child Development, 67, 3010–3028. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van den Broek, P., Lynch, J. S., Naslund, J., Ievers-Landis, C. E., & Verduin, K.
(2003) The Development of comprehension of main ideas in narratives: Evidence from the selection of titles. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 707–718. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van den Broek, P., Rapp, D. N., & Kendeou, P.
(2005) Integrating memory-based and constructionist processes in accounts of reading comprehension. Discourse Processes, 39, 299–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van den Broek, P., Risden, K., Fletcher, C. R., & Thurlow, R.
(1996) A “landscape” view of reading: Fluctuating patterns of activation and the construction of a stable memory representation. In B. K. Britton & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 165–187). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
van den Broek, P., Risden, K., & Husebye-Hartmann, E.
(1995) The role of readers’ standards for coherence in the generation of inferences during reading. In J. R. F. Lorch & E. J. O’Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading (pp. 353–373). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
van den Broek, P., & Trabasso, T.
(1986) Causal networks versus goal hierarchies in summarizing text. Discourse Processes, 9, 1–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van den Broek, P., Tzeng, Y., Risden, K., Trabasso, T., & Basche, P.
(2001) Inferential questioning: Effects on comprehension of narrative texts as a function of grade and timing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 521–529. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van den Broek, P., Young, M., Tzeng, Y., & Linderholm, T.
(1999) The landscape model of reading: Inferences and the online construction of a memory representation. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 71–98). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. (Reprinted in R. B. Ruddell & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (1244–1269). Newark, NJ: International Reading Association).Google Scholar
van Geert, P.
(1991) A dynamic systems model of cognitive and language growth. Psychological Review, 98, 3–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Kleeck, A. V.
(2008) Providing preschool foundations for later reading comprehension: The importance of and ideas for targeting inferencing in storybook‐sharing interventions. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 627–643. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Leijenhorst, L., Karlsson, J., Helder, A., & van den Broek, P.
(2014, July). Neural correlates of revising a situation model for sentences with multiple events in children and young adults. Presentation at the biannual meeting of International Association for the Study of Child Language, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Vaughn, S., Roberts, G., Wexler, J., Vaughn, M., Fall, A.-M., & Schnakenberg, J. B.
(2014) High school students with reading comprehension difficulties: Results of a randomized control trial of a two-year reading intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48, 546–558. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vaughn, S., Swanson, E. A., Roberts, G., Wanzek, J., Stillman-Spisak, S. J., Solis, M., & Simmons, D.
(2013) Improving reading comprehension and social studies knowledge in middle school. Reading Research Quarterly, 48, 77–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, L.,& Perfetti, C. A.
(Eds.) (2011) Vocabulary growth and reading skill. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15, 1–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F.
(1994) Mental models of the day/night cycle. Cognitive Science, 18, 123–183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., Hecht, S. A., Barker, Th. A., Burgess, S. R., Donahue, J., & Garon, T.
(1997) Changing relations between phonological processing abilities and word-level reading as children develop from beginning to skilled readers: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 33, 468–479. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whitehurst, G. J., & Lonigan, C. J.
(1998) Child development and emergent literacy. Child Development, 69, 848–872. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. P.
(1993) Comprehension of students with and without learning disabilities: Identification of themes and idiosyncratic text representation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 631–641. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Explicit instruction can help primary students learn to comprehend expository text. In C. C. Block & S. Parris (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices 2nd edition (pp. 171–182). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Williams, J. P., Hall, K. M., Lauer, K. D., Stafford, K. B., De Sisto, L. A., & deCani, J. S.
(2005) Expository text comprehension in the primary grade classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 538–550. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. P., Lauer, K. D., Hall, K. M., Lord, K. M., Gugga, S. S., Bak, S. J., Jacobs, P. R., & deCani, J. S.
(2002) Teaching elementary school students to identify story themes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 235–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolman, C., van den Broek, P., & Lorch, R. F.
(1997) Effects of causal structure on immediate and delayed story recall by children with mild mental retardation, children with learning disabilities, and children without disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 30, 439–455. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yeari, M., van den Broek, P., & Oudega, M.
(2015) Processing and memory of central versus peripheral information as a function of reading goals: Evidence from eye-movements. Reading and Writing, 28, 1071–1097. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yuill, N. & Oakhill, J.
(1988) Effects of inference awareness training on poor reading comprehension. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2, 33–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Clinton, Virginia
2019. Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Research in Reading 42:2  pp. 288 ff. Crossref logo
Davis, Dennis S., Jill Jones, Nermin Vehabovic & Robyn DeIaco
2021. Reading and inquiring in an afterschool tutoring program: Working to re-imagine the reading intervention paradigm. Improving Schools 24:2  pp. 165 ff. Crossref logo
Henry, Alyssa R. & Emily J. Solari
2021. Developing Social Knowledge to Support Reading Comprehension in Elementary Students With ASD. TEACHING Exceptional Children  pp. 004005992110220 ff. Crossref logo
Kelly, Jerae & Ana Taboada Barber
2021. Interactive Read-Aloud Instruction With Narratives: Teaching Inferencing Using Theory of Mind. TEACHING Exceptional Children 54:2  pp. 106 ff. Crossref logo
Kikas, Eve, Gintautas Silinskas, Kaja Mädamürk & Piret Soodla
2021. Effects of Prior Knowledge on Comprehending Text About Learning Strategies. Frontiers in Education 6 Crossref logo
Tibi, Sana & John R. Kirby
2019. Reading in Arabic: How Well Does the Standard Model Apply?. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 62:4  pp. 993 ff. Crossref logo
Williams, Joanna P.
2021. What educational psychology means to me: The journey of a reading researcher. Educational Psychologist 56:1  pp. 18 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.