Chapter published in:
Theories of Reading Development
Edited by Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton and Rauno K. Parrila
[Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15] 2017
► pp. 437462


Adams, M. J.
(1990) Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Al Otaiba, S., & Fuchs, D.
(2006) Who are the young children for whom best practices in reading are ineffective? An experimental and longitudinal study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 414–431. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anglin, J. M.
(1993) Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. (Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Apel, K., Brimo, D., Diehm, E., & Apel, L.
(2013) Morphological awareness intervention with kindergartners and first- and second-grade students from low socioeconomic status homes: A feasibility study. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 44, 161–173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Apel, K. & Diehm, E.
(2014) Morphological awareness intervention with Kindergarteners and first and second grade students from low SES homes: A small efficacy study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 65–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bahr, R. H., Silliman, E. R., Berninger, V. W., & Dow, M.
(2013) Linguistic pattern analysis of misspellings of typically developing writers in grades 1–9. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, 1587–1599. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baumann, J. F., Edwards, E. C., Boland, E., Olejnik, S., & Kame’enui, E. J.
(2003) Vocabulary tricks: Effects of instruction in morphology and context on fifth-grade students’ ability to derive and infer word meaning. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 447–494. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baumann, J. F., Edwards, E. C., Font, G., Tereshinski, C. A., Kame’enui, E. J., & Olejnik, S.
(2002) Teaching morphemic and contextual analysis to fifth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 37, 150–176. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bender, W. N., & Waller, L.
(2011) The teaching revolution: RTI, technology, & differentiation transform teaching for the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.Google Scholar
Berko, J.
(1958) The child’s learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 150–177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berninger, V., Nagy, W., Carlisle, J., Thomson, J., Hoffer, D., Abbott, S., Abbott, R., Richards, T., & Aylward, E.
(2003) Effective treatment for dyslexics in grades 4 to 6. In B. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 382–417). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Berninger, V., & Richards, T.
(2002) Brain literacy for educators and psychologists. San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
Berninger, V., Winn, W., Stock, P., Abbott, R., Eschen, K., Lin, S-J.,… Nagy, W.
(2008) Tier 3 specialized writing instruction for students with dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 95–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blachman, B. A.
(1994) What we have learned from longitudinal studies of phonological processing and reading, and some unanswered questions: A response to Torgesen, Wagner, and Rashotte. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 287–291. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bowers, P. N. & Cooke, G.
(2012) Morphology and the Common Core: Building students’ understanding of the written word. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, Fall, 31–35.Google Scholar
Bowers, P. N. & Kirby, J. R.
(2010) Effects of morphological instruction on vocabulary acquisition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23, 515–537. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bowers, P. N., Kirby, J. R., & Deacon, S. H.
(2010) The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 80, 144–179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E.
(1983) Categorising sounds and learning to read – a causal connection. Nature, 301, 419–521. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carlisle, J. F.
(2010) Effects of instruction in morphological awareness on literacy achievement: An integrative review. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 464–487. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carlisle, J. F., & Stone, C. A.
(2005) Exploring the role of morphemes in word reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 428–449. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, C.
(1970) Reading, writing, and phonology. Harvard Educational Review, 40, 287–309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N., & Halle, M.
(1968) The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Deacon, S. H., & Kirby, J. R.
(2004) Morphological awareness: Just “more phonological”? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 223–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deacon, S. H., Parrila, R., & Kirby, J. R.
(2008) A review of the evidence on morphological processing in dyslexics and poor readers: A strength or weakness? In G. Reid, A. Fawcett, F. Manis, & L. Siegel (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Dyslexia (pp. 212–237). UK: Sage Publications. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Devonshire, V., Morris, P., & Fluck
(2013) Spelling and reading development: The effect of teaching children multiple levels of representation in their orthography. Learning and Instruction, 25, 85–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ehri, L. C.
(1995) Phases of development in learning to read words by sight. Journal of Research in Reading, 18, 116–125. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ehri, L. C., & McCormick, S.
(1998) Phases of word learning: Implications for instruction with delayed and disabled readers. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 14, 135–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Elbro, C., & Arnbak, E.
(1996) The role of morpheme recognition and morphological awareness in dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, 209–240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, L. B.
(2000) Are morphological effects distinguishable from the effects of shared meaning and shared form? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1431–1444.Google Scholar
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S.
(2006) Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly 41, 93–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P. L., & Young, C. L.
(2003) Responsiveness-to-Intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 157–171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gonnerman, L. M., Seidenberg, M. S., & Andersen, E. S.
(2007) Graded semantic and phonological similarity effects in priming: Evidence for a distributed connectionist approach to morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 323–345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, A. P., & Ahn, S.
(2010) A meta-analysis of morphological interventions: Effects on literacy achievement of children with literacy difficulties. Annals of Dyslexia, 60, 183–208. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) A meta-analysis of morphological interventions in English: Effects on literacy outcomes for school-aged children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17, 257–285. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, A. P., Gilbert, J. K., & Cho, S.-J., Kearns, D. M.
(2014) Probing lexical representations: Simultaneous modeling of word and reader contributions to multidimensional lexical representations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 448–468. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hall, S.
(2008) Implementing response to intervention: A principal’s guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
Henry, M. K.
(2003/2010) Unlocking literacy: Effective decoding & spelling instruction. Baltimore, Maryland: Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
Hulme, C., Bowyer-Crane, C., Carroll, J. M., Duff, F. J. & Snowling, M. J.
(2012) The causal role of phoneme awareness and letter-sound knowledge in learning to read: Combining intervention studies with mediation analyses. Psychological Science, 23. 572–577. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, J. R., Deacon, S. H., Bowers, P. N., Izenberg, L., Wade-Woolley, L., Parrila, R.
(2012) Children’s morphological awareness and reading ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 389–410. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, M. & Kirby, J. R.
(2015) The effects of vocabulary breadth and depth on English reading. Applied Linguistics, 36, 611–634. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Fischer, F. W., & Carter, B.
(1974) Reading and the awareness of linguistic segments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 201–212. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyster, S. H.
(1998) Preventing reading failure: A follow-up study. Dyslexia, 4, 132–144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) The effects of morphological versus phonological awareness training in kindergarten on reading development. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 261–294. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyster, S. H., Lervåg, A. & Hulme, C.
(2014) Pre-school morphological training produces long-lasting improvements in reading comprehension. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, Santa Fe, NM.
McBride-Chang, C., Wagner, R. K., Muse, A., Chow, B. W.-Y., & Shu, H.
(2005) The role of morphological awareness in children’s vocabulary acquisition in English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 415–435. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCutchen, D., Stull, S., Herrera, B. L., Lotas, S., & Evans, S.
(2013) Putting words to work: Effects of morphological instruction on Children’s writing. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 86–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, W. E., Anderson, R. C., Schommer, M., Scott, J., & Stallman, A.
(1989) Morphological families in the internal lexicon. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 262–282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, W. E., Carlisle, J. F., & Goodwin, A. P.
(2013) Morphological knowledge and literacy acquisition. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 3–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
National Reading Panel
(2000) Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Bethesda MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.Google Scholar
Nunes, T., & Bryant, P.
(2006) Improving literacy by teaching morphemes. London: Routlege.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A.
(2007) Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C.
(2011) Phonology is critical in reading: But a phonological deficit is not the only source of low reading skill. In Brady, S. A., Braze, D. & Fowler, C. A. (Eds.), Explaining individual differences in reading: Theory and evidence (pp. 153–171). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H.
(2008) Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 942–971. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K.
(2000) Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 507–537. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D. & Seidenberg, M. S.
(2001) How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2, 31–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reed, D. K.
(2008) A synthesis of morphology interventions and effects on reading outcomes for students in Grades K-12. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23, 36–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Richards, T. L., Aylward, E. H., Field, K. M., Grimme, A. C., Raskind, W., Richards, A. L., Nagy, W., Eckert, M., Leonard, C., Abbott, R. D, & Berninger, V. W.
(2006) Converging evidence for triple word form theory in children with dyslexia. Developmental Neuropsychology, 30, 547–589. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salomon, G. & Perkins, D. N.
(1989) Rocky roads to transfer: Rethinking mechanism of a neglected phenomenon. Educational Psychologist, 24, 113–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schnotz, W., & Kürschner, C.
(2007) A reconsideration of cognitive load theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 496–508. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S.
(2005) Connectionist models of word reading. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 238–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Share, D. L.
(1995) Phonological recoding and self-teaching: sine-qua-non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) On the role of phonology in reading acquisition: The self-teaching hypothesis. In S. A. Brady, D. Braze, C. A. Fowler (Eds.), Explaining individual differences in reading (pp. 45–68). NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Spear-Swerling, L. & Cheesman, E.
(2012) Teachers’ knowledge base for implementing response-to-intervention models in reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 1691–1723. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sweller, J., Kalyuga, S., & Ayres, P.
(2011) Cognitive load theory. New York: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taft, M., & Kougious, P.
(2004) The processing of morpheme-like units in monomorphemic words. Brain and Language, 90, 9–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomesen, M., & Aarnoutse, C.
(1998) Effects of an instructional programme for deriving word meanings. Educational Studies, 24, 107–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Torgesen, J. K.
(2000) Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 55–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Treiman, R.
(1993) Beginning to spell: A study of first-grade children. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Treiman, R., & Cassar, M.
(1996) Effects of morphology on children’s spelling of final consonant clusters. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 141–170. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Treiman, R., & Kessler, B.
(2005) Writing systems and spelling development. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp.120–134). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Venezky, R.
(1967) English orthography: Its graphical structure and its relation to sound. Reading Research Quarterly, 2, 75–105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) The American way of spelling. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L., & Perfetti, C. A.
(2011) Morphological processing in reading acquisition: A cross-linguistic perspective. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 457–466. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolter, J. A. & Dilworth, V.
(2014) The effects of a multilinguistic morphological awareness approach for improving language and literacy. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 76–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolter, J. A. & Green, L.
(2013) Morphological awareness intervention in school-age children with language and literacy deficits: A case study. Topics in Language Disorders, 33, 27–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 28 other publications

Bar-Kochva, Irit, Sebastian Peter Korinth & Marcus Hasselhorn
2020. Effects of a morpheme-based training procedure on the literacy skills of readers with a reading disability. Applied Psycholinguistics 41:5  pp. 1061 ff. Crossref logo
Bowers, Jeffrey S & Peter N Bowers
2018. The importance of correctly characterising the English spelling system when devising and evaluating methods of reading instruction: Comment on Taylor, Davis, and Rastle (2017). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 71:7  pp. 1497 ff. Crossref logo
Bowers, Jeffrey S. & Peter N. Bowers
2018. Progress in Reading Instruction Requires a Better Understanding of the English Spelling System. Current Directions in Psychological Science 27:6  pp. 407 ff. Crossref logo
Castles, Anne, Kathleen Rastle & Kate Nation
2018. Ending the Reading Wars: Reading Acquisition From Novice to Expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 19:1  pp. 5 ff. Crossref logo
Chan, Jessica S., Lesly Wade-Woolley, Lindsay Heggie & John R. Kirby
2020. Understanding prosody and morphology in school-age children’s reading. Reading and Writing 33:5  pp. 1295 ff. Crossref logo
Colenbrander, Danielle, Liam Parsons, Jeffrey S. Bowers & Colin J. Davis
2021. Assessing the Effectiveness of Structured Word Inquiry for Students in Grades 3 and 5 With Reading and Spelling Difficulties: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Reading Research Quarterly Crossref logo
Georgiou, George K., Robert Savage, Kristy Dunn, Peter Bowers & Rauno Parrila
2021. Examining the effects of Structured Word Inquiry on the reading and spelling skills of persistently poor Grade 3 readers. Journal of Research in Reading 44:1  pp. 131 ff. Crossref logo
Goodwin, Amanda, Yaacov Petscher & Jamie Tock
2021. Multidimensional morphological assessment for middle school students. Journal of Research in Reading 44:1  pp. 70 ff. Crossref logo
Ke, Sihui (Echo), Ryan T. Miller, Dongbo Zhang & Keiko Koda
2021. Crosslinguistic Sharing of Morphological Awareness in Biliteracy Development: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Correlation Coefficients. Language Learning 71:1  pp. 8 ff. Crossref logo
Kotzer, Maddie, John R. Kirby & Lindsay Heggie
2021. Morphological Awareness Predicts Reading Comprehension in Adults. Reading Psychology  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Levesque, Kyle C., Helen L. Breadmore & S. Hélène Deacon
2021. How morphology impacts reading and spelling: advancing the role of morphology in models of literacy development. Journal of Research in Reading 44:1  pp. 10 ff. Crossref logo
Li, Miao, John R. Kirby, Esther Geva, Poh Wee Koh & Huan Zhang
2021. Profiles of Poor Decoders, Poor Comprehenders, and Typically Developing Readers in Adolescents Learning English as a Second Language. Journal of Learning Disabilities  pp. 002221942110232 ff. Crossref logo
Manolitsis, George, Ioannis Grigorakis & George K. Georgiou
2017. The Longitudinal Contribution of Early Morphological Awareness Skills to Reading Fluency and Comprehension in Greek. Frontiers in Psychology 8 Crossref logo
Marks, Rebecca A., Rachel L. Eggleston, Xin Sun, Chi-Lin Yu, Kehui Zhang, Nia Nickerson, Xiao-Su Hu & Ioulia Kovelman
2021. The neurocognitive basis of morphological processing in typical and impaired readers. Annals of Dyslexia Crossref logo
Meaux, Ashley Bourque, Julie A. Wolter & Ginger G. Collins
2020. Forum: Morphological Awareness as a Key Factor in Language-Literacy Success for Academic Achievement. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 51:3  pp. 509 ff. Crossref logo
Metsala, Jamie L., Erin Sparks, Margaret David, Nicole Conrad & S. Hélène Deacon
2021. What is the best way to characterise the contributions of oral language to reading comprehension: listening comprehension or individual oral language skills?. Journal of Research in Reading 44:3  pp. 675 ff. Crossref logo
Murphy, Kimberly A. & Emily A. Diehm
2020. Collecting Words: A Clinical Example of a Morphology-Focused Orthographic Intervention. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 51:3  pp. 544 ff. Crossref logo
Park, Yujeong, Mary T. Brownell, Deborah K. Reed, Sana Tibi & Linda J. Lombardino
2020. Exploring How Initial Response to Instruction Predicts Morphology Outcomes Among Students With Decoding Difficulties. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 51:3  pp. 655 ff. Crossref logo
Share, David L.
2021. Is the Science of Reading Just the Science of Reading English?. Reading Research Quarterly 56:S1 Crossref logo
Tibi, Sana, Ashley A. Edwards, Christopher Schatschneider & John R. Kirby
2020. Predicting Arabic word reading: A cross-classified generalized random-effects analysis showing the critical role of morphology. Annals of Dyslexia 70:2  pp. 200 ff. Crossref logo
Tibi, Sana & John R. Kirby
2018. Investigating Phonological Awareness and Naming Speed as Predictors of Reading in Arabic. Scientific Studies of Reading 22:1  pp. 70 ff. Crossref logo
Tibi, Sana & John R. Kirby
2019. Reading in Arabic: How Well Does the Standard Model Apply?. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 62:4  pp. 993 ff. Crossref logo
2019. The development of a measure of root awareness to account for reading performance in the Arabic language: A development and validation study. Applied Psycholinguistics 40:2  pp. 303 ff. Crossref logo
Tighe, Elizabeth L. & Mary A. Fernandes
2019. Unraveling the complexity of the relations of metalinguistic skills to word reading with struggling adult readers: Shared, independent, and interactive effects. Applied Psycholinguistics 40:03  pp. 765 ff. Crossref logo
Vaknin‐Nusbaum, Vered
2021. Morphological Awareness: A Tool to Promote Reading Fluency and Accuracy in Hebrew in Students with Reading Disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 36:1  pp. 26 ff. Crossref logo
Wang, Lei & Duo Liu
2020. The Role of Morphological Awareness in Reading Chinese Characters: The Moderating Effect of Morpheme Family Size. Scientific Studies of Reading 24:2  pp. 170 ff. Crossref logo
Zhang, Dongbo & Sihui Ke
2020. The Simple View of Reading Made Complex by Morphological Decoding Fluency in Bilingual Fourth‐Grade Readers of English. Reading Research Quarterly 55:2  pp. 311 ff. Crossref logo
Zhang, Haomin & Jiexin Lin
2021. Morphological knowledge in second language reading comprehension: examining mediation through vocabulary knowledge and lexical inference. Educational Psychology 41:5  pp. 563 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.