In recent decades, the study of inferences and, in particular, causal inferences, has acquired great importance. Inferences are now considered to be the key to our understanding and interpretation of reality and one of the bases of human cognition. Causal inferences, such as backward and forward inferences, are crucial components in discourse comprehension and reading comprehension processes because they are required in order to establish a coherent representation that provides a basis to predict and explain behaviors. In this chapter, we focus on several aspects related to causal inferences such as its universal character in cognitive processing and reading comprehension and its underlying neural correlates. Finally, we focus on the influence of different text genre on causal inferences generation.
Article outline
1.Introduction
2.Causality and causal inferences
3.Types of causal inferences
4.A frame of underlying processes to analyze causal inferences
4.1Are causal inferences universal in human cognition? How language may affect comprehension processes and cognition
4.2Are causal inferences generated in multiple contexts?
a.Clinical contexts
b.Emotional contexts
c.Social contexts
4.3Conceptually driven (top-down) and data-driven (bottom-up) processes. When do conceptually driven inferences develop?
4.4When do we develop the ability to make causal inferences?
4.5Neural basis of causal inferences
4.6The influence of text characteristics on causal relations and causal inferences
(1986) Referential and causal coherence in the story comprehension of children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 336–366.
Ackerman, B. P.
(1988) Reason inferences in the story comprehension of children and adults. Child Development, 59, 1426–1442.
Adam, J. M., & Revaz, F.
(1996) L’analyse des récits. Seuil, col. Memo, no. 22, París.
Adelson, B.
(1984) When novices surpass experts: The difficulty of a task may increase with expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 10, 483–495.
Albrecht, J. E., & O’Brien, E. J.
(1993) Updating a mental model: Maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, memory, and cognition, 19, 5, 1061–1070.
Angosto, A., Sánchez, P., Álvarez, M., Cuevas, I. & León, J. A.
(2013) Evidence for Top-Down Processing in Reading Comprehension of Children. Psicología Educativa, 19, 83–88.
Applebee, A. N.
(1978) The child’s concept of a story: Ages two to seventeen. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Aske, J.
1989: Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1–14.
Bakhtin, M. M.
(1981) The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakthin (M. Holquist, Ed.; C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin: Texas University.
Barnes, M. A., Dennis, M. & Haefele-Kalvaitis, J.
(1996) The effects of knowledge availability and knowledge accessibility on coherence and elaborative inferencing in children from six to fifteen years of age. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 61, 216–241.
Bates, E., Devescovi, A., & Wulfeck, B.
(2001) Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 369–396.
Beeman, M.
(1993) Semantic processing in the right hemisphere may contribute to drawing inferences from discourse. Brain and Language, 44, 80–120.
Beeman, M. J., Bowden, E. M., & Gernsbacher, M. A.
(2000) Right and left hemisphere cooperation for drawing predictive and coherence inferences during normal story comprehension. Brain and Language, 71, 310–336.
Black, J. B., & Bower, G. H.
(1980) Story understanding as problem solving. Poetics, 9, 223–250.
Boroditsky, L., Schmidt, L. A., & Phillips, W.
(2003) Sex, syntax and semantics. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 61–78). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Botting, N., & Adams, C.
(2005) Semantic and inferencing abilities in children with communication disorders. Int J Lang Commun Disord, 40(1), 49–66.
Bourg, T., Bauer, P. & van den Broek, P.
(1997) Building the bridges: The development of event comprehension and representation. In P. van den Broek, P. Bauer & T. Bourg (Eds.), Developmental spans in event comprehension and representation: Bridging fictional and actual events (pp. 385–407). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bowerman, M.
(1996) The origins of children’s spatial semantic categories: cognitive versus linguistic determinants. In J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 145–176). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Bowyer-Crane, C., & Snowling, M.
(2005) Assessing children’s inference generation: What do tests of reading comprehension measure?British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 2, 189–201.
Brewer, W. R.
(1980) Literary theory, rhetoric, and stylistics: Implications for psychology. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 221–239). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Brewer, W. F., & Lichtenstein, E. H.
(1982) Stories are to entertain: A structural-affect theory of stories. Journal of Pragmatics, 6, 473–486.
Bruner, J. S.
(1986) Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. V.
(1999) Inference ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing, 11, 489–503.
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., Barnes, M. A., & Bryant, P. E.
(2001) Comprehension skill, inference-making ability, and their relation to knowledge. Memory & Cognition., 29, 6, 850–859.
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P.
(2000) Phonological skills and comprehension failure: A test of the phonological processing deficit hypothesis. Reading and Writing, 13, 31–56.
Cain, K., Oakhill, J. V., & Elbro, C.
(2003) The ability to learn new word meanings from context by school-age children with and without language comprehension difficulties. Journal of Child Language, 30, 681–694.
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Lemmon, K.
(2004) Individual differences in the inference of word meanings from context: The influence of reading comprehension, vocabulary knowledge, and memory capacity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 671–681.
Casteel, M. A.
(1993) Effects of inference necessity and reading goal on children’s inferential generation. Developmental Psychology, 29, 346–357.
Cheng, P. W.
(1993) Separating causal laws from causal facts: Pressing the limits of statistical relevance. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 30, pp. 215–264). San Diego: Academic Press.
Cheng, P. W., & Holyoak, K. J.
(1995) Complex adaptive systems as intuitive statiscians: Causality, contingency, and prediction. In H. L. Roitbalt & J. A. Meyer (Eds.), Comparative approaches to cognitive science (pp. 271–302). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, H., & Rees, E.
(1982) Expertise in Problem Solving. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the Psychology Human Intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 7–75). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M., & LaVancher, C.
Chiarello, C., Burgess, C., Richards, L., & Pollock, A.
(1990) Semantic and associative priming in the cerebral hemispheres: Some words do, some words don’t, …. sometimes, some places. Brain and Language, 38, 75–104
Clark, E. V.
(2004) How language acquisition builds on cognitive development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 472–478.
Cook, A. E., & O’Brien, E. J.
(2014) Knowledge activation, integration, and validation during narrative text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 51, 26–49.
Cook, A. E., & O’Brien, E. J.
(2015) Passive activation and instantiation of inferences during reading. In E. J. O’Brien, A. E. Cook, & R. F. Lorch (Eds.). Inferences during reading (pp. 19–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coté, N.; Goldman, S. R., & Saul, E. U.
(1998) Students making sense of informational text: Relations between processing and representation. Discourse Processes, 25,1–53.
Eddy, D. M.
(1982) Probabilistic reasoning in clinical medicine: Problems and opportunities. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgments under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 249–267). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2007) Procesos inferenciales en la comprensión del discurso escrito. Influencia de la estructura del texto en los procesos de comprensión. Revista Signos, 40, 311–336.
Escudero, I., León, J. A., & Morera, Y.
(2013) Are discourse comprehension and cognitive processes influenced by the type of language (English and Spanish)? A cross-language study based on elaborative inferences generation. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 31, 1, 223–237.
Ferstl, E. C. & von Cramon, D. Y.
(2001) The role of coherence and cohesion in text comprehension: An event-related fMRI study. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 11, 325–340.
Ferstl, E. C. & von Cramon, D. Y.
(2002) What does the fronto-medial cortex contribute to language processing: Coherence or theory of mind?Neuroimage, 17, 1599–1612.
Fincher-Kiefer, R.
(1996) Encoding differences between bridging and predictive inferences. Discourse Processes, 22, 225–246.
Fletcher, C. R., & Bloom, C. P.
(1988) Causal reasoning in the comprehension of simple narrative texts. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 235–244.
Fletcher, P. C., Happé, F., Frith, U., Baker, S. C., Dolan, R. J., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Frith, C. D.
(1995) Other minds in the brain: A functional imaging study of ‘theory of mind’ in story comprehension. Cognition, 57, 109–128.
Garton, A. F. & Pratt, C.
(2004) Reading Stories. In T. Nunes & P. Bryant (Eds.), Handbook of Children’s Literacy (pp. 213–228). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Gentner, D., & Goldin-Meadow, S.
(2003) Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gernsbacher, M. A.
(1990) Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Goldman, S. R. & Bisanz, G. L.
(2002) Toward a functional analysis of scientific genres: Implications for understanding and learning processes. In J. Otero, J. A. León & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 19–50). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Graesser, A. C.
(1981) Prose comprehension beyond the world. NY: Springer-Verlag.
Graesser, A. C., & Bower, G. H.
(Eds.) (1990) Inferences and text comprehension. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
Graesser, A. C., & Bertus, E. L.
(1998) The construction of causal inferences while reading expository text on Science and technology. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 247–269.
Graesser, A. C., & Clark, L. F.
(1985) Structures and procedures of implicit knowledge. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Company.
Graesser, A. C., & Kreuz, R. J.
(1993) A theory of inference generation during text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 16, 145–160.
Graesser, A. C., Haberlandt, K., & Koizumi, D.
(1987) How is reading time influenced by knowledge based inferences and world knowledge. In B. K. Britton & S. M. Glynn (Eds.), Executive control process in reading (pp. 217–251). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Graesser, A. C., León, J. A. & Otero, J. C.
(2002) Introduction to the psychology of science text comprehension. In J. C. Otero, J. A. León & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 1–15). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M., & Cai, Z.
(2004) Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36 (2), 193–202.
Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T.
(1994) Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 10, 371–395.
Graesser, A. C., Swamer, S. S., Baggett, W. B. & Sell, M. A.
(1996) New models of deep comprehension. In B. K. Britton & A. C. Graesser, (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 1–32). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Green, B. A.
(1995) Comprehension of expository text from an unfamiliar domain: effects of instruction that provides either domain-specific of strategy knowledge. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2, 313–319.
Gumperz, J., & Levinson, S.
(1996) Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(1994) Methods in reading research. En M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 1–31). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Harris, J. L., Rogers, W. A. & Qualls, C. D.
(1998) Written language comprehension in younger and older adults. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 41, 603–617.
Heider, E. R.
(1972) Universals in color naming and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93, 10–20.
Holyoak, K. J., Koh, K., & Nisbett, R. E.
(1989) A theory of conditioning: Inductive learning within rule-based default hierarchies. Psychological Review, 96, 315–340.
INCE
(1997) Tercer Estudio Internacional de Matemáticas y Ciencias (TIMSS). Madrid: MEC.
INCE
(2003) Conocimiento y destrezas de los alumnos de 15 años. Resultados en España del estudio PISA 2000. Madrid: MEC.
Inman, T. & Dickerson, D.
(1995) Children’s Inferences of Causal Events During Story Understanding. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 156, 265–277.
Jung-Beeman, M.
(2005) Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 512–518.
Kant, I.
(1781) Critique of pure reason. Londres, UK: Macmillan.
Keefe, D. E., & McDaniel, M. A.
(1993) The time course and durability of predictive inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 446–463.
Kendeou, P., Bohn-Gettler, C., White, M., & van den Broek, P.
(2008) Children’s inference generation across different media. Journal of Research in Reading, 31, 259–272.
Kendeou, P., van den Broek, P., White, M. & Lynch, J.
(2007) Preschool and early elementary comprehension: Skill development and strategy interventions. In D. S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 27–45). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Khoo, C., Chan, S., & Niu, Y.
(2002) The many facets of the cause-effect relation. In R. Green, C. A. Bean & S. H. Myaeng (Eds.), The semantics of relationships: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 51–70). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Kintsch, W.
(1988) The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182.
Kintsch, W.
(1998) Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A.
(1978) Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.
Komeda H., Kusumi T.
(2006) The effect of a protagonist’s emotional shift on situation model construction. Memory & Cognition. 34, 1548–1556.
Kucan, L. y Beck, I. L.
(1996) Four fourth graders thinking aloud: An investigation of genre effects. Journal of Literacy Research, 28, 259–287.
Kushnir, T. & Gopnik, A.
(2007) Conditional probability versus spatial contiguity in causal learning: Preschoolers use new contingency evidence to overcome prior spatial assumptions. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1, 186–196.
Langston, M. & Trabasso, T.
(1999) Modeling causal integration and availability of information during comprehension of narrative texts. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 29–69). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lassonde, K. A., & O’Brien, E. J.
(2009) Contextual specificity in the activation of predictive inferences. Discourse Processes, 46(5), 426–438.
León, J. A.
(1996) Prensa y Educación. Un enfoque cognitivo. Buenos Aires: Aique.
León, J. A.
(2003) Conocimiento y Discurso. Claves para inferir y comprender. Madrid: Pirámide.
León, J. A.
(2004) Adquisición de conocimiento y comprensión: Origen, evolución y método. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.
León, J. A.
(2009) Neuroimagen de los procesos de comprensión en la lectura y el lenguaje. Psicología Educativa, 15, 1, 61–71.
León, J. A., Dávalos, T., Escudero, I., Olmos, R., Morera, Y. & Froufe, M.
(2015) Effects of valence and causal direction in the emotion inferences processing during reading: Evidence from a lexical decision task. Anales de Psicología, 31, 2, 677–686.
León, J. A., & Escudero, I.
(2003) Protocolos verbales en el estudio de las inferencias: Una metodología emergente. In J. A. León (Coord.), Conocimiento y discurso. Claves para inferir y comprender (pp. 100–119). Madrid: Pirámide.
León, J. A. & Escudero, I.
(2015) Understanding Causality in Science Discourse for Middle and High School Students. Summary Task as a Strategy for Improving Comprehension. In K. L. Santi & D. K. Reed (Eds.), Improving Reading Comprehension of Middle and High School Students. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
León, J. A., Escudero, I. & Hytönen, K.
under review). The influence of genre on the activation of causal inferences: A cross-language study based on thinking-aloud task between Finnish and Spanish languages. Learning & Instruction.
León, J. A., Escudero, I., Mason, R., Prat, Ch., & Just, M.
(2008) Cortical networks activation for causal inferences: An fMRI investigation. Revista Española de Neuropsicología 10, 1, 72.
León, J. A., Escudero, I. & Olmos, R.
(2012) Evaluación de la comprensión lectora. ECOMPLEC. Madrid: TEA Ediciones, S.A.
León, J. A., Escudero, I., & van den Broek, P.
(2000) Genre of the text and the activation of elaborative inferences: A cross-cultural study based on a thinking aloud task. Poster presented at the 10th annual meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse, Lyon (France).
León, J. A., Escudero, I., & van den Broek, P.
(2003) La influencia del género del texto en el establecimiento de inferencias elaborativas. In León, J. A. (Ed.), Conocimiento y discurso. Claves para inferir y comprender (pp. 153–170). Madrid: Pirámide.
León, J. A. & Peñalba, G.
(2002) Understanding causality and temporal sequence in scientific discourse. In J. C. Otero, J. A. León, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), The Psychology of the scientific text (pp. 155–178) Mahwah, Nueva Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
León, J. A. & Pérez, O.
(2001) The influence of prior knowledge on the time course of clinical diagnosis inferences: A comparison of experts and novices. Discourse Processes, 31, 2, 187–213.
León, J. A. & Slisko, J.
(2000) La dificultad comprensiva de los textos de ciencias. Nuevas alternativas para un viejo problema educativo. Psicología Educativa, 6, 7–26.
León, J. A., Solari, M., Olmos, R. & Escudero, I.
(2011) Inference’s generation in a social context. An analysis of reading comprehension through verbal protocols and a summary oral task. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 29, 1, 13–42.
Levelt, W. J. M.
(1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levinson, S.
(1996) Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question: crosslinguistic evidence. In P. Bloom & M. Peterson (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 109–169). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Li, P. & Gleitman, L.
(2002) Turning the tables: Language and spatial reasoning. Cognition, 83, 265–294.
Liu, J. H., Karasawa, K., & Weiner, R.
(1992) Inferences about the causes of positive and negative emotions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 603–615.
Long, D. L., Golding, J., Graesser, A. C., & Clark, L. F.
(1990) Goal, event, and state inferences: An investigation of inference generation during story comprehension. In A. C. Graesser, & G. H. Bower (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 25 (pp. 89–102). New York: Academic Press.
Long, D. L., Oppy, B. J., & Seely, M. R.
(1997) A “global-coherence” view of event comprehension: Inferential processing as question answering. In P. W. van den Broek, P. J. Bauer, & T. Bourg (Eds.), Developmental spans in event comprehension and representation. Bridging fictional and actual events (pp. 361–384). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lorch, R. F.
(2015) What about expository text? In O’Brien, E. J., Cook, A. E., & Lorch, R. F. (Eds.), Inferences During Reading (pp.348–361). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lorch, R. F.
in press). What is so difficult about expository text? In J. A. León & I. Escudero Eds. Current Trends in Reading Research pp. xx To be completed
Lucy, J.
(1992) Grammatical categories and cognition: A case study of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Mackie, J. L.
(1980) The cement of the universe. A study of causation. Oxford: Clarendon.
Magliano, J. P., Baggett, W. B., Johnson, B. K., & Graesser, A. C.
(1993) The time course of generating causal antecedent and causal consequence inferences. Discourse Processes, 16, 35–53.
Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C.
(1991) A three-pronged method for studying inference generation in literary text. Poetics, 20, 193–232.
Malt, B. C., Sloman, S. A., Gennari, S., Shi, M., & Wang, Y.
(1999) Knowing versus naming: Similarity and the linguistic categorization of artifacts. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 230–262.
Martins, I.
(2002) Visual Imagery in School Science Texts. In J. C. Otero, J. A. León & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 73–90). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R.
(1992) Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99, 440–466.
McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J. P.
(2009) Towards a comprehensive model of comprehension. In B. Ross (Ed), The psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 51, (pp. 297–284). New York, NY, US: Elsevier Science.
Miall, D.
(1989) Beyond the schema given: Afective comprehension of literary narrative. Cognition and Emotion, 3, 55–78.
Millis, K. K. & Graesser, A. C.
(1994) The time-course of constructing knowledge-based inferences for scientific texts. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 583–599.
Munnich, E., Landau, B., & Anne Dosher, B.
(2001) Spatial language and spatial representation: a cross-linguistic comparison. Cognition, 81, 171–208.
Murray, J. D., Klin, C. M. & Myers, J. L.
(1993) Forward inferences in narrative text. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 464–473.
Myers, J. L. & O’Brien, E. J.
(1998) Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Process, 26, 131–157.
Nation, K. & Snowling, M. J.
(1998) Individual differences in contextual facilitation: Evidence from dyslexia and poor reading comprehension. Child Development, 69, 96–1011.
Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J.
(1999) Developmental differences in sensitivity to semantic relations among good and poor comprehenders: evidence from semantic priming. Cognition, 70, B1–B13.
Newton, D. P.
(1995) Support for understanding: Discourse which aids the construction of a functional mental model of causal situations. Research in Science and Technological Education, 13, 109–122.
Noordman, L. G. M.
(2005) Taal en Kennis. [Language and Cognition]. Valedictory lecture. Tilburg University.
Noordman, L. G. M., Vonk, W., Cozijn, R., & Frank, S. L.
(2015) Causal inferences and world knowledge. In E. J. O’Brien, A. E. Cook, & R. F. Lorch (Eds.). Inferences during reading (pp. 260–289). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Noordman, L. G. M., Vonk, W., & Kempff, H.
(1992) Causal inferences during the reading of expository texts. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 573–590.
(2007) Issues of Causality in Children’s Reading Comprehension. In D. S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading Comprehension Strategies: Theories, Interventions, and Technologies (pp. 47–71). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Oakhill, J. V., Cain, K. & Bryant, P. E.
(2003) The dissociation of word reading and text comprehension: Evidence from component skills. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(4), 443–468.
O’Brien, E. J., & Myers, J. L.
(1999) Text comprehension: A view from the bottom up. In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in Honor of TomTrabasso (pp. 35–53). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
OCDE
(2003) Learning for Tomorrow’s World: First Results from PISA 2003. París: OCDE.
OCDE
(2006) PISA 2006: Science Competencies for Tomorrow’s World. París: OCDE.
OCDE
(2009) PISA 2009 Assessment Framework – Key Competencies in Reading, Mathematics and Science. París: OCDE.
OCDE
(2013) PISA 2012. Informe Español Volumen I: Resultados y Contexto. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte.
Ohlsson, S.
(2002) Generating and understanding qualitative explanations. In J. C. Otero, J. A. León & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 91–128). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Olmos, R., León, J. A., Arnal. L. A. M., Moreno, J. D., Escudero, I., & Sánchez-Sánchez, F.
(2016) Psychometric properties of the reading comprehension test ECOMPLEC.Sec.Psicothema, 28, 1, 89–95.
Otero, J. C., León, J. A., & Graesser, A. C.
(Eds.) (2002) The psychology of science text comprehension. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Paris, S. G., Lindauer, B. K. & Cox, G.
(1977) The development of inferential comprehension. Child Development, 48, 1728–1733.
Paris, S. G., & Upton, L. R.
(1976) Children’s memory for inferential relationships in prose. Child Development, 47, 660–668.
Patel, V. L., & Groen, G. J.
(1986) Knowledge-based solution strategies in medical reasoning. Cognitive Science, 10, 91–116.
Pinker, S.
(1994) The language instinct: How the mind creates language. Nueva York: Morrow.
Potts, G. R.; Keenan, J. M., & Golding, J. M.
(1988) Assessing the occurrence of elaborative inferences: Lexical decision versus naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 399–415.
Prat, C. S., Mason, R. A., & Just, M. A.
(2011) Individual differences in the neural basis of Causal Inferencing. Brain and Language, 116, 1–13
Prat, C. S., Mason, R. A., León, J. A., Escudero, I., & Just, M. A.
(2015) Why Smoke Doesn’t Always Lead to Fire: Investigating the Neural Basis of Individual Differences in Predictive Inference Making. Paper presented at 25th Annual Meeting of The Society for Text and Discourse (p. 42). Minneapolis, MN, 6–8 July.
Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P.
(1995) Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Salmon, W. C.
(1998) Causality and explanation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Schmalhofer, F., & Glavanov, D.
(1986) Three Components of Understanding a Programmer’s Manual: Verbatim, Propositional, and Situational Representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 279–294.
Schmidt, C. R., & Paris, S. G.
(1983) Children’s use of successive clues to generate and monitor inferences. Child Development, 54, 742–759.
Schulz, L., Bonawitz, E. B., & Griffiths, T. L.
(2007) Can being scared give you a tummy ache? Naive theories, ambiguous evidence and preschoolers’ causal inferences. Developmental Psychology, 43(5), 1124–1139.
Sharkey, A. J. C., & Sharkey, N. E.
(1992) Weak contextual constraints in text and word priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 543–572.
Singer, M.
(1988) Inferences in reading. Reading Research: Advances in Theory and Practice, 6, 177–219.
Singer, M.
(1994) Discourse inference processes. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 479–515). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Singer, M., & Ferreira, F.
(1983) Inferring consequences in story comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 437–446.
Singer, M. & Gagnon, N.
(1999) Detecting causal inconsistencies in scientific text. In Goldman, S., Graesser, A. & van den Broek, P. (Eds.). Narrative Comprehension, Causality, and Coherence: Essays in Honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 179–194). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Singer, M., Graesser, A C, & Trabasso, T.
(1994) Minimal or global inference during: reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 421–41.
Singer, M., Halldorson, M., Lear J. C., & Andrusiak P.
(1992) Validation of causal bridging inferences in discourse understanding. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 507–524.
Singer, M., Harkness, D. y Stewart, S. T.
(1997) Constructing inferences in expository text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 24, 199–228.
Singer, M., y León, J. A.
(2007) Psychological studies of higher language processes: Behavioral and empirical approaches. In Franz Schmalhofer y Charles A. Perfetti (Eds.), Higher level language processes in the brain: Inference and Comprehension processes (pp. 19–35). Mahwah, Nueva Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Slobin, D. I.
(1996) Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. En M. Shibatani & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (pp. 195–217). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Slobin, D. I.
(1997) Mind, code, and text. En J. Bybee, J. Haiman, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Essays on language function and language type: Dedicated to T. Givón (pp. 437–467). Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Slobin, D. I., & Hoiting, N.
(1994) Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: Typological considerations. Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 487–505.
Sloman, S.
(2005) Causal models: How people think about the world and its alternatives. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Sobel, D. M., & Kirkham, N. Z.
(2007) Bayes nets and babies: infants’ developing statistical reasoning abilities and their representation of causal knowledge. Developmental Science, 10, 3, 298–306.
Trabasso, T., & Magliano, J. P.
(1996) Conscious understanding during text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 21, 255–287.
Trabasso, T., Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C.
(1999) Strategic processing during comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 615–629.
Trabasso, T., Secco, T., & Van den Broek, P. W.
(1984) Causal cohesion and story coherence. In H. Mendl, N. Stein, & T. Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and comprehension of texts (pp. 83–111). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Trabasso, T., & Sperry, L.
(1985) Causal relatedness and importance of story events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 595–611.
Trabasso, T., & Suh, S.
(1993) Understanding text: Achieving explanatory coherence through on-line inferences and mental operations in working memory. Discourse Processes, 16, 3–34.
Trabasso, T. & Van den Broek, P. W.
(1985) Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 612–630.
Trabasso, T., van den Broek, P. W., & Suh, S. Y.
(1989) Logical necessity and transitivity of causal relations in stories. Discourse Processes, 12, 1–25.
Tunmer, W. E., & Chapman, J. W.
(2004) The Use of Context in Learning to Read. In T. Nunes & P. Bryant (Eds.), Handbook of Children’s Literacy (pp. 199–212). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
van den Broek, P.
(1988) The effects of causal relations and hierarchical position on the importance of story statements. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 1–22.
van den Broek, P.
(1989) The effects of causal structure on the comprehension of narratives: Implications for education. Reading Psychology, 10, 19–44.
van den Broek, P.
(1990a) The causal inference maker: Towards a process model of inference generation in text comprehension. In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores d’Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 423–445). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
van den Broek, P.
(1990b) Causal inferences and the comprehension of narrative text. In A. C. Graesser & G. H. Bower (Eds.), Inferences and text comprehension (pp. 175–194). San Diego, CA: Academic.
van den Broek, P., Rapp, D. N., & Kendeou, P.
(2005) Integrating memory-based and constructionist approaches in accounts of reading comprehension. Discourse Processes, 39, 299–316.
van den Broek, P., Young, M., Tzeng, Y., & Linderholm, T.
(1999) The landscape model of reading: Inferences and the online construction of a memory representation. In S. Goldman & H. van Oostendorp (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 71–98). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W.
(1983) Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
(2006) Neural activity of inferences during story comprehension. Brain Research, 1084, 104–114.
Virtue, S., Parrish, T., & Jung-Beeman, M.
(2008) Inferences during story comprehension: Cortical recruitment affected by predictability of events and working-memory capacity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 2274–2284
Virtue, S., & van den Broek, P.
(2005) Hemispheric processing of anaphoric inferences: The activation of multiple antecedents. Brain and Language, 93, 327–337.
(1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Waldmann, M. R., & Holyoak, K. J.
(1992) Predictive and diagnostic learning within causal models: asymmetries in cue competition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 222–235.
Wertsch, J. V.
(1991) Voices in the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Whorf, B.
(1956) Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf, edited by Carroll, JB.
Woolley, G.
(2011) Reading comprehension. Assisting Children with learning difficulties. Netherlands: Springer.
Xu, J., Kemeny, S., Park, G., Frattali, C., & Braun, A.
(2005): Language in context: Emergent features of word, sentence, and narrative comprehension. NeuroImage, 25, 1002–1015.
Yuill, N. & Oakhill, J.
(1991) Children’s problems in text comprehension. Cambridge University Press.
Zwaan, R. A.
(1994) Effect of genre expectations on text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology – Learning Memory and Cognition, 20, 920–933.
Zwaan, R. A. & Brown, C. M.
(1996) The influence of language proficiency and comprehension skill on situation-model construction. Discourse Processes, 21, 289–328.
Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C.
(1995) The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: an event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6, 292–297.
Cited by
Cited by 4 other publications
Fonseca, Liliana, Graciela Migliardo, Marina Simian, Ricardo Olmos & José A. León
2019. Estrategias para Mejorar la Comprensión Lectora: Impacto de un Programa de Intervención en Español. Psicología Educativa 25:2 ► pp. 91 ff.
León, José A, José A. Martínez-Huertas & Olga Jastrzebska
2018. Un Estudio sobre la Competencia Lectora en Adultos con Discapacidad Intelectual y del Desarrollo ante Textos con Contenidos de Clínica y Salud. Clínica y Salud 29:3 ► pp. 115 ff.
Martín-Arnal, Lorena A., José A. León, Paul van den Broek & Ricardo Olmos
2019. Understanding Comics. A Comparison between Children and Adults through a Coherence/Incoherence Paradigm in an Eye-tracking Study. Psicología Educativa 25:2 ► pp. 127 ff.
Moncada, Fernando, Romualdo Ibáñez, Andrea Santana & Claudia Guerra
2023. Spanish adaptation of a cloze procedure to assess reading comprehension beyond the sentence level. Reading and Writing
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.