Chapter published in:
Reading Comprehension in Educational Settings
Edited by José A. León and Inmaculada Escudero
[Studies in Written Language and Literacy 16] 2017
► pp. 63–99

Causal inferences in reading comprehension

State of the art

| Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
| UNED
In recent decades, the study of inferences and, in particular, causal inferences, has acquired great importance. Inferences are now considered to be the key to our understanding and interpretation of reality and one of the bases of human cognition. Causal inferences, such as backward and forward inferences, are crucial components in discourse comprehension and reading comprehension processes because they are required in order to establish a coherent representation that provides a basis to predict and explain behaviors. In this chapter, we focus on several aspects related to causal inferences such as its universal character in cognitive processing and reading comprehension and its underlying neural correlates. Finally, we focus on the influence of different text genre on causal inferences generation.
Published online: 19 October 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.16.03leo
References

References

Ackerman, B. P.
(1986) Referential and causal coherence in the story comprehension of children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 336–366. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1988) Reason inferences in the story comprehension of children and adults. Child Development, 59, 1426–1442. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Adam, J. M., & Revaz, F.
(1996) L’analyse des récits. Seuil, col. Memo, no. 22, París.Google Scholar
Adelson, B.
(1984) When novices surpass experts: The difficulty of a task may increase with expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 10, 483–495.Google Scholar
Albrecht, J. E., & O’Brien, E. J.
(1993) Updating a mental model: Maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, memory, and cognition, 19, 5, 1061–1070.Google Scholar
Angosto, A., Sánchez, P., Álvarez, M., Cuevas, I. & León, J. A.
(2013) Evidence for Top-Down Processing in Reading Comprehension of Children. Psicología Educativa, 19, 83–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Applebee, A. N.
(1978) The child’s concept of a story: Ages two to seventeen. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Aske, J.
1989: Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M.
(1981) The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakthin (M. Holquist, Ed.; C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin: Texas University.Google Scholar
Barnes, M. A., Dennis, M. & Haefele-Kalvaitis, J.
(1996) The effects of knowledge availability and knowledge accessibility on coherence and elaborative inferencing in children from six to fifteen years of age. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 61, 216–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bates, E., Devescovi, A., & Wulfeck, B.
(2001) Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 369–396. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beeman, M.
(1993) Semantic processing in the right hemisphere may contribute to drawing inferences from discourse. Brain and Language, 44, 80–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beeman, M. J., Bowden, E. M., & Gernsbacher, M. A.
(2000) Right and left hemisphere cooperation for drawing predictive and coherence inferences during normal story comprehension. Brain and Language, 71, 310–336. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Black, J. B., & Bower, G. H.
(1980) Story understanding as problem solving. Poetics, 9, 223–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boroditsky, L., Schmidt, L. A., & Phillips, W.
(2003) Sex, syntax and semantics. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 61–78). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Botting, N., & Adams, C.
(2005) Semantic and inferencing abilities in children with communication disorders. Int J Lang Commun Disord, 40(1), 49–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bourg, T., Bauer, P. & van den Broek, P.
(1997) Building the bridges: The development of event comprehension and representation. In P. van den Broek, P. Bauer & T. Bourg (Eds.), Developmental spans in event comprehension and representation: Bridging fictional and actual events (pp. 385–407). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M.
(1996) The origins of children’s spatial semantic categories: cognitive versus linguistic determinants. In J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 145–176). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bowyer-Crane, C., & Snowling, M.
(2005) Assessing children’s inference generation: What do tests of reading comprehension measure? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 2, 189–201. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, W. R.
(1980) Literary theory, rhetoric, and stylistics: Implications for psychology. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 221–239). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Brewer, W. F., & Lichtenstein, E. H.
(1982) Stories are to entertain: A structural-affect theory of stories. Journal of Pragmatics, 6, 473–486. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. S.
(1986) Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. V.
(1999) Inference ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing, 11, 489–503. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., Barnes, M. A., & Bryant, P. E.
(2001) Comprehension skill, inference-making ability, and their relation to knowledge. Memory & Cognition., 29, 6, 850–859. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P.
(2000) Phonological skills and comprehension failure: A test of the phonological processing deficit hypothesis. Reading and Writing, 13, 31–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cain, K., Oakhill, J. V., & Elbro, C.
(2003) The ability to learn new word meanings from context by school-age children with and without language comprehension difficulties. Journal of Child Language, 30, 681–694. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Lemmon, K.
(2004) Individual differences in the inference of word meanings from context: The influence of reading comprehension, vocabulary knowledge, and memory capacity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 671–681. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Casteel, M. A.
(1993) Effects of inference necessity and reading goal on children’s inferential generation. Developmental Psychology, 29, 346–357. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, P. W.
(1993) Separating causal laws from causal facts: Pressing the limits of statistical relevance. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 30, pp. 215–264). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, P. W., & Holyoak, K. J.
(1995) Complex adaptive systems as intuitive statiscians: Causality, contingency, and prediction. In H. L. Roitbalt & J. A. Meyer (Eds.), Comparative approaches to cognitive science (pp. 271–302). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, H., & Rees, E.
(1982) Expertise in Problem Solving. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the Psychology Human Intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 7–75). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M., & LaVancher, C.
(1994) Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439–477Google Scholar
Chiarello, C., Burgess, C., Richards, L., & Pollock, A.
(1990) Semantic and associative priming in the cerebral hemispheres: Some words do, some words don’t, …. sometimes, some places. Brain and Language, 38, 75–104 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V.
(2004) How language acquisition builds on cognitive development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 472–478. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cook, A. E., & O’Brien, E. J.
(2014) Knowledge activation, integration, and validation during narrative text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 51, 26–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Passive activation and instantiation of inferences during reading. In E. J. O’Brien, A. E. Cook, & R. F. Lorch (Eds.). Inferences during reading (pp. 19–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coté, N.; Goldman, S. R., & Saul, E. U.
(1998) Students making sense of informational text: Relations between processing and representation. Discourse Processes, 25,1–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eddy, D. M.
(1982) Probabilistic reasoning in clinical medicine: Problems and opportunities. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgments under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 249–267). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Einhorn, H., & Hogarth, R. M.
(1986) Judging probable cause. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 3–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, I. & León, J. A.
(2007) Procesos inferenciales en la comprensión del discurso escrito. Influencia de la estructura del texto en los procesos de comprensión. Revista Signos, 40, 311–336. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, I., León, J. A., & Morera, Y.
(2013) Are discourse comprehension and cognitive processes influenced by the type of language (English and Spanish)? A cross-language study based on elaborative inferences generation. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 31, 1, 223–237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferstl, E. C. & von Cramon, D. Y.
(2001) The role of coherence and cohesion in text comprehension: An event-related fMRI study. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 11, 325–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) What does the fronto-medial cortex contribute to language processing: Coherence or theory of mind? Neuroimage, 17, 1599–1612. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fincher-Kiefer, R.
(1996) Encoding differences between bridging and predictive inferences. Discourse Processes, 22, 225–246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, C. R., & Bloom, C. P.
(1988) Causal reasoning in the comprehension of simple narrative texts. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 235–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, P. C., Happé, F., Frith, U., Baker, S. C., Dolan, R. J., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Frith, C. D.
(1995) Other minds in the brain: A functional imaging study of ‘theory of mind’ in story comprehension. Cognition, 57, 109–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garton, A. F. & Pratt, C.
(2004) Reading Stories. In T. Nunes & P. Bryant (Eds.), Handbook of Children’s Literacy (pp. 213–228). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D., & Goldin-Meadow, S.
(2003) Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, M. A.
(1990) Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, S. R. & Bisanz, G. L.
(2002) Toward a functional analysis of scientific genres: Implications for understanding and learning processes. In J. Otero, J. A. León & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 19–50). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Graesser, A. C.
(1981) Prose comprehension beyond the world. NY: Springer-Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Graesser, A. C., & Bower, G. H.
(Eds.) (1990) Inferences and text comprehension. San Diego, CA: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Graesser, A. C., & Bertus, E. L.
(1998) The construction of causal inferences while reading expository text on Science and technology. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 247–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Graesser, A. C., & Clark, L. F.
(1985) Structures and procedures of implicit knowledge. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Graesser, A. C., & Kreuz, R. J.
(1993) A theory of inference generation during text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 16, 145–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Graesser, A. C., Haberlandt, K., & Koizumi, D.
(1987) How is reading time influenced by knowledge based inferences and world knowledge. In B. K. Britton & S. M. Glynn (Eds.), Executive control process in reading (pp. 217–251). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Graesser, A. C., León, J. A. & Otero, J. C.
(2002) Introduction to the psychology of science text comprehension. In J. C. Otero, J. A. León & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 1–15). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M., & Cai, Z.
(2004) Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36 (2), 193–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T.
(1994) Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 10, 371–395. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Graesser, A. C., Swamer, S. S., Baggett, W. B. & Sell, M. A.
(1996) New models of deep comprehension. In B. K. Britton & A. C. Graesser, (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 1–32). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Green, B. A.
(1995) Comprehension of expository text from an unfamiliar domain: effects of instruction that provides either domain-specific of strategy knowledge. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2, 313–319. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J., & Levinson, S.
(1996) Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gweon, H., & Schulz, L. E.
(2011) 16-month-olds rationally infer causes of failed actions. Science, 332, 1524. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haberlandt, K. F.
(1994) Methods in reading research. En M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 1–31). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Harris, J. L., Rogers, W. A. & Qualls, C. D.
(1998) Written language comprehension in younger and older adults. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 41, 603–617. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heider, E. R.
(1972) Universals in color naming and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93, 10–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holyoak, K. J., Koh, K., & Nisbett, R. E.
(1989) A theory of conditioning: Inductive learning within rule-based default hierarchies. Psychological Review, 96, 315–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INCE
(1997) Tercer Estudio Internacional de Matemáticas y Ciencias (TIMSS). Madrid: MEC.Google Scholar
(2003) Conocimiento y destrezas de los alumnos de 15 años. Resultados en España del estudio PISA 2000. Madrid: MEC.Google Scholar
Inman, T. & Dickerson, D.
(1995) Children’s Inferences of Causal Events During Story Understanding. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 156, 265–277. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jung-Beeman, M.
(2005) Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 512–518. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I.
(1781) Critique of pure reason. Londres, UK: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Keefe, D. E., & McDaniel, M. A.
(1993) The time course and durability of predictive inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 446–463. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kendeou, P., Bohn-Gettler, C., White, M., & van den Broek, P.
(2008) Children’s inference generation across different media. Journal of Research in Reading, 31, 259–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kendeou, P., van den Broek, P., White, M. & Lynch, J.
(2007) Preschool and early elementary comprehension: Skill development and strategy interventions. In D. S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 27–45). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Khoo, C., Chan, S., & Niu, Y.
(2002) The many facets of the cause-effect relation. In R. Green, C. A. Bean & S. H. Myaeng (Eds.), The semantics of relationships: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 51–70). Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W.
(1988) The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998) Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A.
(1978) Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Komeda H., Kusumi T.
(2006) The effect of a protagonist’s emotional shift on situation model construction. Memory & Cognition. 34, 1548–1556. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kucan, L. y Beck, I. L.
(1996) Four fourth graders thinking aloud: An investigation of genre effects. Journal of Literacy Research, 28, 259–287. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kushnir, T. & Gopnik, A.
(2007) Conditional probability versus spatial contiguity in causal learning: Preschoolers use new contingency evidence to overcome prior spatial assumptions. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1, 186–196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langston, M. & Trabasso, T.
(1999) Modeling causal integration and availability of information during comprehension of narrative texts. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 29–69). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Lassonde, K. A., & O’Brien, E. J.
(2009) Contextual specificity in the activation of predictive inferences. Discourse Processes, 46(5), 426–438. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
León, J. A.
(1996) Prensa y Educación. Un enfoque cognitivo. Buenos Aires: Aique.Google Scholar
(2003) Conocimiento y Discurso. Claves para inferir y comprender. Madrid: Pirámide.Google Scholar
(2004) Adquisición de conocimiento y comprensión: Origen, evolución y método. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.Google Scholar
(2009) Neuroimagen de los procesos de comprensión en la lectura y el lenguaje. Psicología Educativa, 15, 1, 61–71.Google Scholar
León, J. A., Dávalos, T., Escudero, I., Olmos, R., Morera, Y. & Froufe, M.
(2015) Effects of valence and causal direction in the emotion inferences processing during reading: Evidence from a lexical decision task. Anales de Psicología, 31, 2, 677–686. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
León, J. A., & Escudero, I.
(2003) Protocolos verbales en el estudio de las inferencias: Una metodología emergente. In J. A. León (Coord.), Conocimiento y discurso. Claves para inferir y comprender (pp. 100–119). Madrid: Pirámide.Google Scholar
León, J. A. & Escudero, I.
(2015) Understanding Causality in Science Discourse for Middle and High School Students. Summary Task as a Strategy for Improving Comprehension. In K. L. Santi & D. K. Reed (Eds.), Improving Reading Comprehension of Middle and High School Students. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
León, J. A., Escudero, I. & Hytönen, K.
under review). The influence of genre on the activation of causal inferences: A cross-language study based on thinking-aloud task between Finnish and Spanish languages. Learning & Instruction.
León, J. A., Escudero, I., Mason, R., Prat, Ch., & Just, M.
(2008) Cortical networks activation for causal inferences: An fMRI investigation. Revista Española de Neuropsicología 10, 1, 72.Google Scholar
León, J. A., Escudero, I. & Olmos, R.
(2012) Evaluación de la comprensión lectora. ECOMPLEC. Madrid: TEA Ediciones, S.A.Google Scholar
León, J. A., Escudero, I., & van den Broek, P.
(2000) Genre of the text and the activation of elaborative inferences: A cross-cultural study based on a thinking aloud task. Poster presented at the 10th annual meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse, Lyon (France).
(2003) La influencia del género del texto en el establecimiento de inferencias elaborativas. In León, J. A. (Ed.), Conocimiento y discurso. Claves para inferir y comprender (pp. 153–170). Madrid: Pirámide.Google Scholar
León, J. A. & Peñalba, G.
(2002) Understanding causality and temporal sequence in scientific discourse. In J. C. Otero, J. A. León, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), The Psychology of the scientific text (pp. 155–178) Mahwah, Nueva Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
León, J. A. & Pérez, O.
(2001) The influence of prior knowledge on the time course of clinical diagnosis inferences: A comparison of experts and novices. Discourse Processes, 31, 2, 187–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
León, J. A. & Slisko, J.
(2000) La dificultad comprensiva de los textos de ciencias. Nuevas alternativas para un viejo problema educativo. Psicología Educativa, 6, 7–26.Google Scholar
León, J. A., Solari, M., Olmos, R. & Escudero, I.
(2011) Inference’s generation in a social context. An analysis of reading comprehension through verbal protocols and a summary oral task. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 29, 1, 13–42.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M.
(1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, S.
(1996) Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question: crosslinguistic evidence. In P. Bloom & M. Peterson (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 109–169). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Li, P. & Gleitman, L.
(2002) Turning the tables: Language and spatial reasoning. Cognition, 83, 265–294. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liu, J. H., Karasawa, K., & Weiner, R.
(1992) Inferences about the causes of positive and negative emotions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 603–615. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Long, D. L., Golding, J., Graesser, A. C., & Clark, L. F.
(1990) Goal, event, and state inferences: An investigation of inference generation during story comprehension. In A. C. Graesser, & G. H. Bower (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 25 (pp. 89–102). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Long, D. L., Oppy, B. J., & Seely, M. R.
(1997) A “global-coherence” view of event comprehension: Inferential processing as question answering. In P. W. van den Broek, P. J. Bauer, & T. Bourg (Eds.), Developmental spans in event comprehension and representation. Bridging fictional and actual events (pp. 361–384). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Lorch, R. F.
(2015) What about expository text? In O’Brien, E. J., Cook, A. E., & Lorch, R. F. (Eds.), Inferences During Reading (pp.348–361). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
in press). What is so difficult about expository text? In J. A. León & I. Escudero Eds. Current Trends in Reading Research pp. xx To be completed
Lucy, J.
(1992) Grammatical categories and cognition: A case study of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, J. L.
(1980) The cement of the universe. A study of causation. Oxford: Clarendon. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Magliano, J. P., Baggett, W. B., Johnson, B. K., & Graesser, A. C.
(1993) The time course of generating causal antecedent and causal consequence inferences. Discourse Processes, 16, 35–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C.
(1991) A three-pronged method for studying inference generation in literary text. Poetics, 20, 193–232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malt, B. C., Sloman , S. A., Gennari, S., Shi, M., & Wang, Y.
(1999) Knowing versus naming: Similarity and the linguistic categorization of artifacts. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 230–262. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martins, I.
(2002) Visual Imagery in School Science Texts. In J. C. Otero, J. A. León & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 73–90). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R.
(1992) Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99, 440–466. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J. P.
(2009) Towards a comprehensive model of comprehension. In B. Ross (Ed), The psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 51, (pp. 297–284). New York, NY, US: Elsevier Science. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miall, D.
(1989) Beyond the schema given: Afective comprehension of literary narrative. Cognition and Emotion, 3, 55–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Millis, K. K. & Graesser, A. C.
(1994) The time-course of constructing knowledge-based inferences for scientific texts. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 583–599. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Munnich, E., Landau, B., & Anne Dosher, B.
(2001) Spatial language and spatial representation: a cross-linguistic comparison. Cognition, 81, 171–208. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murray, J. D., Klin, C. M. & Myers, J. L.
(1993) Forward inferences in narrative text. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 464–473. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myers, J. L. & O’Brien, E. J.
(1998) Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Process, 26, 131–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nation, K. & Snowling, M. J.
(1998) Individual differences in contextual facilitation: Evidence from dyslexia and poor reading comprehension. Child Development, 69, 96–1011. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J.
(1999) Developmental differences in sensitivity to semantic relations among good and poor comprehenders: evidence from semantic priming. Cognition, 70, B1–B13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newton, D. P.
(1995) Support for understanding: Discourse which aids the construction of a functional mental model of causal situations. Research in Science and Technological Education, 13, 109–122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Noordman, L. G. M.
(2005) Taal en Kennis. [Language and Cognition]. Valedictory lecture. Tilburg University.Google Scholar
Noordman, L. G. M., & Vonk, W.
(1998) Memory-based processing in understanding causal information. Discourse Processes, 26, 191–212. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Noordman, L. G. M., Vonk, W., Cozijn, R., & Frank, S. L.
(2015) Causal inferences and world knowledge. In E. J. O’Brien, A. E. Cook, & R. F. Lorch (Eds.). Inferences during reading (pp. 260–289). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Noordman, L. G. M., Vonk, W., & Kempff, H.
(1992) Causal inferences during the reading of expository texts. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 573–590. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oakhill, J.
(1993) Children’s Difficulties in Reading Comprehension. Educational Psychology Review, 5, 3, 223–237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oakhill, J., & Cain, K.
(2007) Issues of Causality in Children’s Reading Comprehension. In D. S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading Comprehension Strategies: Theories, Interventions, and Technologies (pp. 47–71). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Oakhill, J. V., Cain, K. & Bryant, P. E.
(2003) The dissociation of word reading and text comprehension: Evidence from component skills. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(4), 443–468. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, E. J., & Myers, J. L.
(1999) Text comprehension: A view from the bottom up. In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in Honor of TomTrabasso (pp. 35–53). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
OCDE
(2003) Learning for Tomorrow’s World: First Results from PISA 2003. París: OCDE.Google Scholar
(2006) PISA 2006: Science Competencies for Tomorrow’s World. París: OCDE.Google Scholar
(2009) PISA 2009 Assessment Framework – Key Competencies in Reading, Mathematics and Science. París: OCDE.Google Scholar
(2013) PISA 2012. Informe Español Volumen I: Resultados y Contexto. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte.Google Scholar
Ohlsson, S.
(2002) Generating and understanding qualitative explanations. In J. C. Otero, J. A. León & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 91–128). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Olmos, R., León, J. A., Arnal. L. A. M., Moreno, J. D., Escudero, I., & Sánchez-Sánchez, F.
(2016) Psychometric properties of the reading comprehension test ECOMPLEC.Sec. Psicothema, 28, 1, 89–95.Google Scholar
Otero, J. C., León, J. A., & Graesser, A. C.
(Eds.) (2002) The psychology of science text comprehension. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Paris, S. G., Lindauer, B. K. & Cox, G.
(1977) The development of inferential comprehension. Child Development, 48, 1728–1733. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paris, S. G., & Upton, L. R.
(1976) Children’s memory for inferential relationships in prose. Child Development, 47, 660–668. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Patel, V. L., & Groen, G. J.
(1986) Knowledge-based solution strategies in medical reasoning. Cognitive Science, 10, 91–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S.
(1994) The language instinct: How the mind creates language. Nueva York: Morrow. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Potts, G. R.; Keenan, J. M., & Golding, J. M.
(1988) Assessing the occurrence of elaborative inferences: Lexical decision versus naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 399–415. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prat, C. S., Mason, R. A., & Just, M. A.
(2011) Individual differences in the neural basis of Causal Inferencing. Brain and Language, 116, 1–13 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prat, C. S., Mason, R. A., León, J. A., Escudero, I., & Just, M. A.
(2015) Why Smoke Doesn’t Always Lead to Fire: Investigating the Neural Basis of Individual Differences in Predictive Inference Making. Paper presented at 25th Annual Meeting of The Society for Text and Discourse (p. 42). Minneapolis, MN, 6–8 July.
Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P.
(1995) Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Salmon, W. C.
(1998) Causality and explanation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmalhofer, F., & Glavanov, D.
(1986) Three Components of Understanding a Programmer’s Manual: Verbatim, Propositional, and Situational Representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 279–294. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, C. R., & Paris, S. G.
(1983) Children’s use of successive clues to generate and monitor inferences. Child Development, 54, 742–759.Google Scholar
Schulz, L., Bonawitz, E. B., & Griffiths, T. L.
(2007) Can being scared give you a tummy ache? Naive theories, ambiguous evidence and preschoolers’ causal inferences. Developmental Psychology, 43(5), 1124–1139. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sharkey, A. J. C., & Sharkey, N. E.
(1992) Weak contextual constraints in text and word priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 543–572. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Singer, M.
(1988) Inferences in reading. Reading Research: Advances in Theory and Practice, 6, 177–219.Google Scholar
(1994) Discourse inference processes. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 479–515). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Singer, M., & Ferreira, F.
(1983) Inferring consequences in story comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 437–446. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Singer, M. & Gagnon, N.
(1999) Detecting causal inconsistencies in scientific text. In Goldman, S., Graesser, A. & van den Broek, P. (Eds.). Narrative Comprehension, Causality, and Coherence: Essays in Honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 179–194). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Singer, M., Graesser, A C, & Trabasso, T.
(1994) Minimal or global inference during: reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 421–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Singer, M., & Halldorson, M.
(1996) Constructing and validating motive bridging inferences. Cognitive Psychology, 39, 1–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Singer, M., Halldorson, M., Lear J. C., & Andrusiak P.
(1992) Validation of causal bridging inferences in discourse understanding. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 507–524. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Singer, M., Harkness, D. y Stewart, S. T.
(1997) Constructing inferences in expository text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 24, 199–228. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Singer, M., y León, J. A.
(2007) Psychological studies of higher language processes: Behavioral and empirical approaches. In Franz Schmalhofer y Charles A. Perfetti (Eds.), Higher level language processes in the brain: Inference and Comprehension processes (pp. 19–35). Mahwah, Nueva Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I.
(1996) Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. En M. Shibatani & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (pp. 195–217). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1997) Mind, code, and text. En J. Bybee, J. Haiman, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Essays on language function and language type: Dedicated to T. Givón (pp. 437–467). Amsterdam: John Benjamins CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I., & Hoiting, N.
(1994) Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: Typological considerations. Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 487–505. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sloman, S.
(2005) Causal models: How people think about the world and its alternatives. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sobel, D. M., & Kirkham, N. Z.
(2007) Bayes nets and babies: infants’ developing statistical reasoning abilities and their representation of causal knowledge. Developmental Science, 10, 3, 298–306. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trabasso, T., & Magliano, J. P.
(1996) Conscious understanding during text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 21, 255–287. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trabasso, T., Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C.
(1999) Strategic processing during comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 615–629. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trabasso, T., Secco, T., & Van den Broek, P. W.
(1984) Causal cohesion and story coherence. In H. Mendl, N. Stein, & T. Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and comprehension of texts (pp. 83–111). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Trabasso, T., & Sperry, L.
(1985) Causal relatedness and importance of story events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 595–611. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trabasso, T., & Suh, S.
(1993) Understanding text: Achieving explanatory coherence through on-line inferences and mental operations in working memory. Discourse Processes, 16, 3–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trabasso, T. & Van den Broek, P. W.
(1985) Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 612–630. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trabasso, T., van den Broek, P. W., & Suh, S. Y.
(1989) Logical necessity and transitivity of causal relations in stories. Discourse Processes, 12, 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tunmer, W. E., & Chapman, J. W.
(2004) The Use of Context in Learning to Read. In T. Nunes & P. Bryant (Eds.), Handbook of Children’s Literacy (pp. 199–212). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van den Broek, P.
(1988) The effects of causal relations and hierarchical position on the importance of story statements. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1989) The effects of causal structure on the comprehension of narratives: Implications for education. Reading Psychology, 10, 19–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1990a) The causal inference maker: Towards a process model of inference generation in text comprehension. In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores d’Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 423–445). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
(1990b) Causal inferences and the comprehension of narrative text. In A. C. Graesser & G. H. Bower (Eds.), Inferences and text comprehension (pp. 175–194). San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
van den Broek, P., Rapp, D. N., & Kendeou, P.
(2005) Integrating memory-based and constructionist approaches in accounts of reading comprehension. Discourse Processes, 39, 299–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van den Broek, P., Young, M., Tzeng, Y., & Linderholm, T.
(1999) The landscape model of reading: Inferences and the online construction of a memory representation. In S. Goldman & H. van Oostendorp (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 71–98). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W.
(1983) Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Virtue, S., Haberman, J., Clancy, Z., Parrish, T., & Jung-Beeman, M.
(2006) Neural activity of inferences during story comprehension. Brain Research, 1084, 104–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Virtue, S., Parrish, T., & Jung-Beeman, M.
(2008) Inferences during story comprehension: Cortical recruitment affected by predictability of events and working-memory capacity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 2274–2284 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Virtue, S., & van den Broek, P.
(2005) Hemispheric processing of anaphoric inferences: The activation of multiple antecedents. Brain and Language, 93, 327–337. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vonk, W., & Noordman, L. G. M.
(1992) Kennis en inferenties bij het lezen van tekst [Knowledge and inferences in reading text]. Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelem, 43, 39–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S.
(1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Waldmann, M. R., & Holyoak, K. J.
(1992) Predictive and diagnostic learning within causal models: asymmetries in cue competition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 222–235. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wertsch, J. V.
(1991) Voices in the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Whorf, B.
(1956) Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf, edited by Carroll, JB.Google Scholar
Woolley, G.
(2011) Reading comprehension. Assisting Children with learning difficulties. Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Xu, J., Kemeny, S., Park, G., Frattali, C., & Braun, A.
(2005): Language in context: Emergent features of word, sentence, and narrative comprehension. NeuroImage, 25, 1002–1015. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yuill, N. & Oakhill, J.
(1991) Children’s problems in text comprehension. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A.
(1994) Effect of genre expectations on text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology – Learning Memory and Cognition, 20, 920–933. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, R. A. & Brown, C. M.
(1996) The influence of language proficiency and comprehension skill on situation-model construction. Discourse Processes, 21, 289–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C.
(1995) The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: an event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6, 292–297. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

León, José A, José A. Martínez-Huertas & Olga Jastrzebska
2018. Un Estudio sobre la Competencia Lectora en Adultos con Discapacidad Intelectual y del Desarrollo ante Textos con Contenidos de Clínica y Salud. Clínica y Salud 29:3 ► pp. 115 ff. Crossref logo
Martín-Arnal, Lorena A., José A. León, Paul van den Broek & Ricardo Olmos
2019. Understanding Comics. A Comparison between Children and Adults through a Coherence/Incoherence Paradigm in an Eye-tracking Study. Psicología Educativa 25:2 ► pp. 127 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.