Chapter published in:
Reading Comprehension in Educational SettingsEdited by José A. León and Inmaculada Escudero
[Studies in Written Language and Literacy 16] 2017
► pp. 125–144
Chapter 5Five building blocks for comprehension strategy instruction
Laura K. Allen | Arizona State University
Danielle S. McNamara | Arizona State University
Comprehension is a complex task that is integral to success in academics and the workplace. Unfortunately, it is not a task that comes easily to all students. Hence, an important question faced by educators and researchers is how to most effectively provide students with instruction to improve comprehension, particularly on how to understand and learn from challenging texts. One promising approach is to provide students with training to use comprehension strategies. Strategies are intended to help students overcome skill and knowledge deficits by using overt techniques that mimic or support the processes integral to successful comprehension, including understanding the words and sentences in the text, making connections between sentences, and making connections to what the student already knows (i.e., prior knowledge). In this chapter, we approach these research questions by building upon the 4-pronged comprehension strategy framework proposed by McNamara, Ozuru, Best, and O’Reilly (2007). This framework describes five types of strategies that can help to scaffold reading and comprehension. We expand upon this framework by describing various contextual factors that may influence comprehension and strategy use. Further, we discuss methods to enhance strategy instruction, introducing five building blocks for effective comprehension strategy training.
Article outline
- Five building blocks for comprehension strategy instruction
- Reading comprehension
- This is a complex and challenging task for many readers
- The 4-pronged comprehension strategy framework
- Contextual factors of strategy acquisition
- Stimulus
- Task
- Method
- Population
- The five building blocks for comprehension strategy instruction
- Varying task conditions
- Explicit instruction of strategies
- Deliberate practice opportunities
- Feedback
- Motivational components
- Conclusion
- Reading comprehension
-
References
Published online: 19 October 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.16.05all
https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.16.05all
References
References
Alexander, P. A., & Judy, J. E.
Allen, L. K., Crossley, S. A., Snow, E. L., & McNamara, D. S.
Anderson, N. J.
Balota, D. A., Flores d’Arcais, G. B., & Rayner, K.
Barab, S. A., Gresalfi, M. S., & Arici, A.
Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L.
Berman, I., & Biancarosa, G.
(2005) Reading to achieve: A governor’s guide to adolescent literacy. National governors Association Center for Best Practices. Retrieved from http://www.nga.org/Files/pdf/0510govguideliteracy.pdf.
Block, E. L.
Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R., & Zeidner, M.
Brantmeier, C.
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P.
Carrell, P. L.
Center on Education Policy
Corbett, A. T. & Anderson, J. R.
Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M.
D’Mello, S., & Graesser, A.
Duvivier, R. J., van Dalen, J., Muijtjens, A. M., Moulaert, V. R. M. P., van der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Scherpbier, A. J. J. A.
Ericsson, K. A.
Ericcson, A., Krampe, R., & Tesch-Romer, C.
Everson, H., & Tobias, S.
Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T.
Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A.
Haberlandt, K. F., & Graesser, A. C.
Healy, A., Schneider, V., & Bourne, L.
Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M.
Holman, L.
Hupbach, A., Hardt, O., Gomez, R., & Nadel, L.
Jackson, G. T., & McNamara, D. S.
Kindler, A. L.
Kintsch, W.
Linderholm, T., Virtue, S., Tzeng, Y., & van den Broek, P. W.
Long, D. L., Oppy, B. J., & Seely, M. R.
Lorch, R. F., Jr., Lorch, E. P., & Mogan,A. M.
MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S.
Magliano, J. P., & Schleich, M.
Maqsud, M.
Mayer, R. E.
McCrudden, M. T., Magliano, J. P., & Schraw, G.
McNamara, D. S.
McNamara, D. S., Graesser, A. C., McCarthy, P., & Cai, Z.
McNamara, D. S., Jacovina, M. E., & Allen, L. K.
McNamara, D. S., Jacovina, M. E., Snow, E. L., & Allen, L. K.
McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W.
McNamara, D. S. & Magliano, J. P.
McNamara, D. S., & McDaniel, M. A.
McNamara, D. S., O’Reilly, T. P., Best, R. M., & Ozuru, Y.
McNamara, D. S., Ozuru, Y., Best, R., & O’Reilly, T.
National Assessment Governing Board
(2013) Less than half of 12th Graders estimated to be academically prepared for college coursework. Washington, D.C. Retrieved Jan. 13, 2015, http://www.nagb.org/newsroom/naep-releases/grade-12-preparedness.html
National Assessment of Educational Progress
(2011) The Nation’s Report Card: Writing 2011. Retrieved Nov. 5, 2012, nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/writing.
Oakhill, J., & Yuill, N.
OECS
(2014) PISA 2012 results in focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Retrieved Jan. 13, 2015, http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results.htm
O’Reilly, T., & McNamara, D. S.
Pearson, P. D.
Perfetti, C. A.
Pressley, M., Beard El-Dinary, P., Gaskins, I., Schuder, T., Bergman, J. L., Almasi, J., & Brown, R.
Pritchard, R.
Ricci, K., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A.
Roebers, C. M., Röthlisberger, M., Cimeli, P., Michel, E., & Neuenschwander, R.
Rowe, J., Shores, L., Mott, B., & Lester, J.
Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A.
Short, D. J., & Fitzsimmons, S.
(2007) Double the work – Challenges and solutions to acquiring language and academic literacy for adolescent English language learners: A report to the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Alliance for Excellent Education. Retrieved from http://www.carnegie.org/literacy/pdf/DoubletheWork.pdf.
Sitzmann, T., Kraiger, K., Stewart, D., & Wisher, R.
Taylor, A., Stevens, J. R., & Asher, J. W.
Van den Broek, P., Lorch, R. F., Linderholm, T., & Gustafson, M.