Chapter published in:
Reading Comprehension in Educational Settings
Edited by José A. León and Inmaculada Escudero
[Studies in Written Language and Literacy 16] 2017
► pp. 145167
References

References

Albrecht, J. E., & O’Brien, E. J.
(1993) Updating a mental model: Maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1061–1070.Google Scholar
Alvermann, D. E., & Hague, S. A.
(1989) Comprehension of counterintuitive science text: Effects of prior knowledge and text structure. Journal of Educational Research, 82, 197–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H.
(1974) Human associative memory. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. C.
(1970) Control of student mediating processes during verbal learning and retention. Review of Educational Research, 40, 349–369. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ausubel, D. P.
(1960) The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 267–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K.
(1972) Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4, 717–726. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Britton, B. K., & Gulgoz, S.
(1991) Using Kintsch’s model to improve instructional text: Effects of inference calls on recall and cognitive structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 329–345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, M., & Stordhal, K. E.
(1955) The effect of organizational aids on comprehension and retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 65–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cook, A. E., & O’Brien, E. J.
(2014) Knowledge activation, integration, and validation during narrative text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 51, 26–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Effects of prior knowledge and text structure
Journal of Educational Research, 82, 197–202. Crossref
Frase, L. T.
(1968) Effect of question location, pacing, and mode upon retention of prose materials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 244–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1969) Cybernetic control o fmemory while reading connected discourse. Journal of Educational Psychology, 60, 49–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1970) Influence of sentence order and amount of higher level text processing upon reproductive and productive memory. American Educational Research Journal, 7, 307–319. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frederiksen, C. H.
(1975a) Effects of context-induced processing operations on semantic information acquired from discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 139–166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frederiksen, C.
(1975b) Representing logical and semantic structure of knowledge acquired from discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 371–458. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gilabert, R., Martínez, R., & Vidal-Abarca, E.
(2005) Some good texts are always better: text revision to foster inferences of readers with high and low prior background knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 15, 45–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glenberg, A. M., & Epstein, W.
(1985) Calibration of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 11, 702–718.Google Scholar
Glenberg, A. M., Meyer, M., and Lindem, K.
(1987) Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 69–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Graesser, A. C., León, J. A., & Otero, J.
(2002) Introduction to the psychology of science text comprehension. In J. Otero, J. A. León, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 1–15). Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T.
(1994) Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological review, 101(3), 371–395. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guzzetti, B. J., Snyder, T. E., Glass, G. V., & Gamas, W. S.
(1993) Promoting conceptual change in science: A comparative meta-analysis of instructional interventions from reading education and science education. Reading Research Quarterly, 28(2), 117–159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haviland, S. E., & Clark, H. H.
(1974) What’s new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 512–521. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hershberger, W. A.
(1964) Self-evaluational responding and typographical cueing: Techniques for programming self-instructional reading materials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 288–296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hershberger, W. A., & Terry, D. F.
(1965) Typographical cueing in conventional and programmed texts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 55–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hynd, C. R., & Alvermann, D. E.
(1986) The role of refutation text in overcoming difficulty with science concepts. Journal of Reading, 29, 440–446.Google Scholar
Hyönä, J.
(1994) Processing of topic shifts by adults and children. Reading Research Quarterly,29, 77–90.Google Scholar
Keenan, J. M., Baillet, S. D., & Brown, P.
(1984) The effects of causal cohesion on comprehension and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 115–126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kendeou, P., & O’Brien, E. J.
(2014) The knowledge revision components (KReC) framework: Processes and mechanisms. In D. N. Rapp & J. L. G. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 353–377). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kendeou, P., & van den Broek, P.
(2005) The effects of readers’ misconceptions on comprehension of scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 235–245. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Interactions between prior knowledge and text structure during comprehension of scientific texts. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1567–1577. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W.
(1974) The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(1988) The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction – integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A.
(1978) Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klare, G. R., Mabry, J. E., & Gustafson, L. M.
(1955) The relationship of patterning (underlining) to immediate retention and to acceptability of technical material. Journal of Applied Psychology, 39, 40–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lemarie, J., Lorch, R. F., Eyrolle, H.,& Virbel, J.
(2008) SARA: A text-based and reader-based theory of signaling. Educational Psychologist, 43, 27–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linderholm, T. & van den Broek, P.
(2002) The effects of reading purpose and working memory capacity on the processing of expository text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 778–784. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lorch, R. F., Jr., & Lorch, E. P.
(1995) Effects of organizational signals on text processing strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 537–544. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) Effects of organizational signals on free recall of expository texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 38–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lorch, R. F., Jr., Lorch, E. P., & Inman, W. E.
(1993) Effects of signaling topic structure on text recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 281–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lorch, R. F., Jr., Lorch, E. P., & Klusewitz, M. A.
(1993) College students’ conditional knowledge about reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 239–252. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lorch, R. F., Jr., Lorch, E. P., & Matthews, P. D.
(1985) On-line processing of the topic structure of a text. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 350–362. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lorch, R. F., Jr., Lorch, E. P., & Mogan, A. M.
(1987) Task effects and individual differences in on-line processing of the topic structure of a text. Discourse Processes, 10, 63–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lorch, R. F., Jr., & van den Broek, P.
(1997) Understanding reading comprehension: Current and future contributions of cognitive science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 213–246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maki, R. H., & Berry, S. L.
(1984) Metacomprehension of text material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 663–679.Google Scholar
Mandler, J. M., & Johnson, N. S.
(1977) Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 111–151. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R. E. Dyck, J. L., & Cook, L. K.
(1984) Techniques that help readers build mental models from scientific text: Definitions pretraining and signaling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1089–1105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R.
(1992) Inference during reading. Psychological review, 99(3), 440–466. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, D. S.
(2001) Reading both high-coherence and low-coherence texts: Effects of text sequence and prior knowledge. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 51–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W.
(1996a) Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, D. S., & Kintsch, W.
(1996b) Learning from text: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22, 247–288. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, B. J. F.
(1975) The organization of prose and its effect on memory. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Millis, K. K., & Graesser, A. C.
(1994) The time-course of constructing knowledge-based inferences for scientific texts. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(5), 583–599. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myers, J. L., & O’Brien, E. J.
(1998) Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processes, 26, 131–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myers, J. L., Shinjo, M., & Duffy, S. A.
(1987) Degree of causal relatedness and memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 453–465. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Noordman. L., Vonk, W., & Kempf, H.
(1992) Causal inferences during reading of expository texts. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 573–590. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norman, D. A., & Rumelhart, D. E.
(1975) Explorations in cognition. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
O’Brien, E. J.
(1995) Automatic components of discourse comprehension. In R. F. Lorch & E. J. O’Brien (Eds.) Sources of coherence in reading (pp. 159–17). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
O’Brien, E. J., & Albrecht, J. E.
(1991) The role of context in accessing antecedents in text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 94–102.Google Scholar
O’Brien, E. J., Albrecht, J. E., Hakala, C. M., & Rizzella, M. L.
(1995) Activation and suppression of antecedents during reinstatement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(3), 626–634.Google Scholar
O’Brien, E. J., & Myers, J. L.
(1987) The role of causal connections in the retrieval of text. Memory & Cognition, 15, 419–427. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, E. J., Cook, A. E., & Guéraud, S.
(2010) Accessibility of outdated information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 36, 979–991.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, T. P., & McNamara, D. S.
(2007) Reversing the reverse cohesion effect: Good texts can be better for strategic, high-knowledge readers. Discourse Processes, 43, 121–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ozuru, Y., Dempsey, K., & McNamara, D. S.
(2009) Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts. Learning and Instruction, 19, 228–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radvansky, G. A.
(2009) Spatial directions and situation model organization. Memory & Cognition, 37, 796–806. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radvansky, G. A., Zwaan, R. A., Federico, T., & Franklin, N.
(1998) Retrieval from temporally organized situation models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1224–1237.Google Scholar
Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J.
(2007) Improving students’ self-evaluation of learning for key concepts in textbook materials. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 559–579. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rawson, K. A., O’Neil, R., & Dunlosky, J.
(2011) Accurate monitoring leads to effective control and greater learning of patient education materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17, 288–302.Google Scholar
Rothkopf, E. Z.
(1966) Learning from written materials: An exploration of the control of insepection behavior by test-like events. American Educational Research Journal, 3, 241–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1970) The concept of mathemagenic activities. Review of Educational Research, 40, 325–366. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rothkopf, E. Z., & Bisbicos, E. E.
(1967) Selective facilitative effects of interspersed questions on learning from written material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 56–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schank, R., & Abelson, R.
(1977) Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Singer, M., Harkness, D., & Stewart, S. T.
(1997) Constructing inferences in expository text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 24, 199–228. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spilich, G. J., Vesonder, G. T., Chiesi, H. L., & Voss, J. F.
(1979) Text processing of domain-related information for individuals with high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 275–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sulin, R. A., & Dooling, D. J.
(1974) Intrusion of a thematic idea in retention of prose. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 255–262. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thiede, K. W., & Anderson, M. C. M.
(2003) Summarizing can improve metacomprehension accuracy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 129–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M. C. M., & Therriault, D.
(2003) Accuracy of metcognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 66–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thiede, K. W., Dunlosky, J., Griffin, T. D., & Wiley, J.
(2005) Understanding the delayed-keyword effect on metacomprehension accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1267–1280.Google Scholar
Thiede, K. W., Griffin, T. D., Wiley, J., & Anderson, M. C. M.
(2010) Poor metacomprehension accuracy as a result of inappropriate cue use. Discourse Processes, 47, 331–362. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thiede, K. W., Wiley, J., & Griffin, T. D.
(2011) Test expectancy affects metacomprehension accuracy. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 264–273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, A. K., & McDaniel, M. A.
(2007a) Metacomprehension for educationally relevant materials: Dramatic effects of encoding-retrieval interactions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 212–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007b) The negative cascade of incongruent generative study – test processing in memory and metacomprehension. Memory & Cognition, 35, 668–678. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trabasso, T., Secco, T., & van den Broek, P. W.
(1984) Causal cohesion and story coherence. In H. Mandl, N. L. Stein, & T. Trabasso (eds.), Learning and comprehension of text (pp. 83–111). Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.Google Scholar
Trabasso, T., & Suh, S.
(1993) Understanding text: Achieving explanatory coherence through on-line inferences and mental operations in working memory. Discourse Processes, 16, 3–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trabasso, T., & van den Broek, P. W.
(1985) Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 612–630. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trabasso, T., van den Broek, P. W., & Suh, S. Y.
(1989) Logical necessity and transitivity of causal relations in stories. Discourse Processes, 12, 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van den Broek, P., Bohn-Gettler, C. M., Kendeou, P., Carlson, S., & White, M. J.
(2011) When a reader meets a text: The role of standards of coherence in reading comprehension. In M. T. McCrudden, J. Magliano, & G. Schraw (Eds.), Relevance instructions and goal-focusing in text learning. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
van den Broek, P., Lorch, R. F., Linderholm, T., & Gustafson, M.
(2001) The effects of readers’ goals on inference generation and memory for texts. Memory & Cognition, 29, 1081–1087. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van den Broek, P., Risden, K. & Husebye-Hartmann, E.
(1995) The role of reader’s standards of coherence in the generation of inferences during reading. In E. P. Lorch & E. J. O’Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading (pp. 353–374). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
van den Broek, P., Young, M., Tzeng, Y., & Linderholm, T.
(1998) The landscape model of reading: Inferences and the on-line construction of a memory representation. In H. van Oostendorp, & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 71–98). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W.
(1983) Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F.
(1992) Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535–585. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, M. B. W., & Woodwyk, J. M.
(2010) Processing and memory of information presented in narrative or expository texts. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 341–362. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wiley, J., Ash, I. K., Sanchez, C. A., & Jaeger, A.
(2011) Clarifying goals of reading for understanding from expository science text. In M. T. McCrudden, J. P. Magliano & Schraw, G. (Eds.), Text relevance and learning from text (pp. 353–374). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Wiley, J., & Myers, J. L.
(2003) Availability and accessibility of information and causal inferences from scientific text. Discourse Processes, 36, 109–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, R. A.
(1994) Effect of genre expectations on text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 920–933.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A.
(1998) Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162–1855. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C.
(1995) Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 386–397.Google Scholar