Chapter published in:
It’s not all about you : New perspectives on address research
Edited by Bettina Kluge and María Irene Moyna
[Topics in Address Research 1] 2019
► pp. 7697
References

References

Barberá, Pablo
Barbosa, Luciano & Junlan Feng
2010Robust sentiment detection on Twitter from biased and noisy data. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Posters, 36–44. Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bartens, Angela
2004Notas sobre el uso de las formas de tratamiento en el español colombiano actual. Centro Virtual Cervantes: Coloquio de París. Paris. https://​cvc​.cervantes​.es​/lengua​/coloquio​_paris​/ponencias​/bartens​.htm
Benavides, Carlos
2003La distribución del voseo en Hispanoamérica. Hispania 86 (3). 612–623. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bieswanger, Markus
2013Micro-linguistic structural features of computer-mediated communication. In Susan Herring, Dieter Stein & Tuija Virtanen (eds.), Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication, 463–488. (Handbooks of Pragmatics 9). Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burger, John D., John Henderson, George Kim & Guido Zarrella
2011Discriminating gender on Twitter. Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 1301–1309. (EMNLP ’11). Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Calderón Campos, Miguel
2010Capítulo 4. Formas de tratamiento. In Milagros Izquierdo & José María Enguita Utrilla (eds.), La lengua española en América normas y usos actuales, 225–236. València: Universitat de València.Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard
1976The selfish gene. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dynel, Marta
2014Participation framework underlying YouTube interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 73. 37–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Participation as audience design. In Christian Hoffmann & Wolfram Bublitz (eds.), Pragmatics of social media, 61–82. (Handbooks of Pragmatics 11). Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eisenlauer, Volker
2017Social network sites/facebook. In Christian Hoffmann & Wolfram Bublitz (eds.), Pragmatics of social media, 225–244. (Handbooks of Pragmatics 11). Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Estrada Arráez, Ana & Carlota De Benito Moreno
2016Variación en las redes sociales: datos twilectales. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana 28(2). 77–111.Google Scholar
Farina, Matteo
2015Facebook first post telling. Journal of Pragmatics 90. 1–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flores-Ferrán, Nydia
2004Spanish subject personal pronoun use in New York City Puerto Ricans: Can we rest the case of English contact? Language Variation and Change 16 (1). 49–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foster, Daniel
2016Interpreting the distribution of mixed use of pronominal address forms in Colombia using Twitter. Unpublished master’s thesis. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1981Forms of talk. (Conduct and Communication). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, Bruno & David Sánchez
2017Learning about Spanish dialects through Twitter. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana (RILI) XIV (28). 65–76.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Christian
2017Log in: Introducing the pragmatics of social media. In Christian Hoffmann & Wolfram Bublitz (eds.), Pragmatics of Social Media, 1–28. (Handbooks of Pragmatics 11). Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Sebastian
2007Processing internet-derived text – Creating a corpus of usenet messages. Literary and Linguistic Computing 22 (2). 151–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hummel, Martin, Bettina Kluge & María Eugenia Vázquez Laslop
(eds.) 2010Formas y fórmulas de tratamiento en el mundo hispánico. Mexico City/Graz: El Colegio de México/Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz.Google Scholar
Jang, Ji Son
2010Fórmulas de tratamiento pronominales en los jóvenes universitarios de Medellín (Colombia) desde la óptica sociopragmática: estrato socioeconómico y sexo. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura 15 (26). 43–116.Google Scholar
2012Correlaciones entre la selección pronominal, el origen urbano/rural y la edad: el caso de jóvenes universitarios de Medellín (Colombia). Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura 17 (2). 145–166.Google Scholar
2013Voseo medellinense como expresión de identidad paisa. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura 18 (1). 61–81.Google Scholar
Jurafsky, Daniel & Christopher Martin
2009Speech and language processing: An introduction to natural language processing, computational linguistics, and speech recognition. Pearson/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Kluge, Bettina
2016Forms of address and community identity. In María Irene Moyna & Susana Rivera-Mills (eds.), Forms of address in the Spanish of the Americas, 325–334. (Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
2006New resources, or just better old ones? The Holy Grail of representativeness. Language and Computers, 133–149.Google Scholar
Lipski, John M.
1994Latin American Spanish. (Linguistics Library). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Millán, Mónica
2011Pronouns of address in informal contexts: A comparison of two dialects of Colombian Spanish. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Montes Giraldo, José Joaquín
1967Sobre el voseo en Colombia. Thesaurus: Boletín del Instituto Caro y Cuervo 22 (1). 21–44.Google Scholar
Moreno, Pilar Mestre
2010Alternancia de formas de tratamiento como estrategia discursiva en conversaciones colombianas. In Martin Hummel, Bettina Kluge & María Eugenia Vázquez Laslop (eds.), Formas y fórmulas de tratamiento en el mundo hispánico, 1033–1050. Mexico City/Graz: El Colegio de México/Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz.Google Scholar
Moyna, María Irene
2015 Voseo/tuteo variation in Uruguayan popular songs (1960–2010). Romanische Forschungen 127. 3–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Introduction: Addressing the research questions. In María Irene Moyna & Susana Rivera-Mills (eds.), Forms of address in the Spanish of the Americas, 1–12. (Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murillo Fernández, Mary Edith
2004El polimorfismo en los pronombres de tratamiento del habla payanesa. Centro Virtual Cervantes: Coloquio de París. Paris. https://​cvc​.cervantes​.es​/lengua​/coloquio​_paris​/ponencias​/murillo​.htm
Newall, Gregory
2016Second person singular forms in Cali Colombian Spanish: Enhancing the envelope of variation. In María Irene Moyna & Susana Rivera-Mills (eds.), Forms of address in the Spanish of the Americas, 149–169. (Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, Dong, Rilana Gravel, Dolf Trieschnigg & Theo Meder
2013How old do you think I am? A study of language and age in Twitter. Proceedings of the Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 439–448. Cambridge (MA): AAAI. https://​www​.aaai​.org​/ocs​/index​.php​/ICWSM​/ICWSM13​/paper​/view​/5984​/6383
Oliveira, Sandi Michele de
2013Address in computer-mediated communication. In Susan Herring, Dieter Stein & Tuija Virtanen (eds.), Pragmatics of computer-mediated communication, 291–313. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Penny, Ralph
2004Variation and change in Spanish. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Placencia, María Elena
2010El estudio de formas de tratamiento en Colombia y Ecuador. In Bettina Kluge, Martin Hummel & María Eugenia Vázquez Laslop (eds.), Formas y fórmulas de tratamiento en el mundo hispánico, 341–374. Mexico City/Graz: El Colegio de México/Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz.Google Scholar
Recktenwald, Daniel
2017Toward a transcription and analysis of live streaming on Twitch. Journal of Pragmatics 115. 68–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reed, Darren J.
2017Performance and interaction on SoundCloud: Social remix and the fundamental techniques of conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 115. 82–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma & Andreas H. Jucker
2003Diachronic perspectives on address term systems. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Travis, Catherine E.
2006The communicative realisation of confianza and calor humano in Colombian Spanish. In Cliff Goddard (ed.), Ethnopragmatics: Understanding discourse in cultural context, 199–230. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Uber, Diane Ringer
1985The dual function of usted: Forms of address in Bogotá, Colombia. Hispania 68 (2). 388–392. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Forms of address: The effect of the context. In Manuel Diáz-Campos (ed.), The handbook of Hispanic sociolinguistics, 244–262. (Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics). Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vandergriff, Ilona
2013Emotive communication online: A contextual analysis of computer-mediated communication (CMC) cues. Journal of Pragmatics 51. 1–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Terry
2007Thou and you in early modern English dialogues: Trials, depositions, and drama comedy. (Pragmatics & Beyond). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weyers, Joseph
2016Making the case for increased prestige of the vernacular: Medellín’s voseo. In María Irene Moyna & Susana Rivera-Mills (eds.), Forms of address in the Spanish of the Americas, 289–304. (Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele
2012Discourse of Twitter and social media: How we use language to create affiliation on the web. 1st ed. UK: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
2017Twitter. In Christian Hoffmann & Wolfram Bublitz (eds.), Pragmatics of social media, 201–224. (Handbooks of Pragmatics 11). Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar