Chapter published in:
It’s not all about you : New perspectives on address research
Edited by Bettina Kluge and María Irene Moyna
[Topics in Address Research 1] 2019
► pp. 306331
References

References

Benoit, William L.
2007Communication in political campaigns. Franfurt (Main): Peter Lang.
Blas Arroyo, José Luis
1998Funciones y estructuras discursivas del moderador en el debate político. Langues et Linguistique 24. 1–45.
2000‘Mire usted Sr. González…’ Personal deixis in Spanish political-electoral debate. Journal of Pragmatics 32. 1–27. Crossref link
2003‘Perdóneme que se lo diga, pero vuelve usted a faltar a la verdad, señor González’: Form and function of politic verbal behaviour in face-to-face Spanish political debates. Discourse & Society 14 (4). 395–423. Crossref link
2011Políticos en conflicto: una aproximación pragmático-discursiva al debate electoral cara a cara (Fondo Hispánico de Lingüística y Filología 7). Frankfurt (Main): Peter Lang. Crossref link
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson
1987Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Bühler, Karl
1982 [1934]Sprachtheorie. Stuttgart & New York: Gustav Fischer.
Bull, Peter & Annita Fetzer
2006Who are we and who are you? The strategic use of forms of address in political interviews. Text & Talk 26 (1). 3–37. Crossref link
Charaudeau, Patrick
2005Le discours politique. Les masques du pouvoir. Paris: Vuibert.
Chihu Amparán, Aquiles
2008El framing de los debates presidenciales en México (1994–2006). Mexico City: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología & Miguel Ángel Porrúa.
Clayman, Steven E.
2012Address terms in the organization of turns at talk: The case of pivotal turn extensions. Journal of Pragmatics 44. 1853–1867. Crossref link
Coseriu, Eugenio
1973Sincronía, diacronía e historia. El problema del cambio lingüístico. 3rd rev. ed. Madrid: Gredos.
De Cock, Barbara
2009Funciones pragmáticas de la referencia de persona en el lenguaje coloquial y en el discurso político. Oralia 12. 247–266.
2014Profiling discourse participants. Forms and functions in Spanish conversation and debates. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
2015Subjectivity, intersubjectivity and non-subjectivity across spoken language genres. Spanish in Context 12 (1). 10–34. Crossref link
De Fina, Anna
1995Pronominal choice, identity, and solidarity in political discourse. Text 15 (3). 379–410. Crossref link
De Oliveira, Sandi Michelle
2010La integración de la teoría y la metodología como desencadenante de un nuevo modelo de formas y fórmulas del tratamiento. In Martin Hummel, Bettina Kluge & María Eugenia Vázquez Laslop (eds.), Formas y fórmulas de tratamiento en el mundo hispánico, 57–77. Mexico City/Graz: El Colegio de México/Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz.
Fauconnier, Gilles
1985Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Fernández García, Francisco
2008Los debates Zapatero /vs/ Rajoy de 2008. Claves discursivas de una victoria. LinRed 6. http://​www​.linred​.es. (5 March 2016.)
2014Impoliteness, pseudo-politeness, strategic politeness? On the nature of communicative behaviour in electoral debates. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 58. 60–89. Crossref link
First Kennedy-Nixon Debate
, 26 September 1960© CBS (Columbia Broadcasting System). Sponsored and presented by © ABC, © CBS, © NBC Television Networks and Their Affiliated Stations. John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum, Accession number: TNC 72. http://​jfklibrary​.org. (22 February 2016.)
Fontanella de Weinberg, María Beatriz
1999Sistemas pronominales de tratamiento usados en el mundo hispánico. In Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, vol. 1, 1399–1426. Madrid: Espasa.
Fracchiolla, Béatrice
2011Politeness as a strategy of attack in a gendered political debate – The Royal-Sarkozy debate. Journal of Pragmatics 43, 2480–2488. Crossref link
Goffman, Erving
1967Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to-face behavior. Chicago: Aldine Publishing.
1981Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Hammermüller, Gunther
2010Evolución de las formas de tratamiento del español medieval hasta el siglo XVI. In Martin Hummel, Bettina Kluge & María Eugenia Vázquez Laslop (eds.), Formas y fórmulas de tratamiento en el mundo hispánico, 507–529. Mexico City/Graz: El Colegio de México/ Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz.
Helmbrecht, Johannes
2015A typology of non-prototypical uses of personal pronouns: Synchrony and diachrony. Journal of Pragmatics 88. 176–189. Crossref link
Herrero, Julio César & William L. Benoit
2009A functional analysis of the 2008 Spanish presidential debates. zer 14 (27). 61–81.
Hidalgo Downing, Raquel
2015Mecanismos interpersonales de actitud y alineación en un debate. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 64. 84–103. Crossref link
Jakobson, Roman
1971 (1957)Shifters, verbal categories and the Russian verb. In Roman Jakobson, Selected writings, vol. 2: Word and language, 130–147. The Hague & Paris: Mouton.
Jaworski, Adam & Dariusz Galasiński
2000Vocative forms of address and ideological legitimization in political debates. Discourse Studies 2 (1). 35–53. Crossref link
Johnen, Thomas
2012‘Don’t expect me to repair in four years what you have destroyed in four hundred years’: On the ethos in (inter)action of Lula and Alckmin in an election TV debate. Stockholm Review of Latin American Studies 8. 83–99. http://​www​.lai​.su​.se. (5 March 2016.)
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
1997A multilevel approach in the study of talk-in-interaction. Pragmatics 7 (1). 1–20. Crossref link
2004Introducing polylogue. Journal of Pragmatics 36. 1–24. Crossref link
2014(Im)politesse et gestion des faces dans deux types de situations communicatives: petits commerces et débats électoraux. Sociocultural Pragmatics 2 (2). 293–326.
2017Les débats de l’entre-deux-tours des élections présidentielles françaises. Constantes et évolutions d’un genre. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine & Hugues Constantin de Chanay
2007100 minutes pour convaincre: l’ethos en action de Nicolas Sarkozy. In Mathias Broth, Mats Forsgren, Coco Norén & Françoise Sullet-Nylander (eds.), Le français parlé des médias: Actes du Colloque de Stockholm, 8–12 juin 2005, 309–329. Stockholm: Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis.
Koch, Peter
1997Diskurstraditionen: zu ihrem sprachtheoretischen Status und ihrer Dynamik. In Barbara Frank, Thomas Haye & Doris Tophinke (eds.), Gattungen mittelalterlicher Schriftlichkeit, 43–79. Tübingen: Gunther Narr.
Kuo, Sai-Hua
2002From solidarity to antagonism: The uses of the second-person singular pronoun in Chinese political discourse. Text 22 (1). 29–55. Crossref link
Levinson, Stephen C.
1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Otálora Malassis, Janine Madeline
2014Debates políticos y medios de comunicación. Mexico City: Tribunal Electoral del Poder Judicial de la Federación.
Proctor, Katarzyna & Lilly I-Wen Su
2011The 1st person plural in political discourse: American politicians in interviews and in a debate. Journal of Pragmatics 43, 3251–3266. Crossref link
Roitman, Malin
2014Presidential candidates’ ethos of credibility: The case of the presidential pronoun I in the 2012 Hollande-Sarkozy debate. Discourse & Society 25 (6). 741–765. Crossref link
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel Schegloff & Gail Jefferson
1974A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50 (4). 696–735. Crossref link
Schlieben-Lange, Brigitte
1983Traditionen des Sprechens. Elemente einer pragmatischen Sprachgeschichtsschreibung. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
Searle, John
1979A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In John Searle, Expression and meaning; Studies in the theory of speech acts, 1–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Shibamoto-Smith, Janet S.
2011Honorifics, ‘politeness,’ and power in Japanese political debate. Journal of Pragmatics 43. 3707–3719. Crossref link
Vázquez Laslop, María Eugenia
2010aFormas de tratamiento parlamentario entre el Poder Legislativo y el Poder Ejecutivo en México (1862–2005). In Martin Hummel, Bettina Kluge & María Eugenia Vázquez Laslop (eds.), Formas y fórmulas de tratamiento en el mundo hispánico, 619–648. Mexico City/Graz: El Colegio de México/Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz.
2010bTratamientos directos e indirectos entre los Poderes Legislativo y Ejecutivo en México (1821–1862). In Franca Orletti & Laura Mariottini (eds.), (Des)cortesía en español: espacios teóricos y metodológicos para su estudio, 575–597. Roma: Università degli Studi Roma Tre & Programa EDICE.
2012Evolución de los tratamientos directo e indirecto entre los poderes Legislativo y Ejecutivo en México (1821–2005). In Emilio Montero Cartelle (ed.), Actas del VIII Congreso internacional de historia de la lengua española (Santiago de Compostela, 14–18 de septiembre de 2009), vol. 1, 1981–1992. Santiago de Compostela: Meubook.
2014El discurso político en México (1968–1994): la emergencia del diálogo. In Rebeca Barriga Villanueva & Pedro Martín Butragueño (eds.), Historia sociolingüística de México. Espacio, contacto y discurso político, vol. 3, 1783–1895. Mexico City: El Colegio de México.
Vertommen, Bram
2013The strategic value of pronominal choice: Exclusive and inclusive ‘we’ in political panel debates. Pragmatics 23 (2). 361–383. Crossref link
Wilson, John
1990Politically speaking: The pragmatic analysis of political language (Language in Society 15.) Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Zupnik, Yael-Janette
1994A pragmatic analysis of the use of person deixis in political discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 21. 339–383. Crossref link
Zwicky, Arnold
1971Hey, Whatsyourname! In Michael W. Le Galy, Robert A. Fox & Anthony Bruck (eds.), Papers from the Tenth Regional Meeting. Chicago Linguistic Society, 787–801. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.