Cover not available
Part of
It’s not all about you: New perspectives on address research
Edited by Bettina Kluge and María Irene Moyna
[Topics in Address Research 1] 2019
► pp. 375–396

Introductions at international academic conferences

Address and naming in three national varieties of English

This chapter investigates preferred introduction routines in first encounters in the context of international academic conferences where English is used as the conference language. We focus on reported use of first and last names as well as titles in introductions in American, Australian and British English based on a large-scale survey of reported introduction in three scenarios: introduction of self, of others and expected introduction of self by others. Drawing on quantitative and qualitative data the results demonstrate that while use of first and last name is the unmarked choice, there is also significant variation among speakers of different national varieties, different scenarios and age groups. The results also show the importance of situational factors, seniority and hierarchy for introductions.

Keywords: introductions, address, academic conferences, (varieties of) English, intercultural communication
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
  • 3.Theoretical and methodological approach
  • 4.Methodology
  • 5.Quantitative results
    • 5.1Results by country of origin
      • Introduction of self
      • Introduction of others
      • Expected introduction by others
      • Cross tabulation
    • 5.2Results by age group
      • Introduction of self
      • Introduction of others
      • Expected introduction by others
      • Cross tabulation
  • 6.Qualitative analysis
    • 6.1Introductions as a complex task
    • 6.2Reactions to use of FN
    • 6.3Reactions to use of academic titles
    • 6.4Seniority and hierarchy
    • 6.5Gender
    • 6.6Intercultural comments
    • 6.7Situational aspects
  • 7.Summary and discussion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 28 November 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tar.1.15nor
References
Barron, Anne
2015 Explorations in regional variation: A variational pragmatic perspective. Multilingua 34 (4), 449–459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barron, Anne & Klaus P. Schneider
2009 Variational pragmatics: Studying the impact of social factors on language use in interaction. Intercultural Pragmatics 6 (4). 425–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger & Albert Gilman
1960 The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in Language, 253–276. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Burt, Susan Meredith
2015 ‘There’s not a lot of negotiation’: Address terms in an academic department. In Marina Terkourafi (ed.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on im/politeness (AILA Applied Linguistics Series 14), 71–90. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
1996 Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clyne, Michael
1992 Pluricentric languages – introduction. In Michael Clyne (ed.), Pluricentric languages (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 62), 1–9. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Clyne, Michael, Catrin Norrby & Jane Warren
2009 Language and human relations: Address in contemporary language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Formentelli, Maicol
2009 Address strategies in a British academic setting. Pragmatics 19 (2). 179–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Formentelli, Maicol & John Hajek
2013 Italian L2 address strategies in an Australian university setting: A comparison with L1 Italian and L1 English practice. In Bert Peeters, Kerry Mullan & Christine Béal (eds.), Cross-culturally speaking, speaking cross-culturally, 77–106. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff
2012 ‘Early interactions’ in Australian English, American English and English English: Cultural differences and cultural scripts. Journal of Pragmatics 44. 1038–1050. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1967 On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. In Erving Goffman (ed.), Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to-face behaviour, 5–45. London: Lane.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael & Donal Carbaugh
2015 Self-disclosure in initial interactions amongst speakers of American and Australian English. Multilingua 34 (4). 461–493. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kretzenbacher, Heinz L., John Hajek & Catrin Norrby
2013 Address and introduction across two pluricentric languages in intercultural communication. In Rudolf Muhr, Carla Amorós Negre, Carmen Fernández Juncal, Klaus Zimmermann, Emilio Prieto & Natividad Hernández (eds.), Exploring linguistic standards in non-dominant varieties of pluricentric languages (Österreichisches Deutsch – Sprache der Gegenwart 15), 259–274. Frankfurt (Main): Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kretzenbacher, Heinz L., Michael Clyne, John Hajek, Catrin Norrby & Jane Warren
2014 Meet and greet: Address and introductions in intercultural communication at international conferences. In John Hajek & Yvette Slaughter (eds.), Challenging the monolingual mindset, 78–94. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauranen, Anna
2012 Exploring ELF: Academic English shaped by non-native speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Muhr, Rudolph
2008 The pragmatics of a pluricentric language: A comparison between Austrian German and German German. In Klaus P. Schneider & Anne Barron (eds.), Variational pragmatics: A focus on regional varieties in pluricentric languages (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 178), 211–244. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murray, Thomas E.
2002 A new look at address in American English: The rules have changed. Names 50 (1). 43–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrby, Catrin & Heinz L. Kretzenbacher
2014 National and regional variation in address in pluricentric languages: The examples of Swedish and German. In Augusto Soares da Silva (ed.), Pluricentricity: Language variation and sociocognitive dimensions (Applications of Cognitive Linguistics 24), 243–270. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pillet-Shore, Danielle
2011 Doing introductions: The work involved in meeting someone new. Communications Monographs 78 (1). 73–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Klaus P.
1999 Compliment responses across cultures. In Maria Wysocka (ed.), On language in theory and practice: In honour of Janusz Arabski on the occasion of his 60th birthday, Volume. 1, 162–172. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Univwersytetu Slaskiego.Google Scholar
Svennevig, Jan
1999 Getting acquainted in conversation. A study of initial interactions (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 64). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Schneider, Klaus P.
2010 Variational pragmatics. In Mirjam Fried, Jan-Ola Östman & Jef Verschueren (eds.), Variation and change: Pragmatic perspectives (Handbook of Pragmatics Highlights 6), 239–267. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Klaus P. & Anne Barron
(eds.) 2008a Variational pragmatics: A focus on regional varieties in pluricentric languages (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 178). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008b Where pragmatics and dialectology meet: Introducing variational pragmatics. In Klaus P. Schneider & Anne Barron (eds.), Variational pragmatics: A focus on regional varieties in pluricentric languages (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 178), 1–32. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Norrby, Catrin, Jan Lindström, Jenny Nilsson & Camilla Wide
2020. Pluricentric languages. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 201 ff. DOI logo
Schüpbach, Doris, John Hajek, Heinz L. Kretzenbacher & Catrin Norrby
2021. Approaches to the study of address in pluricentric languages: methodological reflections . Sociolinguistica 35:1 ► pp. 165 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.