Cover not available
Part of
It’s not all about you: New perspectives on address research
Edited by Bettina Kluge and María Irene Moyna
[Topics in Address Research 1] 2019
► pp. 415–434

Terms of address and self-reference in Ulaanbaatar Mongolian

This chapter deals with a system of terms of address and self-reference in the Mongolian of Ulaanbaatar, capital of the Mongolian state. It first deals with the morphological strategies (politeness and definiteness marking, respectively) that are used to extend the reference of regular inalienable person-referring nouns to second and first person referents. Based on ten interviews, it then presents the semi-closed set of person-referring nouns that this system is based on: terms for relatives, friends, lovers, and marginally professions. Semantic extensions between these categories as well as into the category of strangers are described and partially explained through the interplay of factors such as the social background of the interlocutors and communicative intent.
Keywords: Khalkha Mongolian, address, first person, politenes
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methodology
  • 3.Morpho-syntactic properties of the system
  • 4.Subclasses of terms of address
    • 4.1Nouns referring to relatives
      • Elder siblings and grandparents
      • Younger siblings
      • Parents
      • Children
    • 4.2Nouns referring to friends
    • 4.3Nouns referring to lovers
    • 4.4Nouns referring to occupations
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 28 November 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tar.1.17bro
References (24)
References
Abe, Hideko. 2006 [2004]. Lesbian bar talk in Shinjuku, Tokyo. In Debora Cameron & Don Kulick (eds.), The language and sexuality reader, 375–383. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
[Alimaa, Senderžaw] Senderjav, Alimaa. 2015. Duzen und Siezen im Sprachvergleich – Zu Kontrasten beim Gebrauch der pronominalen Anredeformen im Mongolischen und Deutschen [On contrasts in the use of pronominal address forms in Mongolian and German]. Mongolische Notizen 23. 3–9.Google Scholar
Brosig, Benjamin & Gegentana & Foongha Yap. 2018. Evaluative uses of postnominal possessives in Central Mongolian. Journal of Pragmatics 135. 71–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brosig, Benjamin. 2015. Aspect and epistemic notions in the present tense system of Khalkha Mongolian. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana XI (3). 46–127.Google Scholar
. 2018. Pronouns and other terms of address in Khalkha Mongolian. In Ákos Bertalan Apatóczky, Christopher Atwood & Béla Kempf (eds.), Philology of the Grasslands, 101–111. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
[Bum-Očir, Dulam] Dulam, Bum-Ochir. 2006. Respect and power without resistance. Cambridge: University of Cambridge. Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Eŋxžiŋ, Dulamžaw. 2004. Oros-moŋɢol xelnii biyeiiŋ deiksisiiŋ zeregcüülseŋ sudalɢaa (ta/či-tölöönii ügsiiŋ žišeeŋ deer) [A contrastive investigation into person deixis in Russian and Mongolian, exemplified by the pronouns či ‘thou’ and ta ‘you’]. Ulaanbaatar: Xümüüŋlegiiŋ uxaanii ix surɢuul’. Unpublished dissertation.Google Scholar
Guntsetseg, Dolgor. 2016. Differential case marking in Mongolian. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hammar, Lucia. 1983. Syntactic and pragmatic options in Mongolian – A study of Bol and N’. Bloomington: Indiana University. Unpublished dissertation.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Caroline. 1978. Women, taboo and the suppression of attention. In Shirley Ardener (ed.) 1978, Defining females, 73–92. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra. 2009. Introduction – The Sociolinguistics of stance. In Alexandra Jaffe (ed.), Stance – sociolinguistic perspectives, 3–28. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lacaze, Gaëlle. 2012. Prostitution and the transformation of the Chinese trading town of Ereen. In Franck Billé, Grégory Delaplace & Caroline Humphrey (eds.), Frontier encounters – Knowledge and practice at the Russian, Chinese and Mongolian border. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luwsaŋwandaŋ, Š. 1959. Mongol xel ayalɢuunii učir [On the dialects of Mongolian]. Moŋgoliiŋ sudlal 1.Google Scholar
Mills, Sara & Dániel Kádár. 2011. Politeness and culture. In Dániel Kádár & Sara Mills (eds.), Politeness in East Asia, 21–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morita, Emi. 2009. Arbitrating community norms – the use of English me in Japanese discourse. In Angela Reyes & Adrienne Lo (eds.), Beyond Yellow English – Toward a linguistic anthropology of Asian Pacific America, 175–194. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nugteren, Hans. 2011. Mongolic Phonology and the Qinghai-Gansu Languages. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Sandra Thompson. 2003. Japanese (w)atashi/ore/boku ‘I’ – They’re not just pronouns. Cognitive linguistics 14 (4). 321–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Östling, Robert & Benjamin Brosig (comps.). 2011. Corpus of Khalkha Mongolian internet texts from the domain. mn. 34,642,000 words, text file.Google Scholar
Pan, Yuling. 2011. Methodological issues in East Asian politeness research. In Dániel Kádár & Sara Mills (eds.), Politeness in East Asia, 71–97. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pizziconi, Barbara. 2011. Honorifics – The cultural specificity of a universal mechanism in Japanese. In Dániel Kádár & Sara Mills (eds.), Politeness in East Asia, 45–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Recanati, François. 2004. Literal meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rendle-Short, Johanna. 2010. ‘Mate’ as a term of address in ordinary interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 42 (5). 1201–1218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shimunek, Andrew. 2017. Languages of ancient Southern Mongolia and North China. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Žagwaral, R. 1976. Moŋgol xelnii xündetgeliiŋ üg [Deferential words in Mongolian]. Ulaanbaatar: Ardiiŋ bolowsroliiŋ yaamnii xewlel.Google Scholar