Miscellaneous published in:
The Mysterious Address Term anata 'you' in Japanese
Yoko Yonezawa
[Topics in Address Research 4] 2021
► pp. 175–190

References

Aalberse, Suzanne & Wessel Stoop
2015 The exceptional loss of the pronoun T. Journal of Pragmatics 88. 190–201. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Agha, Asif
2006 Language and social relations. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anchimbe, Eric A.
2011 On not calling people by their names: Pragmatic undertones of sociocultural relationships in a postcolony. Journal of Pragmatics 43. 1472–1483. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anchimbe, Eric A. & Richard W. Janney
2011 Postcolonial pragmatics: An introduction. Journal of Pragmatics 43(6). 1451–1459. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Araki, Hiroyuki
1990 Keigo no japanorojii: Keigo o kangaeru nihonjin o kangaeru [Japanology of honorifics: Thoughts about honorifics, thoughts about Japanese people]. Tokyo: Sotakusha Shuppan.Google Scholar
Araki, Tatsuo
2003 Nihongo ni okeru ninshoodaimeishi no yoohoo: Jibun no oya o anata to yobu koto wa dekiru no ka? [The usage of personal pronouns in the Japanese language: Is it possible to call one’s own parents anata ‘you’?]. Comparative Studies of Language and Culture, Shikoku Gakuin University 1. 175–186.Google Scholar
Backhouse, Anthony E.
1993 The Japanese language: An introduction. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barke, Andrew & Satoshi Uehara
2005 Japanese pronouns of address: Their behavior and maintenance over time. In Robin Lakoff & Sachiko Ide (eds.), Broadening the horizon of linguistic politeness, 301–313. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berque, Augustin
2006 From Watsuji’s concept of ‘human’ to beyond the limits of modern ontological topos. In Samantha Wauchope (ed.), Cultural diversity and transversal values: East-West dialogue on spiritual and secular dynamics, 138–144. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Biq, Yung-O.
1991 The multiple uses of the second person singular pronoun ni in conversational Mandarin. Journal of Pragmatics 16(4). 307–321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Braun, Friederike
1988 Terms of address: Problems of patterns and usage in various languages and cultures. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, James D.
2001 Using surveys in language programs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson
1987 Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger W. & Albert Gilman
1960 The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in language, 253–276. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, Jerome
1983 Child’s talk: Learning to use language. New York/London: Norton.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary & Kira Hall
2004 Language and identity. In Alessandro Duranti (ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology, 369–394. Malden/Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren
1968 A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
1996 Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Compton, Carol J.
1994 Choosing Lao pronouns for conversational purposes: Negotiating and establishing relationships verbally. Second Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, 135–146.Google Scholar
Condon, Jane
1981 It’s prime time for Japan’s Barbara Walters, Tetsuko Kuroyanagi. People 16(22). 83.Google Scholar
Cong, Yang Hui & Ryozo Aoki
2011 Keiei senryaku to riidaashippu sutairu to no kankei [The relationship between business strategy and leadership style]. Journal of the University of Marketing and Distribution Sciences: Distribution Sciences & Business Administration 24(1). 93–114.Google Scholar
Cooke, Joseph R.
1968 Pronominal reference in Thai, Burmese, and Vietnamese. Doctoral dissertation. Berkeley: University of California Berkeley.Google Scholar
Coulmas, Florian
1985 Direct and indirect speech: General problems and problems of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 9(1). 41–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
1996 Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25(3). 349–367. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The Weakest Link. Journal of Politeness Research 1(1). 35–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 Reflections on impoliteness, relational work and power. In Derek Bousfield & Miriam A. Locher (eds.), Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice, 17–44. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen
2001 Inflationary effects in language and elsewhere. In Joan L. Bybee & Paul J. Hopper (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, 471–480. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dale, Ian R. H.
1978 Beyond intuition: The use of questionnaires in linguistic investigation. Anthropological Linguistics 20(4). 158–166.Google Scholar
Diamond, Julie
1996 Status and power in verbal interaction: A study of discourse in a close-knit social network. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dickey, Eleanor
1997 Forms of address and terms of reference. Journal of Linguistics 33(2). 255–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger
2003 The relationship between demonstratives and interrogatives. Studies in Language 27(3). 635–655. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diller, Anthony
1994 Thai. In Cliff Goddard & Anna Wierzbicka (eds.), Semantic and lexical universals: Theory and empirical findings, 149–170. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doi, Takeo
1971 Amae no koozoo [The anatomy of dependence]. Tokyo: Kobundo.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul & John Heritage
1992 Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Duchan, Judith F., Gail A. Bruder & Lynne E. Hewitt
1995 Deixis in narrative: A cognitive science perspective. Hillsdale/NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Durie, Mark
1984 A grammar of Acehnese. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Endo, Orie
1992 Josei no yobikata daikenkyuu [Studies of address terms for women]. Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
2006 A cultural history of Japanese women’s language. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for Japanese Studies. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Enfield, Nick J.
2002 Combinatoric properties of natural semantic metalanguage expressions in Lao. In Cliff Goddard & Anna Wierzbicka (eds.), Meaning and universal grammar: Theory and empirical findings, 145–256. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 Ethnosyntax: Introduction. In Nick J. Enfield (ed.), Ethnosyntax: Explorations in grammar and culture, 1–32. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007a Meaning of the unmarked: How ‘default’ person reference does more than just refer. In Nick J. Enfield & Tanya Stivers (eds.), Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural, and social perspectives, 97–120. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007b A grammar of Lao. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 Sources of asymmetry in human interaction: Enchrony, status, knowledge and agency. In Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada & Jakob Steensig (eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation, 285–312. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Relationship thinking: Agency, enchrony, and human sociality. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 The utility of meaning: What words mean and why. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Enfield, Nick J. & Bernard Comrie
2015 Mainland Southeast Asian languages. In Nick J. Enfield & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Languages of Mainland Southeast Asia: The state of the art, 1–27. Berlin/München/Boston: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Enfield, Nick J. & Tanya Stivers
2007 Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural, and social perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan
1972 On sociolinguistic rules: Alternation and co-occurrence. In John J. Gumperz & Dell Hymes (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication, 213–250. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas
1993 Code, inference, placedness and ellipsis. In William A. Foley (ed.), The role of theory in language description, 243–280. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 Dying words: Endangered languages and what they have to tell us. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ewing, Michael & Dwi Noverini Djenar
2019 Address, reference and sequentiality in Indonesian conversation. In Paul Bouissac (ed.), The social dynamics of pronominal systems: A comparative approach, 253–287. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, Luke & James Slotta
2018 The pragmatics of kin address: A sociolinguistic universal and its semantic affordances. Journal of Sociolinguistics 22(4). 375–405. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foley, William A.
1997 Anthropological linguistics: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fujii, Yoko
2011 Nihongo no shinzoku koshoo, ninshooshi ni miru jiko to tasha no ichizuke: Soogo kooi no ba ni okeru bunkateki jikokan no koosatsu [A study of how to situate the self and the other in the use of address terms in Japanese: An interpretation from the cultural perspective of ba in interaction]. Journal of Studies in Literature, Japan Women’s University 60. 86–73.Google Scholar
2012 Differences of situating self in the place/ba of interaction between the Japanese and American English speakers. Journal of Pragmatics 44(5). 636–662. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Social indexicality of the ‘zero’ form of address terms in Japanese: The interpretation from the amae concept on the basis of ‘inseparable self and the other’. Memoirs of the Japan Women’s University Faculty of Literature 62. 23–34.Google Scholar
Fujiwara, Yoichi
2000 Nihongo hoogen bumpoo [Grammar of Japanese dialects]. Tokyo: Musashino Shoin.Google Scholar
Garde, Murray
2013 Culture, interaction and person reference in an Australian language: An ethnography of Bininj Gunwok communication. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, Clifford
1983 Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gergely, György, Harold Bekkering & Ildikó Király
2002 Developmental psychology: Rational imitation in preverbal infants. Nature 415(6873). 755–756. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gergely, György & Gergely Csibra
2006 Sylvia’s recipe: The role of imitation and pedagogy in the transmission of cultural knowledge. In Nick J. Enfield & Stephen C. Levinson (eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition, and interaction, 229–255. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1993 English grammar vol. 1: A function-based introduction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1955 On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry 18(3). 213–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Green, Georgia M.
1995 Ambiguity resolution and discourse interpretation. In Kees van Deemter & Stanley Peters (eds.), Semantic ambiguity and underspecification, 1–26. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Grice, Paul
1975 Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Speech acts, 41–58. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1989 Studies in the way of words. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gu, Yueguo
1990 Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics 14(2). 237–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood & Ruqaiya Hasan
1976 Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hamaguchi, Eshun
1998 Nihonshakai towa nani ka: Fukuzatsukei no shiten kara [What is Japanese society?: Viewed as a complex system]. Tokyo: NHK Books.Google Scholar
Hanks, William F.
2014 Introduction to emancipatory pragmatics, special issue part 3: From practice theory to ba theory. Journal of Pragmatics 69. 1–3. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hashiguchi, Miki
1998 Nininshoo daimeishi anata no rekishiteki hensen ni tsuite [On the history of the Japanese second person pronoun anata ]. Journal of Studies in Kashima Taiiku University 19. 55–63.Google Scholar
Hassall, Tim
2013 Pragmatic development during short-term study abroad: The case of address terms in Indonesian. Journal of Pragmatics 55. 1–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hatta, Yoko
2003 The issues of making English an official language and English education in Japan. Bunkyo University Bungakubu Kiyo [Journal of Literature] 16(2). 107–136.Google Scholar
Haviland, John Beard
1979 How to talk to your brother-in-law in Guugu Yimidhirr. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Languages and their speakers, 161–240. Cambridge (Mass.): Winthrop.Google Scholar
Heritage, John
1984 Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Beverly, Sachiko Ide, Shoko Ikuta, Akiko Kawasaki & Tsunao Ogino
1986 Universals of linguistic politeness: Quantitative evidence from Japanese and American English. Journal of Pragmatics 10(3). 347–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hinds, John
1982 Ellipsis in Japanese. Edmonton: Linguistic Research.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich
1986 Principles of historical linguistics. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoshina, Koichi
1942 Daitooa kyooeiken to kokugo seisaku [Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere and national language policy]. Tokyo: Junseisha.Google Scholar
Ide, Sachiko
1982 Japanese sociolinguistics politeness and women’s language. Lingua 57(2–4). 357–385. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1989 Formal forms and discernment: Two neglected aspects of universals of linguistic politeness. Multilingua 8(2/3). 223–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1990a Person references of Japanese and American children. In Sachiko Ide & Naomi Hanaoka McGloin (eds.), Aspects of Japanese women’s language, 43–61. Tokyo: Kuroshio Shuppan.Google Scholar
1990b How and why do women speak more politely in Japanese? In Sachiko Ide & Naomi Hanaoka McGloin (eds.), Aspects of Japanese women’s language, 63–79. Tokyo: Kuroshio Shuppan.Google Scholar
1992a On the notion of wakimae: Toward an integrated framework of linguistic politeness. Mosaic of Language: Essays in Honour of Professor Natsuko Okuda, Mejiro Linguistic Society. 298–305.Google Scholar
1992b Gender and function of language use: Quantitative and qualitative evidence from Japanese. Pragmatics and Language Learning 3. 117–129.Google Scholar
2006 Wakimae no goyooron [Pragmatics of wakimae ]. Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
2012 Roots of the wakimae aspect of linguistic politeness: Modal expressions and Japanese sense of self. In Michel Meeuwis & Jan-Ola Östman (eds.), Pragmaticizing understanding: Studies for Jef Verschueren, 121–138. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ide, Sachiko & Chikako Sakurai
1997 Shiten to modaritii no gengo koodoo [Speech act, viewpoint and modality]. In Yukinori Takubo (ed.), Shiten to gengo koodoo [Viewpoint and speech act], 119–153. Tokyo: Kuroshio Shuppan.Google Scholar
Ide, Sachiko & Kishiko Ueno
2011 Honorifics and address terms. In Gisle Andersen & Karin Aijmer (eds.), Pragmatics of society, 439–470. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia
2001 Unparliamentary language: Insults as cognitive forms of ideological confrontation. In René Dirven, Roslyn Frank & Cornelia Ilie (eds.), Language and ideology, 235–263. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 Strategic uses of parliamentary forms of address: The case of the U.K. Parliament and the Swedish Riksdag. Journal of Pragmatics 42(4). 885–911. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Inaba, Akihide
1998 Jendaa to sutoresu [Gender and stress]. Kikan Kakei Keizai Kenkyuu [Quarterly Studies of Household Economy] 37(Winter). 32–40.Google Scholar
Inoue, Miyako
2004 What does language remember?: Indexical inversion and the naturalized history of Japanese women. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14(1). 39–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 Vicarious language: Gender and linguistic modernity in Japan. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T.
1974 Strategies of status manipulation in the Wolof greeting. In Richard Bauman & Joel Scherzer (eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking, 167–191. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ishii, Kazumi & Nerida Jarkey
2002 The housewife is born: The establishment of the notion and identity of the shufu in modern Japan. Japanese Studies 22(1). 35–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ishikawa, Matsutaro
1973 Nihon kyookasho taikei 15 kan: Joshi yoo [Japanese textbook system vol. 15: For women]. Tokyo: Kodansha.Google Scholar
Ishiyama, Osamu
2008 Diachronic perspective on personal pronouns in Japanese. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. New York: State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar
2012 The diachronic relationship between demonstratives and first/second person pronouns. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 13(1). 50–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019 Diachrony of personal pronouns in Japanese: A functional and cross-linguistic perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1971 [1957] Shifters, verbal categories and the Russian verb. In Roman Jakobson (ed.), Selected writings, 130–147. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Janney, Richard W. & Horst Arndt
1993 Universality and relativity in cross-cultural politeness research: A historical perspective. Multilingua 12(1). 13–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jarkey, Nerida
2015 The housewife’s companion: Identity construction in a Japanese women’s magazine. In Dwi Noverini Djenar, Ahmar Mahboob & Ken Cruickshank (eds.), Language and identity across modes of communication, 179–201. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jenson, Kenneth
1988 Forms of address in Indonesian. ITL Review of Applied Linguistics 81. 113–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1929 The philosophy of grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Jinnouchi, Masataka
1998 Nihongo no ima [Japanese today]. Tokyo: Arc.Google Scholar
Jung, Hyeseon
1999 Nihongo ninshooshi no shakaigengogakuteki koosatsu [Sociolinguistic study of Japanese personal reference terms]. Unpublished master’s thesis. Osaka: Osaka State University.Google Scholar
2003 Nihongo ninshooshi no shakaigengogakuteki kenkyuu [Sociolinguistic study of Japanese personal reference terms]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Osaka: Osaka State University.Google Scholar
Kadoya, Takateru
2009 Kyuushuu hoogen ni okeru ninshoo daimeishi yurai no bunmatsushi [Considerations about sentence final particles derived from personal pronouns in the Kyushu Area]. Nagoya Hoogen Kenkyuukai Kaihoo [Journal of Nagoya Dialect Society] 25. 133–145.Google Scholar
Kagetsu, Mayumi
2008 Kokkai kaigiroku ni okeru kizukanai hoogen [Unrealised dialect in the minutes of the Japanese Diet]. In Kenjiro Matsuda (ed.), Kokkai kaigiroku o tsukatta nihongo kenkyuu [Studies of Japanese language using the minutes of the Japanese Diet], 207–233. Tokyo: Hitsuji Shobo.Google Scholar
Kajiwara, Makiko
2004 Nihongo ni okeru taishooshi anata no shiyooryooiki ni tsuite [The usage of anata: The second person pronouns in Japanese]. Journal of International Student Centre, Shinshu University 5. 47–57.Google Scholar
Kamada, Osamu
2000 Nihongo no inyoo [Reported speech in Japanese]. Tokyo: Hitsuji Shobo.Google Scholar
Kameyama, Megumi
1985 Zero anaphora: The case of Japanese. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Stanford: Stanford University.Google Scholar
Kanai, Hayato
2002 Shitsureisa toiu kanten kara mita nininshoo shiji no taikei [Second person reference system from the perspective of impoliteness]. Journal of the Faculty of Literature Study, Graduate School of Waseda University 3(48). 83–98.Google Scholar
2003a Futsuu meishi ni yoru nininshoo shiji: Kansetsuka toiu sutorategii [Second person reference with proper nouns: Strategy of indirectness]. Kokugogaku Kenkyuu to Shiryoo [Studies in Japanese Linguistics and Materials] 26. 13–23.Google Scholar
2003b Nininshoo shiji ni okeru shijishi sochira ni tsuite no koosatsu: Nininshoo meishi anata tono taishoo o tooshite [Study of sochira as a second person reference: Through the comparative study of anata ]. Journal of Centre for International Students, Hitotsubashi University 6. 53–62.Google Scholar
2012 About the idea of second person pronoun by Ortega. Journal for International Education & Research: Centre for International Exchange, Saitama University 6. 24–31.Google Scholar
Kanamaru, Fumi
1997 Ninshoo daimeishi, koshoo [Person pronouns and address terms]. In Sachiko Ide (ed.), Joseigo no sekai [The world of women’s language], 15–32. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.Google Scholar
Kanokporn, Kaenjak
1990 Koshoo no taishoo kenkyuu: Tai go [Contrastive study of address terms: Thai]. Nihongogaku 9. 59–64.Google Scholar
Kanzaki, Takaaki
1994 Nichi-eigo daimeishi no kenkyuu [A study of pronouns in English and Japanese]. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.Google Scholar
Karim, Nik Safiah
1995 Personal pronouns and forms of address in Malay. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 6(3). 183–191.Google Scholar
Katagiri, Yasuhiro
2007 Dialogue functions of Japanese sentence-final particles yo and ne . Journal of Pragmatics 39(7). 1313–1323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kawai, Hayao
1976 Bosei shakai nihon no byoori [The pathology of Japan as a maternal society]. Tokyo: Chuo Koronsha.Google Scholar
Kim, Angela A-Jeoung
2012 Power and solidarity as observed in forms of address/reference in Japanese political discourse: Focusing on selected samples from the minutes of the Japanese Diet (2001–2005) in BCCWJ. Journal of Japanese and Japanese Language Education, Keio University 40. 19–47.Google Scholar
Kindaichi, Kyosuke
1959 Nihon no keigo [Japanese honorifics]. Tokyo: Kadokawa Shoten.Google Scholar
Kitagawa, Chisako & Adrienne Lehrer
1990 Impersonal uses of personal pronouns. Journal of Pragmatics 14(5). 739–759. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kluge, Bettina
2016 Generic uses of the second person singular – how speakers deal with referential ambiguity and misunderstandings. Pragmatics 26(3). 501–522. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, Emiko
1992 Suki dakara omae nante: Paatonaa no yobikata [Using omae because of love?: How to address one’s partner]. In Orie Endo (ed.), Josei no yobikata daikenkyuu [Studies of address terms for women], 11–53. Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
Kojima, Toshio
1974 Kooki edo kotoba no keigo taikei [The honorific system in the late Edo period]. Tokyo: Kazama Shoin.Google Scholar
Kori, Chizuko
2003 Ichininshoo daimeishi no shiyoo jittai to shiyoo ishiki ni tsuite: Hirosaki shi no seijin danjo no baai [Situations and perceptions when using the first person pronoun: Focusing on adults in Hirosaki]. Journal of the Faculty of Education, Hirosaki University 90. 1–8.Google Scholar
Koyama, Wataru
2004 The linguistic ideologies of modern Japanese honorifics and the historic reality of modernity. Language & Communication 24(4). 413–435. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koyano, Tetsuo
1996 Terebi to wakamono kotoba [Television and youth language]. Nihongogaku [Journal of Japanese Linguistics] 15(9). 36–45.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu
1973 The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kuroda, Shigeyuki
1965 Generative grammatical studies in the Japanese language. Doctoral dissertation. Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Kurokawa, Shozo
1972 Japanese terms of address: Some usages of the first and second person pronouns. Papers in Japanese Linguistics 1(2). 228–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kyukakai
1941 Kaisetsu reihoo yookoo: Mombushoo seitei [Explanation of handbook of manners: Enacted by The Ministry of Education]. Tokyo: Bunenkaku.Google Scholar
Labov, William
1978 Sociolinguistic patterns. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin
1973a The logic of politeness: Minding your p’s and q’s. Chicago Linguistics Society (CLS), 292–395.Google Scholar
1973b Language and woman’s place. Language in Society 2(1). 45–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1977 What you can do with words: Politeness, pragmatics and performatives. Texas Conference on Performatives, Presuppositions and Implicatures, 79–105.Google Scholar
1979 Stylistic strategies within a grammar of style. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 327(1). 53–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Benjamin
1997 Talking heads: Language, metalanguage, and the semiotics of subjectivity. Durham: Duke University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Duck-Young
2002 The function of the zero particle with special reference to spoken Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 34(6). 645–682. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 Involvement and the Japanese interactive particles ne and yo . Journal of Pragmatics 39(2). 363–388. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Duck-Young & Yoko Yonezawa
2008 The role of the overt expression of first and second person subject in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 40(4). 733–767. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Narah
2014 A reconsideration of the omission of first and second person subjects in modern spoken Korean: Focusing on the pragmatic meanings of the overt subject expressions. Discourse and Cognition 21(3). 145–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019 A pragmatic and sociocultural perspective to subject expression in spoken Korean: With focus on first and second person. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1983 Principles of pragmatics. London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Leith, Dick
1997 A social history of English. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 Deixis. In Laurence R. Horn & Gregory L. Ward (eds.), Handbook of pragmatics, 97–121. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam A.
2004 Power and politeness in action: Disagreements in oral communication. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A. & Holger Limberg
2012 Introduction to advice in discourse. In Holger Limberg & Miriam A. Locher (eds.), Advice in discourse, 1–27. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luong, Hy V.
1990 Discursive practices and linguistic meanings: The Vietnamese system of person reference. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mao, LuMing Robert
1994 Beyond politeness theory: ‘Face’ revisited and renewed. Journal of Pragmatics 21(5). 451–486. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Samuel
1975 A reference grammar of Japanese. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Matsuda, Kenjiro
2004 The on-line full-text database of the minutes of the Diet: Its potentials and limitations. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics at Kobe Shoin 7. 55–82.Google Scholar
2008 Kokkai kaigiroku o tsukatta nihongo kenkyuu [Studies of Japanese language using the minutes of the Japanese Diet]. Tokyo: Hitsuji Shobo.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko
1988 Reexamination of the universality of face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 12(4). 403–426. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maynard, Senko K.
1993 Discourse modality: Subjectivity, emotion and voice in the Japanese language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996 Multivoicedness in speech and thought representation: The case of self-quotation in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 25. 207–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997 Japanese communication: Language and thought in context. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000 Jooi no gengogaku: Basho kooshooron to nihongo hyoogen no patosu [Linguistic emotivity: Place and negotiation theory and pathos of Japanese expressions]. Tokyo: Kuroshio Shuppan.Google Scholar
2001a Expressivity in discourse: Vocatives and themes in Japanese. Language Sciences 23(6). 679–705. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001b Falling in love with style: Expressive functions of stylistic shifts in a Japanese television drama series. Functions of Language 8(1). 1–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001c Koisuru futari no kanjoo kotoba: Dorama hyoogen no bunseki to nihongoron [Emotive language between lovers: Drama analysis and a study of Japanese]. Tokyo: Kuroshio Shuppan.Google Scholar
2016 Fluid orality in the discourse of Japanese popular culture. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McGloin, Naomi Hanaoka
1990 Sex difference and sentence-final particles. In Sachiko Ide & Naomi Hanaoka McGloin (eds.), Aspects of Japanese women’s language, 23–41. Tokyo: Kuroshio Shuppan.Google Scholar
Minagawa, Harumi
2009 The specificity and the constraints on NP-external placement of quantity expressions in Japanese. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 25(1). 39–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miwa, Masashi
2000 Ninshooshi to keigo [Person reference terms and honorifics]. Kyoto: Jimbun Shoin.Google Scholar
2005 Ichininshoo nininshoo to taiwa [First/second person reference terms and dialogue]. Kyoto: Jimbun Shoin.Google Scholar
2010 Nihongo ninshooshi no fushigi: Mono, koto, hito, kimi, kami [The mystery of Japanese person reference terms: Things, people, Emperor, and God]. Tokyo: Horitsu Bunkasha.Google Scholar
Mizuochi, Masaaki
2006 Kakei no jikan haibun koodoo to chichioya no ikuji sanka [Distribution of household time and the fathers’ participation in child raising]. Kikan Shakai Hoshoo Kenkyuu [Quarterly Journal of Social Security Research] 42(2). 149–164.Google Scholar
Mogi, Toshinobu
2008 Kokkai kaigiroku ni okeru gyoosei bunya no gairaigo [Loan words in government administration observed in the minutes of the Japanese Diet]. In Kenjiro Matsuda (ed.), Kokkai kaigiroku o tsukatta nihongo kenkyuu [Studies of Japanese language using the minutes of the Japanese Diet], 85–110. Tokyo: Hitsuji Shobo.Google Scholar
Mombusho
1937 Kokutai no hongi [Underlying principle of national polity]. Tokyo: The Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
Moody, Stephen J.
2018 Terms of address and identity in American-Japanese workplace interaction. In Haruko Minegishi Cook & Janet S. Shibamoto-Smith (eds.), Japanese at work: Politeness, power, and personae in Japanese workplace discourse, 205–234. Cham: Springer International Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morford, Janet
1997 Social indexicality in French pronominal address. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 7(1). 3–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mori, Arimasa
1979 Mori Arimasa zenshuu 12 kan [Collected works of Arimasa Mori vol. 12]. Tokyo: Chikuma Shobo.Google Scholar
Morita, Emi
2003 Children’s use of address and reference terms: Language socialization in a Japanese-English bilingual environment. Multilingua 22(4). 367–395. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morita, Yoshiyuki
1987 Nihongo o migaku shoojiten: Meishi hen [Dictionary for polishing Japanese: Nouns]. Tokyo: Kodansha.Google Scholar
1989 Kiso nihongo jiten [Dictionary of basic Japanese]. Tokyo: Kadokawa Shoten.Google Scholar
Morrow, Phillip R.
2012 Online advice in Japanese: Giving advice in an internet discussion forum. In Holger Limberg & Miriam A. Locher (eds.), Advice in discourse, 255–280. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Muramatsu, Keiko & Min Hua Xie
2015 Nihongo no anata no honshitsu to nihongo no shokyuu kyooiku ni okeru anata no hitsuyoosei [The sense of anata ‘you’ in Japanese and the need for teaching it to Japanese language beginners]. Meijo Ronso [Meijo Treatise Collection] 15. 115–138.Google Scholar
Nakamura, Momoko
2005 Gengo ideorogii to shite no onna kotoba [Women’s language as an ideology]. Goyooron Kenkyuu [Studies of Pragmatics] 7. 109–122.Google Scholar
2006 Gengo ideorogii toshite no onna kotoba: Meijiki jogakuseikotoba no seiritsu [Women’s language as a linguistic ideology: The formation of ‘schoolgirls’ language’ in the Meiji era]. In Nihongo Jendaa Gakkai (ed.), Nihongo to jendaa [Japanese and gender], 121–138. Tokyo: Hitsuji Shobo.Google Scholar
Nakane, Chie
1967 Tateshakai no ningen kankei [Personal relations in a vertical society]. Tokyo: Kodansha.Google Scholar
1972 Human relations in Japan: Summary translation of tateshakai no ningen kankei [Personal relations in a vertical society]. Tokyo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.Google Scholar
Nariyama, Shigeko
2003 Ellipsis and reference tracking in Japanese. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nihon Joshi Kasei Gakuin
1915 Katei no shiori [Handbook for the household]. Tokyo: Nihon Joshi Kasei Gakuin.Google Scholar
Niwa, Tetsuya
1989 Mu-joshi no kinoo: Shudai to kaku to gojun [The function of the zero particle: Topic, case and word order]. Kokugo Kokubun [Japanese Language and Literature] 58(10). 38–57.Google Scholar
Noguchi, Tohru
1997 Two types of pronouns and variable binding. Language 73(4). 770–797. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nwoye, Onuigbo G.
1992 Linguistic politeness and sociocultural variations of the notion of face. Journal of Pragmatics 18(4). 309–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ogi, Naomi
2014 Language and an expression of identities: Japanese sentence-final particles ne and na . Journal of Pragmatics 64. 72–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Okamoto, Shigeko
1985 Ellipsis in Japanese discourse. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
1997 Social context, linguistic ideology, and indexical expressions in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 28(6). 795–817. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 Politeness in East Asia. In Miriam A. Locher & Sage L. Graham (eds.), Interpersonal pragmatics, 71–100. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Okamoto, Shigeko & Janet S. Shibamoto-Smith
2016 The social life of the Japanese language: Cultural discourse and situated practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Okazaki, Shoko
1994 Ellipsis in Japanese conversational discourse. Doctoral dissertation. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Onishi, Masayuki
1994 Semantic primitives in Japanese. In Cliff Goddard & Anna Wierzbicka (eds.), Semantic and lexical universals: Theory and empirical findings, 361–385. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Onishi, Tomoyuki
1992 Nihongo no ninshooshi to ninshoo daimeishi: Suzuki setsu saikoo [Personal reference terms in Japanese: A reconsideration of Suzuki’s view]. Journal of Liberal Arts, Tezukayama Gakuin University 30. 26–46.Google Scholar
Otaka, Hiromi
1999 Nihongo ni okeru taishoo shiji goi sentaku no sutoratejii [Strategies for the choice of terms of address/reference in Japanese]. Language and Culture, Kwansei Gakuin University Language Centre 2. 29–41.Google Scholar
Otani, Hiromi
1995  Wa to ga to Ø: Wa mo ga mo tsukaenai bun [ Wa, ga and Ø: A sentence in which wa or ga cannot be used]. In Tatsuo Miyajima & Yoshio Nitta (eds.), Nihongo ruigi hyoogen no bumpoo: Tambunhen [Japanese grammar of similar expressions: The simple sentence], 287–295. Tokyo: Kuroshio Shuppan.Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara Hall
1973 The semantics of belief-sentences. In Jaakko Hintikka, Julius Moravcsik & Patrick Suppes (eds.), Approaches to natural language, 309–336. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peng, Fred F. C.
1982 Koshoo no shakaigaku: Nichi-bei no hikaku [Sociolinguistics for personal reference terms: Contrastive study of Japanese and English]. In Tetsuya Kunihiro (ed.), Nichi-eigo hikaku kooza: Bunka to shakai [Contrastive studies of Japanese and English: Culture and society], 61–82. Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
Piazza, Roberta, Monika Bednarek & Fabio Rossi
2011 Telecinematic discourse: Approaches to the language of films and television series. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary
1975 Mind, language, and reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Read, K. E.
1955 Morality and the concept of the person among the Gahuku-Gama. Oceania 25(4). 233–282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Katsue Akiba
1990 Female speakers of Japanese in transition. In Sachiko Ide & Naomi Hanaoka McGloin (eds.), Aspects of Japanese women’s language, 129–146. Tokyo: Kuroshio Shuppan.Google Scholar
1997 Gengo to seisa no kenkyuu: Genzai to syoorai [A study of language and gender: Present and future]. In Sachiko Ide (ed.), Joseigo no sekai [The world of women’s language], 199–216. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.Google Scholar
Ri, Choha
2002 Nihongo shijitaikei no rekishi [A history of the demonstrative system in Japanese]. Kyoto: Kyoto Daigaku Gakujutsu Shuppankai.Google Scholar
Rumsey, Alan
1981 Kinship and context among the Ngarinyin. Oceania 51(3). 181–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1990 Wording, meaning and linguistic ideology. American Anthropologist 92(2). 346–361. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey & Emanuel A. Schegloff
2007 Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In Nick J. Enfield & Tanya Stivers (eds.), Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural and social perspectives, 23–28. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saito, Kiyoko
1999 Nininshoo daimeishi to keii hyoogen: Nichi-eigo taishoo kenkyuu [Politeness and the second person pronoun: A contrastive study of English and Japanese]. Journal of the Faculty of Literature, Baika Women’s University 33(3). 1–11.Google Scholar
Sakuma, Kanae
1959 Nihongo no gengo riron [Linguistic theories of the Japanese language]. Tokyo: Koseisha Koseikaku.Google Scholar
Sanada, Ryoko
1997 Hito o arawasu kotoba: Nihongo ni okeru nininshoo no kenkyuu [A study of second person reference terms in Japanese]. Journal of Mejirogakuin Junior College 34. 85–94.Google Scholar
Sano, Shinichiro
2008 Kokkai kaigiroku ni yoru sa ire kotoba no bunseki [An analysis of sa insertion using the minutes of the Japanese diet]. In Kenjiro Matsuda (ed.), Kokkai kaigiroku o tsukatta nihongo kenkyuu [Studies of Japanese language using minutes of the Japanese Diet], 159–184. Tokyo: Hitsuji Shobo.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1996a Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology 102(1). 161–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996b Some practices for referring to persons in talk-in-interaction: A partial sketch of a systematics. In Barbara Fox (ed.), Studies in anaphora, 437–485. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1994 Approaches to discourse. Massachusetts/Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah, Deborah Tannen & Heidi E. Hamilton
2001 The handbook of discourse analysis. Massachusetts/Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Searle, John R.
1969 Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seki, Masaaki
1997 Nihongo kyooikushi kenkyuu josetsu [A study of the history of Japanese language education]. Tokyo: 3A Network.Google Scholar
Sepehri Badi, Azam
2011 Gendai nihongo ni okeru kazoku kara yobareru toki no koshoo [A sociolinguistic study of kinship terms used between family members in the Japanese language]. Journal of Sociolinguistic Studies, Hitotsubashi University 2. 57–71.Google Scholar
2012 Gendai nihongo ni okeru kazoku ni yobikakeru sai no koshoo hyoogen: Sedaisa to seisa o chuushin ni [Expressions used to address family members in modern Japanese: Generation differences and gender differences]. Journal of Japanese Language Studies, Hitotsubashi University 1. 61–72.Google Scholar
2013 Nihongo to perushago no koshoo ni kansuru taishoo kenkyuu [A contrastive study of Japanese and Persian address terms]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Tokyo: Hitotsubashi University.Google Scholar
Sheffler, Harold W.
1978 Australian kin classification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shibamoto-Smith, Janet S.
2003 Gendered structures in Japanese. In Marlis Hellinger & Hadumod Bußmann (eds.), Gender across language: The linguistic representation of women and men, 201–225. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1990 The language of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi, Shigeru Miyagawa & Hisashi Noda
2017 Handbook of Japanese syntax. Boston: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shigematsu, Keiichi
1956  Sensei to iu nininshoo [A second person reference term sensei ]. Kyooiku Jijitsu [Educational Facts] 11(2). 108–109.Google Scholar
Shimizu, Hiroshi
2000 Kyoosoo to basho [Co-creation and place]. In Hiroshi Shimizu, Tadashi Kume, Yoshiyuki Miwa & Yoshihito Miyake (eds.), Ba to kyoosoo [ Ba and co-creation], 23–117. Tokyo: NTT Shuppan.Google Scholar
Shimotani, Maki
2012 Shizen danwa ni okeru nininshoo daimeishi anata ni tsuite no ichi koosatsu: Ninshikiteki yuuisei (Epistemic Primacy) o fumaete [A study of the second person pronoun anata in natural discourse: With the notion of Epistemic Primacy]. Essay Collection in Japanese Education, Centre for International Students in Kansai University of Foreign Language 22. 63–96.Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack & Merav Shohet
2013 The problem of peers in Vietnamese interaction. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 19(3). 618–638. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, Anna
2004 Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1979 Language structure and linguistic ideology. In Paul R. Clyne, William F. Hanks & Carol L. Hofbauer (eds.), The elements: A parasession on linguistic units and levels, 193–247. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
1985 Language and the culture of gender: At the intersection of structure, usage, and ideology. In Elizabeth Mertz & Richard J. Parmentier (eds.), Semiotic mediation: Sociocultural and psychological perspectives, 219–259. Orlando: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Horst J.
2003 From pragmatics to grammar: Tracing the development of respect in the history of the German pronouns of address. In Irma Taavitsainen & Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Diachronic perspectives on address term systems, 85–123. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slembrouck, Stef
1992 The parliamentary Hansard ‘verbatim’ report: The written construction of spoken discourse. Language and Literature 1(2). 101–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sneddon, James N., K. Alexander Adelaar, Dwi Noverini Djenar & Michael C. Ewing
2010 Indonesian: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
1995 Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya
2007 Alternative recognitionals in person reference. In Nick J. Enfield & Tanya Stivers (eds.), Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural and social perspectives, 73–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, Nick J. Enfield & Stephen C. Levinson
2007 Person reference in interaction. In Nick J. Enfield & Tanya Stivers (eds.), Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural, and social perspectives, 1–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada & Jakob Steensig
2011 Knowledge, morality and affiliation in social interaction. In Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada & Jakob Steensig (eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation, 3–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
SturtzSreetharan, Cindi L.
2009  Ore and omae: Japanese men’s uses of first-and second-person pronouns. Pragmatics 19(2). 253–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sugamoto, Nobuko
1989 Pronominality: A noun-pronoun continuum. In Roberta Corrigan, Fred R. Eckman & Michael Noonan (eds.), Linguistic categorization, 267–291. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, Mutsumi
1993 Joseigo no honshitsu: Teineisa, hatsuwa kooi no shiten kara [The nature of women’s language: Looking at politeness and speech acts]. Nihongogaku [Japanese Linguistics] 12(6). 148–155.Google Scholar
2007 Kotoba no danjosa to nihongo kyooiku [Gender difference in language and Japanese language teaching]. Nihongo Kyooiku [Journal of Japanese Language Teaching] 134. 48–57.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Takao
1972 Nihonjin no gengoishiki to koodooyooshiki: Ningenkankei no haaku no yooshiki o chuushin toshite [Language awareness and behaviour in the Japanese: A special focus on human relationships]. In Shigeo Kawamoto, Tetsuya Kunihiro & Oki Hayashi (eds.), Nihon no gengogaku dai 5 kan: Imi, goi [Linguistics in Japanese vol. 5: Semantics and lexicology], 428–445. Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
1973 Kotoba to bunka [Language and culture]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
1978 Japanese and the Japanese: Words in culture. New York: Kodansha International.Google Scholar
1982 Jishooshi to taishooshi no hikaku. In Tetsuya Kunihiro (ed.), Nichi-eigo hikaku kooza: Bunka to shakai [Contrastive studies of Japanese and English: Culture and society], 17–59. Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
Takahara, Kumiko
1992 Second person deixis in Japanese and power semantics. Intercultural Communication Studies 2(1). 117–128.Google Scholar
Takasaki, Midori
1992 Kekkonsuru to namae ga nakunaru nante [Losing a name upon marriage]. In Orie Endo (ed.), Josei no yobikata daikenkyuu [Studies of address terms toward women], 105–153. Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
Takiura, Masato
2005 Nihon no keigoron: Poraitonesu riron kara no saikentoo [Keigo theory in Japan: A reexamination from the viewpoint of politeness theory]. Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
Takubo, Yukinori
1997 Nihongo no ninshoo hyoogen [Person reference expressions in Japanese]. In Yukinori Takubo (ed.), Shiten to gengo koodoo [A viewpoint and speech act], 13–44. Tokyo: Kuroshio Shuppan.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Akio
1991 Hyoojungo [Standard language]. Tokyo: Seibundo Shinkosha.Google Scholar
1996 Tookyoogo to hyoojungo [Tokyo variety and standard Japanese]. In Kokugakuin Daigaku Nihonbunka Kenkyuujo (ed.), Tookyoogo no yukue [Whereabouts of Tokyo variety], 21–76. Tokyo: Tokyodo Shuppan.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Katsuhiko
1989 Kokkago o koete [Beyond national language]. Tokyo: Chikuma Shobo.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Yukari
2010 Shutoken ni okeru gengo dootai no kenkyuu [Language dynamics in the Tokyo metropolitan area]. Tokyo: Kazama Shoin.Google Scholar
Tani, Sumie
1981 Gendaigo ni okeru anata [The use of anata ‘you’ in Modern Japanese]. Inter-University Center for Japanese Language Studies Administered by Stanford University 4. 15–29.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
1989 Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2007 Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse (2nd edn.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
2008 Origins of human communication. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Travis, Catherine
2002 La metalengua semantica natural: The natural semantic metalanguage of Spanish. In Anna Wierzbicka & Cliff Goddard (eds.), Meaning and universal grammar: Theory and empirical findings, 173–242. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsujimura, Natsuko
1996 An introduction to Japanese linguistics. Cambridge (Mass.): Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tsujimura, Toshiki
1968 Keigo no shiteki kenkyuu [Historical studies of honorifics]. Tokyo: Tokyodo Shuppan.Google Scholar
Uesugi, Harunori
1910 Onna gojoo kun to gorin no kyoo [The teaching of the five human relations and the five eternal virtues for women]. Tokyo: Takanawa Saihoo Jogakkoo.Google Scholar
Usui, Yoshiko
2005 Kokkai ni okeru hantai iken hyoomei no koozoo: Kokkai kaigiroku kensaku shisutemu o shiyoo shite [Expressions of objection in the Japanese Diet: Using the Diet Conference Minutes Retrieval System]. Proceedings of 15th Conference of Sociolinguistics Society, 202–205.Google Scholar
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2009 Speech and thought representation in English: A cognitive-functional approach. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wales, Kathleen M.
1983  Thou and you in Early Modern English: Brown and Gilman re-appraised. Studia Linguistica 37(2). 107–125. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watsuji, Tetsuro
2007 [1937] Rinrigaku [Ethics]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J., Sachiko Ide & Konrad Ehlich
1992 Politeness in language: Studies in its history, theory and practice. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whitman, John
1979 Scrambled, over easy, or sunny side up? Chicago Linguistic Society 15. 342–352.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1992 Semantics, culture, and cognition: Universal human concepts in culture-specific configurations. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1997 Understanding cultures through their key words: English, Russian, Polish, German, and Japanese. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2012 ‘Advice’ in English and in Russian: A contrastive and cross-cultural perspective. In Holger Limberg & Miriam A. Locher (eds.), Advice in discourse, 309–332. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams-van Klinken, Catharina & John Hajek
2006 Patterns of address in Dili Tetum, East Timor. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 29(2). 21.21–21.18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, John
1990 Politically speaking: The pragmatic analysis of political language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
1953 Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Nessa
1976 Speech events and natural speech: Some implications for sociolinguistic methodology. Language in Society 5(2). 189–209. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Woolard, Kathryn A. & Bambi B. Schieffelin
1994 Language ideology. Annual Review of Anthropology 23. 55–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yamamoto, Kazuhide
1971 Gembun itchi no rekishi ronkoo [A historical study of colloquial style]. Tokyo: Ofusha.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, Kazuhide & Yasuaki Adachi
2005 Informative spoken language summarization of the minutes of the Japanese Diet. Shizen Gengo Shori [Natrual Language Processing] 12(1). 3–28.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, Seisaku & Robert Edgar Carter
1996 Watsuji Tetsuro’s Rinrigaku: Ethics in Japan. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Yanabu, Akira
1998 Omote/ura no bunka koozoo [Obverse/reverse cultural structure]. In Eshun Hamaguchi (ed.), Nihon shakai towa nani ka [What is Japanese society?], 118–134. Tokyo: NHK Books.Google Scholar
Yasuda, Toshiaki
1999 Kokugo to hoogen no aida: Gengo koochiku no seijigaku [The national language and dialect: Language politics]. Kyoto: Jimbun Shoin.Google Scholar
2006 Kokugo no kindaishi [Modern history of national language in Japan]. Tokyo: Chuo Koronsha.Google Scholar
2007 Kokugo Shingikai: Meisoo no rokujuunen [The National Language Council of Japan: Sixty years of straying]. Tokyo: Kodansha.Google Scholar
Yokotani, Kenji & Keizo Hasegawa
2010a Discourse modalities of family nicknames: Comparison between unbound family nicknames and non-unbound family nicknames. Annual Report of Graduate School of Education in Tohoku University 59(1). 275–292.Google Scholar
2010b Bubetsu shita koshoo wa haiguusha booryoku o shimesu [Insulting family nicknames reflect spousal violence against women]. Annual Report of Graduate School of Education in Tohoku University 58(2). 229–238.Google Scholar
Yonezawa, Yoko
2014 Nininshoo daimeishi anata ni kansuru ichikoosatsu: Kokkaigijiroku no bunseki o tooshite [A study of the second person pronoun anata ‘you’ through an analysis of the minutes of the Japanese Diet]. Proceedings of the 18th Biennial Conference of the Japanese Studies Association of Australia. http://​japaninstitute​.anu​.edu​.au​/sites​/default​/files​/u6​/26​_Yoko​_Yonezawa​-JSAA2013​.pdf
2016 Nininshoo daimeishi anata ni kansuru choosa hookoku [Native speakers’ perceptions of the second person pronoun anata ‘you’ in Japanese]. Nihongo Kyooiku [Journal of Japanese Language Teaching] 163(4). 64–78.Google Scholar
2019 Constructing fluid relationships through language: A study of address terms in a Japanese drama and its pedagogical implications. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 35(2). 189–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yoshioka, Yoshimasa
2014 Arimasa Mori’s essay on the formation of the personality. Journal of Toyo Eiwa University 10. 1–16.Google Scholar
Yui, Megumi
2007 Nihongo oyobi eigo ni okeru taishoo shiji no kinoo: Poraitonesu tono kanrensei [Functions of address terms in English and Japanese: With reference to politeness]. Surugadai University Studies 33. 19–30.Google Scholar
Zhu, Li
2008 Gendai nihongo no nininshoo daimeishi anata ni kansuru kenkyuu: Chuugoku de shuppan sareta kyookasho to nihon de shuppan sareta kyookasho no bunseki o chuushin ni [A study of anata ‘you’ in Modern Japanese: An analysis of textbooks published in Japan and China]. Journal of Studies of Education, Chugoku Shikoku Education Association 54(2). 691–694.Google Scholar