Part of
It's different with you: Contrastive perspectives on address researchEdited by Nicole Baumgarten and Roel Vismans
[Topics in Address Research 5] 2023
► pp. 220–244
Edited by Nicole Baumgarten and Roel Vismans
[Topics in Address Research 5] 2023
► pp. 220–244
Chapter 9And the postcode darlin’. Vocative variation in service
encounters on the telephone in Northern England
The chapter presents the results of an investigation of vocative use in telephone service encounters in the British housing market. The investigation is based on 300+ “mystery shopping” telephone calls placed with real estate agents servicing four socio-economically different areas of a city in northern England. The results show how the contrastiveness inherent in the address system is put to use in context-specific decisions about relationship and transaction management in telephone service encounters: Vocative use is nonreciprocal and restricted to estate agents. The frequency of vocative use as well as choice of vocative type by estate agents (first name, last name, honorific, endearment) is socio-economically stratified and sensitive to socio-ethnic group membership projected through callers’ accent and name. Variation in vocative type within individual calls allows the agent to explicate an asymmetrical role relationship for the purpose of transaction control.
Keywords: vocatives, endearments, service encounters, telephone interactions, British English, Northern England
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Vocatives
- 2.1Forms and semantic meaning
- 2.2Pragmatic-communicative functions
- 2.3Addressing and naming
- 2.4Addressing and naming in telephone service encounters
- 3.Data and analysis
- 4.Results
- 4.1Vocative types and variation (frequencies)
- 4.2Endearments
- 5.Conclusion
-
Notes -
References -
Appendix
References
Agar, Michael
1985 Institutional
discourse. Text – Interdisciplinary
Journal for the Study of
Discourse 5(3). 147–168. 
Agha, Asif
2007 Language
and social
relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ajmer, Karin
Antaki, Charles
2002 “Lovely”:
Turn-initial high-grade assessments in telephone
closings. Discourse
Studies 4(1). 5–23.
Arminen, Ilkka
2005 Institutional
interaction: Studies of talk at
work. London: Routledge.
Baumgarten, Nicole
2021 “Love” as a term of address in British English: Micro-diachronic
variation. Contrastive
Pragmatics 3(1). 31–58.
Baumgarten, Nicole, Inke Du Bois & Victoria Gill
2019 Patterns
of othering minority groups in telephone gatekeeping encounters in
the Sheffield property
market. Journal of Language and
Discrimination 3(2). 120–149.
Beal, Jean
2004 English
dialects in the North of England: morphology and
syntax. In Edgar W. W. Schneider, Kate Burridge, Bernd Kortmann, Rajend Mesthrie & Clive Upton (eds.), A
handbook of varieties of
English, 114–141. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton 2004.
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, Edward Finegan & Randolph Quirk
1999 Longman
grammar of spoken and written
English. London: Longman.
Braun, Friederike
1988 Terms
of address: Problems of patterns and usage in various languages and
cultures. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Cameron, Deborah
2000 Styling
the worker: Gender and the commodification of language in the
globalized service economy. Journal
of
Sociolinguistics 4(3). 323–347.
Clark, Herbert H.
1996 Using
language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clayman, Steven. E.
2010 Address
terms in the service of other actions: The case of news interview
talk. Discourse &
Communication 4(2). 161–183.
2012 Address
terms in the organization of turns at talk: The case of pivotal turn
extensions. Journal of
Pragmatics 44(13). 1853–186.
2013 Agency
in response: The role of prefatory address
terms. Journal of
Pragmatics 57, 290–302.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Margret Selting
2018 Interactional
linguistics: Studying language in social
interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coupland, Nikolas & Hywel Bishop
2007 Ideologised
values for British accents. Journal
of
Sociolinguistics 11(1). 74–93.
Culpeper, Jonathan & Michael Gillings
2018 Politeness
variation in England: A north-south
divide? In Vaclav Brezina, Robbie Love & Karin Aijmer (eds.), Corpus
approaches to contemporary British speech: Sociolinguistic studies
of the Spoken
BNC2014, 33–59. London: Routledge.
de Lopez, Kathrin L.
2013 Clause-final
man in Tyneside
English. In Gisle Andersen & Kristin Bech (eds.), English
corpus linguistics: Variation in time, space and
genre, 139–162. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Dickey, Eleanor
1997 Forms
of address and terms of
reference. Journal of
Linguistics 33(2). 255–274.
Ehlich, Konrad & Jochen Rehbein
1994 Institutionsanalyse. In Gisela Brünner & Gabriele Graefen (Hg.) Texte
und
Diskurse. 287–327. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Félix-Brasdefer, J. C.
(2015) The
language of service
encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Forey, Gail & Marvin Lam
2013 Applying
systemic functional linguistics: Understanding the choices of
quality in the workplace. Journal of
Applied Linguistics and Professional
Practice 9(2). 23–41.
Formentelli, Maicol
2007 The
vocative mate in contemporary English: A corpus
based
study. In Andrea Sansò (ed.), Language
resources and linguistic
theory, 180–199, Milan: Franco Angeli.
Fraser, Bruce
1996 Pragmatic
markers. Pragmatics 6(2). 167–190.
Friginal, Eric
2009 The
language of outsourced call centers: A corpus-based study of
cross-cultural
interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Garrett, Peter, Nikolas Coupland & Angie Williams
2003 Investigating
language attitudes: Social meanings of dialect, ethnicity and
performance. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
Goffman, Erving
1981 Forms
of talk. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Gumperz, J.
1982 Discourse
strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Halliday, Michael A. K.
(1978) Language
as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and
meaning. London: Hodder Arnold.
Harré, Rom & Luk Van Langenhove
1991 Varieties
of positioning. Journal for the
Theory of Social
Behaviour 21(4). 393–407.
Heritage, John
1984 Garfinkel
and
ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
2013 Epistemics
in
conversation. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds.), The
handbook of conversation
analysis, 370–394. Hoboken NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Heyd, Theresa
Hood, Susan
2010 Naming
and negotiating relationships in call centre
talk. In Gail Forey & Jane Lockwood (eds.), Globalization,
communication and the workplace: Talking across the
world, 88–106. London: Continuum.
Hultgren, Anna Kristina
2017 Vocatives
as rationalized politeness: Theoretical insights from emerging norms
in call centre service
encounters. Journal of
Sociolinguistics 21(1). 90–111.
Jagodziński, Piotr & Dawn Archer
2018 Co-creating
customer experience through call centre interaction: Interactional
achievement and professional
face. Journal of Politeness
Research 14(2). 257–277.
Jaworska, Sylvia & Christiana Themistocleous
2018 Public
discourses on multilingualism in the UK: Triangulating a corpus
study with a sociolinguistic attitude
survey. Language in
Society 47(1). 57–88.
Jaworski, A., & Galasiński, D.
(2000) Vocative
address forms and ideological legitimization in political
debates. Discourse
Studies, 2(1), 35–53.
Johnstone, Barbara, Jennifer Andrus & Andrew E. Danielson
2006 Mobility,
indexicality, and the enregisterment of
“Pittsburghese”. Journal of English
Linguistics 34(2). 77–104.
Kiesling, Scott F.
2004 Dude. American
Speech 79(3). 281–305.
Kleinknecht, Friederike & Miguel Souza
2017 Vocatives
as a source category for pragmatic
markers. In Chiara Fedriani & Andrea Sansò (eds.) Pragmatic
markers, discourse markers and modal particles: New
perspectives, 257–287. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kramer, Cheris
1975 Sex-related
differences in address
systems. Anthropological
Linguistics 17(5). 198–210.
Leech, Geoffrey
1999 The
distribution and function of vocatives in American and British
English conversation. Language and
Computers 26. 107–120.
Levinson, Stephen C.
2013 Action
formation and
ascription. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds.), The
handbook of conversation
analysis, 103–130. Hoboken NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Lindström, Jan, Catrin Norrby, Camilla Wide & Jenny Nilsson
2019 Task-Completing
Assessments in Service
Encounters. Research on Language and
Social
Interaction 52(2). 1–19.
Martínez, Ignacio M. P.
2011 The
Language of British Teenagers. A Preliminary Study of its Main
Grammatical Features/El lenguaje de los jóvenes británicos. Estudio
preliminar de los rasgos gramaticales de mayor
relevancia. Atlantis 33(1). 105–126.
Martínez, Ignacio M. P.
2018 “Help
me move to that, blood”. A corpus-based study of the syntax and
pragmatics of vocatives in the language of British
teenagers. Journal of
Pragmatics 130. 33–50.
Mazzon, Gabriella
2003 Pronouns
and nominal address in Shakespearean English. A
socio-affective marking system in
transition. In Irma Taavitsainen & Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Diachronic
perspectives on address term
systems, 223–249. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
McCarthy, Michael J. & Anne O’Keeffe
2003 “What’s
in a name?”: Vocatives in casual conversations and radio phone-in
calls. In Pepi Leistyna & Charles Meyer (eds.), Corpus
analysis: Language structure and language
use, 153–185. Amsterdam: Brill Rodopi.
McConnell-Ginet, Sally
2003 What’s
in a name? Social labeling and gender
practices. In Myriam Meyerhoff & Janet Holmes 2003 The
handbook of language and
gender, 69–97. Oxford: Blackwell.
Ochs, Elinor
1996 Linguistic
resources for socializing
humanity. In Stephen C. Levinson & John J. Gumperz (eds.), Rethinking
linguistic
relativity, 407–437. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Placencia, María E.
2008 Requests
in corner shop transactions in Ecuadorian Andean and Coastal
Spanish. In Klaus P. Schneider & Anne Barron (eds.), Variational
pragmatics. A focus on regional varieties in pluricentric
languages, 307–332. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pomerantz, Anita M.
1984 Agreeing
and disagreeing with assessments. Some features of
preferred/dispreferred turn
shapes. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures
of social action. Studies in conversation
analysis, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Poynton, Cate M.
(1990) Address
and the semiotics of social relations: A systemic-functional account
of address forms and practices in Australian
English. Sydney: University of Sydney doctoral dissertation.
Rendle-Short, Johanna
2007 “Catherine,
you’re wasting your time”: Address terms within the Australian
political interview. Journal of
Pragmatics 39(9). 1503–1525.
2009 The
address term mate in Australian English: is it
still a masculine term? Australian
Journal of
Linguistics 29(2). 245–268.
2010 ’Mate’
as a term of address in ordinary
interaction. Journal of
Pragmatics 42(5). 1201–1218.
Rubino, Antonia
2016 Constructing
pseudo-intimacy in an Italo-Australian phone-in radio
program. Journal of
Pragmatics 103. 33–48.
Silverstein, Michael
2003 Indexical
order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic
life. Language &
Communication 23(3–4). 193–229.
Spencer-Oatey, Helen
2000 Culturally
speaking. Managing rapport through talk across
cultures. London: Continuum.
Staley, Larssyn
2018 Socioeconomic
pragmatic variation: Speech acts and address forms in
context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wales, Katie
2006 Northern
English: A social and cultural
history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wolfson, Nessa & Joan Manes
1980 Don’t
“dear”
me!. In Sally McConnell-Ginet, Ruth A. Borker & Nelly Furman (eds.), Women
and language in literature and
society, 79–92. New York: Praeger
Zwicky, Arnold. M.
1974 Hey,
whatsyourname. In Anthony Bruck, Robert A. Fox & Michael W. La Galy (eds), Proceedings
of the Chicago Linguistic
Society 10(78). 787–801.