Translation processes in time
In think-aloud protocol studies of cognitive processes in translation, the analysis of TAPs very often results in the description of overall characteristics of the processes of individual translators or proficiency groups of translators. The problem with this approach is that it does not allow the researcher to draw conclusions about the actual organisation of the cognitive processes and its effects on text quality. In writing research, functional dependency of cognitive processes—the fact that the context, function and effect of different cognitive processes vary according to the moment in the process on which they occur—was demonstrated by Rijlaarsdam and Van den Bergh (1996). In the present paper the idea is developed that in translation process research, the inclusion of time as a variable may prove to be useful in improving understanding of the effect of process characteristics on process outcome. A dynamic approach, in which a translation process is viewed and analysed as belonging to a changing task situation, is proposed.
Keywords: Cognitive processes, Translation processes, Changing task situation, Variability in translation processes, TAP-analysis, Think-Aloud Protocols
Published online: 19 June 2003
Ericsson, Karl Anders and Herbert Simon
Flower, Linda. S. and John. R. Hayes
Jääskeläinen, Riitta and Sonja Tirkkonen-Condit
Jakobsen, Arnt Lykke
Janssen, Daniël, Joost Schilperoord, Huub van den Bergh, Luuk van Waes and Walter Wassenaar
Krings, Hans P.[ p. 239 ]
Rijlaarsdam, Gert and Huub van den Bergh
1989 “The translation process: An experimental study”. Séguinot 1989a: 21–53.
1989 “Professional vs. non-professional translation: A thinkaloud protocol study”. Séguinot 1989a: 73–85.
Toury, Gideon[ p. 240 ]
Cited by other publications
No author info given
Antunović, Goranka & Nataša Pavlović
Park Ji Young
Robert, Isabelle S. & Louise Brunette
Robert, Isabelle S. & Luuk Van Waes
Schaeffer, Moritz, Jean Nitzke, Anke Tardel, Katharina Oster, Silke Gutermuth & Silvia Hansen-Schirra
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 02 october 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.