Article published In:
Vol. 16:2 (2004) ► pp.201226
Bassnett-McGuire, Susan
1980Translation Studies. New York: Methuen. [Revisited ed.: London-New York: Routledge, 1991.]   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beaugrande, Robert de
1991 “Complexity and linguistics in the evolution of three paradigms”. Theoretical linguistics 17:1–3. 43–73.Google Scholar
Bernárdez, Enrique
1995Teoría y epistemología del texto. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
Chesterman, Andrew
2002 “Semiotic modalities in translation causality”. Across language and cultures 3/21. 145–158.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Jack and Ian Stewart
1995The collapse of chaos. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Cooper, David
1999Linguistic attractors: The cognitive dynamics of language acquisition and change. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Folkart, Barbara
1989 “Translation and the arrow of time”. TTR: Traduction, Terminologie, Rédaction 2/11. 19–50.Google Scholar
Gell-Mann, Murray
1994The quark and the jaguar: Adventures in the simple and the com¬plex. New York-San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Gleick, James
1987Chaos: Making a new science. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Brian
1994How the leopard changed its spots: The evolution of complexity. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Hatim, Basil
2001Teaching and researching translation. Harlow, Essex: Longman.Google Scholar
Hatim, Basil and Ian Mason
1990Discourse and the translator. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hayles, Katherine
1990Chaos bound: Orderly disorder in contemporary literature and science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herdina, Philip and Ulrike Jessner
2002A dynamic model of multilingualism: Perspectives of change in psycholinguistics. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, James S.
1972 “The name and nature of Translation Studies”. Third International Congress of Applied Linguistics, Copenhagen. [Version in Holmes 1988: 67–80.]Google Scholar
Holmes, James
1978 “The future of translation theory: A handful of theses”. International Symposium on Achievements in the Theory of Translation, Moscow and Yerevan. [Quoted from the version in Holmes 1988: 99–102.]Google Scholar
Holmes, James S.
1988Translated!: Papers on literary translation and Translation Studies. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Hurtado Albir, Amparo
2001Traducción y traductología: Introducción a la traductología. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
Kauffman, Stuart
1995aAt home in the universe: The search for the laws of self-organization and complexity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1995b “What is life? Was Schrödinger right?”. Michael Murphy and Luke O’Neill, eds. What is life?: The next fifty years Speculations on the future of biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1995 83–114.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000Investigations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, David
2001Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lefevere, André
1992Translating, rewriting, and the manipulation of literary fame. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lewin, Roger
1992Complexity: Life at the edge of chaos. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Lewontin, Richard
1998Gene, organismo e ambiente. Roma: Guis. Laterza & Figli.Google Scholar
Longa, Víctor M.
2001 “Sciences of complexity and language origins: An alternative to natural selection”. Journal of literary semantics 30:1. 1–17.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
forthcoming. “Traducción, complejidad y dinámica no lineal”. To appear in Verba.
Lorenz, Edward
1963 “Deterministic nonperiodic flow”. Journal of the atmospheric sciences 201. 130–141.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993The essence of chaos. London: University College of London Press.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mainzer, Klaus
1994Thinking in complexity. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mayoral Asensio, Roberto
2001Aspectos epistemológicos de la traducción. Castelló: Universitat Jaume I.Google Scholar
Munday, Jeremy
2001Introducing Translation Studies: Theories and applications. London-New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nida, Eugene A.
1964Toward a science of translating, with special reference to principles and procedures involved in Bible translating. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
2001Contexts in translating. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nida, Eugene A. and Charles Taber
1969The theory and practice of translation. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Prigogine, Ilya and Isabelle Stengers
1984Order out of chaos: Man’s new dialogue with nature. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
Pym, Anthony
1998Method in translation history. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Rabadán, Rosa
1991Equivalencia y traducción: problemática de la equivalencia translémica inglés-español. León: Universidad de León.Google Scholar
Riccardi, Alessandra
ed. 2002Translation Studies: Perspectives on an emerging discipline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rossi, Paolo
1997La nascita della scienza moderna in Europa. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Shannon, Claude
1949 “The mathematical theory of communication”. Shannon and Weav¬er 1949: 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shannon, Claude and Warren Weaver
1949The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Peter
1998Explaining chaos. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snell-Hornby, Mary
1988Translation Studies: An integrated approach. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Ian
1989Does God play dice?: The mathematics of chaos. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
1999Life’s other secret: The new mathematics of the living world. London: Penguin Books. [first published in the USA by John Wiley & Sons, 1998.]Google Scholar
Toury, Gideon
1995Descriptive Translation Studies and beyond. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004a “Probabilistic explanations in Translation Studies: Welcome as they are, would they qualify as universals?”. Anna Mauranen and Pekka Kujamäki, eds. Translation universals—Do they exist? Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins 2004 15–32.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004b “Probabilistic explanations in Translation Studies: Universals—or a challenge to the very concept?”. Gyde Hansen, Kirsten Malmkjær and Daniel Gile, eds. Claims, changes and challenges in Translation Studies: Selected contributions from the EST Congress, Copenhagen 2001. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins 2004 15–25.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waldrop, Mitchell
1992Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Weaver, Warren
1949 “Recent contributions to the mathematical theory of communication”. Shannon and Weaver 1949 29–125.Google Scholar
Wilson, Edward
1998Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Wilss, Wolfram
1996Knowledge and skills in translator behavior. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Kopp, Ruth Katharina
2015. Salevsky, Heidemarie & Ina Müller. 2011. Translation as Systemic Interaction. A New Perspective and a New Methodology. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 27:3  pp. 501 ff. DOI logo
Lange, Anne
2012. Performative Translation Options Under The Soviet Regime. Journal of Baltic Studies 43:3  pp. 401 ff. DOI logo
Pym, Anthony
2015. Translating as risk management. Journal of Pragmatics 85  pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Sung-Gi Jon
2010. Poétique du traduire et science humaine du traduire. Etudes de la Culture Francaise et de Arts en France 33:null  pp. 431 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.