The paper begins with an overview of the relevance of functional/text linguistics, skopos theory, and the cultural-studies approach to the study of (literary) translation. It then examines the textual significance of leitmotifs as ‘vertical translation units’, since both are found to be related to repetitions of a rank-free text element in formulating a network of signification. In leitmotif-conscious translating, it argues, the accountability between the source and target texts can be observed at this level of textual network, while the translation, as a literary text, may induce different perlocutionary effects when functioning in a different cultural milieu.
Abrams, M.H.1999. A glossary of literary terms. New York, London, Toronto, etc.: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
Austin, J.L.. 1975. How to do things with words. (The William James Lectures in 1955.) Oxford: Clarendon.
Baker, Mona. 1992. In other words: A coursebook on translation. London and New York: Routledge.
Baker, Mona. 1996. “Linguistics & cultural studies: Complementary or competing paradigms in Translation Studies?”. Angelika Laueret al., eds. Übersetzungswissenschaft im Umbruch: Festschrift für Wolfram Wilss zum 70. Geburtstag. Tübingen: Gunter Narr, 1996. 9–19.
Baker, Mona. 2000. “Linguistic perspectives on translation”. Peter France, ed. The Oxford guide to literature in English translation. Oxford: Oxford UP., 2000. 20–26.
Baker, Mona. 2005. “Linguistic models and methods in the study of translation”. Harald Kittel, Armin Paul Frank, Norbert Greiner, Theo Hermans, Werner Koller, José Lambert and Fritz Paul, eds. Übersetzung Translation Traduction. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 2005. 285–294.
Barnet, SylvanMorton Berman and William Burto. 1960. A dictionary of literary, dramatic, and cinematic terms. Glenview and London: Scott, Foresman.
Beaugrande, Robert de. 1980. Text, discourse, and process: Toward a multidisciplinary science of texts. London: Longman.
Beaugrande, Robert-Alain de and Wolfgang Ulrich Dressler. 1981. Introduction to text linguistics. London and New York: Longman.
Ben-Ari, Nitsa. 1998. “The ambivalent case of repetitions in literary translation”. Meta 43:1. 68–78.
Berman, Antoine. 2000. “Translation and the trials of the foreign”, tr.Lawrence Venuti .Lawrence Venuti, ed. The Translation Studies reader. London and New York: Routledge, 2000. 284–297.
Boase-Beier, Jean. 1998. “Can you train literary translators?”. Peter Bush and Kirsten Malmkjær, eds. Rimbaud’s rainbow: Literary translation in higher education. Amsterdam-Philadephia: John Benjamins, 1998. 33–42.
Carter, Ronald. 1997. Investigating English discourse: Language, literacy and literature. London and New York: Routledge.
Carter, Ronald and Walter Nash. 1983. “Language and literariness”. Prose studies 6:2. 123–141.
Catford, J.C.1965. A linguistic theory of translation: An essay in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford UP.
Connor, Steven. 1988. Samuel Beckett: Repetition, theory and text. Oxford and New York: Basil Blackwell.
Cook, Guy. 1994. Discourse and literature. Oxford and New York: Oxford UP.
Dollerup, Cay. 1998. Review of Malmkjær 1998. Perspectives: Studies in translatology 6:2.
Gentzler, Edwin. 1993. Contemporary translation theories. London and New York: Routledge.
Gray, Martin. 1984. A dictionary of literary terms. Beirut and Harlow: York and Longman.
Hatim, Basil. 1999. “Implications of research into translator invisibility”. Target 11:2. 201–222.
Hawthorn, Jeremy. 1998. A glossary of contemporary literary theory. London, New York, etc.: Arnold.
Herman, Vimala and Philip Dodd, eds. 1983. Prose studies 6:2. [Special issue on Literariness and Linguistics.] London: Cass.
Klein-Braley, Christine and Peter Franklin. 1998. “‘The foreigner in the refrigerator’: Remarks about teaching translation to university students of foreign languages”.
Malmkjær 1998
: 53–61.
Mackenzie, Rosemary. 1998. “The place of language teaching in a quality-oriented translators’ training programme”.
Malmkjær 1998
: 15–19.
Malmkjær, Kirstened. 1998. Translation and language teaching: Language teaching and translation. Manchester, UK: St. Jerome.
Mao, Tse-tung (Zedong). 1956. “Talks at the Yenan Forum on art and literature”, anonymous tr. Selected works 41, 1941–1945. New York: International Publishers, 1956. 63–93.
McCarthy, Michael and Ronald Carter. 1994. Language as discourse: Perspectives for language teaching. London and New York: Longman.
Miller, J. Hillis. 1982. Fiction and repetition: Seven English novels. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Munday, Jeremy. 2001. Introducing Translation Studies: Theories and applications. London and New York: Routledge.
Neubert, Albrecht and Gregory M. Shreve. 1992. Translation as text. Kent and London: Kent State UP.
Newmark, Peter. 1981. Approaches to translation. Oxford, New York, etc.: Pergamon.
Nord, Christiane. 1991. Text analysis in translation: Theory, methodology, and didactic application of a model for translation-oriented text analysis, trs. Christiane Nord and Penelope Sparrow. Amsterdam-Atlanta: Rodopi.
Nord, Christiane. 1997. Translation as a purposeful activity: Functionalist approaches explained. Manchester, UK: St. Jerome.
Rose, Marilyn Gaddis. 1997. Translation and literary criticism: Translation as analysis. Manchester, UK: St. Jerome.
Schäffner, Christina. 1998. “Qualification for professional translators: Translation in language teaching versus teaching translation”.
Malmkjær 1998
: 117–133.
Shaw, Harry. 1972. Dictionary of literary terms. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Stibbard, Richard. 1998. “The principled use of oral translation in foreign language teaching”.
Malmkjær 1998
: 69–76.
Tannen, Deborah. 1989. Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge, New York, etc.: Cambridge UP.
Toury, Gideon. 1991. “What are descriptive studies into translation likely to yield apart from isolated descriptions?”. Kitty M. van Leuven-Zwart and Ton Naaijkens, eds. Translation Studies: The state of the art. Proceedings of the first James S Holmes symposium on Translation Studies. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi, 1991. 179–208.
Venuti, Lawrence. 1998. The scandals of translation: Towards an ethics of difference. London and New York: Routledge.
Vermeer, Hans J.. 1996. A skopos theory of translation: Some arguments for and against. Heidelberg: TEXTconTEXT.
Weatherby, Joanna. 1998. “Teaching translation into L2: A TT-oriented approach”.
Malmkjær 1998
: 21–38.
Zhu, Chunshen (朱純深). 1982. Re-production of characters in literary translating. Fuzhou:Fujian Normal University. [Unpublished MA thesis.]
Zhu, Chunshen (朱純深). 1986. “‘Motif ’ and literary translation—A comment on the treatment of ‘motifs’ in the Chinese translation of The apple tree”. Chinese translators journal 31. 39–41, 36. [in Chinese]
Zhu, Chunshen (朱純深). 1987 (1998). “Ideolect mixed with exoticism”. Chinese translators journal 41. 13–15. Republished in XU, Jun, ed. Reflections on translation
. Wuhan: Hubei Jiaoyu. [in Chinese]
2023. La repetición en las traducciones homéricas: consideraciones teóricas y análisis de casos. Literatura: teoría, historia, crítica 25:2
Kelbert, Eugenia
2022. Appearances. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 34:2 ► pp. 219 ff.
Pan, Hanting & Meifang Zhang
2022. Translation and Linguistics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Translation, ► pp. 238 ff.
Jiang, Chengzhi
2012. Rethinking the translator’s voice. Neohelicon 39:2 ► pp. 365 ff.
Jiang, Chengzhi
2020. Image(s), Imagery Network and Landscape Representation: Towards an Operational Model for Poetry Interpretation and Translation. In Poetry-Painting Affinity as Intersemiotic Translation, ► pp. 93 ff.
2010. ClinkNotes: Towards a Corpus-Based, Machine-Aided Programme of Translation Teaching. Meta 55:2 ► pp. 387 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.