Article published In:
TargetVol. 17:1 (2005) ► pp.49–70
Segmentation in translation
Differences across levels of expertise and difficulty
The subject of this article is cognitive segmentation in translation. Based on experiments carried out in Translog, a keyboard logging program, significant differences, and also certain similarities, were observed of cognitive segmentation when data from two different subject groups and text types were compared. In the translation of a relatively easy text, novice and professional translators were found to behave fundamentally differently with respect to the size and nature of cognitive units and the speed with which they were produced. When faced with a difficult text, the behaviour in both groups was clearly affected, but some of the differences observed between novice and professional translators in the translation of the easy text were neutralized in that the professionals took over many of the features characteristic of the novices.
Keywords: Translation process, cognitive psychology, segmentation, translation unit, working memory, expertise, problem solving, keyboard logging
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Data and methodology
- 2.1Design
- 2.2Texts
- 2.3Pauses as reflections of TU boundaries
- 3.Results and discussion
- 3.1Effects on the size of TUs
- 3.2Effects on production speed
- 3.3Effect on the nature of TUs
- 4.Conclusion
- Acknowledgments
- Notes
-
References
References
Baddeley, Alan
1986 Working memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Broadbent, Donald E.
1975 “The magic number seven after fifteen years”. Alan, Kennedy eds. Studies in long term memory. London: John Wiley & Sons, 1975 3–18.
Butterworth, Brian
1980 “Evidence from pauses in speech”. Brian, Butterworth ed. Language production 1: Speech and talk. London: Academic Press 1980 155–156.
Campbell, Stuart
Crowder, Robert G.
1976 Principles of learning and memory. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dragsted, Barbara
2004 Segmentation in translation and translation memory systems. An empirical investigation of cognitive segmentation and effects of integrating a TM system into the translation process. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur. [PhD thesis.]
Ericsson, K. Anders and Walter Kintsch
1995 “Long-term working memory”. Psychological review. 102: 2. 211–245. Also retrievable (16 May 2001) from [URL] doi: 
Gerloff, Pamela
1986 “Second language learners’ reports on the interpretive process: Talkaloud protocols of translation.” House and Blum-Kulka 1986 243–262.
Gile, Daniel
1995 Basic concepts and models for interpreter and translator training. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Harris, Brian
1988 “Bi-text, a new concept in translation theory”. Language monthly 54.
House, Juliane Shoshana Blum-Kulka
eds. 1986 Interlingual and intercultural communication: Discourse and cognition in translation and second language acquisition studies. Tübingen: Gunter Narr 1986
Jääskeläinen, Riitta Sonja Tirkkonen-Condit
1991 “Automated processes in professional vs non-professional translation: A Think-aloud protocol study” Sonja Tirkkonen-Condit, ed. Empirical research in translation and intercultural studies. Tübingen: Gunter Narr 1991 89–109.
Jakobsen, Arnt Lykke and Lasse Schou
1999 “Translog documentation”. Probing the process in translation Methods and results. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur. [Copenhagen Studies in Language 24.]
Kiraly, Donald C.
1995 Pathways to translation: Pedagogy and process. Kent: Kent State University Press.
Königs, Frank G.
1987 “Was beim Übersetzen passiert”. Die Neueren Sprachen. 86: 2. 162–185.
Krings, Hans P.
1986a Was in den Köpfen von Übersetzern vorgeht. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
1986b “Translation problems and translation strategies of advanced German learners of French (L2)”.
House and Blum-Kulka 1986
. 263–276.
Lörscher, Wolfgang
1986 “Linguistic aspects of translation processes: Towards an analysis of translation performance”. House and Blum-Kulka 1986 277–292.
1991 Translation performance, translation process and translation strategies: A psycholinguistic investigation. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
1996 “A psycholinguistic analysis of translation processes”. Meta 41: 1. 26–32.
Miller, G.A.
1967 The psychology of communication: Seven essays. New York and London: Basic Books Inc.
Newell, Allen and Herbert A. Simon
1972 Human problem solving. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs.
Schilperoord, J
1996 It’s about time: Temporal aspects of cognitive processes in text production. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Cited by
Cited by 49 other publications
Alves, Fabio
2015. Translation process research at the interface. In Psycholinguistic and Cognitive Inquiries into Translation and Interpreting [Benjamins Translation Library, 115], ► pp. 17 ff. 
Alves, Fabio & Amparo Hurtado Albir
2017. Evolution, Challenges, and Perspectives for Research on Cognitive Aspects of Translation. In The Handbook of Translation and Cognition, ► pp. 535 ff.
Alves, Fabio & Igor A. Lourenço da Silva
2021. Bridging Paradigms to Approach Expertise in Cognitive Translation Studies. In Advances in Cognitive Translation Studies [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 89 ff.
Alves, Fabio & José Luiz Gonçalves
2013. Investigating the conceptual-procedural distinction in the translation process. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies ► pp. 107 ff.
Alves, Fabio & José Luiz Gonçalves
2015. Investigating the conceptual-procedural distinction in the translation process. In Interdisciplinarity in Translation and Interpreting Process Research [Benjamins Current Topics, 72], ► pp. 109 ff.
Alves, Fabio & Arnt Lykke Jakobsen
2022. The Translation Process. In The Cambridge Handbook of Translation, ► pp. 34 ff.
Alves, Fabio & Daniel Vale
2009. Probing the unit of translation in time: Aspects of the design and development of a web application for storing, annotating, and querying translation process data. Across Languages and Cultures 10:2 ► pp. 251 ff.
Angelone, Erik
2018. Chapter 2. Reconceptualizing problems in translation using triangulated process and product data. In Innovation and Expansion in Translation Process Research [American Translators Association Scholarly Monograph Series, XVIII], ► pp. 17 ff.
Angelone, Erik & Álvaro Marín García
2019. Expertise acquisition through deliberate practice. In Translation Practice in the Field [Benjamins Current Topics, 105], ► pp. 123 ff.
Angelone, Erik & Álvaro Marín García
Araghian, Roya, Behzad Ghonsooly & Afsaneh Ghanizadeh
2018. Investigating problem-solving strategies of translation trainees with high and low levels of self-efficacy. Translation, Cognition & Behavior 1:1 ► pp. 74 ff.
Carl, Michael
2023. Models of the Translation Process and the Free Energy Principle. Entropy 25:6 ► pp. 928 ff.
Carl, Michael, Srinivas Bangalore & Moritz Schaeffer
2016. Computational linguistics and translation studies. In Border Crossings [Benjamins Translation Library, 126], ► pp. 225 ff.
Carl, Michael & Moritz J. Schaeffer
2017. Models of the Translation Process. In The Handbook of Translation and Cognition, ► pp. 50 ff.
Carl, Michael, Yuxiang Wei, Sheng Lu, Longhui Zou, Takanori Mizowaki & Masaru Yamada
2024. Hesitation, orientation, and flow: A taxonomy for deep temporal translation architectures. Ampersand 12 ► pp. 100164 ff.
da Silva, Igor Antônio Lourenço
2015. On a more robust approach to triangulating retrospective protocols. In Psycholinguistic and Cognitive Inquiries into Translation and Interpreting [Benjamins Translation Library, 115], ► pp. 175 ff.
Dam-Jensen, Helle, Carmen Heine & Iris Schrijver
2019. The Nature of Text Production – Similarities and Differences between Writing and Translation. Across Languages and Cultures 20:2 ► pp. 155 ff.
Diamond, Bruce J. & Gregory M. Shreve
2017. Deliberate Practice and Neurocognitive Optimization of Translation Expertise. In The Handbook of Translation and Cognition, ► pp. 476 ff.
Dragsted, Barbara
2012. Indicators of difficulty in translation — Correlating product and process data. Across Languages and Cultures 13:1 ► pp. 81 ff.
Dragsted, Barbara & Inge Gorm Hansen
2009. Exploring Translation and Interpreting Hybrids. The Case of Sight Translation. Meta 54:3 ► pp. 588 ff.
Feltgen, Quentin, Georgeta Cislaru, Christophe Benzitoun, F. Neveu, S. Prévost, A. Steuckardt, G. Bergounioux & B. Hamma
2022. Étude linguistique et statistique des unités de performance écrite : le cas de et. SHS Web of Conferences 138 ► pp. 10001 ff.
Halverson, Sandra L.
Heilmann, Arndt, Tatiana Serbina, Daniel Couto Vale & Stella Neumann
Heilmann, Arndt, Tatiana Serbina & Stella Neumann
Jakobsen, Arnt Lykke
2016. Are gaze shifts a key to a translator’s text segmentation?. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 52:2
Jakobsen, Arnt Lykke
2017. Translation Process Research. In The Handbook of Translation and Cognition, ► pp. 19 ff.
Jääskeläinen, Riitta, Pekka Kujamäki & Jukka Mäkisalo
2011. Towards professionalism — or against it? Dealing with the changing world in translation research and translator education. Across Languages and Cultures 12:2 ► pp. 143 ff.
Lehka-Paul, Olha
2020. Behavioural indicators of translators’ decisional styles in a translation task: A longitudinal study. Yearbook of the Poznan Linguistic Meeting 6:1 ► pp. 81 ff.
Mellinger, Christopher D. & Thomas A. Hanson
Mellinger, Christopher D. & Gregory M. Shreve
2016. Match evaluation and over-editing in a translation memory environment. In Reembedding Translation Process Research [Benjamins Translation Library, 128], ► pp. 131 ff.
Mitchell-Schuitevoerder, Rosemary
2020. The translation memory database. In A Project-Based Approach to Translation Technology, ► pp. 25 ff.
Muñoz Martín, Ricardo
2016. Reembedding translation process research. An introduction. In Reembedding Translation Process Research [Benjamins Translation Library, 128], ► pp. 1 ff.
Muñoz Martín, Ricardo & José Mª. Cardona Guerra
2019. Translating in fits and starts: pause thresholds and roles in the research of translation processes. Perspectives 27:4 ► pp. 525 ff.
Naranjo Ruiz, Mónica & Diana Lorena Giraldo Ospina
2023. Units of Translation and the Limited Capacity of Working Memory. In Translatology, Translation and Interpretation - Toward a New Scientific Endeavor,
O'Brien, Sharon
2017. Machine Translation and Cognition. In The Handbook of Translation and Cognition, ► pp. 311 ff.
Qassem, Mutahar
2020. Translation unit and quality of translation. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 33:2 ► pp. 536 ff.
Qassem, Mutahar & Buthainah M. Al Thowaini
2023. Cognitive Processes and Translation Quality: Evidence from Keystroke-Logging Software. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 52:5 ► pp. 1589 ff.
Qassem, Mutahar & Buthainah M. Al Thowaini
2024. Effectiveness of an online training course for trainee translators: Analysis of keylogging data. Education and Information Technologies
Qassem, Mutahar, Buthainah M. Al Thowaini & Anastassia Zabrodskaja
2023. Bi-directionality in translating culture: Understanding translator trainees’ actual and perceived behaviors. PLOS ONE 18:11 ► pp. e0293541 ff.
Scarpa, Federica
2020. Translating Specialised Texts. In Research and Professional Practice in Specialised Translation, ► pp. 187 ff.
Schaeffer, Moritz, Jean Nitzke & Silvia Hansen-Schirra
2019. Predictive Turn in Translation Studies: Review and Prospects. In Handbook of the Changing World Language Map, ► pp. 1 ff.
Schaeffer, Moritz, Jean Nitzke & Silvia Hansen-Schirra
2020. Predictive Turn in Translation Studies: Review and Prospects. In Handbook of the Changing World Language Map, ► pp. 3939 ff.
Su, Wenchao
2020. Eye-Tracking Method. In Eye-Tracking Processes and Styles in Sight Translation [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 49 ff.
Tercedor, Maribel
2010. Cognates as lexical choices in translation. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 22:2 ► pp. 177 ff.
Vanroy, Bram, Moritz Schaeffer & Lieve Macken
2021. Comparing the Effect of Product-Based Metrics on the Translation Process. Frontiers in Psychology 12
Wang, Fuxiang
2022. Impact of translation difficulty and working memory capacity on processing of translation units: evidence from Chinese-to-English translation. Perspectives 30:2 ► pp. 306 ff.
Wang, Yu & Ali Jalalian Daghigh
2023. Effect of text type on translation effort in human translation and neural machine translation post-editing processes: evidence from eye-tracking and keyboard-logging. Perspectives ► pp. 1 ff.
Zheng, Jianwei & Wenjun Fan
2021. Different processes for translating expressive versus informative texts? A computer-assisted study of professionals’ English–Chinese translation. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 36:3 ► pp. 782 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.