Article published in:
Target
Vol. 20:1 (2008) ► pp. 128
References

References

Baldauf, Christa
1997Metapher und Kognition: Grundlagen einer neuen Theorie der Alltagsmetapher. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. [Sprache in der Gesellschaft, 24.]Google Scholar
Bartsch, Renate
2002Consciousness emerging: The dynamics of perception, imagination, action, memory, thought and language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [Advances in Consciousness Research.]   CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, Richard
. [1979] 1993 “Metaphor and theory change: What is ‘metaphor’ a metaphor for?Ortony [1979] 1993. 481–532. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brünner, Gisela
1987 “Metaphern für Sprache und Kommunikation in Alltag und Wissenschaft”. Diskussion Deutsch 18:94. 100–119.Google Scholar
Chesterman, Andrew
1997Memes of translation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [Benjamins Translation Library, 22.]   CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Andy
1997Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
de Bono, Edward
1971Laterales Denken: Ein Kursus zur Erschließung Ihrer Kreativitätsreserven, tr. Margaret Carroux and Wolfgang Eisermann. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel
1991Consciousness explained. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
[ p. 25 ]
D’hulst, Lieven
1992 “Sur le rôle des métaphores en traductologie contemporaine”. Target 4:1. 33–51.   CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K. Anders and Herbert A. Simon
1984Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fernández-Duque, Diego and Mark L. Johnson
2002 “Cause and effect theories of attention: The role of conceptual metaphors”. Review of general psychology. 6:2. 153–165.   CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, Howard
1985The mind’s new science: A history of the cognitive revolution. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gentner, Dedre and Donald R. Gentner
1983 “Flowing waters or teeming crowds: Mental models of electricity”. Dedre Gentner and A.L. Stevens, eds. Mental Models. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1983 99–119.Google Scholar
Gentner, Dedre and Michael Jeziorski
1993 “The shift from metaphor to analogy in Western science”. Ortony [1979] 1993. 447–480. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodenough, Ward H.
1964 “Cultural anthropology and linguistics”. Dell Hymes, ed. Language in culture and society: A reader in linguistics and anthropology. New York: Harper & Row 1964 36–39.Google Scholar
Guilford, Joy Peter
1975 “Creativity: A quarter century of progress”. I.A. Taylor and J.W. Geztels, eds. Perspectives in creativity. Chicago: Aldine 1975 37–59.Google Scholar
Gutt, Ernst-August
. [1991] 2000: Translation and relevance: Cognition and context. Manchester/Boston: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Hallyn, Fernand
ed. 2000Metaphor and analogy in the sciences. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.   CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halverson, Sandra
2001 “An outline of a cognitive theory of translation”. EST Congress 2001. The Copenhagen Business School. 31.8.–1.9.2001. Copenhagen, 2001.Google Scholar
Harras, Gisela
1978Kommunikative Handlungskonzepte, oder: Eine Möglichkeit, Handlungsabfolgen als Zusammenhänge zu erklären, exemplarisch an Theatertexten. Tübingen. [Reihe Germanistische Linguistik, 16.]   CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hendriks-Jansen, Horst
1996Catching ourselves in the act: Situated activity, interactive emergence, evolution, and human thought. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hermans, Theo
1985 “Images of translation: Metaphor and imagery in the Renaissance discourse on translation”. Theo Hermans, ed. The manipulation of literature: Studies in literary translation. London: Croom Helm 1985 103–135.Google Scholar
Holland, Dorothy and Naomi Quinn
eds. 1987Cultural models in language & thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.   CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holz-Mänttäri, Justa
1984Translatorisches Handeln: Theorie und Methode. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia. [Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae B 226.]Google Scholar
. [1996] 2001 “Evolutionäre Translationstheorie”. Rupert Riedl and Manuela Delpos, eds. Die Evolutionäre Erkenntnistheorie im Spiegel der Wissenschaften. Wien: Wiener Universitätsverlag. Reprinted in 2001 in TEXTconTEXT 15:2. 245–281.Google Scholar
Hönig, Hans G.
1988 “Wissen Übersetzer eigentlich, was sie tun?Lebende Sprachen 1:88. 10–14.Google Scholar
1992 “Von der erzwungenen Selbstentfremdung des Übersetzers—Ein offener Brief an Justa Holz-Mänttäri”. TEXTconTEXT 7:1. 1–14.Google Scholar
1995Konstruktives Übersetzen. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Jääskeläinen, Riitta
2000 “Focus on methodology in think-aloud studies on translating”. Sonja Tirkkonen-Condit and Riitta Jääskeläinen, eds. Tapping and mapping the processes of translation and interpreting. Amsterdam: John Benjamins 2000 71–82.   CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 26 ]
Johnson, Mark
1987The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 “Metaphor-based values in scientific models”. Lorenzo Magnani and Nancy J. Nersessian, eds. Model-based reasoning: Science, technology, values. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 2002 1–19.   CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keesing, Roger M.
1987 “Models, ‘folk’ and ‘cultural’: Paradigms regained?Holland and Quinn 1987 369–393.   CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiraly, Donald C.
2000A social constructivist approach to translator education: Empowerment from theory to practice. Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar
Koskinen, Kaisa
2004 “Shared culture?: Reflections on recent trends in Translation Studies”. Target 16:1. 143–156.   CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S.
[1979] 1993 “Metaphor in science”. Ortony [1979] 1993. 533–542. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kußmaul, Paul
2000Kreatives Übersetzen. Tübingen: Stauffenburg. [Studien zur Translation, 10.]Google Scholar
Lachat Leal, Christine
1998 “Análisis del concepto de contexto en la teoría de la relevancia”. Jose Luis Cifuentes Honrubia, ed. Estudios de lingüística cognitiva. Alicante: Universidad de Alicante 1998 1. 103–112.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
1987Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.   CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993 “The contemporary theory of metaphor”. Ortony [1979] 1993. 202–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson
1980Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1999Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Rafael E. Núñez
2000Where mathematics comes from. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Liebert, Wolf-Andreas
1995 “Metaphernbereiche der virologischen Aidsforschung”. Lexicology 1. 142–182.Google Scholar
Martín de León, Celia
2005Contenedores, recorridos y metas: Metáforas en la traductología funcionalista. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. [Studien zur romanischen Sprachwissenschaft und interkulturellen Kommunikation, 24.]Google Scholar
2007 “Modelos de coste-beneficio en traductología”. Wotjak 2007. 255–266.Google Scholar
McElhanon, Kenneth A.
2005 “From word to scenario: The influence of linguistic theories upon models of translation”. Journal of translation 1:3. 29–67.Google Scholar
Meheus, Joke
2000 “Analogical reasoning in creative problem solving processes: Logico-philosophical perspectives”. Hallyn 2000 . 17–34.   CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz Martín, Ricardo
1995Lingüística para traducir. Barcelona: Teide.Google Scholar
1999 “Contra Sísifo: interdisciplinariedad y multiculturalidad”. Perspectives 7:2: Hispanic Translation Studies, Guest editors Ricardo Muñoz Martín and Frederic Chaume Varela. 1999. 153–164.Google Scholar
forthcoming. “Benchmarking cognitive translatologies. (I) Theoretical prolegomena”. To appear in Translation and Interpreting Studies.
2007 “Traductología cognitiva y traductología empírica”. Wotjak 2007. 267–278.Google Scholar
Newell, Allen and Herbert A. Simon
1972Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
[ p. 27 ]
Nord, Christiane
1989 “Loyalität statt Treue”. Lebende Sprachen 34:3. 100–105.Google Scholar
1991 “Scopos, loyalty, and translational conventions”. Target 3:1. 91–109.   CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994 “Traduciendo funciones”. Amparo Hurtado, ed. Estudis sobre la traducció. Recull aportacions presentades en les I Jornades sobre la Traducción: Teoria de la Traducción, organitzades pel Departament de Filologia de la Universitat Jaume I els dies 14 i 15 de maig de 1993. Castelló: Universitat Jaume I 1994 97–112. [Estudis sobre la traducción, 1.]Google Scholar
1997Translating as a purposeful activity: Functionalist approaches explained. Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar
Núñez, Rafael E.
2000 “Conceptual metaphor and the embodied mind: What makes mathematics possible?Hallyn 2000 . 125–145.   CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Núñez, Rafael E. and Eve Sweetser
2006 “With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time”. Cognitive science 30. 1–49.   CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortony, Andrew
ed. [1979] 1993Metaphor and thought. Second revised edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.   CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pöchhacker, Franz
1994Simultandolmetschen als komplexes Handeln. Tübingen: Narr. [Language in Performance, 10.]Google Scholar
Preiser, Siegfried
1976Kreativitätsforschung. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Prunč, Erich
2003Einführung in die Translationswissenschaft Vol 1. Graz: Institut für Translationswissenschaft.Google Scholar
Pym, Anthony
2004 “Propositions on cross-cultural communication and translation”. Target 16:1. 1–28.   CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, Naomi and Dorothy Holland
1987 “Culture and cognition”. Holland and Quinn 1987 3–40.   CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, Michael J.
[1979] 1993 “The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language”. Ortony [1979] 1993. 164–201. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rehbein, Jochen
1977Komplexes Handel: Elemente zur Handlungstheorie der Sprache. Tübingen: J.B. Metzler. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reiß, Katharina and Hans J. Vermeer
. [1984] 1991Grundlegung einer allgemeinen Translationstheorie. Tübingen: Niemeyer. [Linguistische Arbeiten, 147.]Google Scholar
Risku, Hanna
1998Translatorische Kompetenz: Kognitive Grundlagen des Übersetzens als Expertentätigkeit. Tübingen: Narr. [Studien zur Translation, 5.]Google Scholar
2000 “Situated translation und situated cognition: Ungleiche Schwestern”. Mira Kadric, Klaus Kaindl and Franz Pöchhacker, eds. Translationswissenschaft: Festschrift für Mary Snell-Hornby zum 60. Geburtstag. Tübingen: Stauffenburg 2000 81–91.Google Scholar
2002a “Cognitive foundations of translation: Three paradigms of cognitive science and their consequences for Translation Studies”. Seminar held in the Universidad de Granada, April 2002.Google Scholar
2002b “Situatedness in Translation Studies”. Cognitive systems research 3:3. 523–533.   CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R.
2000Razones para actuar: Una teoría del libre albedrío, tr. Luis M. Valdés Villanueva. Oviedo: Nobel.Google Scholar
Shannon, Claude E. and Warren Weaver
. [1949] 1963The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Simon, Gérard
2000 “Analogies and metaphors in Kepler”. Hallyn 2000 . 71–82.   CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Suchman, Lucy A.
1987Plans and situated actions: The problem of human/machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 28 ]
Toury, Gideon
1995Descriptive Translation Studies and beyond. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.   CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Turbayne, Colin Murray
1962The myth of metaphor. New Haven–London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ulmann, Gisela
1968Kreativität: Neue amerikanische Ansätze zur Erweiterung des Intelligenzkonzepts. Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
Varela, Francisco J., Evan Thompson and Eleanor Rosch
. [1991] 1993The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vermeer, Hans J.
1978 “Ein Rahmen für eine allgemeine Translationstheorie”. Lebende Sprachen 23:3. 99–102.   CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vermeer, Hans J.
. [1989] 1992Skopos und Translationsauftrag—Aufsätze. Frankfurt: IKO: Verlag für Interkulturelle Kommunikation.Google Scholar
Vermeer, Hans J.
1990 “Texttheorie und Translatorisches Handeln”. Target 2:2. 219–242.   CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996aA skopos theory of translation (Some arguments for and against). Heidelberg: TEXTconTEXT. [Reihe Wissenschaft, 1.]Google Scholar
1996bDie Welt, in der wir übersetzen: Drei translatologische Überlegungen zu Realität, Vergleich und Prozess. Heidelberg: TEXTconTEXT. [Reihe Wissenschaft, 2.]Google Scholar
Witte, Heidrun
1992 “Zur gesellschaftlichen Verantwortung des Translators—Anmerkungen”. TEXTconTEXT 7:2. 119–129.Google Scholar
2000Die Kulturkompetenz des Translators: Begriffliche Grundlegung und Didaktisierung. Tübingen: Stauffenburg. [Studien zur Translation, 9.]Google Scholar
Wotjak, Gerd
ed. 2007Quo vadis Translatologie?: Ein halbes Jahrhundert universitärer Ausbildung von Dolmetschern und Übersetzern in Leipzig. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 9 other publications

No author info given
2017.  In Reflections on Translation Theory [Benjamins Translation Library, 132], Crossref logo
Halverson, Sandra L.
2010.  In Handbook of Translation Studies [Handbook of Translation Studies, 1],  pp. 378 ff. Crossref logo
Martín de León, Celia & Maris Presas
2011. Metaphern als Ausdruck subjektiver Theorien zum Übersetzen. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 23:2  pp. 272 ff. Crossref logo
McAuley, Thomas E.
2015. Audience Attitude and Translation Reception. Babel. Revue internationale de la traduction / International Journal of Translation 61:2  pp. 219 ff. Crossref logo
Muñoz Martín, Ricardo
2016. Of minds and men – computers and translators. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 52:2 Crossref logo
Sammut, Ivan
2018. The translation of EU trademarks – a special type of Intellectual Property translation. International Journal of Legal Discourse 3:1  pp. 133 ff. Crossref logo
Schlager, Daniela
2021.  In Literary Translator Studies [Benjamins Translation Library, 156],  pp. 199 ff. Crossref logo
Schäffner, Christina
2011.  In Handbook of Translation Studies [Handbook of Translation Studies, 2],  pp. 157 ff. Crossref logo
Łabendowicz, Olga
2018.  In Eye Tracking and Multidisciplinary Studies on Translation [Benjamins Translation Library, 143],  pp. 259 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.