Article published in:
Legal and institutional translation: Functions, processes, competences
Edited by Fernando Prieto Ramos
[Target 33:2] 2021
► pp. 341–367

The mediated voice

A discursive study of interpreter-mediated closing statements in Chinese criminal trials

| Newcastle University
This article examines how the voices of trial participants are mediated by court interpreters. The research focuses on closing statements articulated by defendants in Chinese criminal trials, the last chance for their voices to be heard prior to sentencing. Drawing upon the concept of voice and theories of speech acts and pragmatic equivalence, and based on the discourse analysis of seven authentic trial recordings, this study reveals how the discursive performance of the defendant is constructed, altered, and sometimes undermined through interpreting. The findings reveal that speech acts performed by the defendant are often not maintained in the interpreted renditions and that the concept of closing statements is difficult to convey. It is argued that when interpreters fail to convey the pragmatic force of defendants’ utterances, the voice of the defendants is not fully heard, which places them at a disadvantage and impacts upon their right to equality and justice. The article also reveals system-bound constraints on the effective provision of language assistance and the safeguarding of defendants’ legal rights.
Keywords: court interpreting, closing statements, voice, speech acts, pragmatic equivalence
Article outline
  • 1.The right to a closing statement
  • 2.Theoretical approach
    • 2.1Conceptualisation of voice
    • 2.2Accuracy and pragmatic force in court interpreting
  • 3.The study
    • 3.1Apology
      • 3.1.1Apology with mitigation
      • 3.1.2Apology with pleading
    • 3.2Defence
    • 3.3Waiver
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 25 May 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/target.21066.du
References
Austin, John L.
1962 How to Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures by J. L. Austin. Edited by J. O. Urnson. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bai, Bing, and Jincun Cheng
2007 “刑事庭审被告人最后陈述权探析 [A study on the right of the accused to closing statement in criminal trials].” Journal of Chengdu Electromechanical College 39 (2): 86–89.Google Scholar
Berk-Seligson, Susan
2002 The Bilingual Courtroom: Court Interpreters in the Judicial Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2017 The Bilingual Courtroom: Court Interpreters in the Judicial Process. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Biernacka, Agnieszka
2019 Interpreter-Mediated Interactions of the Courtroom: A Naturally Occurring Data Based Study. Berlin: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan
2005a “Bourdieu the Ethnographer: The Ethnographic Grounding of Habitus and Voice.” The Translator 11 (2): 219–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005b Discourse: A Critical Introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cao, Deborah
2002 “Finding the Elusive Equivalents in Chinese/English Legal Translation.” Babel 48 (4): 330–341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 Translating Law. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 “Legal Translation.” In Handbook of Translation Studies, edited by Yves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer, vol. 11, 191–195. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, Andrew K. F.
2012 “The Use of Reported Speech by Court Interpreters in Hong Kong.” Interpreting 14 (1): 73–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Guy
1989 Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coulmas, Florian
1981 “ ‘Poison to Your Soul’: Thanks and Apologies Contrastively Viewed.” In Volume 2: Conversational Routine – Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech, edited by Florian Coulmas, 69–92. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Du, Biyu
2016 The Bilingual Trial: Access to Interpreting, Communication and Participation in Chinese Criminal Courts. PhD diss. University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
2019 “Multilingualism in Legal Space: The Issue of Mutual Understanding in ELF Communication between Defendants and Interpreters.” International Journal of Multilingualism 16 (3): 317–335. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dubslaff, Friedel, and Bodil Martinsen
2005 “Exploring Untrained Interpreters’ Use of Direct versus Indirect Speech.” In Healthcare Interpreting: Discourse and Interaction, edited by Franz Pöchhacker and Miriam Shlesinger, special issue of Interpreting 7 (2): 211–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gill, Kathleen
2000 “The Moral Functions of an Apology.” The Philosophical Forum 31 (1): 11–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1981 Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
González, Roseann Dueñas, Victoria Félice Vásquez, and Holly Mikkelson
1991 Fundamentals of Court Interpretation: Theory, Policy, and Practice. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gruber, M. Catherine
2014 “I’m Sorry for What I’ve Done:” The Language of Courtroom Apologies. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Sandra Beatriz
1996 “Pragmatic Considerations in Court Interpreting.” Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 19 (1): 61–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 The Discourse of Court Interpreting: Discourse Practices of the Law, the Witness, and the Interpreter. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 Community Interpreting. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 “Court Interpreting.” In The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics, edited by Malcolm Coulthard and Alison Johnson, 440–454. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “Interpreting Culture: Dealing with Cross-cultural Issues in Court Interpreting.” Perspectives 22 (3): 321–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 “Approaching the Bench: Teaching Magistrates and Judges How to Work Effectively with Interpreters.” MonTI 71: 163–180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Brian
1990 “Norms in Interpretation.” Target 2 (1): 115–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, Malcolm
2000 “A Beginner’s Course in Legal Translation: The Case of Culture-bound Terms.” In La traduction juridique: Histoire, théorie(s) et pratique / Legal Translation: History, Theory/ies, Practice (Proceedings, Geneva, 17–19 February 2000), edited by GREJUT, 357–369. Bern/Geneva: ASTTI/ETI.Google Scholar
2002 “What’s So Special about Legal Translation.” Meta 47 (2): 177–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heffer, Chris
2013 “Projecting Voice: Towards an Agentive Understanding of a Critical Capacity.” Working Papers in Language and Literature. Cardiff: Cardiff University.Google Scholar
2018 “When Voices Fail to Carry: Voice Projection and the Case of the ‘Dumb’ Jury.” In Meaning and Power in the Language of Law, edited by Janny H. C. Leung and Alan Durant, 207–235. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019 “Ways of Losing Voice While Using It.” In Rethinking Language, Text and Context: Interdisciplinary Research in Stylistics in Honour of Michael Toolan, edited by Ruth Page, Beatrix Busse, and Nina Nørgaard, 237–253. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
House, Juliane
1977 A Model for Translation Quality Assessment. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
2015 Translation Quality Assessment: Past and Present. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hu, Xitong
2017 “对刑事速裁程序保留被告人最后陈述的反思 [Challenges to the reservation of last statement by defendants in the criminal immediate judgement procedure].” Law Science Magazine 38 (7): 133–140.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell
1996 Ethnography, Linguistics, Narrative Inequality: Toward an Understanding of Voice. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Li, Changsheng
2008 论对抗式刑事审判 [On the adversary criminal trial]. PhD diss. Southwest University of Political Science and Law.Google Scholar
Marszalenko, Jakub E.
2016 “Conduits, Communication Facilitators, and Referees: Revisiting the Role of the Court Interpreter in the Japanese Context.” SKASE Journal of Translation and Interpreting 9 (2): 29–43.Google Scholar
Mikkelson, Holly
1998 “Towards a Redefinition of the Role of the Court Interpreter.” Interpreting 3 (1): 21–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Ruth
2008 “Missing Stitches: An Overview of Judicial Attitudes to Interlingual Interpreting in the Criminal Justice Systems of Canada and Israel.” In Doing Justice to Court Interpreting, edited by Miriam Schlesinger and Franz Pöchhacker, special issue of Interpreting 10 (1): 34–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poon, Wai-yee Emily
2002 “The Pitfalls of Linguistic Equivalence: The Challenge for Legal Translation.” Target 14 (1): 75–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Šarčević, Susan
1997 New Approach to Legal Translation. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
2012 “Challenges to the Legal Translator.” In The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law, edited by Peter M. Tiersma and Lawrence M. Solan, 187–199. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John R.
1969 Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shlesinger, Miriam
1991 “Interpreter Latitude vs. Due Process: Simultaneous and Consecutive Interpretation in Multilingual Trials.” In Empirical Research in Translation and Intercultural Studies: Selected Papers of the TRANS-SIF Seminar, Savonlinna 1988, edited by Sonja Tirkkonen-Condit, 147–155. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Shlesinger, Miriam, and Franz Pöchhacker
2008 “Introduction: Doing Justice to Court Interpreting.” In Doing Justice to Court Interpreting, edited by Miriam Schlesinger and Franz Pöchhacker, special issue of Interpreting 10 (1): 1–7. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siems, Mathias
2018 Comparative Law. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tiffen, Brian Witney
1974 The Intelligibility of Nigerian English. PhD diss. University of London.Google Scholar
Wang, Jian, and Bingjun Yang
2007 “我国法庭口译面临的机遇与挑战 [On the opportunities for and challenges to court interpretation in China].” Journal of Sichuan International Studies University 23 (3): 115–120.Google Scholar
Yu, Qihuo
2008 被告人最后陈述权研究 [On the defendant’s last statement]. Master thesis. Southwest University of Political Science and Law.Google Scholar
Zhu, Yao
2010 “被告人最后陈述权实证研究 – 以中国法院网直播的50个案件为素材 [Empirical study on the right of the accused to closing statement – based on 50 cases broadcast by China Court website].” Journal of Hunan University (Social Sciences) 24 (6): 131–135.Google Scholar
Zhu, Yupeng, and Yuanlu Yu
2014 “刑事诉讼翻译制度的缺陷及重构 [On the defects of the criminal court interpreting system and its reconstruction].” Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators 27 (2): 103–105.Google Scholar