Introduction published In:
Legal and institutional translation: Functions, processes, competencesEdited by Fernando Prieto Ramos
[Target 33:2] 2021
► pp. 175–182
Edited by Fernando Prieto Ramos
[Target 33:2] 2021
► pp. 175–182
Introduction
Legal and institutional translation
Functions, processes, competences
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: Diversification of themes, contexts and methods
- 2.Legal translation and revision processes and competences
- 3.Functions and implications of institutional legal translation
- 4.Closing remarks
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
This article is available free of charge.
References
Berk-Seligson, Susan
2017 The
Bilingual Courtroom: Court Interpreters in the Judicial Process. 2nd
ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Biel, Łucja, Jan Engberg, M. Rosario Martín Ruano, and Vilelmini Sosoni
eds. 2019 Research
Methods in Legal Translation and Interpreting: Crossing Methodological
Boundaries. London: Routledge. 
Biel, Łucja
2017 “Researching
Legal Translation: A Multi-perspective and Mixed-method Framework for Legal
Translation.” Revista de Llengua i Dret / Journal of Language and
Law 681: 76–88.
Biernacka, Agnieszka
2019 Interpreter-Mediated Interactions of the Courtroom: A Naturally Occurring Data Based
Study. Berlin: Peter Lang.
Cao, Deborah
2007 Translating
Law. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Dullion, Valérie, Alexandre Guigue, Fabrizio Megale, Denise Merkle, Reine Meylaerts, and Fernando Prieto Ramos
2019 “Textes
juridiques.” In Histoire des traductions en langue
française. XXe siècle [The history of translations into French: 20th
century], edited by Bernard Banoun, Isabelle Poulin, and Yves Chevrel, 1485–1528. Lagrasse: Verdier.
Gémar, Jean-Claude
2013 “Translating
vs Co-drafting Law in Multilingual Countries: Beyond the Canadian
Odyssey.” In Legal Translation in Context: Professional Issues and
Prospects, edited by Anabel Borja Albi and Fernando Prieto Ramos, 155–179. Bern: Peter Lang.
Jacobsen, Bente
2004 “Pragmatic
Meaning in Court Interpreting: An Empirical Study of Additions in Consecutively Interpreted Question-Answer
Dialogues.” Hermes: Journal of
Linguistics 321: 237–249.
Koskinen, Kaisa
2000 “Institutional
Illusions: Translating in the EU Commission.” The
Translator 6 (1): 49–65.
Orlando, Daniele
2017 “Calling
Translation to the Bar: A Comparative Analysis of the Translation Errors Made by Translators and
Lawyers.” Translation and Translanguaging in Multilingual
Contexts 3 (1): 81–96.
Ortega Herráez, Juan Miguel, Cynthia Giambruno, and Erik Hertog
2013 “Translating
for Domestic Courts in Multicultural Regions: Issues and New Developments in Europe and the United States of
America.” In Legal Translation in Context: Professional Issues and
Prospects, edited by Anabel Borja Albi and Fernando Prieto Ramos, 89–121. Bern: Peter Lang.
Prieto Ramos, Fernando
2014a “Legal
Translation Studies as Interdiscipline: Scope and
Evolution.” Meta 59(2): 260–277.
2014b “International
and Supranational Law in Translation: From Multilingual Lawmaking to Adjudication.” The
Translator 20 (3): 313–331.
Šarčević, Susan
1997 New
Approach to Legal Translation. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
2018 “Challenges
to Legal Translators in Institutional Settings.” In Institutional
Translation for International Governance: Enhancing Quality in Multilingual Legal Communication, edited by Fernando Prieto Ramos, 9–24. London: Bloomsbury.
Simeoni, Daniel
Simonnæs, Ingrid, and Marita Kristiansen
eds. 2019 Legal
Translation: Current Issues and Challenges in Research, Methods and
Applications. Berlin: Frank & Timme.
Snell-Hornby, Mary
2006 The
Turns of Translation Studies: New Paradigms or Shifting
Viewpoints? Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Verified Market Research