Cover not available
Article published In:
Target
Vol. 22:2 (2010) ► pp.298–329

Translation historiography in the Modern World

Modernization and translation into Persian

| Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

Nearly all scholarly works about the encounter of Iran with European modernity emphasize the role of translation not only in introducing new literary forms into the Persian literary system, but also in becoming the main engine of change and modernization of the culture. This paper concerns itself with this constructivist narrative of the available historiographical discourse and the translational environment between 1851 and 1921 in Iran. After describing the field of translation in the period in question, I challenge the uncritical conception of translation as a positive force by, on the one hand, investigating hypothetical cultural and linguistic implications, and on the other hand, questioning the power of translation per se, as ascribed to it in the above mentioned historiographical discourse, in socio-cultural modernization. This will prioritize the individual and cultural translational effects over the supposed institutional ones.

Keywords: modern Persian prose, translation movements, the Darolfonun, the Constitutional Revolution, translation historiography, Iranian modernity
Article outline
  • 1.Translation studies in Iran and the Persian language
  • 2.The unanimous agreement
  • 3.Problems and inadequacies
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 January 2011
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/target.22.2.06aza
References
Ahmadzadeh, Hashem
2003 Nation and Novel: A Study of Persian and Kurdish Narrative Discourse. Uppsala: Uppsala University Press.Google Scholar
Aryanpour, Yahya
2002a  Az Saba ta Nima [ From Saba to Nima]. First volume. Tehran: Zavvar Press.Google Scholar
2002b  Az Nima ta Roozegar-e Ma [From Nima to Our Time]. Third volume of Az Saba ta Nima [From Saba to Nima] series. Tehran: Zavvar Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail
1973 [1929]  Marxism and the Philosophy of Language [with Valentin N. Voloshinov: Marksizm i filosofija jazyca, Leningrad 1929]. Translated by Ladislav Matejka and I. R. Titunik. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
1996 [1930s]  The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays [essays originally published in Voprosy literatury i estetiki, Moscow 1975]. Holquist, Michael, ed. Translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Balay, Christophe
2006  Peidayesh-e Roman-e Farsi [La genese du roman persan modern, 1998]. Translated byMahvash Ghavimi and Nasrin Khattat. Tehran: Institut Francais de Recherche en Iran and Editions Mo’in.Google Scholar
2008 Sarchashme-haye Dastan Koutah-e Farsi [Aux sources de la nouvelle persane, 1983]. Translated by Ahmad Karimi-Hakkak. Tehran: Institut Francais de Recherche en Iran and Editions Mo’in.Google Scholar
Blasi, Anthony J. and Weigert, Andrew J.
1976 “Towards a Sociology of Religion: An Interpretive Sociology Approach”. Sociological Analysis 37:3. 189–204.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michael Boyden, José Lambert and Reine Meylaerts
2007 “La langue de la litterature: institutionnalisation des lettres par le biais du discours.” Plus Oultre. Mélanges offerts à Daniel-Henri Pageaux. Etudes coordinées par Sobhi Habchi. Préface de Pierre Brunel. Introduction de Jean Bessière et Jean-Marc Moura. Postface de Sobhi Habchi. Paris: L’Harmattan, 171. 455–470.Google Scholar
Chesterman, Andrew
2008 “The Status of Interpretive Hypotheses”. Gyde Hansen et al. eds. Efforts and Models in Interpreting and Translation Research. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 49–61.Google Scholar
1998 “Causes, Translations, Effects”. Target 10:2. 201–230.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 “On the Idea of a Theory”. Across 8:1. 1–16.Google Scholar
Dabashi, Hamid
1985 “The Poetics of Politics: Commitment in Modern Persian Literature”. Iranian Studies 18:2/4. 147–188.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Graef, Ortwin
2007 “Grave Livers: On the Modern Element in, Wordsworth, Arnold, and Warner”. ELH 741. 145–169.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Even-Zohar, Itamar
1990 “The Position of Translated Literature within the Literary Polysystem”. Poetics Today 11:1. 45–51.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997 “Factors and Dependencies in Culture: A Revised Outline for Polysystem Culture Research”. Canadian Review of Comparative Literature. XXIV:1. 15–34.Google Scholar
2004 “Polysystem Theory (Revised)”. Even-Zohar, Itamar, Papers in Culture Research, electronic book available at: [URL]Google Scholar
Hermans, Theo
1996 “Norms and the Determination of Translation: A Theoretical Framework”. Román Álvarez and M. Carmen-África Vidal, eds. Translation, Power, Subversion. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 25–51.Google Scholar
1999 Translation in Systems: Descriptive and System-oriented Approaches Explained. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Hyun, Theresa M. and Lambert, José
eds. 1995  Translation and Modernization. Volume IV of Earl Miner and Haga Toru, general editors, ICLA 1991 Tokyo: The Force of Vision: Proceedings of the XIIIth Congress of International Comparative Literature Association. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Jazayery, Mohammad Ali
1970 “Modern Persian Prose Literature”. Journal of the American Oriental Society 90:2. 257–265.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamshad, Hassan
1966 Modern Persian Prose Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Katouzian, Homa
1991 “Iran”. Robin Ostle, ed. Modern Literature in Near and Middle East 1850–1970. London: Routledge. 130–157.Google Scholar
Lambert, José
1980 “Production, Tradition et Importation: une clef pour l’étude de la litérrature en traduction”. Canadian Review of Comparative Literature. VII.2. 246–252.Google Scholar
1995 “Literature, Translation and (De)colonization”. Theresa M. Hyun and José Lambert, eds. Translation and Modernization. Tokyo: ICLA 1991 Tokyo Congress Headquarters. 98–117.Google Scholar
Mirabedini, Hassan
2007  Sad Sal Dastan-Nevisi dar Iran [A hundred years of story-writing in Iran]. First volume. Tehran: Cheshmeh Press.Google Scholar
Morris, Pam
ed. 1997 The Bakhtin Reader: Selected Writings of Bakhtin, Medvedev and Voloshinov. London and New York: Arnold.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter J.
1982 Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. London: Methuen.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rahimian, Hormoz
2006  Adabiat-e Moaser-e Nasr: Advar-e Nasr-e Farsi: az Mashrooteh ta Enghelab-e Eslami [Contemporary prose literature: the phases of Persian prose: from the Constitutional to the Islamic revolution]. Tehran: SAMT.Google Scholar
Schwarz, Roberto
1992 Misplaced Ideas: Essays on Brazilian Culture. John Gledson, ed. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
2001 “National Adequation and Critical Originality”. Translated by R. Kelly Washbourne and Neil Larsen. Cultural Critique 491. 18–42.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vahdat, Farzin
2002 “God and Juggernaut: Iran’s Intellectual Encounter with Modernity”. New York: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Yeganeh, Nahid
1993 “Women, Nationalism and Islam in Contemporary Political Discourse in Iran”. Feminist Review 441. 3–18.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Azadibougar, Omid
2020. Textual Strategies. In World Literature and Hedayat’s Poetics of Modernity, ► pp. 139 ff. DOI logo
Fatollahi, Moslem
2018. Cannibalism and cultural manipulation: How Morier is received in the Persian literary canon. Human Affairs 28:2 ► pp. 141 ff. DOI logo
Núñez, Gabriel González
2016. When a Translator Joins the Revolution: A Paratextual Analysis of Manuel García de Sena’s La independencia1. TTR 27:1 ► pp. 189 ff. DOI logo
Tahmasebian, Kayvan & Rebecca Ruth Gould
2022. The Translational Horizons of Iranian Modernism: Ahmad Shamlu’s Canon of the Global South. Twentieth-Century Literature 68:1 ► pp. 25 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Literary Translation in Modern Iran [Benjamins Translation Library, 114], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.