Cover not available
Article published In:
Target
Vol. 36:2 (2024) ► pp.159–183

Situated minds and distributed systems in translation

Exploring the conceptual and empirical implications

ORCID logo | Stockholm University
ORCID logo | University of Vienna

This article sheds light on two different perspectives on the boundaries of the cognitive system and the consequences of their adoption for Cognitive Translation and Interpreting Studies (CTIS). Both are represented by different approaches within the cognitive scientific cluster of approaches referred to as situated or 4EA (embodied, embedded, enactive, extended, and affective) cognition. The first, the person-centred perspective, takes individuals as a starting point and describes their interactions with their social and material surroundings. The second, the distributed, extended perspective, takes the joint activity of different situated actors and material artefacts as its starting point and depicts this socio-cognitive unit as the object of analysis. With this article, we do not seek to advocate the use of one over the other. Rather, we attempt to offer a coherent interpretation of how the cognitive process of translation can be studied and interpreted as a situated activity either from the perspective of individual actors or from a larger, distributed, and extended angle that considers people and the relevant social and material environment as a system. Specifically, we discuss what is to be gained if translation is studied from a distributed cognitive perspective. To this end, we illustrate key aspects of the discussion using empirical examples from current field research in which both an individual and a distributed perspective are applied to analyse interaction in a translation workplace.

Keywords: extended translation, situated cognition, distributed cognition, structuration of activity, representation, artefact
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Similarities: Birds of a feather
  • 3.Differences: Expanding the view
    • 3.1Boundaries of the unit of analysis
    • 3.2Structuration of activity
    • 3.3Role of artefacts
    • 3.4Role of representation(s)
  • 4.Situated approaches in CTIS
    • 4.1Empirical applications of situated approaches in CTIS
  • 5.Case study
    • 5.1Empirical extract
    • 5.2Analysis
      • 5.2.1Boundaries of the unit of analysis
      • 5.2.2Structuration of activity
      • 5.2.3The role of artefacts
      • 5.2.4The role of representations
  • 6.Final remarks and conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 23 April 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/target.22172.san
References
Alves, Fabio, and Amparo Hurtado Albir
2017 “Evolution, Challenges, and Perspectives for Research on Cognitive Aspects of Translation.” In Schwieter and Ferreira (2017, 537–554). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alves, Fabio, and Arnt Lykke Jakobsen
2021 “Grounding Cognitive Translation Studies: Goals, Commitments and Challenges.” In The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Cognition, edited by Fabio Alves and Arnt Lykke Jakobsen, 545–554. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chemero, Anthony
2009 Radical Embodied Cognitive Science. Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Andy
1997 Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dahlbäck, Nils, Jana Rambusch, and Tarja Susi
2012 “Distribuerad kognition [Distributed cognition].” In Kognitionsvetenskap [Cognitive science], edited by Jens Allwood and Mikael Jensen, 487–496. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Dragsted, Barbara
2008 “Computer-Aided Translation as a Distributed Cognitive Task.” In Cognition Distributed: How Cognitive Technology Extends Our Minds, edited by Itiel E. Dror and Stevan Harnad, 238–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ehrensberger-Dow, Maureen, and Gary Massey
2019 “Socio-Technical Issues in Professional Translation Practice.” In Translation Practice in the Field: Current Research on Socio-Cognitive Processes, edited by Hanna Risku, Regina Rogl, and Jelena Milosevic, 105–122. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ehrensberger-Dow, Maureen, and Sharon O’Brien
2015 “Ergonomics of the Translation Workplace: Potential for Cognitive Friction.” Translation Spaces 4 (1): 98–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fırat, Gökhan
2021 “Uberization of Translation: Impacts on Working Conditions.” The Journal of Internationalization and Localization 8 (1): 48–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garbis, Christer
2002 The Cognitive Use of Artifacts in Cooperative Process Management. Rescue Management and Underground Line Control. PhD diss., Linköping University.
Groleau, Carole
2002 “Structuration, Situated Action and Distributed Cognition: Rethinking the Computerization of Organizations.” Systèmes d’Information et Management 7 (2). [URL]
Hirvonen, Maija, and Liisa Tiittula
2018 “How are Translations Created? Using Multimodal Conversation Analysis to Study a Team Translation Process.” Linguistica Antverpiensa, New Series: Themes in Translation Studies 171: 157–173.Google Scholar
Hollan, James, Edwin Hutchins, and David Kirsh
2000 “Distributed Cognition: Towards a New Foundation for Human-Computer Interaction Research.” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 7 (2): 174–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, Edwin
1995a Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1995b “How a Cockpit Remembers Its Speeds.” Cognitive Science 19 (3): 265–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999 “Cognitive Artifacts.” In The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences, edited by Robert A. Wilson and Frank C. Kiel, 126–127. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2006 “The Distributed Cognition Perspective on Human Interaction.” In Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction, edited by Nick J. Enfield and Stephen C. Levinson, 375–398. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
2011 “Enculturating the Supersized Mind.” Philosophical Studies 1521: 437–446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, Edwin, and Leysia Palen
1997 “Constructing Meaning from Space, Gesture, and Speech.” In Discourse, Tools, and Reasoning: Essays on Situated Cognition, edited by Lauren B. Resnick, Roger Säljö, Clotilde Pontecorvo, and Barbara Burge, 23–40. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobsen, Arnt L.
2017 “Translation Process Research.” In Schwieter and Ferreira (2017, 21–49). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Korhonen, Annamari, and Maija Hirvonen
2021 “Joint Creative Process in Translation: Socially Distributed Cognition in Two Production Contexts.” Cognitive Linguistic Studies 8 (2): 251–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luria, Alexander M.
1966 Higher Cortical Functions in Man. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Martín de León, Celia, and Alba Fernández Santana
2021 “Embodied Cognition in the Booth: Referential and Pragmatic Gestures in Simultaneous Interpreting.” Cognitive Linguistic Studies 8 (2): 277–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Menary, Richard, and Alexander Gillett
2022 “The Tools of Enculturation.” Topics in Cognitive Science 141: 363–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muñoz Martín, Ricardo
2010 “On Paradigms and Cognitive Translatology.” In Translation and Cognition, edited by Gregory Shreve and Erik Angelone, 169–187. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “Reembedding Translation Process Research: An Introduction.” In Reembedding Translation Process Research, edited by Ricardo Muñoz Martín, 1–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 “Looking Toward the Future of Cognitive Translation Studies.” In Schwieter and Ferreira (2017, 555–572). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021 “Situated Cognition.” In Handbook of Translation Studies Online, Volume 51, edited by Yves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer, 207–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nurminen, Mary
2020 “Raw Machine Translation Use by Patent Professionals: A Case of Distributed Cognition.” Translation, Cognition & Behavior 3 (1): 100–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pleijel, Richard
2021 “Translation Teams as Cognitive Systems: Archival Material, Cognitive Artifacts, and Group-Level Cognitive Processes.” Cognitive Linguistic Studies 8 (2): 307–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Risku, Hanna
2002 “Situatedness in Translation Studies.” Cognitive Systems Research 3 (3): 523–533. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 “Translation Process Research as Interaction Research: From Mental to Socio-Cognitive Processes.” In Minding Translation/Con la traducción en mente, edited by Ricardo Muñoz Martín, special issue of MonTI 11: 331–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Risku, Hanna, Florian Windhager, and Matthias Apfelthaler
2013 “A Dynamic Network Model of Translatorial Cognition and Action.” Translation Spaces 21, 151–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Risku, Hanna, and Florian Windhager
2015 “Extended Translation: A Socio-Cognitive Research Agenda.” In Interdisciplinarity in Translation and Interpreting Process Research, edited by Maureen Ehrensberger-Dow, Susanne Göpferich, and Sharon O’Brien, 35–47. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Risku, Hanna, and Regina Rogl
2021 “Translation and Situated, Embodied, Distributed, Embedded, and Extended Cognition.” In The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Cognition, edited by Fabio Alves and Arnt Lykke Jakobsen, 478–499. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Robbins, Philip, and Murat Aydede
2009 “A Short Primer on Situated Cognition.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition, edited by Philip Robbins and Murat Aydede, 3–10. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, Yvonne
2006 “Distributed Cognition and Communication.” In The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd ed., edited by Keith Brown, 731–733. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sannholm, Raphael
2021 Translation, Teamwork, and Technology: The Use of Social and Material Scaffolds in the Translation Process. PhD diss. Stockholm University.
Schwieter, John W., and Aline Ferreira
eds. 2017 The Handbook of Translation and Cognition. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suchman, Lucy
2007 Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Teixeira, Carlos S. C., and Sharon O’Brien
2017 “Investigating the Cognitive Ergonomic Aspects of Translation Tools in a Workplace Setting.” Translation Spaces 6 (1): 79–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thagard, Paul
2005 Mind: Introduction to Cognitive Science. 2nd ed. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev S.
1986 Thought and Language. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Xiao, Kairong, and Sandra L. Halverson
2021 “Cognitive Translation and Interpreting Studies (CTIS): Emerging Trends in Epistemology and Methodology.” Cognitive Linguistic Studies 8 (2): 235–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar