Article published In:
Vol. 23:1 (2011) ► pp.325


Alcina, Amparo
2008 “Translation technologies: scope, tools and resources”. Target 20:1. 79–102.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austermühl, Frank
2001Electronic tools for translators. Manchester: St Jerome Publishing.Google Scholar
Baker, Mona
1993 “Corpus Linguistics and Translation Studies: implications and applications”. Mona Baker, Gill Francis and Elena Tognini-Bonelli, eds. Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins 1993 233–250.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996 “Corpus-based Translation Studies: the challenges that lie ahead”. Harold Somers, ed. Terminology, LSP and Translation: studies in language engineering in honour of Juan C. Sager. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins 1996 175–186.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999 “The role of corpora in investigating the linguistic behavior of professional translators”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 4:2. 281–298.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 “A Corpus-based View of Similarity and Difference in Translation”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9: 2. 167–193.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas
1993 “Representativeness in corpus design”. Literary and Linguistic Computing 8: 4. 243–257.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
1986 “Shifts of cohesion and coherence in translation”. Julianne House and Shoshana Blum-Kulka, eds. Interlingual and intercultural communication: discourse and cognition in translation and second language acquisition studies. Tübingen: Gunter Narr 1986 17–35.Google Scholar
Bly, Robert
2002The Online Copywriter’s Handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Brinck, Tom, Darren Gergle and Scott Wood
2002Usability for the Web. San Francisco: Morgan Kauffman.Google Scholar
Bowker, Lynn
2006 “Translation memory and ‘text’”. Lynn Bowker, ed. Lexicography, terminology and translation. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press 2006 175–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002Computer-aided translation technology: a practical introduction. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
Cheong, Ho-Jeong
2006 “Target text contraction in English into Korean Translation: a contradiction of presumed translation universals?”. Meta 51:2. 343–367.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chesterman, Andrew
2000 “Causal model for Translation Studies”. Maeve Olohan, ed. Intercultural faultlines. Research models in Translation Studies I. Textual and cognitive aspects. Manchester: St Jerome Publishing 2000 15–27.Google Scholar
2004a “Beyond the particular”. Anna Mauranen and Pekka Kujamäki, eds. Translation universals: do they exist?. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins 2004 33–50.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004b “Hypotheses about translation universals.” Gyde Hansen, Kirsten Malmkjær and Daniel Gile, eds. Claims, changes and challenges in Translation Studies. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins 2004 1–13.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 “Response and discussion”. Paper presented at the MATS 2010, Methodological advances in Corpus-Based Translation Studies Conference, University College Ghent, Belgium, January 8, 9, 2010.Google Scholar
Cronin, Michael
2003Translation and globalization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Daelemans, Walter and Véronique Hoste
(eds.) 2009Evaluation of translation technology. LANS 8/2009. Brussels: Academic and Scientific Publishers.Google Scholar
Delisle, Jean, Lee-Jahnke, Hannelore and Monique C. Cormier
1999Translation terminology. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Díaz-Cintas, Jorge
2003Teoría y práctica de la subtitulación: ingles/Español. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Dieguez, María I.
2008 “Análisis terminológico de sitios web localizados del ingles al Español: uso de técnicas de amplificación y elision”. Tradumática 61. Available at [URL]
Dunne, Kieran
2006Perspectives on localization. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Englund-Dimitrova, Birgitta
2005Expertise and explicitation in the translation. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frawley, William
2000 “Prolegomenon to a theory of translation”. Lawrence Venuti ed. The translation studies reader. London-New York: Routledge. 250–263.Google Scholar
Gamero, Silvia
2001La Traducción de textos técnicos. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Gerzymisch-Arbogast, Heidrun
2008 “Universal thought in translation”. MuTra 2007–LSP translation scenarios: Conference proceedings, June 10, 2009. Available at [URL]
Halverson, Sandra Louise
1998 “Translation studies and representative corpora: establishing links between translation corpora, theoretical/descriptive categories and a conception of the object of study”. Meta 43:4. 494–514.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, James
1972/1988The name and nature of translation studies.” James S. Holmes, ed. Translated! Papers on literary translation and translation studies. Amserdam: Rodopi. 67–80.Google Scholar
House, Juliane
1987Translation quality assessment: A model revisited. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
2008 “Beyond intervention: universals in translation”. Trans-kom 1:1. 6–19.Google Scholar
Hjort-Pedersen, Mette
2010 “Explicitation and implicitation in legal translation: A process study of trainee translators”. Meta 55:2. 237–250.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jeney, Cynthia
2007Writing for the web: A practical guide. Columbus: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Jiménez-Crespo, Miguel A.
2008aEl proceso de localización web: estudio contrastivo de un corpus comparable del género sitio web corporativo. Department of Translation and Interpreting, University of Granada, Spain. [PhD thesis]. Available at: [URL]
2008b “Web genres in localization: a Spanish corpus study”. Localization Focus – The International Journal of Localization 6:1. 2–13.Google Scholar
2008c “Caracterización del género ‘sitio web corporativo’ español: análisis descriptivo con fines traductológicos”. Maria Fernández Sánchez and Ricardo Muñoz Martín, eds. Aproximaciones cognitivas al estudio de la traducción y la interpretación. Granada: Comares 2008 259–300.Google Scholar
2009a “Conventions in localisation: a corpus study of original vs. translated web texts.” Jostrans: The Journal of Specialized Translation 121. 79–102.Google Scholar
2009b “Navegación Web accesible”. Tercedor, Maria Isabel, ed. Inclusión y accesibilidad desde el diseño y la presentación de materiales multimedia. Granada: Editorial Tragacanto, 187–206.Google Scholar
2010a “The effect of Translation Memory tools in translated web texts: evidence from a comparative product-based study”. Linguistica Antverpiensia 81. 213–232.Google Scholar
2010b “Localization and writing for a new medium: a review of digital style guides”. Tradumática 81. Available at: [URL]. DOI logo
Kenny, Dorothy
2001Lexis and creativity in translation. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Klaudy, Kinga
1996 “Back-translation as a tool for detecting explicitation strategies in translation”. Kinga Klaudy, Jose Lambert and Aniko Sohár, eds. Translation Studies in Hungary. Budapest: Scholastica, 99–114.Google Scholar
1998 “Explicitation”. Mona Baker, ed. Routledge Encyclopaedia of Translation Studies. London: Routledge, 80–84.Google Scholar
Klaudy, Kinga and Karoly, Krisztina
2003 “Implicitation in translation: an empirical justification of operational asymmetry in translation”. Across Languages and Cultures 6:1. 13–28.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larose, Robert
1998 “Méthodologie de l’évaluation des traductions”. Meta 43:2. 163–186.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laviosa-Braithwaite, Sara
1996 “Investigating simplification in an English Comparable Corpus of newspaper articles”. Kinga Klaudy and Janos Kohn, eds. Transferre Necesse Est: current issues of translation theory. Budapest: Scholastica 1996 531–540.Google Scholar
Laviosa, Sara
1998 “The corpus-based approach: A new paradigm in Translation Studies”. Meta 43:4. 474–479.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002Corpus-based Translation Studies. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
2003Localization Industry Primer. Geneva: The Localization Industry Standards Association (LISA). Available at: [URL]
2004Localization Industry Primer, 2nd Edition. Geneva: The Localization Industry Standards Association (LISA).Google Scholar
Malmkjær, Kirsten
2005 “Norms and nature in Translation Studies”. Synaps: Fagspråk, Kommuniksjon, Kulturkunnscap 161. 13–19.Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna and Kujamäki, Pekka
2004Translation universals: do they exist?. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munday, Jeremy
2009The Routledge companion to Translation Studies. London-New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Jacob
2000Designing Web usability: the practice of simplicity. Indianapolis: News Riders.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Jacob and Loranger, Hoa
2006Prioritizing Web usability. Indianapolis: News Riders.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Jacob and Tahir, Marie
2002Homepage usability: 50 Websited deconstructed. Indianapolis: News Riders.Google Scholar
Nord, Christiane
1997Translating as a purposeful activity: Functionalist approaches explained. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
O’Hagan, Minako
2009 “Evolution of user-generated translation: fansubs, translation hacking and crowdsourcing”. The Journal of Internationalization and Localization 11. 94–121.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O´Hagan, Minako and Ashworth, Donald
2003Translation-mediated communication in a digital World: facing the challenges of globalization and localization. Clevendon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Olohan, Maeve
2004Introducing corpora in Translation Studies. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olohan, Maeve and Mona Baker
2000 “Reporting that in translated English: evidence for subconscious processes of explicitation?”. Across Languages and Cultures 1:2. 141–158.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perego, Elisa
2003 “Evidence of explicitation in subtitling: towards a categorisation”. Across Languages and Cultures 4:1. 63–88.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Price, John and Lisa Price
2002Hot text. Web writing that works. Berkeley: News Riders.Google Scholar
Puurtinen, Tiina
2004 “Explicitation of clausal relations: A corpus-based analysis of clause connectives in translated and non-translated Finnish children’s literature”. Anna Mauranen and Pekka Kujamäki, eds. Translation universals: do they exist?. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins 2004 165–176.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pym, Anthony
2005 “Explaining explicitation”. Krisztina Károly and Ágota Fora, eds. New trends in Translation Studies: In honour of Kinga Klaudy. Budapest. Akadémiai Kiadó 2005 29–34.Google Scholar
Reineke, Detlef
2005 .Traducción y localización. Las Palmas de Gran Canaria: Anroart Ediciones.Google Scholar
Saldhana, Gabriela
2008 “Explicitation revisited: bringing the reader into the picture”. Transkom 1:1. 20–35.Google Scholar
Schäler, Reinhard
2005 “The Irish model in localization”. Paper presented at LISA Forum Cairo 2005: Perspectives from the Middle East and Africa. Available at: [URL].
Snell-Hornby, Mary
2006The Turns of Translation Studies. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spyridakis, Jan H.
2000 “Guidelines for authoring comprehensible WebPages and evaluating their success”. Technical Communication 47:3. 359–382.Google Scholar
Swales, John
1990Genre analysis. English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Toury, Gideon
1995Descriptive Translation Studies and beyond. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 “Probabilistic explanations in Translation Studies: welcome as they are, would they qualify as universals?”. Anna Mauranen and Pekka Kujamäki, eds. Translation universals: do they exist? Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins 2004 15–32.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tirkkonen-Condit, Sonia
2004 “Unique items—over—or under-represented in translated language?”. Anna Mauranen and Pekka Kujamäki, eds. Translation universals: do they exist?, Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins 2004 177–184.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tymoczko, Maria
2005 “Trajectories of research in Translation Studies”. Meta 50:4. 1082–1097.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998 “Computerized corpora and the future of Translation Studies”. Meta 43:4. 652–659.Google Scholar
Vanderauwera, Rita
1985Dutch novels translated into English: The transformation of a ‘minority’ literature. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Venuti, Laurence
2005 “Translation, history, narrative”. Meta 50:3. 800–816.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vinay, Jean-Paul and Jean Darbelnet
1958Stylistique comparée du français et de l’anglais. Méthode de traduction. Paris: Didier.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Alós, Julieta, Sky Marsen & Noora Alkaabi
2017. The light belongs to Yves Saint Laurent: luxury beauty brands in translation. Perspectives 25:3  pp. 434 ff. DOI logo
Casado Valenzuela, Alicia
2019. Los universales de localización. Babel. Revue internationale de la traduction / International Journal of Translation 65:5  pp. 678 ff. DOI logo
Jimenez-Crespo, Miguel A.
2011. A corpus-based error typology: towards a more objective approach to measuring quality in localization. Perspectives 19:4  pp. 315 ff. DOI logo
Jiménez-Crespo, Miguel Ángel & Maribel Tercedor Sánchez
2017. Lexical variation, register and explicitation in medical translation. Translation and Interpreting Studies 12:3  pp. 405 ff. DOI logo
Li, Xi & Long Li
2021. Reframed narrativity in literary translation: an investigation of the explicitation of cohesive chains. Journal of Literary Semantics 50:2  pp. 151 ff. DOI logo
Zanettin, Federico
2013. Corpus Methods for Descriptive Translation Studies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 95  pp. 20 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 april 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.