Cover not available
Article published In:
Target
Vol. 23:1 (2011) ► pp.48–61

Interpreting accent in the courtroom

| University of New South Wales
| University of Western Sydney
| University of Western Sydney

Findings from research conducted into interpreted court proceedings have suggested that it is the interpreters’ rendition that the judiciary and jurors hear and upon which they base their evaluations of witnesses’ testimony. Previous research into the effect of foreign accent of witnesses indicated particular foreign accents negatively influence mock jurors’ evaluations of the testimony. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of interpreters’ foreign accents on the evaluation of witnesses’ testimony. Contrary to previous research, our results indicated that participants rated the witness more favourably when testimony was interpreted by an interpreter with a foreign language accent. Accented versions were all rated as more credible, honest, trustworthy and persuasive than the non-accented versions. This paper discusses the findings in the light of methodological concerns and limitations, and highlights the need for further research in the area.

Keywords: interpreted testimony, native accent, non native accent, credibility, juror evaluations
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Perceptions of non-native accent
  • 3.The study
  • 3.1Method
  • 3.1.1Participants
  • 3.1.2Data collection
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Evaluations of guilt
    • 4.2Ratings of credibility, honesty, trustworthiness and persuasiveness
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 10 August 2011
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/target.23.1.03hal
References
Allport, G. W.
1954 The nature of prejudice. Reading: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics
2006 “Language Spoken at Home by Proficiency in Spoken English by Sex, Australia (Australia)”. Census of Population and Housing. Australian Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
Berk-Seligson, S.
1990/2002 The Bilingual Courtroom. Court Interpreters in the Judicial Process. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1999 “The impact of court interpreting on the coerciveness of leading questions”. Forensic Linguistics 6:1. 30–56.Google Scholar
Bresnahan, M., Ohashi, R., Nebashi, R., Liu, W. and Morinaga Shearman, S.
2002 “Attitudinal and affective response toward accented English.” Language and Communication 22:2. 171–185.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Community Relations Commission for a Multicultural NSW
2010 “Appendix 5, Language Services Statistical Information”. Annual Report 2009/10. 134.Google Scholar
Fraser, B., and Freedgood, L.
1999 “Interpreter alterations to pragmatic features in trial testimony”. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, 21.Google Scholar
Frumkin, L.
2007 “Influences of accent and ethnic background on perceptions of eyewitness testimony”. Psychology, Crime and Law 13:3. 317–331.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giles, H.
1970 “Evaluative reactions to accents”. Educational Review 221. 211–227.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giles, H., Bourhis, R. Y., Trudgill, P. and Lewis, A.
1974 “The imposed norm hypothesis: A validation”. Quarterly Journal of Speech 601. 405–410.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giles, H., Bourhis, R. Y., and Davies, A.
1979 Prestige speech styles: The imposed norm and inherent value hypotheses In McCormack, W. and Wurm, S. eds. Language in anthropology IV: Language in many ways. The Hague, Mouton 1979 307–348.Google Scholar
Giles, H. C. Sasoon
1983 “The effect of speaker’s accent, social class background and message style on British listeners’ social judgments”. Language and communication 3. 305–313.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hale, S.
2001 “How are Courtroom Questions Interpreted? An Analysis of Spanish Interpreters’ Practices”. I. Mason, ed. Triadic Exchanges. Studies in Dialogue Interpreting. Manchester: St. Jerome 2001 21–50.Google Scholar
2002 “How faithfully do Court Interpreters render the style of non-English speaking witnesses’s testimonies? A data based study of Spanish-English bilingual proceedings”. Discourse Studies 4:1. 25–47.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 “The need to raise the bar. Court interpreters as specialized experts”. M. Coulthard and A. Johnson eds The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics. London and New York: Routledge 2010 440–454.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. W.
1993 “Contact theory of intergroup hostility: A review and evaluation of the theoretical and empirical literature”. International Journal of Group Tensions 231. 43–65.Google Scholar
Kolb, W., and Franz Pöchhacker
2009 “Stories Retold: Interpreting in Asylum Appeal Hearings”. D. Russell and S. Hale eds. Interpreting in Legal Settings. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press 2009.Google Scholar
Lambert, W.
1967 “A social psychology of bilingualism”. Journal of Social Issues 231. 91–109.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindemann, S.
(2005) “Who speaks ‘broken English’?: US undergraduates’ perceptions of nonnative English 1”. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 15:2. 187–212.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lippi-Green, R.
1994 “Accent, standard language ideology and discriminatory pretext in the courts”. Language in Society 231. 163–198   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997 English with an accent: Language, ideology and discrimination in the United States. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Martinsen, B., and Dubslaff, F.
2010 “The cooperative courtroom. A case study of interpreting gone wrong”. Interpreting 12:1. 21–59.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milroy, J. and L. Milroy
1992 Authority in language: Investigating language prescription and standardization. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Nesdale, D. and R. Rooney
1996 “Evaluations and stereotyping of accented speakers by preadolescent children”. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 151. 133–154.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Patchen, M.
1999 Diversity and unity: Relations between racial and ethnic groups. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F., and Tropp, L. R.
2006 “A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90:5. 751–783.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rickford, J. and Traugott, E.C.
1992 “Symbol of powerlessness and degeneracy, or symbol of solidarity and truth? Paradoxical attitudes toward pidgins and Creoles”. Greenbaum, S.C. Davies, R., and Jupp, T., eds Language and discrimination: A study of communication in multi-ethnic workplaces. London, Longman 1992 252–261.Google Scholar
Rigney, A.
1999 “Questioning in interpreted testimony”. Forensic Linguistics 6:1.83–108.Google Scholar
Ryan, E.B. and Giles, H.
1982 Attitudes towards language variation: social and applied contexts. London: Edware Arnold.Google Scholar
Sobral Fernandez, J. and Prieto Ederra, A.
1994 “Presentacion, discurso, y persuasión en testigos”. Revista de Psicología Social 91. 13–18.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

Abdel Latif, Muhammad M. M.
2018. Towards a typology of pedagogy-oriented translation and interpreting research. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 12:3 ► pp. 322 ff. DOI logo
Abdel Latif, Muhammad M. M.
2020. Translation and Interpreting Assessment Research. In Translator and Interpreter Education Research [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
Cheung, Andrew K. F.
2020. Interpreters’ perceived characteristics and perception of quality in interpreting. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 22:1 ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Cho, Jinhyun
2021. ‘That’s not how we speak’: interpreting monolingual ideologies in courtrooms. Griffith Law Review 30:1 ► pp. 50 ff. DOI logo
RUIZ ROSENDO, Lucia & Marie DIUR
2017. Los exámenes de admisión en las organizaciones internacionales: la oposición para intérpretes en plantilla de las Naciones Unidas. CLINA: Revista Interdisciplinaria de Traducción, Interpretación y Comunicación Intercultural 3:2 ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Russell, Debra
2012. Court/Legal interpreting. In Handbook of Translation Studies [Handbook of Translation Studies, 3], ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Smith, Jénine, Leslie Swartz, Sanja Kilian & Bonginkosi Chiliza
2013. Mediating words, mediating worlds: Interpreting as hidden care work in a South African psychiatric institution. Transcultural Psychiatry 50:4 ► pp. 493 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2017. Teaching Dialogue Interpreting [Benjamins Translation Library, 138], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.