Article published In:
TargetVol. 24:2 (2012) ► pp.203–224
Is translated language more standardized than non-translated language?
Using profile-based correspondence analysis for measuring linguistic distances between language varieties.
With this article, we seek to support the law of growing standardization by showing that texts translated into Belgian Dutch make more use of standard language than non-translated Belgian Dutch texts. Additionally, we want to examine whether the use of standard vs. non-standard language can be attributed to the variables text type and source language. In order to achieve that goal, we gathered a diverse set of linguistic variables and used a 10-million-word corpus that is parallel, comparable and bidirectional (the Dutch Parallel Corpus; Macken et al. 2011). The frequency counts for each of the variables are used to determine the differences in standard language use by means of profile-based correspondence analysis (Plevoets 2008). The results of our analysis show that (i) in general, there is indeed a standardizing trend among translations and (ii) text types with a lot of editorial control (fiction, non-fiction and journalistic texts) contain more standard language than the less edited text types (administrative texts and external communication) which adds support for the idea that the differences between translated and non-translated texts are text type dependent.
Keywords: profile-based correspondence analysis, translated versus nontranslated language, standardization, Belgian Dutch, text type
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical background
- 2.1The law of growing standardization
- 2.2The language situation of Belgian Dutch
- 3.Methodology
- 3.1Hypothesis and variables selection
- 3.2Corpus and data extraction
- 3.3Manual validation
- 3.4Profile-based correspondence analysis
- 3.5Two-dimensional plots and interpretation
- 4.Results
- 5.Conclusions and suggestions for future work
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References
Baker, Mona
1993 “Corpus Linguistics and Translation Studies. Implications and Applications.” In Text and Technology. In Honour of John Sinclair, ed. by Mona Baker, Gill Francis, and Elena Tognini-Bonelli, 233–250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 
1996 “Corpus-Based Translation Studies: The Challenges that Lie Ahead.” In Terminology, LSP and Translation: Studies in Language Engineering in Honour of Juan C. Sager, ed. by Harold Somers, 175–186. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ben-Shahar, Rina
1994 “Translating Literary Dialogue: A Problem and its Implications for Translation into Hebrew.” Target 6 (2): 195–212.
Bernardini, Silvia, and Adriano Ferraresi
2011 “Practice, Description and Theory Come Together: Normalization or Interference in Italian Technical Translation?” Meta 56 (2): 226–246.
Bush, Peter
2001 “Literary Translation — Practices.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies, ed. by Mona Baker, 127–130. London and New York: Routledge.
Chesterman, Andrew
De Sutter, Gert, Isabelle Delaere, and Koen Plevoets
2012 “Lexical Lectometry in Corpusbased Translation Studies. Combining Profile-based Correspondence Analysis and Logistic Regression Modelling.” In Quantitative Methods in Corpus-based Translation Studies. A Practical Guide to Descriptive Translation Research, ed. by Michael P. Oakes and Ji Meng, 325–345. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Geeraerts, Dirk, Stefan Grondelaers, and Dirk Speelman
1999 Convergentie en divergentie in de nederlandse woordenschat. Een onderzoek naar kleding- en voetbaltermen. Amsterdam: Meertens Instituut.
Greenacre, Michael
2007 Correspondence Analysis in Practice 2nd ed. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Kenny, Dorothy
1998 “Creatures of Habit? What Translators Usually do with Words.” Meta 43 (4): 515–523.
2000 “Lexical Hide-and-Seek: Looking for Creativity in a Parallel Corpus.” In Intercultural Faultlines: Research Models in Translation Studies: Textual and Cognitive Aspects, ed. by Maeve Olohan, 93–104. Manchester: St. Jerome.
Landauer, Thomas, and Susan Dumais
1997 “A Solution to Plato’s Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and the Representation of Knowledge.” Psychological Review 104 (2): 211–240.
Macken, Lieve, Orphée De Clercq, and Hans Paulussen
2011 “Dutch Parallel Corpus: A Balanced Copyright-Cleared Parallel Corpus.” Meta 56 (2): 374–390.
Malmkjær, Kirsten
1997 “Punctuation in Hans Christian Andersen’s Stories and in their Translations into English.” In Nonverbal Communication and Translation, ed. by Fernando Poyatos, 151–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mauranen, Anna
2008 “Universal Tendencies in Translation.” In Incorporating Corpora: The Linguist and the Translator, ed. by Gunilla Anderman and Margaret Rogers, 32–48. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
May, Rachel
1997 “Sensible Elocution: How Translation Works in & upon Punctuation.” The Translator 3 (1): 1–20.
Neumann, Stella
2011 Contrastive Register Variation. A Quantitative Approach to the Comparison of English and German. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.
Olohan, Maeve
2008 “Scientific and Technical Translation.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies. Second Edition, ed. by Mona Baker and Gabriela Saldanha, 240–43. London and New York: Routledge.
Olohan, Maeve, and Mona Baker
2000 “Reporting that in Translated English: Evidence for Subconscious Processes of Explicitation?” Across Languages and Cultures 1 (2): 141–158.
Øverås, Linn
1998 “In Search of the Third Code. An Investigation of Norms in Literary Translation.” Meta 43 (4): 557–570.
Penninckx, Willy, Paul Buyse, and Willy Smedts
2001 Correct taalgebruik. Kortrijk-Heule: UGA.
Plevoets, Koen
2008 Tussen spreek- en standaardtaal. Een corpusgebaseerd onderzoek naar de situationele, regionale en sociale verspreiding van enkele morfosyntactische verschijnselen uit het gesproken Belgisch–Nederlands. Doctoral dissertation. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven.
In progress “The Correspondence Analysis of Linguistic Profiles.”
Plevoets, Koen, Dirk Speelman, and Dirk Geeraerts
2007 “The Distribution of t/v Pronouns in Netherlandic and Belgian Dutch.” In Variational Pragmatics, ed. by Klaus P. Schneider and Anne Barron, 181–209. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Puurtinen, Tiina
2003 “Genre-specific Features of Translationese? Linguistic Differences between Translated and Non-translated Finnish Children’s Literature.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 18 (4): 389–406.
Pym, Anthony
2008 “On Toury’s Laws of how Translators Translate.” In Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond. Investigations in Honor of Gideon Toury, ed. by Anthony Pym, Miriam Shlesinger, and Daniel Simeoni, 311–328. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Reiczigel, Jeno
1996 “Bootstrap Tests in Correspondence Analysis.” Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis 12 (2): 107–117.
Salton, Gerard, Andrew Wong, and Chung-Shu Yang
1975 “A Vector Space Model for Automatic Indexing.” Communications of the ACM 18 (1): 613–620.
Scott, Nelia
1998 Normalisation and Readers’ Expectations: A Study of Literary Translation with Reference to Lispector’s A Hora Da Estrela. Doctoral dissertation. University of Liverpool.
Speelman, Dirk, Stefan Grondelaers, and Dirk Geeraerts
2003 “Profile-based Linguistic Uniformity as a Generic Method for Comparing Language Varieties.” Computers and the Humanities 37 (3): 317–337.
Steiner, Erich
2001 “Translations English-German: Investigating the Relative Importance of Systemic Contrasts and of the Text Type ‘translation’.” SPRIKreports 71: 1–49.
Stewart, Dominic
2000 “Conventionality, Creativity, and Translated Text: The Implications of Electronic Corpora in Translation.” In Intercultural Faultlines. Research Models in Translation Studies: Textual and Cognitive Aspects, ed. by Maeve Olohan, 73–91. Manchester: St. Jerome.
Strang, Gilbert
2009 Introduction to Linear Algebra. Wellesley: Wellesley-Cambridge Press.
Teich, Elke
2003 Cross-linguistic Variation in System and Text. A Methodology for the Investigation of Translations and Comparable Texts. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Toury, Gideon
Vanderauwera, Ria
1985 Dutch Novels Translated into English: The Transformation of a “Minority” Literature. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Cited by
Cited by 20 other publications
Alasmri, Ibrahim & Haidee Kruger
2018. Conjunctive markers in translation from English to Arabic: a corpus-based study. Perspectives 26:5 ► pp. 767 ff. 
Cvrček, Václav & Lucie Chlumská
2015. Simplification in translated Czech: a new approach to type-token ratio. Russian Linguistics 39:3 ► pp. 309 ff.
de Baets, Pauline & Gert de Sutter
2023. How do translators select among competing (near-)synonyms in translation?. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 35:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Dybiec-Gajer, Joanna
2017. Looby, Robert. 2015. Censorship, Translation and English Language Fiction in People’s Poland. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 29:2 ► pp. 344 ff.
Frankenberg-Garcia, Ana
2019. A corpus study of splitting and joining sentences in translation. Corpora 14:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Gao, Jie
2022. An investigation of high-proficiency L2 English speakers' oral test performance: A profiling approach. Frontiers in Communication 7
Halverson, Sandra L.
2015. Cognitive Translation Studies and the merging of empirical paradigms. Translation Spaces 4:2 ► pp. 310 ff.
Halverson, Sandra L.
2017. Multimethod Approaches. In The Handbook of Translation and Cognition, ► pp. 193 ff.
Kruger, Haidee & Bertus van Rooy
Kruger, Haidee & Bertus van Rooy
2016. Syntactic and pragmatic transfer effects in reported-speech constructions in three contact varieties of English influenced by Afrikaans. Language Sciences 56 ► pp. 118 ff.
Liu, Kanglong, Zhongzhu Liu & Lei Lei
2022. Simplification in translated Chinese: An entropy-based approach. Lingua 275 ► pp. 103364 ff.
Niu, Jiang & Yue Jiang
2024. Does simplification hold true for machine translations? A corpus-based analysis of lexical diversity in text varieties across genres. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11:1
Paulussen, Hans, Lieve Macken, Willy Vandeweghe & Piet Desmet
2013. Dutch Parallel Corpus: A Balanced Parallel Corpus for Dutch-English and Dutch-French. In Essential Speech and Language Technology for Dutch [Theory and Applications of Natural Language Processing, ], ► pp. 185 ff.
Prieels, Lynn & Gert De Sutter
2018. Between language policy and language reality: a corpus-based multivariate study of the interlingual and intralingual subtitling practice in Flanders. Perspectives 26:3 ► pp. 322 ff.
Redelinghuys, Karien & Haidee Kruger
2015. Using the features of translated language to investigate translation expertise. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20:3 ► pp. 293 ff.
Ruette, Tom, Katharina Ehret & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi
2016. A lectometric analysis of aggregated lexical variation in written Standard English with Semantic Vector Space models. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 48 ff.
Sutter, Gert, Patrick Goethals, Torsten Leuschner & Sonia Vandepitte
2012. Towards methodologically more rigorous corpus-based translation studies. Across Languages and Cultures 13:2 ► pp. 137 ff.
Vandevoorde, Lore
2019. Register, Source Language, and Cognateness Effects on Lexical Choice in Translated Dutch. Meta 63:3 ► pp. 627 ff.
Vandevoorde, Lore, Els Lefever, Koen Plevoets & Gert De Sutter
2017. A corpus-based study of semantic differences in translation. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 29:3 ► pp. 388 ff.
Zhang, Xiaomin, Haidee Kotze & Jing Fang
2023. Hyper-conventional, unconventional, or “just right”? The interplay of normalisation and cross-linguistic influence in the use of modal particles in translated Chinese children’s literature. Meta 67:2 ► pp. 384 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.