Article published in:

Interdisciplinarity in Translation and Interpreting Process Research
Edited by Maureen Ehrensberger-Dow, Susanne Göpferich and Sharon O'Brien
[Target 25:1] 2013
► pp. 61–76

Translation competence

Explaining development and stagnation from a dynamic systems perspective

Susanne Göpferich | Justus Liebig University Giessen, Germany

This article introduces Dynamic Systems Theory (DST) as a framework for the investigation of translation competence development. After a presentation of the basic concepts and assumptions underlying this theory, results from the longitudinal study TransComp will be discussed against the background of DST. TransComp is a three-year product- and process-oriented longitudinal study of the development of translation competence in 12 students of translation, whose translation products and processes were compared with those of 10 professional translators. The article outlines both the difficulties involved in the application of DST to the investigation of translation competence development and the added value that it promises for our understanding of developmental processes in translators, including the ways they can be fostered in translation training.

Keywords: translation competence development, Dynamic Systems Theory, DST, expertise, novice-expert paradigm, contrastive analyses, didactical implications, cognitive apprenticeship, translatology

Published online: 04 March 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/target.25.1.06goe

References

Angelone, Eric

2010 “Uncertainty, Uncertainty Management and Metacognitive Problem Solving in the Translation Task.” In Translation and Cognition, ed. by Gregory Shreve and Eric Angelone, 17–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Bayer-Hohenwarter, Gerrit

2011 “The Development of Creativity Analysed: A Plea for More Fine-grained Analyses in Translation Process Research.” Paper at the 2nd International Research Workshop “Methodology in Translation Process Research.” University of Giessen, 27–29 July, 2011.

2012 Translatorische Kreativität: Definition, Messung, Entwicklung. Tübingen: Narr. [Translationswissenschaft, 8.]

Bergen, David

2009 “The Role of Meta-Cognition and Cognitive Conflict in the Development of Translation Competence.” Across Languages and Cultures 10 (2): 231–250.

de Bot, Kees, Wander Lowrie, and Marjolijn Verspoor

2007 “A Dynamic Systems Theory Approach to Second Language Acquisition.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 10 (1): 7–21.

Dreyfus, Hubert L., and Stuart E. Dreyfus

1986 Mind Over Machine. Oxford: Blackwell.

Englund Dimitrova, Birgitta

2005 Expertise and Explicitation in the Translation Process. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [Benjamins Translation Library, 64.]

Ericsson, K. Anders, and Walter Kintsch

1995 “Long-term Working Memory.” Psychological Review 102: 21–245.

Van Gelder, Tim

1989 “The Dynamical Hypothesis in Cognitive Science.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21: 615–656.

Gile, Daniel

1995 Basic Concepts and Models for Interpreter and Translator Training. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

1997 “Conference Interpreting as a Cognitive Management Problem.” In Cognitive Processes in Translation and Interpreting, ed. by Joseph H. Danks, Stephen B. Fountain, Michael K. McBeath, and Gregory M. Shreve, 196–214. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications.

Göpferich, Susanne

2008 Translationsprozessforschung: Stand — Methoden — Perspektiven. Tübingen: Narr. [Translationswissenschaft, 4.]

2009 “Towards a Model of Translation Competence and Its Acquisition: The Longitudinal Study ‘TransComp’.” In Behind the Mind: Methods. Models and Results in Translation Process Research, ed. by Susanne Göpferich, Arnt L. Jakobsen, and Inger M. Mees, 11–37. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur Press. [Copenhagen Studies in Language, 37.]

2010 “The Translation of Instructive Texts from a Cognitive Perspective.” In New Approaches in Translation Process Research, ed. by Susanne Göpferich, Fabio Alves, and Inger M. Mees, 5–55. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur Press. [Copenhagen Studies in Language, 39.]

2011 “From Multidisciplinarity to Transdisciplinarity: The Investigation of Competence Development as a Case in Point.” MikaEL Electronic Proceedings of the KäTu [ p. 76 ]Symposium on Translation and Interpreting Studies 5: 1–24.

Göpferich, Susanne, Gerrit Bayer-Hohenwarter, and Hubert Stigler

(eds) 2011 TransComp — The Development of Translation Competence. Corpus and Asset-Management-System for the Longitudinal Study TransComp. Graz: Karl-Franzens-Universität. http://gams.uni-graz.at/container:tc (last accessed 02 January, 2012).

Hönig, Hans G.

1995 Konstruktives Übersetzen. Tübingen: Stauffenburg. [Studien zur Translation, 1.]

Jääskeläinen, Riitta

2002 “Think-Aloud Protocol Studies into Translation: An Annotated Bibliography.” Target 14 (1): 107–136.

Jungermann, Heinrich, Hans Rüdiger Pfister, and Katrin Fischer

2005 Die Psychologie der Entscheidung. Eine Einführung. 2. Auflage. München: Elsevier.

Kellogg, Ronald T.

2008 “Training Writing Skills: A Cognitive Developmental Perspective.” Journal of Writing Research 1 (1): 1–26.

Prassl, Friedrike

2010 “Translators’ Decision-Making Processes in Research and Knowledge Integration.” In New Approaches in Translation Process Research, ed. by Göpferich Susanne, Fabio Alves, and Inger M. Mees, 57–81. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur Press. [Copenhagen Studies in Language, 37.]

Prassl, Friederike

In progress. Translatorische Recherche und Wissensintegration. (Dissertation). Graz: Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz/ITAT (status: June 2011).

Schäffner, Christina, and Beverly Adab

2000 “Developing Translation Competence: Introduction.” In Developing Translation Competence, ed. by Christina Schäffner and Beverly Adab, vii–xvi. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Shreve, Gregory M.

1997 “Cognition and the Evolution of Translation Competence.” In Cognitive Processes in Translation and Interpreting, ed. by Joseph H. Danks, Stephen B. Fountain, Michael K. McBeath, and Gregory M. Shreve, 20–136. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications.

2006 “The Deliberate Practice: Translation and Expertise.” Journal of Translation Studies 9 (1): 27–42.

Thelen, Ester, and Linda B. Smith

1994 A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Verspoor, Marjolijn, Kees de Bot, and Wander Lowie

2004 “Dynamic Systems Theory and Variation: A Case Study in L2 Writing.” In Words in their Places, ed. by Hendrik Aertsen, 407–421. Amsterdam: VU.

Verspoor, Marjolijn, Wander Lowrie, and Marijn van Dijk

2008 “Variability in Second Language Development from a Dynamic Systems Perspective.” The Modern Language Journal 92 (2): 214–231.

Cited by

Cited by 24 other publications

No author info given

2016. In Memes of Translation [Benjamins Translation Library, 123],

Abdel Latif, Muhammad M. M.

2018. Towards a typology of pedagogy-oriented translation and interpreting research. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 12:3 ► pp. 322 ff.

Biel, Łucja

2017. Enhancing the communicative dimension of legal translation: comparable corpora in the research-informed classroom. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 11:4 ► pp. 316 ff.

Cheng, Si

2019. In Quality Assurance and Assessment Practices in Translation and Interpreting [Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies, ], ► pp. 199 ff.

Chodkiewicz, Marta

2021. Changes in undergraduate students’ conceptual knowledge of translation during the first years of translation/interpreting- and foreign language-related education. Perspectives 29:3 ► pp. 371 ff.

Cid, Clara Ginovart, Carme Colominas & Antoni Oliver

2020. Language industry views on the profile of the post-editor. Translation Spaces 9:2 ► pp. 283 ff.

Guerberof-Arenas, Ana & Antonio Toral

2020. The impact of post-editing and machine translation on creativity and reading experience. Translation Spaces 9:2 ► pp. 255 ff.

Göpferich, Susanne

2017. In The Handbook of Translation and Cognition, ► pp. 402 ff.

Göpferich, Susanne

2019. In Researching Cognitive Processes of Translation [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 169 ff.

Hu, Wan

2018. In Education, Translation and Global Market Pressures, ► pp. 41 ff.

Jin, Shengxi, Zhengjun Lin & Todd Oakley

2021. Translating Metaphtonymy: Exploring Trainee Translators' Translation Approaches and Underlying Factors. Frontiers in Psychology 12

Kumpulainen, Minna

2018. Translation competence from the acquisition point of view. Translation, Cognition & Behavior 1:1 ► pp. 147 ff.

Massey, Gary

2017. In The Handbook of Translation and Cognition, ► pp. 496 ff.

Massey, Gary & Barbara Brändli

2015. In Towards Authentic Experiential Learning in Translator Education, ► pp. 177 ff.

Massey, Gary & Maureen Ehrensberger-Dow

2017. Machine learning: Implications for translator education. Lebende Sprachen 62:2 ► pp. 300 ff.

Mellinger, Christopher D.

2019. Metacognition and self-assessment in specialized translation education: task awareness and metacognitive bundling. Perspectives 27:4 ► pp. 604 ff.

Mo, Aiping & Deliang Man

2017. The ecosystem of translator workstation. Babel. Revue internationale de la traduction / International Journal of Translation 63:3 ► pp. 401 ff.

Palumbo, Giuseppe & Ann Hill Duin

2018. In Multilingual Writing and Pedagogical Cooperation in Virtual Learning Environments [Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies, ], ► pp. 109 ff.

Redelinghuys, Karien & Haidee Kruger

2015. Using the features of translated language to investigate translation expertise. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20:3 ► pp. 293 ff.

Robert, Isabelle S., Aline Remael & Jim J.J. Ureel

2017. Towards a model of translation revision competence. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 11:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Tiselius, Elisabet & Adelina Hild

2017. In The Handbook of Translation and Cognition, ► pp. 423 ff.

Whyatt, Boguslawa

2017. In The Handbook of Translation and Cognition, ► pp. 176 ff.

Whyatt, Bogusława

2017. In Non-professional Interpreting and Translation [Benjamins Translation Library, 129], ► pp. 45 ff.

Yu, Zhibin & Yanping Dong

2021. The Emergence of a Complex Language Skill: Evidence from the Self-organization of Interpreting Competence in Interpreting Students. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition ► pp. 1 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.