Article published in:

Interdisciplinarity in Translation and Interpreting Process Research
Edited by Maureen Ehrensberger-Dow, Susanne Göpferich and Sharon O'Brien
[Target 25:1] 2013
► pp. 107–124

Investigating the conceptual-procedural distinction in the translation process

A relevance-theoretic analysis of micro and macro translation units

Fabio Alves | Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil

José Luiz Gonçalves | Federal University of Ouro Preto, Brazil

This article draws on relevance theory (Sperber and Wilson 1986/1995) and its application to translation (Gutt 2000) to investigate processing effort in translation in relation to two different types of encodings, namely conceptual and procedural encodings (Blakemore 2002, Wilson 2011). Building on the experimental paradigm of data triangulation in translation process research (Alves 2003; Jakobsen 2005), it analyses the translation processes of eight professional translators when performing a direct and an inverse translation task. The analysis focuses on the number and types of encodings found in micro/macro translation units (Alves and Vale 2009; 2011). Results suggest that processing effort in translation is greater in instances of procedural than conceptual encodings.

Keywords: translation process research, relevance theory, conceptual and procedural encodings, micro/macro translation units, processing effort in translation

Published online: 04 March 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/target.25.1.09alv

References

Alves, Fabio

1995 Zwischen Schweigen und Sprechen: Wie bildet sich eine transkulturelle Brücke? Hamburg: Dr. Kovac.

(ed) 2003 Triangulating Translation: Perspectives in Process Oriented Research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [Benjamins Translation Library, 41.]

2007 “Cognitive Effort and Contextual Effect in Translation: A Relevance-Theoretic Approach.” Journal of Translation Studies 10 (1): 18–35.

Alves, Fabio, and José Luiz Gonçalves

2003 “A Relevance Theory Approach to the Investigation of Inferential Processes in Translation.” In Triangulating Translation: Perspectives in Process Oriented Research, ed. by Fabio, Alves, 3–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Alves, Fabio, Adriana Pagano, and Igor Silva

2009 “A New Window on Translators’ Cognitive Activity: Methodological Issues in the Combined Use of Eye Tracking, Key Logging and Retrospective Protocols.” In Methodology, Technology and Innovation in Translation Process Research. A Tribute to Arnt Lykke Jakobsen, ed. by Inger Mees, Fabio Alves, and Susanne Göpferich, 267–291. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.

Alves, Fabio, and Daniel Vale

2009 “Probing the Unit of Translation in Time: Aspects of the Design and Development of a Web Application for Storing, Annotating, and Querying Translation Process Data.” Across Languages and Cultures 10 (2): 251–273.

Alves, Fabio, and Daniel, Vale

2011 “On Drafting and Revision in Translation: A Corpus Linguistics Oriented Analysis of Translation Process Data.” TC3. Translation: Corpora, Computation and Cognition 1 (1): 105–122.

[ p. 123 ]

Blakemore, Diane

1987 Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.

2002 Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dragsted, Barbara

2005 “Segmentation in Translation. Differences Across Levels of Expertise and Difficulty.” Target 17 (1): 49–70.

Elman, Jeffrey L., Elizabeth A. Bates, Mark H. Johnson, Annette Karmiloff-Smith, Domenico Parisi, and Kim Plunkett

1996 Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Gutt, Ernst-August

1998 “Relevance and Effort: A Paper for Discussion.” Paper presented at the II Relevance Theory Workshop 8–10 September 1998, University of Luton.

2000 Translation and Relevance: Cognition and Context, 2nd ed. Manchester: St Jerome.

Jakobsen, Arnt

2005 “Investigating Expert Translators’ Processing Knowledge.” In Knowledge Systems and Translation, ed. by Helle V. Dam, Jan Engberg, and Heidrun Gerzymisch-Arbogast, 173–189. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Jensen, Astrid

2001 The Effects of Time on Cognitive Processes and Strategies in Translation. Copenhagen: Working Papers in LSP.

Königs, Frank

1987 “Was beim Übersetzen passiert: theoretische Aspekte, empirische Befunde und praktische Konsequenzen.” Die neueren Sprachen 2: 162–185.

PACTE.

2008 “First Results of a Translation Competence Experiment: ‘Knowledge of Translation’ and ‘Efficacy of the Translation Process’.” In Translator and Interpreter Training. Issues, Methods and Debates, ed. by John Kearns, 104–126. London: Continuum.

Scardamalia, Marlene, and Carl Bereiter

1991 “Literate Expertise.” In Toward a General Theory of Expertise, ed. by Karl-Anders Ericsson, and John Smith, 172–194. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Shreve, Gregory

2006 “The Deliberate Practice: Translation and Expertise.” Journal of Translation Studies 9 (1): 27–42.

Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson

186/1995 Relevance: Communication and Cognition, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.

Taboada, Maite, and William C. Mann

2006 “Rhetorical Structure Theory: Looking Back and Moving Ahead.” Discourse Studies 8 (3): 423–459.

Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber

1993 “Linguistic Form and Relevance.” Lingua 90: 1–25.

Wilson, Deirdre

2011 “The Conceptual-Procedural Distinction: Past, Present, and Future.” In Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives, ed. by Victoria, Escandell-Vidal, Manuel, Leonetti, and Aoife, Ahern, 3–28. London: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Cited by

Cited by 13 other publications

Abdel Latif, Muhammad M. M.

2018. Towards a typology of pedagogy-oriented translation and interpreting research. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 12:3 ► pp. 322 ff.

Alos, Julieta

2015. Explicating the implicit: an empirical investigation into pragmatic competence in translator training. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 9:3 ► pp. 287 ff.

Alves, Fabio

2015. In Psycholinguistic and Cognitive Inquiries into Translation and Interpreting [Benjamins Translation Library, 115], ► pp. 17 ff.

Alós, Julieta

2016. Discourse relation recognition in translation: a relevance-theory perspective. Perspectives 24:2 ► pp. 201 ff.

Behrens, Bergljot

2016. In New Directions in Empirical Translation Process Research [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 265 ff.

Daems, Joke, Sonia Vandepitte, Robert J. Hartsuiker & Lieve Macken

2017. Identifying the Machine Translation Error Types with the Greatest Impact on Post-editing Effort. Frontiers in Psychology 8

Dai, Guangrong

2016. In Hybridity in Translated Chinese [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 193 ff.

Ehrensberger-Dow, Maureen, Michaela Albl-Mikasa, Katrin Andermatt, Andrea Hunziker Heeb & Caroline Lehr

2020. Cognitive load in processing ELF: Translators, interpreters, and other multilinguals. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 9:2 ► pp. 217 ff.

Ferreira, Aline

2014. Analyzing recursiveness patterns and retrospective protocols of professional translators in L1 and L2 translation tasks. Translation and Interpreting Studies 9:1 ► pp. 109 ff.

Jääskeläinen, Riitta

2017. In The Handbook of Translation and Cognition, ► pp. 213 ff.

Liu, Kanglong, Muhammad Afzaal & Diego Raphael Amancio

2021. Syntactic complexity in translated and non-translated texts: A corpus-based study of simplification. PLOS ONE 16:6 ► pp. e0253454 ff.

Schaeffer, Moritz, David Huepe, Silvia Hansen-Schirra, Sascha Hofmann, Edinson Muñoz, Boris Kogan, Eduar Herrera, Agustín Ibáñez & Adolfo M. García

2020. The Translation and Interpreting Competence Questionnaire: an online tool for research on translators and interpreters. Perspectives 28:1 ► pp. 90 ff.

Wang, Fuxiang

2021. Impact of translation difficulty and working memory capacity on processing of translation units: evidence from Chinese-to-English translation. Perspectives ► pp. 1 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.