Cover not available
Article published In:
Target
Vol. 4:2 (1992) ► pp.191–208

Translation Policy and Literary/Cultural Changes in Early Modern Korea (1895-1921)

| Kyung Hee University, Seoul

This article gives an overview of the relationship between the establishment of translation policy and literary/cultural shifts during the first two decades of the twentieth century in Korea. During the Kae Hwa ("Enlightenment") period, 1895-1910, translations were undertaken primarily for didactic purposes. Next followed a period when foreign texts were imported with the aim of developing modern Korean literature. The concept of "translational norms", as proposed by Toury, is used to explain the changing practices of individual translators as well as the general evolution of translation within the Korean literary system.

Article outline
  • 0.Introduction
  • 1.Position of Translated Literature in Early Modern Korea
  • 2.Translation Norms in Early Modern Korea
    • 2.1Restrictions on Literary Production
    • 2.2Shifting Types of Translation Norms
  • 3.Translation Norms and the Establishment of Modern Korean Literature
    • 3.1Translation and Literary Production
    • 3.2Examples
      • 3.2.1Ch'oe Namson's "Sea" Poems
      • 3.2.2Kim Ok's "Season" Poems
  • 4.Concluding Remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 1 January 1992
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/target.4.2.04hyu
References
Ch’oe, Namson
ed. 1980 [1914-1918]. Ch’ongch’un [Youth]. Seoul: T’ae Hak Sa.Google Scholar
ed. 1982 [1908-1911]. Sonyon [Boys]. Seoul: Hyun Dae Sa.Google Scholar
Chung, Han-mo
1981 Han Kuk Hyon Dae Si Mun Hak Sa [History of Modern Korean Poetry]. Seoul: Il Ji Sa.Google Scholar
Even-Zohar, Itamar
1978 “The Position of Translated Literature within the Literary Polysystem”. James S Holmes, José Lambert and Raymond van den Broeck, eds. Literature and Translation: New Perspectives in Literary Studies. Leuven: Acco 1978 117–127.Google Scholar
Hermans, Theo
1985 “Translation Studies and a New Paradigm”. Theo Hermans, ed. The Manipulation of Literature: Studies in Literary Translation. London and Sydney: Croom Helm 1985 7–15.Google Scholar
1990 “Translational Norms: A Systematic and Social Perspective”. Paper presented at the International Conference on the Translation of Chinese Literature, National Taiwan University, Taipei.Google Scholar
1991 “Translational Norms and Correct Translations”. Kitty M. van Leuven-Zwart and Ton Naaijkens, eds. Translation Studies: The State of the Art. Proceedings of the First James S Holmes Symposium on Translation Studies. Amsterdam-Atlanta, GA: Rodopi 1991 155-169Google Scholar
Jong, Ki-sou
1987 La Corée et l’Occident: La culture française. Paris: Minard.Google Scholar
Kim, Byong-ch’ol
1975 Han Kuk Kun Dae Bon Yok Mun Hak Sa Yon Gu [History of Modern Korean Literary Translation]. Seoul: Ul Yu Mun Hwa Sa.Google Scholar
Kim, Jae-hong
1985 “So Gu Sang Jing Ju Uiui Su Yong” [The Reception of Western Symbolism in Literary Trends]. Pak Ch’ul Hui, ed. Mun Ye Sa Jo. Seoul: I U Ch’ul P’an Sa 1985 203–219.Google Scholar
Kim, Jae-hong and Theresa Hyun
1990 “The Politics of Literary Translation in Early Modern Korea”. The Beonyuk Segye 1990 13–22.Google Scholar
1991 “Translation as Cultural Re-modelling: Kim Ok and the Creation of Modern Korean Poetic Forms”. Revue de Littérature Comparée 21. 165–173.Google Scholar
Kim, Yong-jik
1986 Han Kuk Kun Dae Si Sa [History of Modern Korean Poetry]. Seoul: Sae Mun Sa.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, Senryu and Totan Miyamori
eds. 1908 Ei Bei Hyaku Ka Si Sen [Selections from a Hundred British and American Poets]. Tokyo: SanseidoGoogle Scholar
Lambert, José
1989 “L’Epoque romantique en France: Les genres, la traduction et l’évolution littéraire”. Revue de littérature comparée 21. 25–30.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, Kevin
1984 Han Kuk Kun Dae Siui Yong Si Yong Hyang Yon Gu [The Influence of English Poetry on Modern Korean Poetry]. Seoul: Sae Mun Sa.Google Scholar
Paker, Saliha
1986 “Translated European Literature in the Late Ottoman Literary Polysystem”. New Comparison 11. 67–79.Google Scholar
Sym, Myung-ho
1982 The Making of Modern Korean Poetry: Foreign Influences and Native Creativity. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.Google Scholar
T’aeso
1918–1919 T’aeso Munye Sinbo [The Journal of Western Literature and Arts], ed. Chang, Tuch’ol. Seoul.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Chiharu
1979 “Aperçu sur l’histoire de la traduction au Japon”. Babel 25:3. 127–130.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toury, Gideon
1980 In Search of a Theory of Translation. Tel Aviv: Porter Institute for Poetics and Semiotics, Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar
1988 “Translating English Literature via German and Vice Versa: A Symptomatic Reversal in the History of Modern Hebrew Literature”. Harald Kittel, ed. Die Literarische Übersetzung: Stand und Perspektiven ihrer Erforschung. Berlin: Erich Schmidt 1988 139–157.Google Scholar
I’ymoczko, Maria
1986 “Translation as a Force for Literary Revolution in the Twelfth-Century Shift from Epic to Romance”. New Comparison 11. 7–27.Google Scholar
Yoon, Ho-byong
1986 French Symbolism and Modern Korean Poetry: A Study in Poetic Language and Its Social Significance in Korea. State University of New York at Stoney Brook. [Ph.D. Dissertation.]Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Asscher, Omri
2021. Translation as a probe into homeland-diaspora relations. Translation Studies 14:1 ► pp. 36 ff. DOI logo
Meng, Lingzi
2019. Literature Review. In Gender in Literary Translation [Corpora and Intercultural Studies, 3], ► pp. 9 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.