Is There a Special Kind of “Reading” for Translation?
An Empirical Investigation of Reading in the Translation Process
Gregory M. Shreve | Kent State University
Christina Schäffner | Aston University, Birmingham
Joseph H. Danks | Kent State University
Jennifer Griffin | Kent State University
The role of reading in translation is rarely discussed in the literature. Translation has mainly been discussed within a product-oriented framework. The more process-oriented approaches of recent years have taken notice of reading as a component activity of the translation process. However, few empirical studies have been completed which address the role of reading in translation. The way a person reads, and the result of that reading (some sort of mental representation of the text or text segment), will depend on the reader's purposes and motivations. The present empirical study indicates that while the translator's reading of a text may be to some extent more thorough and deliberate than that of an ordinary reader, it is not likely to be markedly so. The study also indicates a significant variability in the way translators "read for translation". This suggests the existence of alternate strategies in this kind of reading.
Published online: 01 January 1993
https://doi.org/10.1075/target.5.1.03shr
https://doi.org/10.1075/target.5.1.03shr
References
[ p. 37 ]References
Danks, Joseph H.
Forthcoming. “The Psycholinguistics of Reading and Translation”. Gregory Shreve, Albrecht Neubert and Klaus Gommlich eds. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Basic Issues in Translation Studies Kent, Ohio Institute for Applied Linguistics Kent State University Forum on Translation Studies, 2
Danks, Joseph H. and L.J. End
1987 “Processing Strategies for Reading and Listen-ing”. R. Horowitz and S.J. Samuels, eds. Comprehending Oral and Written Language. New York: Academic Press 1987 271–294.
Déjean Le Féal, Karla
1988 “A Look into the Black Box”. Fremdsprachen 4. 237–240.
Hatim, Basil and Ian Mason
1990 Discourse and the Translator. London: Longman.
Krings, Hans P.
1986 Was in den Köpfen von Übersetzern vorgeht: Eine empirische Untersuchung zur Struktur des Übersetzungsprozesses an fortgeschrittenen Franzö-sischlernen. Tübingen: Narr.
Neubert, Albrecht
1985 Text and Translation. Leipzig: Verlag Enzyklopädie. [Über-setzungswissenschaftliche Beiträge, 8.]
1991 “Models of Translation”. Sonja Tirkonnen-Condit, ed. Empirical Research in Translation and Intercultural Studies. Tübingen: Narr 1991 17–26.
Neubert, Albrecht and Gregory Shreve
1992 Translation as Text. Kent and London: Kent State University Press. [Übersetzungswissenschaftliche Beiträge, 13 and Translation Studies, 1.]
Séguinot, Candace
1989 “The Translation Process: An Experimental Study”. Candace Séguinot, ed. The Translation Process. Toronto: H. G. Publications 1989 21–53.
Toury, Gideon
1982 “A Rationale for Descriptive Translation Studies”. Dispositio VII:19–20. 23–39.
Cited by
Cited by 22 other publications
Bowker, Lynne & Cheryl McBride
2017. Précis-writing as a form of speed training for translation students.
The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 11:4 ► pp. 259 ff. 
Campbell, Stuart
1999. A Cognitive Approach to Source Text Difficulty in Translation1.
Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 11:1 ► pp. 33 ff.
Chen, Jinjin
2021.
In Explorations in Empirical Translation Process Research [Machine Translation: Technologies and Applications, 3],
► pp. 315 ff.
Cheong, Ho-Jeong
2005. Reading for Translation.
FORUM. Revue internationale d’interprétation et de traduction / International Journal of Interpretation and Translation 3:1 ► pp. 37 ff.
Cho, Sang-Eun
2005. Correlation Between Translation Unit and Readability as Identified in the Process of Japanese-Korean Translation.
FORUM. Revue internationale d’interprétation et de traduction / International Journal of Interpretation and Translation 3:2 ► pp. 17 ff.
Halverson, Sandra L.
2019. ‘Default’ translation.
Translation, Cognition & Behavior 2:2 ► pp. 187 ff.
Ho, Chen-En, Tze-Wei Chen & Jie-Li Tsai
2020. How does training shape English-Chinese sight translation behaviour?.
Translation, Cognition & Behavior 3:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Hvelplund, Kristian Tangsgaard
2017.
In Translation in Transition [Benjamins Translation Library, 133],
► pp. 56 ff.
Hvelplund, Kristian Tangsgaard & Barbara Dragsted
2018.
In Innovation and Expansion in Translation Process Research [American Translators Association Scholarly Monograph Series, XVIII],
► pp. 55 ff.
Marmaridou, A. Sophia S.
1996. Directionality in Translation Processes and Practices.
Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 8:1 ► pp. 49 ff.
Mellinger, Christopher D. & Thomas A. Hanson
2018. Order effects in the translation process.
Translation, Cognition & Behavior 1:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Muñoz Martín, Ricardo
2016.
In Reembedding Translation Process Research [Benjamins Translation Library, 128],
► pp. 1 ff.
Muñoz Martín, Ricardo
2016. Of minds and men – computers and translators.
Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 52:2
Sayaheen, Bilal
2019.
In The Evolving Curriculum in Interpreter and Translator Education [American Translators Association Scholarly Monograph Series, XIX],
► pp. 185 ff.
Scarpa, Federica
2020.
In Research and Professional Practice in Specialised Translation,
► pp. 187 ff.
Shreve, Gregory M. & Isabel Lacruz
2017.
In The Handbook of Translation and Cognition,
► pp. 127 ff.
TZOU, YEH-ZU, JYOTSNA VAID & HSIN-CHIN CHEN
2017. Does formal training in translation/interpreting affect translation strategy? Evidence from idiom translation.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20:3 ► pp. 632 ff.
Walker, Callum
2021.
In An Eye-Tracking Study of Equivalent Effect in Translation,
► pp. 13 ff.
Whyatt, Boguslawa
2017.
In The Handbook of Translation and Cognition,
► pp. 176 ff.
Whyatt, Bogusława, Marta Kajzer-Wietrzny & Katarzyna Stachowiak
2017.
In Translation in Transition [Benjamins Translation Library, 133],
► pp. 136 ff.
Whyatt, Bogusława, Katarzyna Stachowiak & Marta Kajzer-Wietrzny
2016. Similar and different: cognitive rhythm and effort in translation and paraphrasing.
Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 52:2
Zlatnar Moe, Marija & Tanja Žigon
2016.
In Interconnecting Translation Studies and Imagology [Benjamins Translation Library, 119],
► pp. 145 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.