Article published In:
TASK
Vol. 1:2 (2021) ► pp.155161
References (23)
References
Ahmadian, M. J., & Long, M. H. (eds.). (2021). The Cambridge Handbook of Task-Based Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bryfonski, L., & McKay, T. H. (2017). TBLT implementation and evaluation: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 231, 603–632. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. (2017). Salience in usage-based SLA. In S. Gass, P. Spinner, & J. Behney. (Eds.), Salience in second language acquisition (pp. 21–40). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jordan, G., & Long, M. H. (to appear). English Language Teaching for Adults. The way it is now, and the way it could be. Cambridge Scholars.
Long, M. H. (1981). Input, interaction and second language acquisition. In H. Winitz. (Ed.), Native language and foreign language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379 1, 259–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1983). Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5 (2), 177–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann. (Eds.), Modeling and assessing second language development (pp. 77–99). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(1990). Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12, 3, 251–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991a). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. B. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch. (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991b). The design and psycholinguistic motivation of research on foreign language learning. In B. Freed. (Ed.), Foreign language acquisition research and the classroom (pp. 309–320). D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
(ed.) (2005). Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). Problems in SLA. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2013a). Maturational constraints on child and adult SLA. In G. Granena & M. H. Long. (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment (pp. 3–41). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013b). Some implications of research findings on sensitive periods in language learning for educational policy and practice. In G. Granena & M. H. Long. (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment (pp. 259–271). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Second language acquisition and Task-Based Language Teaching. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2020). Enhanced incidental and implicit L2 acquisition for international students. In S. Rastelli & C. Bagna. (Eds.), Manifesto per l’insegnamiento della lengua italiana agli student internazionali. Otto commenti (pp. 23–41). Ospedaletto-Pisa.Google Scholar
(2021). The L in TBLT. In M. J. Ahmadian & M. H. Long. (Eds.), The handbook of task-based language teaching. Cambridge University Press. DOI logo
Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1993). Units of analysis in syllabus design: The case for task. In G. Crookes & S. M. Gass. (Eds.), Tasks in pedagogical context. Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9–54). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Long, M. H., & Porter, P. (1985). Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19 (2), 207–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research and practice. In C. J. Doughty & J. Williams. (Eds.), Focus on form in second language acquisition (pp. 15–41). Cambridge University Press. Reprinted in Ortega, L. (Ed.). (2011). Second language acquisition: Critical concepts in linguistics. Routledge.Google Scholar
Long, M. H., & Ross, S. (2009). Input elaboration: a viable alternative to “authentic” and simplified texts. In Namai, K., & Fukada, Y. (eds.), Toward the fusion of language, culture and education: From the persepectives of international and interdisciplinary research. A feschrift for Yasukata Yano. (pp. 307–25). Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (2011). Second language task complexity, the cognition hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity. Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 3–37). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yano, Y., Long, M. H., & Ross, S. (1994). The effects of simplified and elaborated texts on foreign language reading comprehension. Language Learning 44, 2, 189–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar