Miscellaneous published in:
TASK
Vol. 1:2 (2021) ► pp. 289301
References
Ellis, R.
(2003) Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford.Google Scholar
(2018) Reflections on task-based language teaching. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gurzynski-Weiss, L.
IATBLT (n.d). The TBLT Language Learning Task Bank. Oxford. https://​tblt​.indiana​.edu
Michel, M.
n.d.). Dating in Dutch: An argumentative task. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss & IATBLT. The TBLT Language Learning Task Bank. https://​tblt​.indiana​.edu​/tasks​/details​.html​?id​=50
Michel, M. C.
(2011) Cognitive and interactive aspects of task-based performance in Dutch as a second language (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Amsterdam.
(2011) Effects of task complexity and interaction on L2 performance. In P. Robinson. Second language task complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance, (141–173). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Michel, M., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I.
(2007) The influence of complexity in monologic versus dialogic tasks in Dutch L2. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL) 45(3), pp. 241–259. Crossref
Michel, M. C., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I.
(2012) Task complexity and interaction:(Combined) effects on task-based performance in Dutch as a second language. EUROSLA Yearbook, 12 (1), 164–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Michel, M. C.
(2013) The use of conjunctions in cognitively simple versus complex oral L2 tasks. Modern Language Journal, 97 (1), 178–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar