Article published In:
TASKVol. 1:2 (2021) ► pp.196–226
Impact of task preparedness on L2 oral performance and strategy use
The case of Chinese EFL learners
The present study sets out to explore the effects of pre-task planning and unpressured on-line planning on L2 learners’ oral performance and their choices of planning strategies in a dialogic task condition. Forty-eight intermediate Chinese EFL learners were invited to perform the task and were then assigned to four groups, each with a different planning condition. Complexity, accuracy, and fluency of their oral production were measured. Results indicated that in the dialogic task condition, unpressured on-line planning raised syntactic complexity. Strikingly, pre-task planning did not improve L2 performance in all dimensions. Additionally, a trade-off effect was found between complexity and accuracy. Retrospective interviews were conducted to explore strategies employed by the participants and their perceptions of task preparedness. Results showed that the participants preferred to use metacognitive strategies and social/affective strategies in the dialogic task. Both advantages and limitations were identified by the participants regarding different planning conditions.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Planning and task performance
- Planning and strategy use
- Research questions
- Methodology
- Participants
- Design of the study
- The task
- The procedure
- Measures
- Complexity
- Accuracy
- Fluency
- Results
- Complexity
- Accuracy
- Fluency
- Trade-off effect
- The retrospective interviews
- Discussion
- Effects of task planning on L2 performance (RQ 1)
- Trade-off effect occurred in the current study (RQ 2)
- Strategies employed during pre-task planning (RQ 3)
- Strategies employed during on-line planning (RQ 4)
- Learners’ perceptions of task preparedness (RQ 5)
- Conclusion
- Limitations and future directions
-
References
References (46)
Ahmadian, M. J.
(
2012)
The effects of guided careful online planning on complexity, accuracy and fluency in intermediate EFL learners’ oral production: The case of English articles.
Language Teaching Research,
16
(1), 129–149.
Brown, A. L., Bransford, J. D., Ferrara, R. A., & Campione, J. C.
(
1983)
Learning, remembering, and understanding. In
J. H. Flavell &
M. Markman. (Eds.).
Carmichael’s manual of child psychology (pp. 77–166). John Wiley & Sons.
Brown, S.
(
2006)
Teaching listening. Cambridge University Press.
Bui, G.
(
2014)
Task readiness: Theoretical framework and empirical evidence from topic familiarity, strategic planning, and proficiency levels. In
P. Skehan. (Ed.),
Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 63–94). John Benjamins.
Chen, M. L.
(
2009)
Influence of grade level on perceptual learning style preferences and language learning strategies of Taiwanese English as a foreign language learners.
Learning and Individual Differences,
19
(2), 304–308.
Council of Europe
(
2001)
Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.
Crookes, G.
(
1989)
Planning and interlanguage variation.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition,
11
1, 367–383.
Elder, C. A., & Iwashita, N.
Ellis, R.
(
1987)
Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse: Style shifting in the use of the past tense.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition,
9
1, 12–20.
Ellis, R.
(
2009)
The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 oral production.
Applied Linguistics,
30
1, 474–509.
Ellis, R.
(
2018)
Reflections on task-based language teaching. Multilingual Matters.
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C.
(
2019)
Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
Foster, P., & Skehan, P.
(
1996)
The influence of planning and task type on second language performance.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition,
18
1, 299–323.
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G.
(
2000)
Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons.
Applied Linguistics,
23
(3), 354–375.
Gilabert, R., Barón, J., & Levkina, M.
Griffiths, C.
(
2003)
Language learning strategy use and proficiency: The relationship between patterns of reported language learning strategy (LLS) use by speakers of other language (SOL) and proficiency with implications for the teaching/learning situation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) University of Auckland.
Guiraud, P.
(
1959)
Problèmes et méthodes de la statistique linguistique. Reidel.
Levelt, W. J. M.
(
1989)
Speaking: From intention to articulation. The MIT Press.
Michel, M.
(
2017)
Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency (CAF). In
S. Loewen &
M. Sato. (Eds.),
The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 50–68). Routledge.
Michel, M., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I.
(
2007)
The influence of complexity in monologic versus dialogic tasks in Dutch L2.
IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching,
45
(3), 241–259.
O’Malley, J. M. & Chamot, A. U.
(
1990)
Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
Ortega, L.
(
1999)
Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition,
21
(1), 109–148.
Oxford, R.
(
1989)
Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students.
The Modern Language Journal,
73
(3), 291–300.
Oxford, R.
(
1990)
Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Newbury House.
Oxford, R.
(
2003)
Language learning styles and strategies: Concepts and relationships.
International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching,
41
(4), 271–278.
Skehan, P.
(
1996)
Second-language acquisition research and task-based instruction in
J. Willis &
D. Willis. (Eds.),
Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 17–30). Heinemann.
Skehan, P.
(
1998)
A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford University Press.
Skehan, P.
(
2009)
Models of speaking and the assessment of second language proficiency. In
A. Benati. (Ed.),
Issues in second language proficiency (pp. 202–215). Continuum.
Skehan, P.
(
2018)
Second Language Task-Based Performance: Theory, Research, Assessment. Routledge.
Syafryadin, S.
(
2020)
Students’ strategies in learning speaking: Experience of two Indonesian schools.
Journal for Language and Foreign Language Learning,
9
(1), 34–47.
Tavakoli, P.
(
2016)
Fluency in monologic and dialogic task performance: Challenges in defining and measuring L2 fluency.
IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching,
54
(2): 133–150.
Tavakoli, P. & Foster, P.
(
2008)
Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on learner output.
Language Learning,
58
(2), 439–473.
Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P.
Vermeer, A.
(
2000)
Coming to grips with lexical richness in spontaneous speech data.
Language Testing,
17
(1), 65–83.
Wendel, J.
(
1997)
Planning and second language narrative production (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Temple University, Japan.
Yu, G.
(
2010)
Lexical diversity in writing and speaking task performance.
Applied Linguistics,
31
(2), 236–259.
Yuan, F., & Ellis, R.
(
2003)
The effects of pre-task and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production.
Applied Linguistics,
24
(1), 1–27.
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
Gu, Qianqian & Kris Van den Branden
2024.
The effects of two methods of on-line planning on L2 task-based speaking performance and strategy use.
Language Teaching Research
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.