Cover not available
Article published In:
TASK
Vol. 2:2 (2022) ► pp.164–183

Self-Determination theory and tasks

A motivational framework for TBLT research

ORCID logo | Kindai University , Japan
ORCID logo | Kindai University , Japan

Researchers investigating TBLT have used psycholinguistic and sociolinguistic theories in support of the approach, but there has been limited discussion of motivational frameworks. A framework for motivation within TBLT would enhance our understanding of learner motivation, and could be utilised in future studies. This paper argues that Self-Determination Theory is an appropriate framework. After briefly describing the key tenets of TBLT and SDT, the paper shows how SDT helps us understand the motivational benefits of tasks. It outlines the six mini-theories of SDT, and aligns them with existing studies to highlight how results may be explained by these theories. Some suggestions are then provided as to how these theories can be used for conducting future classroom-based research.

Keywords: motivation, self-determination theory, theoretical framework, classroom, tasks
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • TBLT–A psycholinguistic and sociocultural rationale
  • TBLT and motivation
  • Self-Determination Theory (SDT): A brief overview
  • SDT and TBLT: A research framework
    • Cognitive evaluation theory (CET)
    • Organismic integration theory (OIT)
    • Causality orientations theory (COT)
    • Basic Psychological Needs Theory (BPNT)
    • Goal contents theory (GCT)
    • Relationships motivation theory (RMT)
  • Measurement
    • Basic psychological needs satisfaction and frustration scale (BPNSFS)
    • Language learning orientation scale (LLOS)
  • Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 24 January 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/task.21024.lee
References
Aubrey, S.
(2017) Measuring Flow in the EFL Classroom: Learners’ Perceptions of Inter- and Intra-Cultural Task-Based Interactions. TESOL Quarterly, 51(3), 661–692. [URL]. DOI logo
Bandura, A.
(1997) Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Benson, P.
(2011) Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning (2nd ed). Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Breen, M.
(1989) The evaluation cycle for language learning tasks. In R. K. Johnson (ed.) Second Language Curriculum (pp. 187–206). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, H. D. & Lee, H.
(2015) Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (4th ed.). Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Butler, Y. G.
(2017) Motivational elements of digital instructional games: A study of young L2 learners’ game designs. Language Teaching Research, 21 1, 735–750. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bygate, M.
(2020) Some directions for possible survival of TBLT as a real world project. Language Teaching, 53 1, 275–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comanaru, R., & Noels, K. A.
(2009) Self-Determination, motivation, and the learning of Chinese as a heritage language. Canadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue Canadienne Des Langues Vivantes, 66 1, 131–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dao, P.
(2020) Effect of interaction strategy instruction on learner engagement in peer interaction. System, 911, 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M.
(1985) Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dembovskaya, S. B.
(2009) Task-based instruction: The effect of motivational and cognitive pre-tasks on second language oral French production (Doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa). DOI logo
Djafri, F. & Wimbarti, S.
(2018) Measuring foreign language anxiety among learners of different foreign languages: in relation to motivaiton and perception of teacher’s behaviors. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 3 1, 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z.
(2002) The motivational basis for language learning tasks. In P. Robinson (ed.), Individual differences and instructed second language acquisition, (pp 137–158). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 Self, (pp 9–42). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019) Task motivation: What makes an L2 task engaging? In Z. Wen & M. Ahmadian (Eds.), Researching L2 task performance and pedagogy. In honour of Peter Skehan, (pp. 53–66). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020) Innovations and challenges in language learning motivation. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2003) Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2018) Reflections on task-based language teaching. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. & Shintani, N.
(2014) Language pedagogy through second language acquisition. Routledge.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C.
(2020) Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. C.
(2010) Motivation and second language acquisition: The socio-educational model. Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A., & Mercer, S.
(2021a) Student engagement in the language classroom. Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. H., Vitta, J. P., & Wu, J.
(2021b) Engagement in language learning: A systematic review of 20 years of research methods and definitions. Language Teaching Research. Online First. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jauregi, K., de Graaff, R., van den Bergh, H., & Kriz, M.
(2012) Native/non-native speaker interactions through video-web communication: A clue for enhancing motivation? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25 1, 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J., & Dörnyei, Z.
(2004) The interaction of linguistic and motivational variables in second language task performance. Zeitschrift für Interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht 9 1, 1–21.Google Scholar
Kormos, J. & Wilby, J.
(2019) Task Motivation. In M. Lamb, K. Csizér, A. Henry and S. Ryan. (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Motivation (pp. 267–286). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kozaki, Y. & Ross, S.
(2011) Contextual dynamics in foreign language learning motivation. Language Learning, 61 1, 1328–1354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lamb, M.
(2017) The motivational dimension of language teaching. Language Teaching, 50 1, 301–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambert, C.
(2010) A task-based needs analysis: Putting principles into practice. Language Teaching Research, 14 (1), 99–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) Tasks, affect and second language performance. Language Teaching Research 21, 657–664. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambert, C., Philp, J., & Nakamura, S.
(2017) Learner-generated content and engagement in second language task performance. Language Teaching Research, 21 1, 665–680. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, J. P.
(2006) Sociocultural theory and second language learning: State of the art. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28 1, 67–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leeming, P.
(2019) Emergent leadership and group interaction in the task-based language classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 53 (3), 768–793. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021) The influence of small groups on leader stability and task engagement in the language classroom. Language Teaching research (online first). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leeming, P., Aubrey, S., & Lambert, C.
(2020) Collaborative pre-task planning processes and second language task performance. RELC Journal (online first). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leeming, P. & Harris, J.
(2022) Measuring foreign language students’ self-determination: A Rasch validation study. Language Learning 72 1, 646–694. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Long, M.
(1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.). Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Long, M. H.
(2015) Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lou, N. M., Chaffee, K. E., Vargas Lascano, D. I., Dincer, A., & Noels, K. A.
(2018) Complementary perspectives on autonomy in Self-Determination Theory and language learner autonomy. TESOL Quarterly, 52 1, 210–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K., & Chaikitmongkol, W. P.
(2007) Teachers’ and learners’ reactions to a task-based EFL course in Thailand. TESOL Quarterly, 41 1, 107–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McEown, M. S., & Oga-Baldwin, W. L. Q.
(2019) Self-determination for all language learners: New applications for formal language education. System, 86 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mills, N.
(2014) Self-efficacy in second language acquisition. In S. Mercer & M. Williams (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on the self in SLA (pp. 6–19). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moskovsky, C., Alrabai, F., Paolini, S. & Ratcheva, S.
(2013) The effects of teachers’ motivational strategies on learners’ motivation: A controlled investigation of second language acquisition. Language Learning, 63 1, 34–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muir, C., & Dörnyei, Z.
(2013) Directed Motivational Currents: Using vision to create effective motivational pathways. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 3 1, 357–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newton, J. & Nation, I. P.
(2021) Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking (2nd ed). Routledge.Google Scholar
Nishimura, T., & Suzuki, T.
(2016) Basic psychological need satisfaction and frustration in Japan: Controlling for big five personality traits. Japanese Psychological Research, 58 1, 320–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noels, K. A., Pelletier, L. G., Clément, R., & Vallerand, R. J.
(2000) Why are you learning a second language? Motivational orientations and self-determination theory. Language Learning, 50 1, 57–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noels, K. A., Lou, N. M., Vargas Lascano, D. I., Chaffee, K. E., Dincer, A., Zhang, Y. S. D., & Zhang, X.
(2019a) Self-determination and motivated engagement in language learning. In M. Lamb, K. Csizér, A. Henry, & S. Ryan (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Motivation for Language Learning (pp. 95–115). Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noels, K. A., Vargas Lascano, D. I., & Saumure, K.
(2019b) The development of self-determination across the language course: Trajectories of motivational change and the dynamic interplay of psychological needs, orientations, and engagement. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41 1, 821–851. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norton, B.
(2000) Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity, and educational change. Longman.Google Scholar
Philp, J., Adams, R., & Iwashita, N.
(2013) Peer interaction and second language learning. Taylor and Francis. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Philp, J.
(2016) Epilogue: New pathways in researching interaction. In M. Sato, & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 377–396). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Popoure, G.
(2014) The influence of content on adult L2 learners’ task motivation: An interest theory perspective. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17 1, 69–90.Google Scholar
Robinson, P.
(2011) Task-based language learning: A review of issues. Language Learning 61 1, 1–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robson, G.
(2016) A structural model of situational constructs accounting for Willingness to Communicate at a Japanese university. In Q. Zhang (Ed.), Pacific Rim Objective Measurement Symposium (PROMS) 2015 Conference Proceedings pp. 267–287. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L.
(2017) Self-Determination Theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. The Guildford Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Powelson, C. L.
(1991) Autonomy and relatedness as fundamental to motivation and education. The Journal of Experimental Education, 60 1, 49–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R.
(2001) Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P.
(1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swain, M.
(2005) The output hypothesis: theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 471–483). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Swain, M. & Lapkin, S.
(1998) Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82 1, 320–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swain, M., Lapkin, S., Knouzi, I., Suzuki, W. & Brooks, L.
(2009) Languaging: University students learn the grammatical concept of voice in French. Modern Language Journal, 931, 5–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van den Branden, K.
(2006) Introduction: Task-based language teaching in a nutshell. In K. Van den Branden (Ed.), Task- Based Language Education, (pp 1–16). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S.
(1986) Thought and language. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Watanabe, Y. & Swain, M.
(2007) Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research, 11 1, 121–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willis, D., & Willis, J.
(2007) Doing task-based teaching. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar