Chapter published in:
Task-Based Approaches to Teaching and Assessing Pragmatics
Edited by Naoko Taguchi and YouJin Kim
[Task-Based Language Teaching 10] 2018
► pp. 2–24

Chapter 1
Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics

An overview

| Carnegie Mellon University
| Georgia State University
Article outline
  • Characteristics of tasks in TBLT
  • Instructional activities in L2 pragmatics
  • Coding and analysis of instructional features
  • Trends of instructional features in L2 pragmatics
  • Tasks in TBLT and pragmatics teaching: What each field can offer
  • Chapters in this book
  • References
Published online: 15 August 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.10.01tag
References
Alcón-Soler, E., & Martínez-Flor, A.
(2008) Investigating pragmatics in foreign language learning, teaching and testing. Bristol: Multilingual matters.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brunfaut, T., & Révész, A.
(2013) Text characteristics of task input and difficulty in second language listening comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 31–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bygate, M.
(Ed.) (2015) Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Introduction. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT (pp. wv–xxiv). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ed. in press Learning language through task repetition Amsterdam John Benjamins
Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M.
(Eds.) (2001) Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Carless, D.
(2004) Issues in teachers’ reinterpretation of a task-based innovation in primary schools. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 639–662.Google Scholar
(2007) The suitability of task-based approaches for secondary schools: Perspectives from Hong Kong. System, 35, 595-608.Google Scholar
Candlin, C. N.
(1987) Towards task-based language learning. In C. N. Candlin and D. F. Murphy (eds.). Language learning tasks (pp. 5–22). London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Chaudron, C., Doughty, C. J., Kim, Y., Kong, D., Lee, J., Lee, Y., Long, M., Rivers, R., & Urano, K.
(2005) A task-based needs analysis of a tertiary Korean as a foreign language program. In M. Long (Ed.), Second language needs analysis (pp. 225–261). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, J.
(2016) Request modification in synchronous computer-mediated communication: The role of focused instruction. Modern Language Journal, 100, 484–507.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, J., & Vyatkina, N.
(2012) Telecollaboration for professional purposes: Towards developing a formal register in the foreign language classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 68, 422–450. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
East, M.
(2012) Task-based language teaching from the teachers’ perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) Research intro practice: The task-based approach to instructed second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 50, 412–424.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2003) Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(Ed.) (2005) Planning and task performance in a second language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19, 221–246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) Moving task-based language teaching forward. Language Teaching, 50, 507–526.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., & Shintani, N.
(2014) Exploring language pedagogy through second language acquisition research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Eslami-Rasekh, Z., Eslami-Rasekh, A., & Fatahi, A.
(2004) The effect of explicit metapragmatic Instruction on speech act awareness of advanced EFL students. TESL EJ, 8, 1–12.Google Scholar
Fukuya, Y., & Martinez-Flor, A.
(2008) The interactive effects of pragmatic-eliciting tasks and pragmatics instruction. Foreign Language Annuals, 41, 478–500. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gurzynski-Weiss, L., Long, A., & Solon, M.
(2017) TBLT and L2 pronunciation: Do the benefits of tasks extend beyond grammar and lexis? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 213–224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Houck, N., & Tatsuki, D.
(2011) Pragmatics from research to practice: New directions. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.Google Scholar
Ishihara, N., & Cohen, A. D.
(2010) Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet. Harlow: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Kakegawa, T.
(2009) Development of the use of Japanese sentence-final particles through email correspondence. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), Pragmatic competence (pp. 301–333). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kasper, G., & Dahl, M.
(1991) Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 215–247. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kasper, G., & Rose, K.
(2002) Pragmatic development in a second language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kim, Y.
(2015) The role of tasks as vehicles for learning in classroom interaction. In N. Markee (Ed.), Handbook of classroom discourse and interaction (pp. 163–181). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kim, Y., Jung, Y., & Tracy-Ventura, N.
(2017) Implementation of a localized task-based course in an EFL context: A study of students’ evolving perceptions. TESOL Quarterly, 51, 632–660.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y., & Taguchi, N.
(2015) Promoting task-based pragmatics instruction in EFL classroom context: The role of task complexity. Modern Language Journal, 99, 656–677. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Learner-learner interaction during collaborative pragmatic tasks: The role of cognitive and pragmatic task demands. Foreign Language Annals, 49, 42–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, J., & Thorne, S. L.
(2007) Sociocultural theory and second language learning. In. B. Van Patten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 201–224). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Anderson, M.
(2011) Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Littlewood, W.
(1981) Communicative language teaching: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Long, M.
(1985) A role of instruction in second language acquisition: Task based language teaching. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modeling and assessing second language development (pp. 77–99). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(Ed.) (2005) Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2016) In defense of tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and real issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 5–33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Long, M., & Crookes, G.
(1993) Units of analysis in syllabus design: The case for task. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks in pedagogical contexts: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9–54). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Louw, K. J., Derwing, T. M., & Abbott, M. L.
(2010) Teaching pragmatics to L2 learners for the workplace: The job interview. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 66, 739–758. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martínez-Flor, A.
(2008) The effect of an inductive-deductive teaching approach to develop learners’ use of request modifiers in the EFL classroom. In E. Alcon-Soler (Ed.), Learning how to request in an instructed language learning context (pp.191–225). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Nguyen, T., Pham, T., & Pham, M.
(2012) The relative effects of explicit and implicit form-focused instruction on the development of L2 pragmatic competence. Journal of pragmatics, 44, 416–434. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J.
(2015) Thinking and acting programmatically in task-based language teaching: Essential roles for program evaluation. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domain and directions in the development of TBLT (pp. 27–57). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J. M.
(2016) Current uses for task-based language assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 230–244.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J. M., Brown, J. D., Hudson, T., & Yoshioka, J.
(1998) Designing second language performance assessments (Technical Report #18). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.Google Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Kim, Y.
(2016) Task-based learner production: A substantive and methodological review. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 73–97.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prabhu, N. S.
(1987) Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Richards, J. C.
(2006) Communicative language teaching today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richards, J., & Rodgers, T.
(2010) Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, S., & Kasper, G.
(2013), Assessing second language pragmatics. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P.
(2015) The cognition hypothesis, second language task demands, and the SSARC model of pedagogic task sequencing. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domain and directions in the development of TBLT (pp. 87–122). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Safont, M. P.
(2004) An analysis of EAP learners’ pragmatic production: A focus on request forms. Ibérica, 8, 23–39.Google Scholar
Samuda, V.
(2015) Tasks, design, and the architecture of pedagogical spaces. In M. Bygate (ed.). Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference. (pp. 271–302).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Samuda, V., & Bygate, M.
(2008) Tasks in second language learning. Houndmills: Palgrave.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sardegna, V. G., & Molle, D.
(2010) Videoconferencing with strangers: Teaching Japanese EFL students verbal backchannel signals and reactive expressions. Intercultural Pragmatics, 7–2, 279–310. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shehadeh, A.
(2012) Task-based language assessment: Components, development and implementation. In Coombe, C., O’Sullivan, B., Stoynoff, S. (eds.): The Cambridge Guide to Second Language Assessment (pp. 156–163). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shintani, N.
(2016) Input-based tasks in foreign language instruction for young learners. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P.
(2015) Limited attention capacity and cognition: Two hypotheses regarding second language performance on tasks. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domain and directions in the development of TBLT (pp. 123–156). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Storch, N., & Aldosari, A.
(2010) Learners’ use of first language (Arabic) in pair work in an EFL class. Language Teaching Research, 14, 355–375. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sydorenko, T.
(2015) The use of computer-delivered structured tasks in pragmatic instruction: An exploratory study. Intercultural Pragmatics, 12, 333–362. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S.
(1998) Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82, 320–337 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N.
(2011) Teaching pragmatics: Trends and issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 289–310. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. State-of-the-art article. Language Teaching, 48, 1–50 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N., & Kim, Y.
(2016) Collaborative dialogue in learning pragmatics: Pragmatic-related episodes as an opportunity for learning request-making. Applied Linguistics, 26, 416–437.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N., Li, Q., & Tang, X.
(2017) Learning Chinese formulaic expressions in a scenario-based interactive environment. Foreign Language Annals, 50, 641–660.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N., & Roever, C.
(2017) Second language pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Takahashi, S.
(2010) Assessing learnability in second language pragmatics. In A. Trosborg (Ed.), Handbook of pragmatics VII (pp. 391–421). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Thomas, J.
(1983) Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4, 91–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Utashiro, T., & Kawai, G.
(2009) Blended learning for Japanese reactive tokens: Effects of computer-led, instructor-led, and peer-based instruction. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), Pragmatic competence (pp.275–299). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Van den Branden, K.
(Ed.) (2006) Task-based language teaching in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2015) Task-based language education: From theory to practice… and back again. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT (pp. 303–320). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) The role of teachers in task-based language education. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 164–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., & Norris, J. M.
(Eds.) (2009) Task-based language teaching: A reader. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Youn, S. -J.
(2015) Validity argument for assessing L2 pragmatics in interaction using mixed methods. Language Testing, 32, 199–225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Bardovi‐Harlig, Kathleen
2019.  In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Barón, Júlia, M. Luz Celaya & Mayya Levkina
2020. Learning pragmatics through tasks. Applied Pragmatics 2:1 ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Jung, Jookyoung & Xuehua Fu
2021. The impact of pragmalinguistic support on video-conferenced collaborative suggestion-giving task. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 Crossref logo
Taguchi, Naoko
2022. Immersive Virtual Reality for Pragmatics Task Development. TESOL Quarterly 56:1 ► pp. 308 ff. Crossref logo
Youn, Soo Jung
2020. Interactional Features of L2 Pragmatic Interaction in Role‐Play Speaking Assessment. TESOL Quarterly 54:1 ► pp. 201 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.