Chapter published in:

Task-Based Approaches to Teaching and Assessing Pragmatics
Edited by Naoko Taguchi and YouJin Kim
[Task-Based Language Teaching 10] 2018
► pp. 56–81

Chapter 3. Effects of task supported language teaching on learners’ use and knowledge of email request mitigators

Eva Alcón-Soler | Universitat Jaume I

The present study examines whether task supported language teaching (TSLT) has an impact on L2 English learners’ use and knowledge of request mitigators, assessing the impact of student-students vs. teacher-students interactions on students’ attention to pragmatics during task-based interaction. Forty-eight students of English at a Spanish university participated in the study. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: the student-students interaction group (N = 16), the teacher-students interaction group (N = 16), and the control group (N = 16). Data were collected in pre-test, post-test and delayed post-test email tasks and analysed for frequency of use of request mitigators. Participants’ self-evaluations of email appropriateness were also used to examine whether TSLT facilitated knowledge of request mitigators during student-students and teacher-students tasks performance. In addition, interactions during the TSLT treatment were recorded and analysed for pragmatic related episodes (Taguchi & Kim, 2014) on request-making expressions. Findings from the study showed positive effects of TSLT on learners’ use of request mitigators. In addition, differences were found in the impact of the participatory structure on students’ level of interactional engagement during task performance, which seems to have an impact on pragmatic learning outcomes. More specifically, in teacher-students interaction students hardly ever paid attention towards pragmatics, but if they did, it had an impact on the students’ knowledge of request mitigators. On the contrary, metapragmatic discussion in student-students interaction seemed to trigger attention towards pragmatics and enhanced students’ awareness of how to mitigate email requests.

Published online: 15 August 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.10.03alc

References

Alcón-Soler, E.

(2007) Fostering EFL learners’ awareness of requesting through explicit and implicit consciousness-raising tasks. In M. P. García Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 221–241). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

(2013) Mitigating e-mail requests in teenagers’ first and second language academic cyber-consultation. Multilingua, 32(6), 779–799.

Alegría de la Colina, A., & García Mayo, M. P.

(2007) Attention to form across collaborative tasks by low-proficiency learners in an EFL setting. In M. P. García Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 91–116). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Bardovi-Harlig, K.

(2015) Operationalizing conversation in studies of instructional effect in L2 pragmatics. In E. Alcón & L. Yates (Eds.), Pragmatic learning across contexts. System, 48 (special issue) 21–34.

Basterrechea, M., & García Mayo, M. P.

(2013) Language-related episodes during collaborative tasks: A comparison of CLIL and EFL learners. In K. McDonough and A. Mackey (Eds.), Second language interaction in diverse educational contexts (pp. 25–43). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Biesenbach-Lucas, S.

(2006) Making requests in E-mail. Do cyber-consultation entail directness? Towards convention in a new medium. In K. Bardovi-Harlig, C. Félix-Brasdefer, & A. S. Omar (Eds.), Pragmatics language learning (Vol. 11, pp. 81–107). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.

(2007) Student writing emails to faculty: An examination of e-politeness among native and non-native speakers of English. Language Learning and Technology, 11(2), 59–81.

Blum-Kulka, S., Kasper, G., & House, J.

(1989) Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S.

(1987) Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Codina-Espurz, V.

(2008) The immediate vs. delayed effect of instruction on mitigators in relation to learner’ language proficiency in English. In E. Alcón-Soler (Ed.), Learning how to request in an instructed language learning context (pp. 227–256). Bern: Peter Lang.

Economidou-Kogetsidis, M.

(2009) Interlanguage request modification: The use of lexical phrasal downgraders and mitigating supportive moves. Multilingua, 28(1), 79–112.

(2011) “Please answer me as soon as possible”: Pragmatic failure in non-native speakers’ e-mail requests to faculty. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 3193–3215.

Ellis, R.

(2003) Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R., & Shintani, N.

(2014) Exploring language pedagogy through second language acquisition. New York, NY: Routledge.

Félix-Brasdefer, C.

(2012) E-mail requests to faculty: E-politeness and internal modification. In M. Economidou-Kogetsidis & H. Woodfield (Eds.), Interlanguage request modification (p. 87–118). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

García Mayo, M. P.

(2014) Collaborative tasks and their potential for grammar instruction in second/foreign language contexts. In A. Benati, M. C. Laval, & M. Arche (Eds.), The grammar dimension in instructed second language learning: Theory, research and practice (pp. 82–102). London: Continuum.

(Ed.) (2015) Learning language and content through tasks: Exploring the interfaces, System, 54 (special issue).

García Mayo, M. P., & Azkarai, A.

(2016) EFL task-based interaction: Does task modality impact on language-related episodes. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Research agenda and pedagogical potential (pp. 241–266). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

González-Lloret, M. & Ortega, L.

(2014) Technology-mediated TBLT. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Hartford, B. S., & Bardovi-Harlig, K.

(1996) At your earliest convenience: Written student requests to faculty. In L. F. Bouton (Ed.), Pragmatics and language learning (pp. 55–69). Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Division of English as an International Language.

Ishihara, N., & Cohen, A.

(2010) Teaching and learning pragmatics. Where language and culture meet. London: Longman.

Jeon, E. H., & Kaya, T.

(2006) Effects of L2 instruction on interlanguage pragmatic development: A meta-analysis. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 165–211). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Kim, Y.

(2008) The contribution of collaborative and individual tasks to the acquisition of second language vocabulary. Modern Language Journal, 92, 114–130.

(2015) The role of tasks as vehicles for language learning in classroom interaction. In N. Markee (Ed.), The handbook of classroom discourse and interaction (pp. 163–181). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Kubota, M.

(1995) Teachability of conversational implicatures to Japanese EFL learners. IRLT Bulletin, 9, 35–67.

Li, S.

(2012) The effect of input-based practice on pragmatic development in L2 Chinese. Language Learning, 62, 403–438.

Lantolf, J.

(Ed.) (2000) Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Long, M. H.

(2015) Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Nasaji, H., & Tian, J.

(2010) Collaborative and individual output task and their effects on learning English phrasal verbs. Language Teaching Research, 14, 164–187.

Nguyen, T. T. M.

(2013) Instructional effects on the acquisition of modifiers in constructive criticisms by EFL learners. Language awareness, 22, 76–94.

Philp, J., & Duchesne, S.

(2016) Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 50–72.

Prabhu, N. S.

(1987) Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Robinson, P.

(2001) Task complexity, task difficulty and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 27–57.

Rose, K. R.

(2005) On the effects of instruction in second language pragmatics. System, 33, 385–399.

Rose, K. R. & Kasper, G.

(Eds.) (2001) Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Salazar, P.

(2003) Pragmatic instruction in the EFL context. In A. Martínez-Flor, E. Usó-Juan, & A. Fernández-Guerra (Eds.), Pragmatic competence and foreign language teaching. Castelló: Servei de Publicacions.

Schmidt, R.

(1993) Consciousness, learning and interlanguage pragmatics. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 21–42). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

(2001) Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–33). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Skehan, P.

(1998) Task-based instruction. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 268–286.

(Ed.) (2014) Processing perspectives on task performance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Storch, N.

(2007) Investigating the merits of pair work on text editing tasks in ESL classes. Language Teaching Research, 11, 143–159.

Swain, M., & Lapkin, S.

(1995) Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 370–391.

(2001) Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks. Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 99–117). London: Longman.

(2002) Talking it through: Two French immersion learner’s response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 285–304.

Taguchi, N.

(2011) Teaching pragmatics: Trends and issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 289–310.

(2015) Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. State-of-the-art article. Language Teaching, 48, 1–50.

Taguchi, N., & Kim, Y.

(2014) Collaborative dialogue in learning pragmatics: Pragmatics-related episodes as an opportunity for learning request-making. Applied Linguistics, 1–23.

Taguchi, N., & Sykes, J.

(2013) Technology in interlanguage pragmatics research and teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Takahashi, S.

(2010) Assessing learnability in second language pragmatics. In A. Trosborg (Ed.), Handbook of pragmatics VII (pp. 391–421). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Takimoto, M.

(2012) Metapragmatic discussion in interlanguage pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 1240–1253.

University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate (UCLES)

(2001) CAMBRIDGE IELTS 2 – Examination Papers from the University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Van den Braden, K., Bygate, M., & Norris, J.

(2009) Task-based language teaching: A reader. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Vellenga, H.

(2004) Learning pragmatics from ESL & EFL textbooks: How likely? TESOL-EJ, 8(2), 1–18.

Verhelst, N., Van Avermaet, P., Takala, S., Figueras, N., & North, B.

(2009) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Vygostky, L.

(1978) Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Willis, D., & Willis, J.

(2007) Doing task-based teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Cited by other publications

Fakher Ajabshir, Zahra

2020. The relative efficacy of input enhancement, input flooding, and output-based instructional approaches in the acquisition of L2 request modifiers. Language Teaching Research ► pp. 136216881989665 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 may 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.