Chapter published in:
Learning Language through Task Repetition
Edited by Martin Bygate
[Task-Based Language Teaching 11] 2018
► pp. 97116


Ahmadian, M. J., & Tavakoli, M.
(2011) The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition on accuracy, fluency, and complexity of EFL learners’ oral production. Language Teaching Research, 15, 35–59.Crossref link
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L.
(1995) The CELEX lexical database (release 2). Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.
Bachman, L. F.
1990Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S.
(1996) Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests (Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brown, C., Snodgrass, T., Kemper, S., Herman, R., & Covington, M.
(2008) Automatic measurement of propositional idea density from part-of-speech tagging. Behavior Research Methods, 40(2), 540–545.Crossref link
Brysbaert, M., & New, B.
(2009) Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 977–990.Crossref link
Bygate, M.
(1996) Effects of task repetition: Appraising the developing language of learners. In D. Willis & J. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 134–146). London: Heinemann.
(1999) Task as context for the framing, reframing and unframing of language. System, 27(1), 33–48.Crossref link
(2001) Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 23–48). Harlow: Longman.
Bygate, M., & Samuda, V.
(2005) Integrative planning through the use of task-repetition. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 37–76). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Crossref link
Canale, M.
(1983) From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In J. C. Richard & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and Communication (pp. 2–14). London: Longman.
Canale, M., & Swain, M.
(1980) Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47.Crossref link
Cohen, J.
(1992) A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.Crossref link
Coltheart, M.
(1981) The MRC psycholinguistic database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33, 497–505.Crossref link
Cook, G.
(1989) Discourse. (Language Teaching: A Scheme for Teacher Education). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Council of Europe
(2001) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crossley, S. A.
(2013) Assessing automatic processing of hypernymic relations in first language speakers and advanced second language learners: A semantic priming approach. The Mental Lexicon, 8(1), 96–116.Crossref link
Crossley, S. A., Cobb, T., & McNamara, D. S.
(2013) Comparing count-based and band-based indices of word frequency: Implications for active vocabulary research and pedagogical applications. System, 41(4), 965–981.Crossref link
Crossley, S. A., & Salsbury, T.
(2010) Using lexical indices to predict produced and not produced words in second language learners. The Mental Lexicon, 5(1), 115–147.Crossref link
Crossley, S., Salsbury, T., & McNamara, D.
(2010) The development of polysemy and frequency use in English second language speakers. Language Learning, 60(3), 573–605.Crossref link
de Jong, N., & Perfetti, C. A.
(2011) Fluency training in the ESL classroom: An experimental study of fluency development and proceduralization. Language Learning, 61, 533–568.Crossref link
Ellis, R.
(2003) Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2005) Integrative planning through the use of task-repetition. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 3–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Crossref link
(2009) The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity and accuracy in l2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30, 474–509.Crossref link
Engber, C. A.
(1995) The relationship of lexical proficiency to the quality of ESL compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(2), 139–155.Crossref link
Fellbaum, C.
(1998) WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G.
(2000) Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 354–375.Crossref link
Fukuta, J.
(2016) Effects of task repetition on learners’ attention orientation in L2 oral production. Language Teaching Research, 20(3), 321–340.Crossref link
Gass, S., Mackey, A., Álvarez-Torres, M. J., & Fernández-García, M.
(1999) The effects of task repetition on linguistic output. Language Learning, 49, 549–581.Crossref link
Graesser, A. C., & McNamara, D. S.
(2011) Computational analyses of multilevel discourse comprehension. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 371–398.Crossref link
Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Kulikowich, J. M.
(2011) Coh Metrix: Providing multilevel analyses of text characteristics. Educational Researcher, 40, 223–234.Crossref link
Graesser, A., McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M., & Cai, Z.
(2004) Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 193–202.Crossref link
Grice, P.
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Hempelmann, C. F., Dufty, D., McCarthy, P. M., Graesser, A. C., Cai, Z., & McNamara, D. S.
(2005) Using LSA to automatically identify givenness and newness of noun phrases in written discourse. In B. G. Bara, L. Barsalou, & M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 941–946). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hinkel, E.
(2004) TOEFL test strategies (3rd ed.). Hauppauge, NY: Barron’s Educational Series.
Housen, A., & Kuiken, F.
(2009) Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 461–473.Crossref link
Jarvis, S.
(2013) Capturing the diversity in lexical diversity. Language Learning, 63(supplement 1), 87–106.Crossref link
Kintsch, W. A.
(1974) The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lambert, C., Kormos, J., & Minn, D.
(2017) Task repetition and second language speech processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(1), 167–196.Crossref link
Landauer, T., McNamara, D. S., Dennis, S., & Kintsch, W.
(Eds.) (2007) Handbook of latent semantic analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Levelt, W. J. M.
(1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
(1999) Producing spoken language: A blueprint of the speaker. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), Neurocognition of language (pp. 83–122). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Levelt, W. J. M., & Indefrey, P.
(2000) The speaking mind/brain: Where do spoken words come from? In A. Marantz, Y. Miyashita, & W. O’Neil (Eds.), Image, language, brain papers from the First Mind Articulation Project Symposium (pp. 77–93). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Long, M.
(2014) Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Love, R., Dembry, C., Hardie, A., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T.
(2017) The Spoken BNC2014. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(3), 319–344.Crossref link
Lynch, T., & Maclean, J.
(2000) Exploring the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom language learning. Language Teaching Research, 4, 221–50.Crossref link
Malvern, D. D., Richards, B. J., Chipere, N., & Durán, P.
(2004) Lexical diversity and language development: Quantification and assessment. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Crossref link
McCarthy, P. M.
(2005) An assessment of the range and usefulness of lexical diversity measures and the potential of the measure of textual, lexical diversity (MTLD) (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Memphis, Memphis, TN.
McCarthy, M., & Carter, R.
(2014) Language as discourse: Perspectives for language teaching. London: Routledge.
McCarthy, P. M., Dufty, D., Hempelman, C., Cai, Z., Graesser, A. C., & McNamara, D. S.
(2012) Newness and givenness of information: Automated identification in written discourse. In P. M. McCarthy & C. Boonthum-Denecke (Eds.), Applied natural language processing and content analysis: Identification, investigation, and resolution (pp. 457–478). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Crossref link
McCarthy, P. M., & Jarvis, S.
(2010) MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 381–392.Crossref link
McCrum-Gardner, E.
(2008) Which is the correct statistical test to use? British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 46(1), 38–41.Crossref link
McNamara, D. S., Graesser, A. C., McCarthy, P. M., & Cai, Z.
(2014) Automated evaluation of text and discourse with Coh-Metrix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Crossref link
McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., Cai, Z., & Graesser, A.
(2005, January 1). Coh-Metrix version 1.4. Retrieved from http://​cohmetrix​.memphis​.edu (2 July, 2016).
McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., McCarthy, P. M., & Graesser, A. C.
(2010) Coh-Metrix: Capturing linguistic features of cohesion. Discourse Processes, 47, 292–330.Crossref link
Miller, G. A., Beckwith, R., Fellbaum, C., Gross, D., & Miller, K.
(1990) Five papers on WordNet (Technical Report No. 43). Princeton, NJ: Cognitive Science Laboratory, Princeton University. Retrieved from http://​wordnetcode​.princeton​.edu​/5papers​.pdf
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L.
(2009) Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555–578.Crossref link
Nunan, D.
(1989) Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Qiu, X., & Lo, Y. Y.
(2017) Content familiarity, task repetition and Chinese EFL learners’ engagement in second language use. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 681–698.Crossref link
Robinson, P.
(2011) Task-based language learning: A review of issues. Language Learning, 61(Supplement 1), 1–36.Crossref link
Samuda, V., & Bygate, M.
(2008) Tasks in second language learning. Houndmills: Palgrave.Crossref link
Skehan, P.
(1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2009) Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532.Crossref link
Skehan, P., Bei, X., Li, Q., & Wang, Z.
(2012) The task is not enough: Processing approaches to task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 16(3), 170–187.Crossref link
Skehan, P., & Foster, P.
(1999) The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49(1), 93–120.Crossref link
Templin, M.
(1957) Certain language skills in children. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press.Crossref link
Van den Branden, K., Bygate M., & Norris, J.
(Eds.) (2009) Task based language teaching: A reader. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Crossref link
Wang, Z.
(2014) On-line time pressure manipulations: L2 speaking performance under five types of planning and repetition conditions. In P. Skehan (Eds.), Processing Perspectives on Task Performance (pp. 27–62). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Crossref link
Widdowson, H. G.
(1978) Teaching language as communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(1980) Conceptual and communicative functions in written discourse. Applied linguistics, 1, 234.Crossref link
Wilson, M. D.
(1988) The MRC psycholinguistic database: Machine readable dictionary, version 2. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 20(1), 6–11.Crossref link
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Wang, Zhan, Peter Skehan & Gaowei Chen
2019. The effects of hybrid online planning and L2 proficiency on video-based speaking task performance. Instructed Second Language Acquisition 3:1  pp. 53 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 april 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.