Chapter published in:
Learning Language through Task Repetition
Edited by Martin Bygate
[Task-Based Language Teaching 11] 2018
► pp. 117–142

Chapter 5
The impact of intra-cultural and inter-cultural task repetition on interaction

| Kansai University
Previous classroom-based research has shown that task repetition (Kim, 2013) and interlocutor proficiency (e.g. Watanabe & Swain, 2007) can affect the extent to which learners reflect on language form during the performance of collaborative tasks. Furthering these lines of inquiry, this study compares the effect of task repetition on Japanese EFL learners’ attention to linguistic form during the performances of oral tasks under two conditions: when task repetition involves (1) a Japanese interlocutor and (2) a non-Japanese interlocutor. Japanese learners (n = 36) from two EFL classes performed two oral, collaborative tasks in pairs. In one class, learners were paired with international, English-speaking students (n = 18), while in the other class learners were paired with peers of the same class. Participants in each group kept the same partner for the duration of the initial and repeated task performances. Task interactions were transcribed and analyzed in terms of language-related episodes (LREs). Results indicated that repeating tasks with a non-Japanese interlocutor led to a number of significant benefits, including a higher incidence of LREs overall, more episodes being resolved with uptake, and a higher rate of complex and grammatical LREs than during the first task performances. On the other hand, repetition with a Japanese interlocutor resulted in no significant change in LRE production, but a significant decrease in the production of lexical LREs.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Attention to form during task interaction
  • Effect of task repetition on LREs
  • Effect of interlocutor on LREs
  • The current study
  • Method
    • Participants
    • Research design
    • Tasks
  • Analysis
    • Identification of LREs
    • Linguistic focus
    • Type
    • Complexity
    • Resolution
    • Inter-coder reliability
    • Examining task repetition
  • Results
    • Total LREs
    • Linguistic focus
    • Type
    • Complexity
    • Resolution
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 25 September 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.11.05aub
References
Ahmadian, M., & Tavakoli, M.
(2011) The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition on accuracy, complexity and fluency of EFL learners’ oral production. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 35–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Altman, D. G.
(1991) Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Aubrey, S.
(2017) Inter-cultural contact and flow in a task-based Japanese EFL classroom. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 717–734.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bowles, M., Adams, R., & Toth, P. D.
(2014) A comparison of L2-L2 and L2-heritage learner interactions in Spanish language classrooms. Modern Language Journal, 98(2), 497–517.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bygate, M.
(1996) Effects of task repetition: Appraising the developing language of learners. In J. Willis & D. Willis (eds). Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 136–146). Oxford: Heinmeann.Google Scholar
(2001) Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks, second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 23–48). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., Basturkmen, S., & Loewen
(2001) Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51(2), 281–318.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fernández Dobao, A.
(2012) Collaborative dialogue in learner-learner and learner-native speaker interaction. Applied Linguistics, 33(3), 229–256.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fleiss, J. L.
(1981) Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Fortune, A., & Thorp, D.
(2001) Knotted and entangled: New light on the identification, classification and value of language related episodes in collaborative output tasks. Language Awareness, 10(2–3), 143–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuji, A., & Mackey, A.
(2009) Interactional feedback in learner-learner interactions in a task-based EFL classroom. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 47(3–4), 267–301Google Scholar
Kim, Y.
(2013) Promoting attention to form through task repetition in a Korean EFL context. In K. McDonough & A. Mackey (Eds.), Second language interaction in diverse educational settings (pp. 3–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y., & Tracy-Ventura, N.
(2013) The role of task repetition in L2 performance development: What needs to be repeated during task-based interaction? System, 41(3), 829–840.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y., & McDonough, K.
(2008) The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collaborative dialogue between Korean as a second language learners. Language Teaching Research, 12(2), 211–234.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G.
(1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leeser, M.
(2004) Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research, 8(1), 55–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Loewen, S.
(2005) Incidental focus on form and second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(3), 361–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Long, M.
(1991) Focus on form: a design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, T., & Maclean, J.
(2000) Exploring the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom language learning. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 221–250.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., Kanganas, A. P., & Oliver, R.
(2007) Task familiarity and interactional feedback in child ESL classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 285–312.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manchon, R.
(2014) The distinctive nature of task repetition in writing: Implications for theory, research and pedagogy. Esudios de Linguistica Inglesa Aplicada, 14, 13–41.Google Scholar
Patanasorn, C.
(2010) Effects of procedural content and task repetition on accuracy and fluency in an EFL context (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Northern Arizona University.Google Scholar
Skehan, P.
1998 A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skehan, P., & Foster, P.
1999 The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49(1), 93–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Storch, N., & Aldosari, A.
(2013) Pairing learners in pair work activity. Language Teaching Research, 17(1), 31–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M.
(1985) Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–256). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
(1995) Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2000) The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 94–119). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2005) Legislation by hypothesis: The case of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 376–401.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. In H. Bynes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S.
(1998) Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 320–337.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, Y., & Swain, M.
(2007) Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research, 11(2), 121–142.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J.
(2001) The effectiveness of spontaneous attention to form. System, 29(3), 325–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yule, G., & Macdonald, D.
(1990) Resolving referential conflicts in L2 interaction: The effect of proficiency and interaction role. Language Learning, 40(4), 539–536.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Chun, Lam Ting & Scott Aubrey
2021. Using a Modified Dictogloss to Improve English as a Second Language Learners’ use of Genre-appropriate Conventions and Style. RELC Journal ► pp. 003368822110457 ff. Crossref logo
Leeming, Paul, Scott Aubrey & Craig Lambert
2020. Collaborative Pre-Task Planning Processes and Second-Language Task Performance. RELC Journal ► pp. 003368822095322 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.