Chapter published in:Learning Language through Task Repetition
Edited by Martin Bygate
[Task-Based Language Teaching 11] 2018
► pp. 279–309
Chapter 11Understanding benefits of repetition from a complex dynamic systems perspective
The case of a writing task
This classroom-based study explored the benefits of repeating a writing task over one year from the perspective of complex dynamic systems. The study specifically investigated how students’ use of self-regulation related to changes in L2 writing. Data were collected from 26 students in an EFL classroom at a university over 30 weeks. Students were engaged in a 10-minute timed-writing task on a chosen topic with immediate self-reflection every week. Students’ L2 compositions were analysed using fluency, syntactic and lexical measures, and their self-reflections written in L1 were analysed in terms of self-regulatory processes. The analysis of two focal students revealed that the first student showed more elaborate engagement and employed self-regulatory cycles of goal-setting and self-evaluation, which improved his L2 writing over time, while the second student with more limited engagement employed less elaborate self-regulatory processes, which reflected little change in his writing. Based on these cases, we contend that repeated encounters with tasks over extended periods create a valuable pedagogic environment, and within this context students’ agentic attitudes towards the L2 writing task are likely to influence their learning in significant ways.
- Previous research on oral task repetition
- Benefits of writing task repetition: Internal repetition and self-regulation
- Understanding task repetition from the perspective of complex dynamic systems
- The present study
- Task and procedure
Published online: 25 September 2018
Ahmadian, M. J., & Tavakoli, M.
Arevart, S., & Nation, P.
Austin, J. T., & Vancouver, J. B.
Baba, K., & Nitta, R.
(2010) Dynamic effects of task type practice on the Japanese EFL university student’s writing: Text analysis with Coh-Metrix. Proceedings of the 23 International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference (FLAIRS #2010), 217–222.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M.
Boud, D., Keogh, R, & Walker, D.
(1987/2009) Learner contributions to task design. In C. Candlin, & E. Murphy (Eds.), Language learning tasks (pp. 23–46). London: Prentice Hall.
Bygate, M., & Samuda, V.
Coughlan, P., & Duff, P.
Council of Europe
de Bot, K., & Larsen-Freeman, D.
de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M.
de Jong, N., & Perfetti, C. A.
Gass, S., Mackey, A., Alvarez–Torres, M. J., & Fernández–García, M.
Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., & Cai, Z.
Heckhausen, J., & Dweck, C. S.
Larsen–Freeman, D., & Cameron, L.
Lynch, T., & Maclean, J.
Mackey, A., Kanganas, A. P., & Oliver, R.
Manchón, R. M.
McCarthy, P. M., & Jarvis, S.
Nitta, R., & Baba, K.
Philp, J., & Duchesne, S.
Plough, I., & Gass, S.
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J.
van Geert, P.
van Geert, P., & van Dijk, M.
van Lier, L.
Weigle, S. C.
Zimmerman, B. J.
Cited by 15 other publications
Mohammad Javad Ahmadian & Michael H. Long
Amelohina, Victoria, Florentina Nicolás-Conesa & Rosa M. Manchón
Fogal, Gary G.
Kim, YouJin, Bumyong Choi, Hyunae Yun, Binna Kim & Sujeong Choi
Kim, YouJin, Sanghee Kang, Hyunae Yun, Binna Kim & Bumyong Choi
Lin, Meng-Ying Daphne
PFENNINGER, SIMONE E.
Sánchez, Alberto J., Rosa M. Manchón & Roger Gilabert
Xu, Qi & Hongying Peng
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.