Chapter published in:
TBLT as a Researched Pedagogy
Edited by Virginia Samuda, Kris Van den Branden and Martin Bygate
[Task-Based Language Teaching 12] 2018
► pp. 200–212

Researching TBLT for young, beginner learners in Japan

| Kobe Gakuin University
This chapter addresses a personal account of how I came to carry out research into TBLT within, and as a response to, my own teaching context. I started my career as an English teacher in a large private language institution. Due to my dissatisfaction with the effectiveness of the teaching methods at the institution, I started my own language school, where I implemented more intensive production-based teaching. However, similar problems emerged in my own school, particularly the failure to develop students’ communicative skills after years of instruction. After studying the literature on second language learning and teaching, I decided to effect a radical change in my teaching method: employing task-based language teaching (TBLT). My first attempt to use tasks with experienced students succeeded. However, to implement TBLT in a classroom with young beginning learners, I realized that I needed a more specialized approach. After reviewing the literature on tasks with absolute beginners, I decided to design input-based tasks. While the students clearly enjoyed the tasks, at that point I was still uncertain about their effectiveness, especially given the lack of immediate language production by the students. This led me to conduct experimental research investigating the effectiveness of this approach compared to the traditional one I used to use – presentation-practice-production (PPP).The chapter starts with a brief overview of my teaching context – English education for young learners in Japan. Then, I provide a personal account of my journey as an English teacher and my attempts to conduct research in my own teaching context, notably my struggle with effective research design. My hope is that my story will provide an example of how it is possible for a teacher to conduct research to resolve classroom issues or to confirm a teaching approach in a given teaching context.
Published online: 01 November 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.12.08shi
References

References

Anthony, E. M.
(1963) An approach, method and technique. English Language Teaching, 17, 63–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Asher, J. J.
(1972) Children’s first language as a model for second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 56(3), 133–139.Google Scholar
Benesse
(2009) Chugakko eigo ni kansuru kihon chosa (Kyoin chosa) [Basic research about English in junior high school (Teacher perspectives)]. Tokyo: Benesse.Google Scholar
Berben, M., Van den Branden, K., & Van Gorp, K.
(2007) “We’ll see what happens.” Tasks on paper and tasks in a multilingual classroom. In K. Van den Branden, K. Van Gorp & M. Verhelst (Eds.), “Tasks” in Action. Task-based language education from a classroom-based perspective (pp.32–67). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Butler, Y. G.
(2007) Foreign language education at elementary schools in Japan: Searching for solutions amidst growing diversification. Current Issues in Language Planning, 8(2), 129–147. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, H. (1986) Teaching oral English 2nd edition. Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Coughlan, P., & Duff, P.
(1994) Same task, different activities: Analysis of SLA from an activity theory perspective. In J. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp.173–194). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2003) Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2009) Task-based language teaching: sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 221–246. doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00231.xGoogle Scholar
(2012) Language teaching research and language pedagogy. London: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., Tanaka, Y., & Yamazaki, A.
(1994) Classroom interaction, comprehension, and the acquisition of L2 word meanings. Language Learning, 44(3), 449–491. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Estaire, S., & Zanon, J.
(1994) Planning class work: A task-based approach. Oxford: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Koike, I., & Tanaka, H.
(1995) English in foreign langauge education policy in Japan: Toward the twenty-first century. World Englishes, 14(1), 13–25. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kumaravadivelu, B.
(2001) Toward a postmethod pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 35(4), 537–560. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levin, L.
(1972) Comparative studies in foreign-language teaching. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Long, M. H.
(1985) A role for instruction in second language acquisition: task-based language teaching. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling and assessing second language acquisition (pp.77–99). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Lyster, R.
(2007) Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Education Culture Sport Science and Technology (MEXT)
(2001) Shogakko eigokatsudo jissen-no tebiki [Practical handbook for elementary school English activities]. In C. Ministry of Education, Sport, Science, and Technology (MEXT) (Ed.). Tokyo: Kairyudo.Google Scholar
Nakata, R., Frazier, K., Hoskins, B., & Graham, C.
(2007) Let’s go. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Prabhu, N. S.
(1987) Second Language Pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Seedhouse, P.
(2005) “Task” as research construct. Language Learning, 55(3), 533–570. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shintani, N.
(2016) The role of input-based tasks in foreign language instruction for young learners. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Skehan, P.
(1998) Taks-based instruction. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 268–286. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, P.
(1970) A comparison of the audiolingual and cognitive approaches to foreign language instruction: The Pennsylvania Foreign Language Project. Philadelphia PA: Center for Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
Ur, P.
(1996) A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., & Norris, J. M.
(2009) Task-based language teaching: A reader. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Willis, J.
(1996) A framework for task-based learning. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Yule, G., & Macdonald, D.
(1990) Resolving referential conflicts in L2 interaction: The effect of proficiency and interactive role. Language Learning, 40, 539–556. CrossrefGoogle Scholar