Chapter published in:
TBLT as a Researched Pedagogy
Edited by Virginia Samuda, Kris Van den Branden and Martin Bygate
[Task-Based Language Teaching 12] 2018
► pp. 213234
Allwright, R.
(1975) Problems in the study of the language teacher’s treatment of learner error. In M. Burt & H. Dulay (Eds.), On TESOL ’83: The question of control (pp.231–252). Washington, DC: TESOL.Google Scholar
Allwright, R., & Bailey, K.
(1991) Focus on the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, K., Maclean, J., & Lynch, T.
(2004) Study speaking (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aston, G.
(1993) Notes on the interlanguage of comity. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 224–250). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Byrne, D.
(1987) Techniques for classroom interaction. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Cathcart, R., & Olsen, J.
(1976) Teachers’ and students’ preferences for correction of classroom errors. In J. Fanselow &. R. Crymes (Eds.), On TESOL ’76 (pp.41–53). Washington, DC: TESOL.Google Scholar
Chaudron, C.
(1977) A descriptive model of discourse in the corrective treatment of learners’ errors. Language Learning, 27(1), 29–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chenoweth, N., Day, R., Chun, A., & Luppescu, S.
(1983) Attitudes and preferences of nonnative speakers to corrective feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 79–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cook, V.
(2008) Second language learning and language teaching (4th ed.). London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Di Pietro, R.
(1987) Strategic interaction: Learning language through scenarios. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Doughty, C., & Williams, J.
(Eds.) (1998) Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, L.
(2004) Questions and answers about teacher written commentary and student revision: Teachers and students working together. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(1), 63–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gurzynski-Weiss, L.
(2009) Investigating learners’ feedback and instructor preferences in the Spanish foreign language classroom. Hispania, 92(2), 295.Google Scholar
Harmer, J.
(2001) The practice of English language teaching (3rd ed.). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Hatch, E.
(1978) Discourse analysis in second language acquisition. In E. Hatch (Ed.), Second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F.
(2006) Interpersonal aspects of response: Constructing and interpreting teacher written feedback. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp.206–225). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ingels, S.
(2010) Transcription and self-correction strategies for improving L2 pronunciation. Paper presented at TESOL Convention, Boston, April 2010.
Katayama, A.
(2007) Japanese EFL students’ preferences toward correction of classroom oral errors. Asian EFL Journal, 9(4), 1–10.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P.
(1998) The importance of timing in focus on form. In C. J. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp.177–196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Long, M.
(1977) Teacher feedback on learner error: mapping cognitions. In H. Brown, C. Yorio, & R. Crymes (Eds.), On TESOL ’77 (pp.278–293). Washington, DC: TESOL.Google Scholar
(1983) Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5(2), 177–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, T.
(1996) Proof-listening: A feedback technique in speaking classes. Modern English Teacher, 5(4), 41–45.Google Scholar
(2001) Seeing what they meant: Transcribing as a route to noticing. ELT Journal, 55(2), 124–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Learning from the transcripts of an oral communication task. ELT Journal, 61(4), 311–320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Responding to learners’ perceptions of feedback: The use of comparators in second language speaking courses. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 3(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
Lynch, T., & Anderson, K.
(1992) Study speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lyster, R.
(2004) Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(3), 399–432. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L.
(1997) Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M.
(2013) Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46(1), 1–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A.
(2006) Feedback, noticing and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 405–430. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., Al-Khalil M., Atanassova G., Hama M., Logan-Terry A., & Nakatsukasa K.
(2007) Teachers’ intentions and learners’ perceptions about corrective feedback in the L2 classroom. Innovation in Language Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 129–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mennim, P.
(2003) Rehearsed oral L2 output and reactive focus on form. ELT Journal, 57(2), 130–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Long-term effects of noticing on oral output. Language Teaching Research, 11(3), 265–280. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nolasco, R., & Arthur, L.
(1987) Conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oliver, R.
(1995) Negative feedback in child NS-NNS conversation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(4), 459–481. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Richards, J. C.
(1985) Conversational competence through role-play activities. RELC Journal, 16(1), 82–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rolin-Ianziti, J.
(2010) The organization of delayed second language correction. Language Teaching Research, 14(2), 183–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Samuda, V.
(2001) Guiding relationships between form and meaning during task performance: The role of the teacher. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp.119–140). Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Schachter, J.
(1983) Nutritional needs of language learners. In M. Clarke & J. Handscombe (Eds.), On TESOL ’82: Pacific perspectives on learning and teaching (pp.175–189). Washington, DC: TESOL.Google Scholar
Seedhouse, P.
(2001) The case of the missing “No”: The relationship between pedagogy and interaction. Language Learning, 51, 347–385. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sheen, Y.
(2004) Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research, 8(3), 263–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P.
(2003) Task-based instruction. Language Teaching, 36, 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stillwell, C., Curabba, B., Alexander, K., Kidd, A., Kim, E., Stone, P., & Wyle, C.
(2010) Students transcribing tasks: Noticing fluency, accuracy and complexity. ELT Journal, 64(4), 445–455. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M.
(1985) Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp.235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin S.
(1995) Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: a step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 371–391. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vigil, N., & Oller, J.
(1976) Rule fossilization: A tentative model. Language Learning, 26(2), 281–295. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Willis, J.
(1996) A framework for task-based learning. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
(2004) Perspectives on task-based instruction: Understanding our practices, acknowledging different practitioners. In B. L. Leaver & J. Willis (Eds.), Task-based instruction in foreign language education: Practice and programs (pp.3–44). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Yoshida, R.
(2008) Teachers’ choice and learners’ preference of corrective feedback types. Language Awareness, 17(1), 78–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) How do teachers and learners perceive corrective feedback in the Japanese language classroom? Modern Language Journal, 94(2), 293–314. CrossrefGoogle Scholar