Chapter published in:
TBLT as a Researched Pedagogy
Edited by Virginia Samuda, Kris Van den Branden and Martin Bygate
[Task-Based Language Teaching 12] 2018
► pp. 214234
References

References

Allwright, R.
(1975) Problems in the study of the language teacher’s treatment of learner error. In M. Burt & H. Dulay (Eds.), On TESOL ’83: The question of control (pp.231–252). Washington, DC: TESOL.
Allwright, R., & Bailey, K.
(1991) Focus on the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Anderson, K., Maclean, J., & Lynch, T.
(2004) Study speaking (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Aston, G.
(1993) Notes on the interlanguage of comity. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 224–250). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Byrne, D.
(1987) Techniques for classroom interaction. Harlow: Longman.
Cathcart, R., & Olsen, J.
(1976) Teachers’ and students’ preferences for correction of classroom errors. In J. Fanselow &. R. Crymes (Eds.), On TESOL ’76 (pp.41–53). Washington, DC: TESOL.
Chaudron, C.
(1977) A descriptive model of discourse in the corrective treatment of learners’ errors. Language Learning, 27(1), 29–46. Crossref link
Chenoweth, N., Day, R., Chun, A., & Luppescu, S.
(1983) Attitudes and preferences of nonnative speakers to corrective feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 79–87. Crossref link
Cook, V.
(2008) Second language learning and language teaching (4th ed.). London: Hodder Education.
Di Pietro, R.
(1987) Strategic interaction: Learning language through scenarios. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Doughty, C., & Williams, J.
(Eds.) (1998) Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goldstein, L.
(2004) Questions and answers about teacher written commentary and student revision: Teachers and students working together. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(1), 63–80. Crossref link
Gurzynski-Weiss, L.
(2009) Investigating learners’ feedback and instructor preferences in the Spanish foreign language classroom. Hispania, 92(2), 295.
Harmer, J.
(2001) The practice of English language teaching (3rd ed.). Harlow: Longman.
Hatch, E.
(1978) Discourse analysis in second language acquisition. In E. Hatch (Ed.), Second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F.
(2006) Interpersonal aspects of response: Constructing and interpreting teacher written feedback. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp.206–225). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Ingels, S. (2010) Transcription and self-correction strategies for improving L2 pronunciation. Paper presented at TESOL Convention, Boston, April 2010.
Katayama, A.
(2007) Japanese EFL students’ preferences toward correction of classroom oral errors. Asian EFL Journal, 9(4), 1–10.
Lightbown, P.
(1998) The importance of timing in focus on form. In C. J. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp.177–196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Long, M.
(1977) Teacher feedback on learner error: mapping cognitions. In H. Brown, C. Yorio, & R. Crymes (Eds.), On TESOL ’77 (pp.278–293). Washington, DC: TESOL.
(1983) Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5(2), 177–193. Crossref link
Lynch, T.
(1996) Proof-listening: A feedback technique in speaking classes. Modern English Teacher, 5(4), 41–45.
(2001) Seeing what they meant: Transcribing as a route to noticing. ELT Journal, 55(2), 124–132. Crossref link
(2007) Learning from the transcripts of an oral communication task. ELT Journal, 61(4), 311–320. Crossref link
(2009) Responding to learners’ perceptions of feedback: The use of comparators in second language speaking courses. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 3(1), 1–13.
Lynch, T., & Anderson, K.
(1992) Study speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyster, R.
(2004) Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(3), 399–432. Crossref link
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L.
(1997) Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37–66. Crossref link
Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M.
(2013) Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46(1), 1–40. Crossref link
Mackey, A.
(2006) Feedback, noticing and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 405–430. Crossref link
Mackey, A., Al-Khalil M., Atanassova G., Hama M., Logan-Terry A., & Nakatsukasa K.
(2007) Teachers’ intentions and learners’ perceptions about corrective feedback in the L2 classroom. Innovation in Language Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 129–152. Crossref link
Mennim, P.
(2003) Rehearsed oral L2 output and reactive focus on form. ELT Journal, 57(2), 130–138. Crossref link
(2007) Long-term effects of noticing on oral output. Language Teaching Research, 11(3), 265–280. Crossref link
Nolasco, R., & Arthur, L.
(1987) Conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Oliver, R.
(1995) Negative feedback in child NS-NNS conversation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(4), 459–481. Crossref link
Richards, J. C.
(1985) Conversational competence through role-play activities. RELC Journal, 16(1), 82–100. Crossref link
Rolin-Ianziti, J.
(2010) The organization of delayed second language correction. Language Teaching Research, 14(2), 183–206. Crossref link
Samuda, V.
(2001) Guiding relationships between form and meaning during task performance: The role of the teacher. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp.119–140). Harlow: Pearson Education.
Schachter, J. (1983) Nutritional needs of language learners. In M. Clarke & J. Handscombe (Eds.), On TESOL ’82: Pacific perspectives on learning and teaching (pp.175–189). Washington, DC: TESOL.
Seedhouse, P.
(2001) The case of the missing “No”: The relationship between pedagogy and interaction. Language Learning, 51, 347–385. Crossref link
Sheen, Y.
(2004) Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research, 8(3), 263–300. Crossref link
Skehan, P.
(2003) Task-based instruction. Language Teaching, 36, 1–14. Crossref link
Stillwell, C., Curabba, B., Alexander, K., Kidd, A., Kim, E., Stone, P., & Wyle, C.
(2010) Students transcribing tasks: Noticing fluency, accuracy and complexity. ELT Journal, 64(4), 445–455. Crossref link
Swain, M.
(1985) Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp.235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Swain, M., & Lapkin S.
(1995) Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: a step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 371–391. Crossref link
Vigil, N., & Oller, J.
(1976) Rule fossilization: A tentative model. Language Learning, 26(2), 281–295. Crossref link
Willis, J.
(1996) A framework for task-based learning. Harlow: Longman.
(2004) Perspectives on task-based instruction: Understanding our practices, acknowledging different practitioners. In B. L. Leaver & J. Willis (Eds.), Task-based instruction in foreign language education: Practice and programs (pp.3–44). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Yoshida, R.
(2008) Teachers’ choice and learners’ preference of corrective feedback types. Language Awareness, 17(1), 78–93. Crossref link
(2010) How do teachers and learners perceive corrective feedback in the Japanese language classroom? Modern Language Journal, 94(2), 293–314. Crossref link