Chapter 8
Peter Skehan’s influence in research on task difficulty
A bibliometric analysis using CiteSpace
This paper presents results of a bibliometric analysis of studies on task difficulty over a period of nearly 40 years from 1990 to 2018 using CiteSpace V. The research data, consisting of 164 research articles and their 1706 citing references, were retrieved from the core collection of the Web of Science-SSCI database. The top 20 most often cited references were visualized and highlighted through a 406-node network of cited references. The results demonstrate that Skehan’s (2009) article was ranked as the most influential reference in studies on task difficulty or task complexity, which is clear evidence of Skehan’s far-reaching impacts on key areas in TBLT and SLA research.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Method
- Data
- Analysis
- Results
- The most influential reference in the literature on task difficulty
- Conclusion
-
Notes
-
References
References (57)
Adams, R., Alwi, N., & Newton, J.
(
2015)
Task complexity effects on the complexity and accuracy of writing via text chat.
Journal of Second Language Writing, 29, 64–81.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baddock, N., Bishop, D., Hardiman, M., Barry, J., & Watkins, K.
(
2012)
Co-localisation of abnormal brain structure and function in specific language
impairment.
Brain and Language, 120(3), 310–320.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baralt, M.
(
2013)
The impact of cognitive complexity on feedback efficacy during online versus face-to-face
interactive tasks.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 689–725.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chen, C.
(
2004)
Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowledge domain
visualization.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 101(Suppl.), 5303–5310.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chen, C.
(
2006)
CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific
literature.
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359–377.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chen, C.
(
2011)
Predictive effects of structural variation on citation counts.
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(3), 431–449.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chen, C., Ibekwe-Sanhuan, F., & Hou, J.
(
2010)
The structure and dynamics of co citation clusters: A multiple perspective co-citation
analysis.
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(7), 1386–1409.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cho, M.
(
2018)
Task complexity, modality, and working memory in L2 task performance.
System, 72, 85–98.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Jong, N., & Vercellotti, M.
(
2016)
Similar prompts may not be similar in the performance they elicit: Examining fluency, complexity,
accuracy, and lexis in narratives from five picture prompts.
Language Teaching Research, 20(3), 387–404.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, R., & Yuan, F.
(
2004)
The effects of planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in second language narrative
writing.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(1), 59–84.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, R.
(
2009)
The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity, and accuracy
in L2 oral production.
Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 474–509.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Evans, N., Hartshorn, K., Cox, T., & de Jel, T.
(
2014)
Measuring written linguistic accuracy with weighted clause ratio: A question of
validity.
Journal of Second Language Writing, 24, 33–50.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Foster, P., & Skehan, P.
(
1999)
The influence of source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance.
Language Teaching Research, 3(3), 215–247.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frear, M., & Bitchener, J.
(
2015)
The effects of cognitive task complexity on writing complexity.
Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 45–57.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gilabert, R.
(
2007)
Effects of manipulating task complexity on self-repairs during L2 oral production.
International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 215–240.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Housen, A., & Kuiken, F.
(
2009)
Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition.
Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 461–473.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackson, D. & Suethanapornkul, S.
(
2013)
The cognition hypothesis: A synthesis and meta-analysis of research on second language task
complexity.
Language Learning, 63(2), 330–367.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kim, Y.
(
2009)
The effects of task complexity on learner-learner interaction.
System, 37(2), 254–268.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kormos, J.
(
2011)
Task complexity and linguistic and discourse features of narrative writing
performance.
Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 148–161.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kormos, J. & Trebits, A.
(
2012)
The role of task complexity, modality, and aptitude in narrative task performance.
Language Learning, 62(2), 439–472.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I.
(
2008)
Cognitive task complexity and written output in Italian and French as a foreign
language.
Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(1), 48–60.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levelt, W.
(
1989)
Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Norris, J., & Ortega, L.
(
2000)
Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative
meta-analysis.
Language Learning, 50(3), 417–528.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L.
Norris, J., & Ortega, L.
(
2009)
Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of
complexity.
Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555–578.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ong, J., & Zhang, L. J.
(
2010)
Effects of task complexity on the fluency and lexical complexity in EFL students’ argumentative
writing.
Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(4), 218–233.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ong, J., & Zhang, L. J.
(
2013)
Effects of the manipulation of cognitive processes on EFL writers’ text quality.
TESOL Quarterly, 47(2), 375–398.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pallotti, G.
(
2009)
CAF: Defining, refining and differentiating constructs.
Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 590–601.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pallotti, G.
(
2015)
A simple view of linguistic complexity.
Second Language Research, 31(1), 117–134.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rahimi, M., & Zhang, L. J.
(
2018a)
Effects of task complexity and planning conditions on L2 argumentative writing
production.
Discourse Processes, 55(8), 726–742.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rahimi, M., & Zhang, L. J.
(
2018b)
Writing task complexity, students’ motivational beliefs, anxiety and their writing production in
English as a second language.
Reading and Writing, 1–23.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Révész, A.
(
2009)
Task complexity focus on form, and second language development.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(3), 437–470.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Révész, A., Ekiert, M., & Torgersen, E.
(
2016)
The effects of complexity, accuracy, and fluency on communicative adequacy in oral task
performance.
Applied Linguistics, 37(6), 828–848.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Robinson, P.
(
2003)
The Cognition Hypothesis, task design and adult task-based language learning.
Studies in Second Language Learning, 21(2), 45–105.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Robinson, P.
(
2005)
Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework for second language
task design.
International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 43, 1–32.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Robinson, P.
(
2007a)
Task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis and second language learning and
performance.
International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45, 161–176.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Robinson, P.
(
2007b)
Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: Effects on L2 speech production,
interaction, uptake and perceptions of task difficulty.
International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45, 193–213.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Robinson, P.
(
2011a)
Task-based language learning: A review of issues.
Language Learning, Suppl.
1, 1–36.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Segalowitz, N.
(
2010)
Cognitive bases of second language fluency. New York, NY: Routledge.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Skehan, P.
(
2009)
Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency and
lexis.
Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Skehan, P.
(
2011)
Researching tasks: Performance, assessing and pedagogy. Shanghai: Foreign Language Education Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Skehan, P., & Foster, P.
(
1997)
Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language
performance.
Language Teaching Research, 1(1), 185–211.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Skehan, P., & Foster, P.
(
2001)
Cognition and tasks. In
P. Robinson (Ed.),
Cognition and second language instruction (pp.183–205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Skehan, P., & Foster, P.
(
2008)
Complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis in task-based performance: A meta-analysis of the Ealing
research. In
S. Van Daele,
A. Housen,
F. Kuiken,
M. Pierrard, &
I. Vedder (Eds.),
Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language use, learning and teaching (pp.207–226). Brussels: University of Brussels Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tavakoli, P. & Foster, P.
(
2008)
Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on learner
output.
Language Learning, 58(2), 439–473.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P.
Thai, C., & Boers, F.
(
2015)
Repeating a monologue under increasing time pressure: Effects on fluency, complexity, and
accuracy.
TESOL Quarterly, 50(2), 110–115.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wang, L., Wu, H., & Zhang, L. J.
(
2017)
International academic English writing research (1990–2015): A scientometric analysis with
CiteSpace.
Foreign Language Teaching and Learning Theory and Practice, 38(4), 57–63.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wang, L., Wu, H., & Zhang, L. J.
(
2019)
The effects of task complexity on linguistic complexity in EFL writing.
Modern Foreign Languages, 42(6), 46–54.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wickens, C.
(
2002)
Multiple resources and performance prediction.
Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3(2), 159–177.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Xing, J.
(
2016)
The effects of task complexity on non-English majors’ oral production (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Beijing Normal University.
Yuan, F., & Ellis, R.
(
2003)
The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2
monologic oral production.
Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 1–27.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zhang, L. J.
(
2013)
Second language writing as and for second language learning.
Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(4), 446–447.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zhang, L. J., Wang, L., & Wu, H.
(
2017)
A meta-analysis of linguistic complexity research (1990–2015) conducted within cognitive
linguistics frameworks.
Fudan Forum on Foreign Languages and Literature, 10(1), 53–60.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by 3 other publications
Xu, Ting Sophia, Lawrence Jun Zhang & Janet S. Gaffney
2022.
EXAMINING THE RELATIVE EFFECTS OF TASK COMPLEXITY AND COGNITIVE DEMANDS ON STUDENTS’ WRITING IN A SECOND LANGUAGE.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition 44:2
► pp. 483 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Li, Hui Helen, Lawrence Jun Zhang & Haoran Xie
2021.
Effects of structured small-group student talk as collaborative prewriting discussions on Chinese university EFL students’ individual writing: A quasi-experimental study.
PLOS ONE 16:5
► pp. e0251569 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Li, Hui Helen, Lawrence Jun Zhang & Judy M. Parr
2020.
Small-Group Student Talk Before Individual Writing in Tertiary English Writing Classrooms in China: Nature and Insights.
Frontiers in Psychology 11
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.