Article published in:
Processing Perspectives on Task Performance
Edited by Peter Skehan
[Task-Based Language Teaching 5] 2014
► pp. 126
References
Bell, H
(2003) Using frequency lists to assess L2 texts. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Swansea.Google Scholar
Crookes, G
(1989) Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 367–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Daller, H., Van Hout, R., & Treffers-Daller, J
(2003) Lexical richness in the spontaneous speech of bilinguals. Applied Linguistics, 24, 197–222. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeBot, K
(1992) A bilingual production model: Levelt's “Speaking” model adapted. Applied Linguistics, 13, 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Jong, N., Steinel, M.P., Florijn, A., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J
(2012) The effect of task complexity on functional adequacy, fluency and lexical diversity in speaking performances of native and non-native speakers. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in SLA (pp. 121–142). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C
(2003) Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, enhancement. In C. Doughty & M.H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 256–310). Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C. & Williams, J
(1998) Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams J. (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp 197–262). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Ellis, R
(2003) Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
(2005) Planning and task-based performance: Theory and research. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 3–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foster, P
(2001) Lexical measures in task-based performance. Paper presented at the AAAL Conference, Vancouver, Canada.
Foster, P. & Skehan, P
(1996) The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 3, 299–324. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., & Skehan, P
(2012) Complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis in task-based performance: a synthesis of the Ealing research. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 199–220). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Anticipating a post-task activity: The effects on accuracy, complexity and fluency of L2 language performance. Canadian Modern Language Review 69, 3, 249–273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G
(2000) Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21, 354−75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., & Wigglesworth, G
(2010) Towards a new measure of accuracy in task-based second language performance. English Department, St.Mary’s University, Twickenham.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K
(1975) Spoken and written language. Gelong: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Housen, A., & Kuiken, F
(2009) Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30, 461–473. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Housen, A., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I
(2012) Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in SLA. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J
(2006) Speech production and second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Laufer, B., & Nation, P
(1999) A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing, 16, 33–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W.J
(1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
(1999) Language production: a blueprint of the speaker. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), Neurocognition of Language (pp. 83–122). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Long, M.H
(1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Second Language Acquisition, (pp. 413–468). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, T
(2001) Seeing what they meant: transcribing as a route to noticing. English Language Teaching Journal, 55, 124–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Learning from the transcript of an oral communication task. English Language Teaching Journal, 61, 311–319. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L
(1997) Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Long, M., & Robinson, P
(1998) Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom SLA (pp. 15–41). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B
(2000) The CHILDES Project: Tools for analysing talk, Volume 1: Transcription format and programs (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Malvern, D., & Richards, B
(2002) Investigating accommodation in language proficiency interviews using a new measure of lexical diversity. Language Testing, 19, 85–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, E., Myles, F., Rule, S., & Mitchell, R
(2003) Using CHILDES tools for researching second language acquisition. In S. Sarangi & T. van Leeuwen (Eds.), Applied Linguistics and Communities of Practice (Vol. 18, pp. 98–113). London: BAAL/Continuum.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B
(1980).Theory and research in second language learning: An emerging paradigm. Language Learning, 30, 331–350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meara, P., & Bell, H
(2001) P_Lex: A simple and effective way of describing the lexical characteristics of short L2 texts. Prospect, 16(3), 5–19.Google Scholar
Mehnert, U
(1998) The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 83–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J., & Ortega, L
(2009) Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30, 555–578. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L
(1995) The effect of planning on L2 Spanish narratives. Research Note 15 , Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.Google Scholar
(1999) Planning and focus-on-form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 109–148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) What do learners plan? Learner-driven attention to form during pre-task planning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 77–109). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Read, J
(2000) Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Richards, B. & Malvern, D
(2007) Validity and threats to the validity of vocabulary measurement. In H. Daller, J. Milton, J. Treffers-Daller (Eds.), Modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge (pp. 79–92). Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P
(2001) Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Rethinking-for-speaking and L2 task demands: The Cognition Hypothesis, task classification, and sequencing. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Task-based Language Teaching, University of Hawaii, September 2007.Google Scholar
Robinson, P., & Gilabert, R
(2007) Task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, and second language learning and performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 161–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P., Cadierno, T., & Shirai, Y
(2009) Time and motion: Measuring the effects of the conceptual demands of tasks on second language speech production. Applied Linguistics, 30, 533–544. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P
(2011) Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 3–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Samuda, V
(2001) Guiding relationships between form and meaning during task performance: the role of the teacher. In Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: second language learning, teaching, and testing. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Segalowitz, N
(2010) Cognitive bases of second language fluency. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Skehan, P
(1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
(2001) Tasks and language performance. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & Swain M. (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 167–185). London: Longman.Google Scholar
(2009a) Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30, 510–532. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009b) Models of speaking and the assessment of second language proficiency. In A. Benati (Ed.), Issues in second language proficiency (pp. 202–215). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2011) Researching tasks: Performance, assessment, pedagogy. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Google Scholar
(2013) Nurturing noticing. In J.M. Bergsleithner, S.N. Frota, & J.K. Yoshioka (Eds.), Noticing and second language acquisition: Studies in honor of Richard Schmidt. (pp. 169–180). Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Skehan, P., & Foster, P
(1997) Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1, 185–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49, 93–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skehan P., & Foster, P
(2005) Strategic and on-line planning: The influence of surprise information and task time on second language performance. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 193–216). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P
(2005) Planning, task structure, and performance testing. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 239–273). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Towell, R., Hawkins, R., & Bazergui, N
(1996) The development of fluency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics, 17, 84–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Lier, L. & Matsuo, N
(2000) Varieties of conversational experience: Looking for learning opportunities. Applied Language Learning, 11, 265–288.Google Scholar
Van Patten, B
(1990) Attending to content and form in the input: an experiment in consciousness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 287–301. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) Input processing and grammar instruction in second language acquisition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Van den Branden, K
(2006) Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Willis J
(1996) A framework for task-based learning. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 19 other publications

Aubrey, Scott, Craig Lambert & Paul Leeming
2020. The impact of first as opposed to second language pre-task planning on the content of problem-solving task performance. Language Teaching Research  pp. 136216882091784 ff. Crossref logo
Awwad, Anas & Rashed Alhamad
2021. Online task planning and L2 oral fluency: does manipulating time pressure affect fluency in L2 monologic oral narratives? . International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 Crossref logo
Awwad, Anas & Rashed Alhamad
2021. Online task planning and L2 oral fluency: does manipulating time pressure affect fluency in L2 monologic oral narratives? . International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 59:4  pp. 605 ff. Crossref logo
Awwad, Anas & Parvaneh Tavakoli
2022. Task complexity, language proficiency and working memory: Interaction effects on second language speech performance . International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 60:2  pp. 169 ff. Crossref logo
Bui, Gavin, Peter Skehan & Zhan Wang
2018.  In The Handbook of Advanced Proficiency in Second Language Acquisition,  pp. 219 ff. Crossref logo
Dörnyei, Zoltán
2019.  In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13],  pp. 53 ff. Crossref logo
Ellis, Rod
2019.  In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13],  pp. 15 ff. Crossref logo
Farahanynia, Mahsa & Mohammad Khatib
2021. Participatory structure of planning and cognitive task complexity in L2 oral performance: a processing perspective. The Language Learning Journal  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Fukuta, Junya, Yoshito Nishimura & Yu Tamura
2022. Pitfalls of production data analysis for investigating L2 cognitive mechanism. Journal of Second Language Studies Crossref logo
Khoram, Alireza & Zuochen Zhang
2019. The impact of task type and pre-task planning condition on the accuracy of intermediate EFL learners’ oral performance. Cogent Education 6:1  pp. 1675466 ff. Crossref logo
Lambert, Craig
2017. Tasks, affect and second language performance. Language Teaching Research 21:6  pp. 657 ff. Crossref logo
Lambert, Craig, Scott Aubrey & Paul Leeming
2021. Task Preparation and Second Language Speech Production. TESOL Quarterly 55:2  pp. 331 ff. Crossref logo
PANG, FRANCINE & PETER SKEHAN
2021. Performance Profiles on Second Language Speaking Tasks. The Modern Language Journal 105:1  pp. 371 ff. Crossref logo
Parsons, Daniel
2017. Formative assessment in discussion tasks. ELT Journal 71:1  pp. 24 ff. Crossref logo
Saito, Kazuya
2019. To What Extent Does Long‐Term Foreign Language Education Help Improve Spoken Second Language Lexical Proficiency?. TESOL Quarterly 53:1  pp. 82 ff. Crossref logo
Souza Ferraz D'Ely, Raquel Carolina, Mailce Borges Mota & Martin Bygate
2019.  In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13],  pp. 199 ff. Crossref logo
Tavakoli, Parvaneh
2019.  In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13],  pp. 39 ff. Crossref logo
Thai, Chau & Frank Boers
2016. Repeating a Monologue Under Increasing Time Pressure: Effects on Fluency, Complexity, and Accuracy. TESOL Quarterly 50:2  pp. 369 ff. Crossref logo
Yang, Weiwei & YouJin Kim
2020. The effect of topic familiarity on the complexity, accuracy, and fluency of second language writing . Applied Linguistics Review 11:1  pp. 79 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 july 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.