Article published in:
Processing Perspectives on Task Performance
Edited by Peter Skehan
[Task-Based Language Teaching 5] 2014
► pp. 6394
References
Baddeley, A
(1997) Human memory: Theory and practice. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Barry, S., & Lazarte, A
(1995) Embedded clause effects on recall: Does high prior knowledge of content domain overcome syntactic complexity in students of Spanish? Modern Language Journal, 79, 491–504. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Banks, J
(2004) The impact of event familiarity on the complexity and coherence of children narratives of positive events. Unpublished MSc thesis. North Carolina State University.Google Scholar
Bei, X.G
(2010) Exploring task-internal and task-external readiness: The effects of topic familiarity and strategic planning in topic-based task performance at different proficiency levels. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
(2011) Formality in second language discourse: Measurement and performance. Interdisciplinary Humanities, 28(1), 22–31.Google Scholar
(2013) Effects of immediate repetition in L2 speaking task: A focused study. English Language Teaching, 6(1), 11–19.Google Scholar
Bui, H.Y.G
In review). L2 fluency as influenced by content familiarity and planning performance and methodology. Submitted to Language Teaching Research.
In preparation). Lexical diversity, lexical sophistication and lexical density in L2 speaking tasks. Unpublished manuscript.
Bortfeld, H., Leon, S.D., Bloom, J.E., Schober, M.F., & Brennan, S.E
(2001) Disfluency rates in conversation: Effects of age, relationship, topic, role, and gender. Language and Speech, 44(2), 123–147. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bügel, K., & Buunk, B
(1996) Sex differences in foreign language text comprehension: The role of interests and prior knowledge. Modern Language Journal, 80, 15–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bygate, M
(1996) Effects of task repetition: Appraising the developing language of learners. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 136–146). Oxford: Heinemann.Google Scholar
(2001) Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds). Researching pedagogical tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp.23–48). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Bygate, M., & Samuda, V
(2005) Integrative planning through the use of task repetition. In R. Ellis (ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 37–74). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chang, C
(2006) Effects of topic familiarity and linguistic difficulty on the reading strategies and mental representations of non-native readers of Chinese. Journal of Language and Learning, 4, 172–198.Google Scholar
Chang, Y.F
(1999) Discourse topics and interlanguage variation. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Representation and process: Proceedings of the 3rd Pacific Second Language Research Forum (Vol. 1, pp. 235–241). Tokyo: PacSLRF.Google Scholar
Chen, Q., & Donin, J
(1997) Discourse processing of first and second language biology texts: Effects of language proficiency and domain-specific knowledge. Modern Language Journal, 81, 209–227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chiang, C.S., & Dunkel, P
(1992) The effect of speech modification, prior knowledge, and listening proficiency on EFL lecture learning. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 345–373. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J
(1992) A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crookes, G
(1989) Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 367–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dornyei, Z., & Katona, L
(1992) Validation of the C-test amongst Hungarian EFL learners. Language Testing, 9, 187–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R
(2005) Planning and task-based performance: Theory and research. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 3–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 Oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 474–509. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., & Yuan, F.Y
(2005) The effects of careful within-task planning on oral and written task performance. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 167–192). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foster, P
(2001) Rules and routines: a consideration of their role in task-based language production of native and non-native speakers. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Teaching, learning and testing (pp. 75–97). Longman, London.Google Scholar
Foster, P., & Skehan, P
(1996) The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299–323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G
(2000) Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 354- 375. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R.C
(2001) Psychological statistics using SPSS for Windows. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Good, D.A., & Butterworth, B
(1980) Hesitancy as a conversational resource: some methodological implications. In H. Dechert & M. Raupach (Eds.), Temporal variables in speech production (pp. 145–152). The Hague: Mouton.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heylighen, F., & Dewaele, J
(1999) Formality of language: Definition, measurement and behavioral determinants. Internal report, Center “Leo Apostel”, Free University of Brussels.
Johnson, P
(1982) Effects on reading comprehension of language complexity and cultural background of text. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 169–181. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kawauchi, C
(2005) The effects of strategic planning on the oral narratives of learners with low and high intermediate proficiency. In R. Ellis. (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 143–164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W
(1988) The role of knowledge of discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 92, 163–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998) Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Lee, J.F
(1986) Background knowledge and L2 reading. Modern Language Journal, 70, 350–354. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S.K
(2007) Effects of textual enhancement and topic familiarity on Korean EFL students reading comprehension and learning of passive form. Language learning, 57, 87–118. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leeser, M.J
(2004) The effects of topic familiarity, mode, and pausing on second language learnres’ comprehension and focus on form. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 587–615. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Learner-based factors in L2 reading comprehension and processing grammatical form: Topic familiarity and working memory. Language Learning, 57(2), 229–270. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W.J.M
(1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Long, D.R
(1990) What you don’t know can’t help you: An exploratory study of background knowledge and second language listening comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 65–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Markham, P., & Latham, M
(1987) The influence of religious-specific background knowledge on the listening comprehension of adult second-language students. Language Learning, 37, 157–170. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mehnert, U
(1998) The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 83–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Merlo, S., & Mansur, L.L
(2004) Descriptive discourse: Topic familiarity and disfluencies. Journal of Communication Disorders, 37, 489–503. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mohan, B.A
(1986) Language and Content. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Ortega L
(1999) Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 109–148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L
(2005) What do learners plan? Learner-driven attention to form during pre-task planning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 77–109). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L., Iwashita, N., Norris, J., & Rabie, S
in preparation). A multi-language comparison of syntacticcomplexity measures and their relationships to foreign language proficiency. Manuscript in preparation.
Robinson, P
(2001) Task complexity, task difficulty and task production: exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Samuda, V
(2001) Guiding relationships between form and meaning during task performance: The role of the teacher. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, and M. Swain (Eds), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 119–140). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Rinehart, B.C
(1994) The effects of topic familiarity on second language listening comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 179–189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shimoda, T.A
(1993) The effects of interesting examples and topic familiarity on text comprehension, attention, and reading speed. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 93–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P
(1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
(2009) Lexical performance by native and non-native speakers on language learning tasks. In B. Richards, H.M. Daller, D. Malvern, P. Meara, J. Milton, J. Treffers-Daller (Eds.), Vocabulary studies in first and second language acquisition: the interface between theory and application (pp. 107–124). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Skehan, P., & Foster, P
(1997) Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research,1(3),185–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) The influence of task structure and processing conditions in narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49(1), 93–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Strategic and online planning: the influence of surprise information and task time on second language performance. In R. Ellis. (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 193–216). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P
(2005) Strategic planning, task structure, and performance testing. In R. Ellis. (Ed), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 239–273). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thalheimer, W., & Cook, S
(2002) How to calculate effect sizes from published research articles: A simplified methodology. Retrieved April 18, 2009 from http://​work​-learning​.com​/effect​_sizes​.htm.
Tulving, E., & Thomson, D.M
(1973) Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological review, 80(5), 352–373. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, F., & Ellis, R
(2003) The effects of pre-task planning and on-Line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 1–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z
(2009) Modeling L2 Speech Production and Performance: Evidence from Five Types of Planning and Two Task Structures. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, G
(1997) An investigation of planning time and proficiency level on oral test discourse. Language Testing, 14(1), 85–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 9 other publications

Bui, Gavin
2021. Influence of learners’ prior knowledge, L2 proficiency and pre-task planning on L2 lexical complexity . International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 59:4  pp. 543 ff. Crossref logo
Bui, Gavin & Rhett Yu
2021.  In Task-Based Language Teaching and Assessment,  pp. 119 ff. Crossref logo
Pfenninger, Simone E & David Singleton
2016. Affect trumps age: A person-in-context relational view of age and motivation in SLA. Second Language Research 32:3  pp. 311 ff. Crossref logo
Qiu, Xuyan
2022. Picture or non-picture? The influence of narrative task types on lower- and higher-proficiency EFL learners’ oral production . International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 60:2  pp. 383 ff. Crossref logo
Qiu, Xuyan & Hong Cheng
2021. The effects of task types on L2 oral production and learner engagement. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 Crossref logo
Qiu, Xuyan & Yuen Yi Lo
2017. Content familiarity, task repetition and Chinese EFL learners’ engagement in second language use. Language Teaching Research 21:6  pp. 681 ff. Crossref logo
Rezaei, Amir & Antonella Valeo
2022. Investigating the impact of task complexity on uptake and noticing of corrective feedback recasts. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 Crossref logo
Suzuki, Noriko
2022. Effects of content-based instruction (CBI) on EFL secondary school learners’ writing. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 10:1  pp. 5 ff. Crossref logo
Wang, Zhan, Peter Skehan & Gaowei Chen
2019. The effects of hybrid online planning and L2 proficiency on video-based speaking task performance. Instructed Second Language Acquisition 3:1  pp. 53 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 july 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.