Article published in:
Processing Perspectives on Task Performance
Edited by Peter Skehan
[Task-Based Language Teaching 5] 2014
► pp. 129154
References
Bialystok, E
(1990) Communication strategies: A psychological analysis of second Language use. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brown, J.D. & Rodgers, T
(2002) Doing second language research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bygate, M
(1996) Effects of task repetition: Appraising the developing languages of learners. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 136–145). Oxford: Macmillan Heinemann.Google Scholar
(2000) Introduction. Language Teaching Research, 4, 185–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M.Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 23–48). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Clennell, C
(1999) Promoting pragmatic awareness and spoken discourse skills with EAP classes. ELT Journal, 53, 83–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J
(1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.).Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Doughty, C
(2001) Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206–257). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 256–310). New York, NY: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C., & Williams, J
(1998a) Issues and terminology. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom language acquisition (pp.1–11). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
(1998b) Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom language acquisition (pp.197–261). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
(Eds.) (1998c) Focus on form in classroom language acquisition. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Ellis, R
(2001) Introduction: Investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning, 51, 1–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
(2008) The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ferris, D.R
(2003) Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Foster P., & Skehan P
(2013), Anticipating a post-task activity: The effects on accuracy, complexity and fluency of L2 language performance. Canadian Modern Language Journal 69, 3, 249–273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G
(2000) Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21, 354–375. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fotos, S., & Nassaji, H
(Eds.) (2007) Form-focused instruction and teacher education: Studies in honor of Rod Ellis. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F
(2006) Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and Issues. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kepner, C.G
(1991) An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second-language writing skills. Modern Language Journal, 75, 305–313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J
(1999) Monitoring and self-repair. Language Learning, 49, 303–342. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S
(1982) Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
(1985) The Input Hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Leeman, J
(2007) Feedback in L2 learning: Responding to errors during practice. In R. Dekeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp.111–137). Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leeser, M
(2004) Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research, 8, 55–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lightbown, P., & Spada, N
(1990) Focus-on-form and corrective feedback in communicative language teaching: effects on second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 429–448. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Loewen, S
(2005) Incidental focus on form and second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 361–386. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Long, M
(1983) Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4, 126–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1991) Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of research on second language acquisition (pp.413–468). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Long, M., & Robinson, P
(1998) Focus on form: Theory, research and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom language acquisition (pp. 15–41). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Lynch, T
(2001) Seeing what they meant: Transcribing as a route to noticing. ELT Journal, 55, 124–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Learning from the transcripts of an oral communication task. ELT Journal, 61, 311–320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, T., & Maclean, J
(2001) A case of exercising: Effects of immediate task repetition on learners’ performance. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M.Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp.141–162). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Malvern, D., & Richards, B
(2002) Investigating accommodation in language proficiency interviews using a new measure of lexical diversity. Language Testing, 19, 85–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, B
(1990) Restructuring. Applied Linguistics, 11, 113–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mennim, P
(2003) Rehearsed oral L2 output and reactive focus on form. ELT Journal, 57, 130–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Learner negotiation of L2 form in transcription exercises. ELT Journal, 66(1), 52–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J., & Ortega, L
(2000) Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pica, T
(2002) Subject-matter content: How does it assist the interactional and linguistic needs of classroom language learners? Modern Language Journal, 86, 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prabhu, N.S
(1987) Second language pedagogy. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Read, J
(2000) Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, W
(1988) Second language grammar: Teaching and learning. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R
(2001) Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sheppard, K
(1992) Two feedback types: Do they make a difference? RELC Journal, 23, 103–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P
(1996) A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 37, 38–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
(2007) Task research and language teaching: Reciprocal relationships. In S. Fotos & H. Nassaji (Eds.), Form-focused instruction and teacher education: Studies in honor of Rod Ellis (pp. 55–69). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Skehan, P., & Foster, P
(1997) Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1, 185–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 183–205). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spada, N
(1997) Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching, 30, 73–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stern, H.H
(1983) Fundamental concepts of language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stillwell, C., Curabba, B., Alexander, K., Kidd, A., Kim, E., Stone, P., & Wyle, C
(2010) Students transcribing tasks: Noticing fluency, accuracy and complexity. ELT Journal, 64, 445–455. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Storch, N
(2007) Investigating the merits of pair work on a text editing task in ELS classes. Language Teaching Research, 11, 143–159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M
(1993) The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren’t enough. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 158–164.Google Scholar
(1995) Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidhofer (Eds.), Principles and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H.G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144).Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
(2005) The output hypothesis: theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook on research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471–483).Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S
(1995) Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371–391. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998) Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 320–337. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Truscott, J
(2007) The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 255–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Willis, D., & Willis, J
(2007) Doing task-based teaching. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Willis, J
(1996) A framework for task-based learning. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H.Y
(1998) Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy and complexity (Technical Report #17). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

van de Guchte, Marrit, Martine Braaksma, Gert Rijlaarsdam & Peter Bimmel
2016. Focus on form through task repetition in TBLT. Language Teaching Research 20:3  pp. 300 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 july 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.