Article published in:
Processing Perspectives on Task Performance
Edited by Peter Skehan
[Task-Based Language Teaching 5] 2014
► pp. 129154


Bialystok, E.
(1990) Communication strategies: A psychological analysis of second Language use. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Brown, J.D. & Rodgers, T.
(2002) Doing second language research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bygate, M.
(1996) Effects of task repetition: Appraising the developing languages of learners. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 136–145). Oxford: Macmillan Heinemann.
(2000) Introduction. Language Teaching Research, 4, 185–192. Crossref link
(2001) Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M.Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 23–48). Harlow: Longman.
Clennell, C.
(1999) Promoting pragmatic awareness and spoken discourse skills with EAP classes. ELT Journal, 53, 83–91. Crossref link
Cohen, J.
(1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.).Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Doughty, C.
(2001) Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206–257). Cambridge: CUP. Crossref link
(2003) Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 256–310). New York, NY: Blackwell. Crossref link
Doughty, C., & Williams, J.
(1998a) Issues and terminology. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom language acquisition (pp.1–11). Cambridge: CUP.
(1998b) Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom language acquisition (pp.197–261). Cambridge: CUP.
(Eds.) (1998c) Focus on form in classroom language acquisition. Cambridge: CUP.
Ellis, R.
(2001) Introduction: Investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning, 51, 1–46. Crossref link
(2003) Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: OUP.
(2008) The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford: OUP.
Ferris, D.R.
(2003) Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Foster P., & Skehan P.
(2013), Anticipating a post-task activity: The effects on accuracy, complexity and fluency of L2 language performance. Canadian Modern Language Journal 69, 3, 249–273. Crossref link
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G.
(2000) Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21, 354–375. Crossref link
Fotos, S., & Nassaji, H.
(Eds.) (2007) Form-focused instruction and teacher education: Studies in honor of Rod Ellis. Oxford: OUP.
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F.
(2006) Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and Issues. Cambridge: CUP. Crossref link
Kepner, C.G.
(1991) An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second-language writing skills. Modern Language Journal, 75, 305–313. Crossref link
Kormos, J.
(1999) Monitoring and self-repair. Language Learning, 49, 303–342. Crossref link
Krashen, S.
(1982) Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.
(1985) The Input Hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
Leeman, J.
(2007) Feedback in L2 learning: Responding to errors during practice. In R. Dekeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp.111–137). Cambridge: CUP.Crossref link
Leeser, M.
(2004) Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research, 8, 55–81. Crossref link
Lightbown, P., & Spada, N.
(1990) Focus-on-form and corrective feedback in communicative language teaching: effects on second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 429–448. Crossref link
Loewen, S.
(2005) Incidental focus on form and second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 361–386. Crossref link
Long, M.
(1983) Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4, 126–141. Crossref link
(1991) Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of research on second language acquisition (pp.413–468). New York: Academic Press.
Long, M., & Robinson, P.
(1998) Focus on form: Theory, research and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom language acquisition (pp. 15–41). Cambridge: CUP.
Lynch, T.
(2001) Seeing what they meant: Transcribing as a route to noticing. ELT Journal, 55, 124–132. Crossref link
(2007) Learning from the transcripts of an oral communication task. ELT Journal, 61, 311–320. Crossref link
Lynch, T., & Maclean, J.
(2001) A case of exercising: Effects of immediate task repetition on learners’ performance. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M.Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp.141–162). Harlow: Longman.
Malvern, D., & Richards, B.
(2002) Investigating accommodation in language proficiency interviews using a new measure of lexical diversity. Language Testing, 19, 85–104. Crossref link
McLaughlin, B.
(1990) Restructuring. Applied Linguistics, 11, 113–128. Crossref link
Mennim, P.
(2003) Rehearsed oral L2 output and reactive focus on form. ELT Journal, 57, 130–138. Crossref link
(2011) Learner negotiation of L2 form in transcription exercises. ELT Journal, 66(1), 52–61. Crossref link
Norris, J., & Ortega, L.
(2000) Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528. Crossref link
Pica, T.
(2002) Subject-matter content: How does it assist the interactional and linguistic needs of classroom language learners? Modern Language Journal, 86, 1–19. Crossref link
Prabhu, N.S.
(1987) Second language pedagogy. Oxford: OUP.
Read, J.
(2000) Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: CUP. Crossref link
Rutherford, W.
(1988) Second language grammar: Teaching and learning. London: Longman.
Schmidt, R.
(2001) Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Sheppard, K.
(1992) Two feedback types: Do they make a difference? RELC Journal, 23, 103–110. Crossref link
Skehan, P.
(1996) A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 37, 38–62. Crossref link
(1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: OUP.
(2007) Task research and language teaching: Reciprocal relationships. In S. Fotos & H. Nassaji (Eds.), Form-focused instruction and teacher education: Studies in honor of Rod Ellis (pp. 55–69). Oxford: OUP.
Skehan, P., & Foster, P.
(1997) Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1, 185–211. Crossref link
(2001) Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 183–205). Cambridge: CUP. Crossref link
Spada, N.
(1997) Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching, 30, 73–87. Crossref link
Stern, H.H.
(1983) Fundamental concepts of language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stillwell, C., Curabba, B., Alexander, K., Kidd, A., Kim, E., Stone, P., & Wyle, C.
(2010) Students transcribing tasks: Noticing fluency, accuracy and complexity. ELT Journal, 64, 445–455. Crossref link
Storch, N.
(2007) Investigating the merits of pair work on a text editing task in ELS classes. Language Teaching Research, 11, 143–159. Crossref link
Swain, M.
(1993) The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren’t enough. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 158–164.
(1995) Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidhofer (Eds.), Principles and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H.G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144).Oxford: OUP.
(2005) The output hypothesis: theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook on research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471–483).Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S.
(1995) Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371–391. Crossref link
(1998) Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 320–337. Crossref link
Truscott, J.
(2007) The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 255–272. Crossref link
Willis, D., & Willis, J.
(2007) Doing task-based teaching. Oxford: OUP.
Willis, J.
(1996) A framework for task-based learning. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman.
Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H.Y.
(1998) Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy and complexity (Technical Report #17). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
Cited by

Cited by other publications

van de Guchte, Marrit, Martine Braaksma, Gert Rijlaarsdam & Peter Bimmel
2016. Focus on form through task repetition in TBLT. Language Teaching Research 20:3  pp. 300 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 june 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.