Part of
Processing Perspectives on Task PerformanceEdited by Peter Skehan
[Task-Based Language Teaching 5] 2014
► pp. 187–210
Edited by Peter Skehan
[Task-Based Language Teaching 5] 2014
► pp. 187–210
Chapter 7. Structure and processing condition in video-based narrative retelling
This chapter reports on a study of video-based narrative retellings, in which the major variables are degree of structure and the nature of the processing conditions under which the retellings were done. The two variables were manipulated in a 4 × 4 design. Four Mr. Bean video clips were used, with different levels of structure, ranging from no structure to a clear, well organised problem-solution structure. In addition to a control group, there were two online processing conditions (opportunity to pause, and provision of a summary before the task), and one offline Watch-then-Tell condition. The results of the study show that two of the online conditions had some mitigating influence, that is, the opportunity to pause the video, and the provision of a summary before the video was seen. More structured narratives and less pressured processing conditions produced more accurate and more complex performances. The same influences lead to less end-of-clause pausing but more reformulations. The results are discussed in terms of the Levelt model of speaking, applied to second language performance.
References
Crookes, G
(1989) Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 367–383. 
de Bot, K
(1992) A bilingual production model: Levelt’s ‘Speaking Model’ adapted. Applied Linguistics, 13, 1–24.
Ellis, R
(2005) Planning and task-based performance: Theory and research. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 3–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ellis, R., & Yuan, F
(2004) The effects of planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in second language narrative writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(1), 59–84.
Foster, P., & Skehan, P
(1996) The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(3), 299–324.
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, J
(2000) Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 354−75.
Foster, P., & Tavakoli, P
(2009) Lexical diversity and lexical selection: A comparison of native and non-native speaker performance. Language Learning, 59, 866–896.
Foster, P., & Wigglesworth, G
(2010) Towards a new measure of accuracy in task-based second language performance. English Department, St.Mary’s University, Twickenham.
Gilabert, R
(2007) Effects of manipulating task complexity on self-repairs during L2 oral production. IRAL, 45, 215–240.
Hoey, M
(1983) On the surface of discourse. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Kormos, J
(2006) Speech production and second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Levelt, W.J
(1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge: CUP.
(1999) Language production: A blueprint of the speaker. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), Neurocognition of language (pp. 83–122). Oxford: OUP.
MacWhinney, B
(2000) The CHILDES Project: Tools for analysing talk, Volume 1: Transcription format and programs (3rd ed). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mehnert, U
(1998) The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(1), 83–108.
Norris, J., & Ortega, L
(2009) Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555–578.
Robinson, P
(2001) Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 287–318). Cambridge: CUP.
(2011) Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 3–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Robinson P., Cadierno, T., & Shirai, Y
(2009) Time and motion: Measuring the effects of the conceptual demands of tasks on second language speech production. Applied Linguistics, 30, 533–554.
Segalowitz, N
(2010) Cognitive bases of second language fluency. London: Routledge.
Skehan, P
(2009a) Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532.
(2009b) Models of speaking and the assessment of second language proficiency. In A. Benati (Ed.), Issues in second language proficiency (pp. 202–215). London: Continuum.
Skehan, P., & Foster, P
(1997) Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 185–211.
(1999) The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49(1), 93–120.
(2001) Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 183–205). Cambridge: CUP.
(2005) Strategic and on-line planning: The influence of surprise information and task time on second language performance. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 193–218). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2008) Complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis in task-based performance: A meta-analysis of the Ealing research. In S. Van Daele, A. Housen, F. Kuiken, M. Pierrard, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Complexity, accuracy and fluency in second language use, learning and teaching (pp. 263–284). Brussels: Royal Flemish Academy of Belgium for Sciences and Arts.
Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P
(2005) Planning, task structure, and performance testing. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 239–276). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Tavakoli, P., & Foster, P
(2008) Task design and second language performance: the effect of narrative type on learner output. Language Learning, 58(2), 439–473.
Winter, E
(1976) Fundamentals of information structure: A pilot manual for further development according to student need. Hatfield, Herts: The Hatfield Polytechnic Linguistics Group, School of Humanities.
Cited by
Cited by 8 other publications
Bui, Gavin, Peter Skehan & Zhan Wang
2018. Task Condition Effects on Advanced‐Level Foreign Language Performance. In The Handbook of Advanced Proficiency in Second Language Acquisition, ► pp. 219 ff. 
Farahanynia, Mahsa & Mohammad Khatib
2022. Participatory structure of planning and cognitive task complexity in L2 oral performance: a processing perspective. The Language Learning Journal 50:6 ► pp. 777 ff.
Michel, Marije C., Andrea Révész, Danni Shi & Yanmei Li
2019. Chapter 6. The effects of task demands on linguistic complexity and accuracy across task types and L1/L2 speakers. In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13], ► pp. 133 ff.
Skehan, Peter
2016. Sidesteps towards applied linguistics. In Becoming and Being an Applied Linguist, ► pp. 89 ff.
Skehan, Peter
2022. Chapter 11. Performance on second language speaking tasks. In Second Language Acquisition Theory [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 14], ► pp. 211 ff.
Skehan, Peter, Gavin Bui, Zhan Wang & Sabrina Shum
2024. Re-examining accuracy measures in second language task-based spoken performance. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 3:1 ► pp. 100098 ff.
Wang, Qiong & Shaofeng Li
2019. Chapter 4. The relationship between task motivation and L2 motivation. In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13], ► pp. 67 ff.
Xing, Jiaxin & Shaoqian Luo
2019. Chapter 7. The effects of reasoning demands on Chinese EFL learners’ oral performance and cognitive processes. In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13], ► pp. 153 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.