Article published in:
Processing Perspectives on Task Performance
Edited by Peter Skehan
[Task-Based Language Teaching 5] 2014
► pp. 211260
References
Anderson, J.R
(2004) Cognitive psychology and its implications (6th ed.). New York, NY: Worth.Google Scholar
Bruton, A
(2002) From tasking purposes to purposing tasks. English Language Teaching Journal, 56, 280–288. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bygate, M
(2001) Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks (pp. 23–48). London: Longman.Google Scholar
(2006) Areas of research that influence L2 speaking instruction. In E. Uso-Juan & A. Martinez-Flor (Eds.), Current trends in the development and teaching of the four language skills (pp. 159–186). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bygate M., & Samuda V
(2009) Creating pressure in task pedagogy: The joint roles of field, purpose, and engagement within the interactional approach. In A. Mackey & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction (pp. 90–116). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M
(Eds.) (2001) Researching pedagogic tasks. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Corder, S. Pit
(1981) Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Crookes, G
(1989) Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 367–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dornyei, Z
(2005) The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Ellis, R
(1987) Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse: Style shifting in the use of the past tense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 12–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Planning and task-based performance: Theory and research. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 3–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 474–509. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., & Skehan, P
(1996) The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299–324. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoey, M
(1983) On the surface of discourse. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W
(1994) The psychology of discourse processing. In M.A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 721–740). San Diego CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kormos, J
(1999) Monitoring and self-repair. Language Learning, 49, 303–342. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Speech production and second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Levelt, W.J
(1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
(1999) Language production: A blueprint of the speaker. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), Neurocognition of language (pp. 83–122). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Li, Q
(2010) Focus on form in task based language teaching: exploring the effects of post-task activities and task practice on learners’ oral performance. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Littlewood, W
(2004) The task-based approach: Some problems and suggestions. English Language Teaching Journal, 58(4), 319–326. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Long, M.H., & Crookes, G
(1992) Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 27–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Loschky, L., & Bley-Vroman, R
(1993) Grammar and task-based methodology. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
McDonough, K., & Trofimovich, P
(2009) Using priming methods in second language research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Norris, J
(2009) Task-based teaching and testing. In M.H.Long & C.Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of language teaching (pp. 578–594). Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O'Malley, J.M. & Chamot, A.U
(1990) Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L
(2005) What do learners plan? Learner-driven attention to form during pre-task planning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 77–109). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M
(2003) Language processing capacity. In C. Doughty & M.H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 679–714). Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinter, A
(2005) Task repetition with a 10-year-old. In C. Edwards & J. Willis (Eds.), Teachers exploring tasks in English language teaching (pp. 113–126). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P
(2001) Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 287–318). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 3–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P., & Gilabert, R
(2007) Task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, and second language learning and performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 161–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R
(1990) The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 17–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P
(1986) Cluster analysis and the identification of learner types. In V. Cook (Ed.), Experimental approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 81–94). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
(1989) Individual differences in second language learning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
(1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
(2001) Tasks and language performance. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & Swain M. (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 167–185). London: Longman.Google Scholar
(2007) Task research and language teaching: Reciprocal relationships. In S. Fotos & H. Nassaji (Eds.), Form-focused instruction and teacher education: Studies in honour of Rod Ellis (pp. 55–69). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
(2009a) Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009b) Models of speaking and the assessment of second language proficiency. In A. Benati (Ed.), Issues in second language proficiency (pp. 202–215). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2013) Nurturing noticing. In J. Bergleitner & S. Fotos (Eds.), Festschrift in honour of Richard Schmidt. Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Skehan, P., Bei, X., Li, Q., & Wang Z
(2012) The task is not enough: Processing approaches to task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 16(2), 170–187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P., & Foster, P
(1997) Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 185–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49(1), 93–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M
(1985) Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
(1995) Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 245–256). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Swan, M
(2005) Legislating by hypothesis: The case of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 26, 376–401. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tannen, D
(1989) Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P
(2005) Strategic planning, task structure, and performance testing. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 239–276). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z
(2009) Modelling speech production and performance: Evidence from five types of planning and two task structures. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Willis, J
(1996) A framework for task-based learning. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Willis, D., & Willis, J
(2007) Doing task-based teaching. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Winter, E
(1976) Fundamentals of information structure: A pilot manual for further development according to student need. Hatfield, Herts: The Hatfield Polytechnic Linguistics Group, School of Humanities.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 33 other publications

Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud, Gavin Bui & Yizhou Wang
2021. The effects of topic familiarity on emotionality and linguistic complexity in EAP writing. Language Teaching Research  pp. 136216882110335 ff. Crossref logo
Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud & Yizhou Wang
2022. The effects of prompt types on L2 learners’ textual emotionality and lexical complexity. Journal of Second Language Studies 5:1  pp. 34 ff. Crossref logo
Brown, Alan V., Gregory L. Thompson & Troy L. Cox
2021.  In Advancedness in Second Language Spanish [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 31],  pp. 42 ff. Crossref logo
Bui, Gavin, Peter Skehan & Zhan Wang
2018.  In The Handbook of Advanced Proficiency in Second Language Acquisition,  pp. 219 ff. Crossref logo
de Jong, Nel & Philip Tillman
2018.  In Learning Language through Task Repetition [Task-Based Language Teaching, 11],  pp. 43 ff. Crossref logo
Duran-Karaoz, Zeynep & Parvaneh Tavakoli
2020. PREDICTING L2 FLUENCY FROM L1 FLUENCY BEHAVIOR. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 42:4  pp. 671 ff. Crossref logo
Ellis, Rod
2019.  In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13],  pp. 15 ff. Crossref logo
Khezrlou, Sima
2020. Training planning in second language narrative writing. ELT Journal 74:1  pp. 49 ff. Crossref logo
Khezrlou, Sima
2021. Focus on form in task repetition through oral and written task modeling. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 Crossref logo
Kim, YouJin, Scott Crossley, YeonJoo Jung, Kristopher Kyle & Sanghee Kang
2018.  In Learning Language through Task Repetition [Task-Based Language Teaching, 11],  pp. 75 ff. Crossref logo
Kobayashi, Manami
2022. The distributed practice effects of speaking task repetition. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 32:1  pp. 142 ff. Crossref logo
Kourtali, Nektaria‐Efstathia & Andrea Révész
2020. The Roles of Recasts, Task Complexity, and Aptitude in Child Second Language Development. Language Learning 70:1  pp. 179 ff. Crossref logo
Lambert, Craig, Judit Kormos & Danny Minn
2017. TASK REPETITION AND SECOND LANGUAGE SPEECH PROCESSING. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 39:1  pp. 167 ff. Crossref logo
Matsumoto, Kazumi, Maki Hirotani & Atsushi Fukada
2020.  In Recent Tools for Computer- and Mobile-Assisted Foreign Language Learning [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ],  pp. 132 ff. Crossref logo
Mohammadzadeh, Aysheh, Touran Ahour, Mahnaz Saeidi & María Consuelo Sáiz Manzanares
2020. A Sociocultural Perspective on Second Language Writing: The Effect of Symmetrical versus Asymmetrical Scaffolding on Intermediate EFL Learners’ Writing Accuracy, Fluency, and Complexity and Their Attitudes. Education Research International 2020  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
PANG, FRANCINE & PETER SKEHAN
2021. Performance Profiles on Second Language Speaking Tasks. The Modern Language Journal 105:1  pp. 371 ff. Crossref logo
Rahimi, Muhammad
2019. Effects of increasing the degree of reasoning and the number of elements on L2 argumentative writing. Language Teaching Research 23:5  pp. 633 ff. Crossref logo
Rahimi, Muhammad & Lawrence Jun Zhang
2019. Writing task complexity, students’ motivational beliefs, anxiety and their writing production in English as a second language. Reading and Writing 32:3  pp. 761 ff. Crossref logo
Rezaei, Amir & Antonella Valeo
2022. Investigating the impact of task complexity on uptake and noticing of corrective feedback recasts. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 Crossref logo
Sasayama, Shoko & John M. Norris
2019.  In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13],  pp. 95 ff. Crossref logo
Silva, Breno B., Katarzyna Kutyłowska & Agnieszka Otwinowska
2021. Learning academic words through writing sentences and compositions: Any signs of an increase in cognitive load?. Language Teaching Research  pp. 136216882110204 ff. Crossref logo
Skehan, Peter
2016.  In Becoming and Being an Applied Linguist,  pp. 89 ff. Crossref logo
Skehan, Peter
2016.  In Cognitive Individual Differences in Second Language Processing and Acquisition [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 3],  pp. 17 ff. Crossref logo
Skehan, Peter
2016. Tasks Versus Conditions: Two Perspectives on Task Research and Their Implications for Pedagogy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 36  pp. 34 ff. Crossref logo
Souza Ferraz D'Ely, Raquel Carolina, Mailce Borges Mota & Martin Bygate
2019.  In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13],  pp. 199 ff. Crossref logo
Tao, Na & Ying Wang
2022. Effects of prior knowledge and reasoning demands on Chinese EFL writing performance. Language Teaching Research  pp. 136216882210898 ff. Crossref logo
Tavakoli, Parvaneh, Colin Campbell & Joan McCormack
2016. Development of Speech Fluency Over a Short Period of Time: Effects of Pedagogic Intervention. TESOL Quarterly 50:2  pp. 447 ff. Crossref logo
TAVAKOLI, PARVANEH, FUMIYO NAKATSUHARA & ANN–MARIE HUNTER
2020. Aspects of Fluency Across Assessed Levels of Speaking Proficiency. The Modern Language Journal 104:1  pp. 169 ff. Crossref logo
Tran, Mai Ngoc & Kazuya Saito
2021. Effects of the 4/3/2 activity revisited: Extending Boers (2014) and Thai & Boers (2016). Language Teaching Research  pp. 136216882199413 ff. Crossref logo
Van den Branden, Kris & Koen Van Gorp
2021. Implementing task-based language education in primary education. Language Teaching for Young Learners 3:1  pp. 3 ff. Crossref logo
Wang, Zhan, Peter Skehan & Gaowei Chen
2019. The effects of hybrid online planning and L2 proficiency on video-based speaking task performance. Instructed Second Language Acquisition 3:1  pp. 53 ff. Crossref logo
Xing, Jiaxin & Shaoqian Luo
2019.  In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13],  pp. 153 ff. Crossref logo
YILDIZ, Mine & Savaş YEŞİLYURT
2021. Effects of Task Complexity on Text Easibility and Coherence of EFL Learners’ Narrative Writing. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi  pp. 36 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 july 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.