Part of
Processing Perspectives on Task PerformanceEdited by Peter Skehan
[Task-Based Language Teaching 5] 2014
► pp. 211–260
Edited by Peter Skehan
[Task-Based Language Teaching 5] 2014
► pp. 211–260
Chapter 8. Limited attentional capacity, second language performance, and task-based pedagogy
References (53)
Anderson, J.R. (2004). Cognitive psychology and its implications (6th ed.). New York, NY: Worth.
Bruton, A. (2002). From tasking purposes to purposing tasks. English Language Teaching Journal, 56, 280–288. 
Bygate, M. (2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks (pp. 23–48). London: Longman.
. (2006). Areas of research that influence L2 speaking instruction. In E. Uso-Juan & A. Martinez-Flor (Eds.), Current trends in the development and teaching of the four language skills (pp. 159–186). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bygate M., & Samuda V. (2009). Creating pressure in task pedagogy: The joint roles of field, purpose, and engagement within the interactional approach. In A. Mackey & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction (pp. 90–116). New York, NY: Routledge.
Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (Eds.) (2001). Researching pedagogic tasks. London: Longman.
Corder, S. Pit. (1981). Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford: OUP.
Crookes, G. (1989). Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 367–383.
Dornyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ellis, R. (1987). Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse: Style shifting in the use of the past tense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 12–20.
. (2005). Planning and task-based performance: Theory and research. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 3–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (2009). The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 474–509.
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299–324.
Hoey, M. (1983). On the surface of discourse. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Kintsch, W. (1994). The psychology of discourse processing. In M.A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 721–740). San Diego CA: Academic Press.
Kormos, J. (1999). Monitoring and self-repair. Language Learning, 49, 303–342.
. (2006). Speech production and second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Levelt, W.J. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge: CUP.
. (1999). Language production: A blueprint of the speaker. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), Neurocognition of language (pp. 83–122). Oxford: OUP.
Li, Q. (2010). Focus on form in task based language teaching: exploring the effects of post-task activities and task practice on learners’ oral performance. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Littlewood, W. (2004). The task-based approach: Some problems and suggestions. English Language Teaching Journal, 58(4), 319–326.
Long, M.H., & Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 27–55.
Loschky, L., & Bley-Vroman, R. (1993). Grammar and task-based methodology. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
McDonough, K., & Trofimovich, P. (2009). Using priming methods in second language research. London: Routledge.
Norris, J. (2009). Task-based teaching and testing. In M.H.Long & C.Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of language teaching (pp. 578–594). Oxford: Blackwell.
O'Malley, J.M. & Chamot, A.U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ortega, L. (2005). What do learners plan? Learner-driven attention to form during pre-task planning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 77–109). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pienemann, M. (2003). Language processing capacity. In C. Doughty & M.H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 679–714). Oxford: Blackwell.
Pinter, A. (2005). Task repetition with a 10-year-old. In C. Edwards & J. Willis (Eds.), Teachers exploring tasks in English language teaching (pp. 113–126). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 287–318). Cambridge: CUP.
. (2011). Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 3–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Robinson, P., & Gilabert, R. (2007). Task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, and second language learning and performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 161–176.
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 17–46.
Skehan, P. (1986). Cluster analysis and the identification of learner types. In V. Cook (Ed.), Experimental approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 81–94). Oxford: Pergamon.
. (1989). Individual differences in second language learning. London: Edward Arnold.
. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: OUP.
. (2001). Tasks and language performance. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & Swain M. (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 167–185). London: Longman.
. (2007). Task research and language teaching: Reciprocal relationships. In S. Fotos & H. Nassaji (Eds.), Form-focused instruction and teacher education: Studies in honour of Rod Ellis (pp. 55–69). Oxford: OUP.
. (2009a). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532.
. (2009b). Models of speaking and the assessment of second language proficiency. In A. Benati (Ed.), Issues in second language proficiency (pp. 202–215). London: Continuum.
. (2013). Nurturing noticing. In J. Bergleitner & S. Fotos (Eds.), Festschrift in honour of Richard Schmidt. Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center.
Skehan, P., Bei, X., Li, Q., & Wang Z. (2012). The task is not enough: Processing approaches to task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 16(2), 170–187.
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 185–211.
. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49(1), 93–120.
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 245–256). Oxford: OUP.
Swan, M. (2005). Legislating by hypothesis: The case of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 26, 376–401.
Tannen, D. (1989). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: CUP.
Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P. (2005). Strategic planning, task structure, and performance testing. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 239–276). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wang, Z. (2009). Modelling speech production and performance: Evidence from five types of planning and two task structures. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. London: Longman.
Willis, D., & Willis, J. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford: OUP.
Winter, E. (1976). Fundamentals of information structure: A pilot manual for further development according to student need. Hatfield, Herts: The Hatfield Polytechnic Linguistics Group, School of Humanities.
Cited by (51)
Cited by 51 other publications
Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud, Gavin Bui & Yizhou Wang
2024. The effects of topic familiarity on emotionality and linguistic complexity in EAP writing. Language Teaching Research 28:4 ► pp. 1616 ff. 
Albarqi, Ghadah
2024. Investigating EFL oral production in a technology mediated TBLT context. Journal of China Computer-Assisted Language Learning
Alzoubi, Osama
2024. Implementing collaborative pre-task planning with intermediate Arab EFL learners in a blended, task-based environment: A mixed methods study. Ampersand 13 ► pp. 100193 ff.
Mostafaei Alaei, Mahnaz & Abbas Mansouri
2024. Unraveling the differential effects of task rehearsal and task repetition on L2 task performance: the mediating role of task modality. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching
Ryan, Jonathon, Pauline Foster, Yi Wang, Anthea Fester & Jia Rong Yap
2024. Task design, L1 literacy, and second language oracy. Studies in Second Language Acquisition ► pp. 1 ff.
Silva, Breno B., Katarzyna Kutyłowska & Agnieszka Otwinowska
2024. Learning academic words through writing sentences and compositions: Any signs of an increase in cognitive load?. Language Teaching Research 28:3 ► pp. 1143 ff.
Tran, Mai Ngoc & Kazuya Saito
2024. Effects of the 4/3/2 activity revisited: Extending Boers (2014) and Thai & Boers (2016). Language Teaching Research 28:2 ► pp. 326 ff.
Yenkimaleki, Mahmood & Vincent J. van Heuven
2024. The effect of fluency training on interpreter trainees’ speech fluency, comprehensibility, and
accentedness. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics
Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud
2023. Unpacking the effects of different lengths of pre-task planning time: L2 writing outcomes and learners’ perceptions. The Language Learning Journal ► pp. 1 ff.
Jiang, Michael Yi‐Chao, Morris Siu‐Yung Jong, Wilfred Wing‐Fat Lau, Ching‐Sing Chai & Na Wu
2023. Exploring the effects of automatic speech recognition technology on oral accuracy and fluency in a flipped classroom. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 39:1 ► pp. 125 ff.
Kourtali, Nektaria-Efstathia & Lais Borges
2023. The effects of feedback timing on L2 development in written SCMC. Computer Assisted Language Learning ► pp. 1 ff.
Rezaei, Amir & Antonella Valeo
2023. Investigating the impact of task complexity on uptake and noticing of corrective feedback recasts. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 61:4 ► pp. 1271 ff.
Ryan, Jonathon, Pauline Foster, Anthea Fester, Yi Wang, Jenny Field, Celine Kearney & Jia Rong Yap
2023. First Language Literacy and Second Language Oracy: A Partial Replication of Foster and Skehan (1996). Language Learning 73:4 ► pp. 1003 ff.
Vandeweerd, Nathan, Alex Housen & Magali Paquot
2023. Comparing the longitudinal development of phraseological complexity across oral and written tasks. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 45:4 ► pp. 787 ff.
Xing, Jiaxin
2023. How do EFL learners process oral tasks with different complexity: an exploratory study. Frontiers in Psychology 14
Zhang, Ying
2023. The Influence of Game-Enhanced Communication on EFL Learners’ Pragmatic Competence in Compliment Responses. Applied Linguistics
Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud & Yizhou Wang
2022. The effects of prompt types on L2 learners’ textual emotionality and lexical complexity. Journal of Second Language Studies 5:1 ► pp. 34 ff.
Albert, Ágnes
2022. Language Tasks. In Investigating the Role of Affective Factors in Second Language Learning Tasks [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 31 ff.
B. Silva, Breno
2022. The Writing Cycle and Cognitive Processes that May Affect Learning. In Writing to Learn Academic Words [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 45 ff.
B. Silva, Breno
2022. Study 2—Incidental Lexical Learning Through Writing Sentences and Timed Compositions: Is Learning Affected by Task-Induced Cognitive Load?. In Writing to Learn Academic Words [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 107 ff.
B. Silva, Breno
2022. General Discussion for Study 2 (Chapter 6) and Study 3 (Chapter 7). In Writing to Learn Academic Words [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 157 ff.
Kobayashi, Manami
2022. The distributed practice effects of speaking task repetition. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 32:1 ► pp. 142 ff.
Tao, Na & Ying Wang
2022. Effects of prior knowledge and reasoning demands on Chinese EFL writing performance. Language Teaching Research
Yenkimaleki, Mahmood, Vincent Van Heuven & Mostafa Hosseini
2022. The Effect of Fluency Training on Interpreter Trainees’ Speech Fluency: Does Content Familiarity Matter?. SSRN Electronic Journal
Brown, Alan V., Gregory L. Thompson & Troy L. Cox
2021. Chapter 3. ACTFL OPIc question prompt and advanced Spanish fluency. In Advancedness in Second Language Spanish [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 31], ► pp. 42 ff.
PANG, FRANCINE & PETER SKEHAN
2021. Performance Profiles on Second Language Speaking Tasks. The Modern Language Journal 105:1 ► pp. 371 ff.
Van den Branden, Kris & Koen Van Gorp
2021. Implementing task-based language education in primary education. Language Teaching for Young Learners 3:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
YILDIZ, Mine & Savaş YEŞİLYURT
2021. Effects of Task Complexity on Text Easibility and Coherence of EFL Learners’ Narrative Writing. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi 11:1 ► pp. 36 ff.
Duran-Karaoz, Zeynep & Parvaneh Tavakoli
2020. PREDICTING L2 FLUENCY FROM L1 FLUENCY BEHAVIOR. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 42:4 ► pp. 671 ff.
Khezrlou, Sima
2020. Training planning in second language narrative writing. ELT Journal 74:1 ► pp. 49 ff.
Khezrlou, Sima
2023. Focus on form in task repetition through oral and written task modeling. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 61:2 ► pp. 479 ff.
Kourtali, Nektaria‐Efstathia & Andrea Révész
2020. The Roles of Recasts, Task Complexity, and Aptitude in Child Second Language Development. Language Learning 70:1 ► pp. 179 ff.
Matsumoto, Kazumi, Maki Hirotani & Atsushi Fukada
2020. Examining Oral Performance Characteristics of L2 Learners With the CAF Calculator. In Recent Tools for Computer- and Mobile-Assisted Foreign Language Learning [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ], ► pp. 132 ff.
Mohammadzadeh, Aysheh, Touran Ahour, Mahnaz Saeidi & María Consuelo Sáiz Manzanares
2020. A Sociocultural Perspective on Second Language Writing: The Effect of Symmetrical versus Asymmetrical Scaffolding on Intermediate EFL Learners’ Writing Accuracy, Fluency, and Complexity and Their Attitudes. Education Research International 2020 ► pp. 1 ff.
TAVAKOLI, PARVANEH, FUMIYO NAKATSUHARA & ANN–MARIE HUNTER
2020. Aspects of Fluency Across Assessed Levels of Speaking Proficiency. The Modern Language Journal 104:1 ► pp. 169 ff.
Ellis, Rod
2019. Chapter 1. Task preparedness. In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13], ► pp. 15 ff.
Ellis, Rod
2024. Chapter 12. Conclusion. In Individual Differences and Task-Based Language Teaching [Task-Based Language Teaching, 16], ► pp. 346 ff.
Rahimi, Muhammad
2019. Effects of increasing the degree of reasoning and the number of elements on L2 argumentative writing. Language Teaching Research 23:5 ► pp. 633 ff.
Rahimi, Muhammad & Lawrence Jun Zhang
2019. Writing task complexity, students’ motivational beliefs, anxiety and their writing production in English as a second language. Reading and Writing 32:3 ► pp. 761 ff.
Sasayama, Shoko & John M. Norris
2019. Chapter 5. Unravelling cognitive task complexity. In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13], ► pp. 95 ff.
Souza Ferraz D'Ely, Raquel Carolina, Mailce Borges Mota & Martin Bygate
2019. Chapter 9. Strategic planning and repetition as metacognitive processes in task performance. In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13], ► pp. 199 ff.
Wang, Zhan, Peter Skehan & Gaowei Chen
2019. The effects of hybrid online planning and L2 proficiency on video-based speaking task performance. Instructed Second Language Acquisition 3:1 ► pp. 53 ff.
Xing, Jiaxin & Shaoqian Luo
2019. Chapter 7. The effects of reasoning demands on Chinese EFL learners’ oral performance and cognitive processes. In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13], ► pp. 153 ff.
Bui, Gavin, Peter Skehan & Zhan Wang
2018. Task Condition Effects on Advanced‐Level Foreign Language Performance. In The Handbook of Advanced Proficiency in Second Language Acquisition, ► pp. 219 ff.
de Jong, Nel & Philip Tillman
2018. Chapter 2. Grammatical structures and oral fluency in immediate task repetition. In Learning Language through Task Repetition [Task-Based Language Teaching, 11], ► pp. 43 ff.
Kim, YouJin, Scott Crossley, YeonJoo Jung, Kristopher Kyle & Sanghee Kang
2018. Chapter 3. The effects of task repetition and task complexity on L2 lexicon use. In Learning Language through Task Repetition [Task-Based Language Teaching, 11], ► pp. 75 ff.
Lambert, Craig, Judit Kormos & Danny Minn
2017. TASK REPETITION AND SECOND LANGUAGE SPEECH PROCESSING. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 39:1 ► pp. 167 ff.
Skehan, Peter
2016. Sidesteps towards applied linguistics. In Becoming and Being an Applied Linguist, ► pp. 89 ff.
Skehan, Peter
2016. Foreign language aptitude, acquisitional sequences, and psycholinguistic processes. In Cognitive Individual Differences in Second Language Processing and Acquisition [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 3], ► pp. 17 ff.
Skehan, Peter
2016. Tasks Versus Conditions: Two Perspectives on Task Research and Their Implications for Pedagogy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 36 ► pp. 34 ff.
Tavakoli, Parvaneh, Colin Campbell & Joan McCormack
2016. Development of Speech Fluency Over a Short Period of Time: Effects of Pedagogic Intervention. TESOL Quarterly 50:2 ► pp. 447 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.