Cover not available
Part of
Task-Based Language Learning – Insights from and for L2 Writing
Edited by Heidi Byrnes and Rosa M. Manchón
[Task-Based Language Teaching 7] 2014
► pp. 27–52

The internal dimension of tasks

The interaction between task factors and learner factors in bringing about learning through writing

This chapter considers how an “internal dimension of tasks” can both shed new light on the relationship between task interpretation, task performance, and learning outcomes, and advance the research agenda on task learning with worthwhile new empirical questions. Building on an expanded notion of the construct of task and the premise that language learning through task is closely linked to the problem-solving activity learners engage in while they are composing, the chapter explores the nature of learner agency in this problem-solving activity and hence the close connection between learners’ own perceptions of task demands, goals, and expected outcomes, and their processing activity during task execution. The chapter claims that TBLT-based understandings of the interplay between task factors and learner factors can benefit from incorporating insights derived from the cognitively-oriented L2 writing theoretical and empirical literature. This should facilitate the quest for answers to theoretically and pedagogically relevant empirical questions on task learning in general.

Published online: 14 November 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.7.02man
References
Appel, C., & Gilabert, R
(2002) Motivation and task performance in a task-based, web-based tandem project. ReCALL, 14, 16–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baralt, M., & Gurzynski-Weiss, L
(2011) Comparing learner’s anxiety during task-based interaction in computer-mediated and face-to-face communication. Language Teaching Research, 15, 201–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M
(1987)  The psychology of written composition . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D
(2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing . London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breen, M
(1987/2009). Learner contributions to task design. In C. Candlin & D. Murphy (Eds.), Language learning tasks (pp. 23–46). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Reprinted in K. Van den Branden, M. Bygate, & J. M. Norris (Eds.) (2009). Task-based language teaching: A reader (pp. 333–356). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bygate, M
2006 Areas of research that influence L2 speaking instruction. In E. Uso-Juan & A. Martinez-Flor (Eds.), Current trends in the development and teaching of the four language skills (pp.159-186). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bygate, M., Norris, J., & Van den Branden, K
(2011) Series editors’ preface to Volume 2. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity. Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. xi–xii). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cumming, A
(1989) Writing expertise and second language proficiency. Language Learning, 39, 81–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1990) Metalinguistic and ideational thinking in second language composing. Written Communication, 7, 482–511. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (2006)  Goals for academic writing: ESL students and their instructors . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Goal theory and second-language writing development, two ways. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 135–164). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z
(2002) The motivational basis of language learning tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences in instructed language learning (pp. 137–157). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & Kormos, J
(2000) The role of individual and social variables in oral task performance. Language Teaching Research, 4, 275–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R
(2003). Task-based language learning and teaching . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(Ed.) (2005)  Planning and task-performance in a second language . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) Epilogue. A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 335–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012)  Language teaching research and language pedagogy . Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fayol, M., Alamargot, D., & Berninger, V.W
(Eds.) (2012a)  Translation of thought to written text while composing. Advancing theory, knowledge, research, methods, tools, and applications . London: Psychology Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012b) From cave writers to elite scribes to professional writers to universal writers, translation is fundamental to writing. In M. Fayol, D. Alamargot, & V.W. Berninger (Eds.), Translation of thought to written text while composing. Advancing theory, knowledge, research, methods, tools, and applications (pp. 3–14). London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Ferris, D
(2010) Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA. Intersections and practical applications. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 181–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flower, L
(1990) The role of task representation in reading-to-write. In L. Flower, V. Stein, J. Ackerman, M.J. Kantz, K. McCormick & W. Peck (Eds.), Reading to write: Exploring a cognitive and social process (pp. 35-75). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Flower, L.S., & Hayes, J.R
(1980) The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In L.W. Gregg & E.R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 31–50). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Flower, L., & Hayes, J.R
(1981) A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., & Skehan, P
(1996) The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299–323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freiermuth, M.R., & Huang, H
(2012) Bringing Japan and Taiwan closer electronically: A look at an intercultural online synchronic chat task and its effect on motivation. Language Teaching Research, 16, 61–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galbraith, D., Van Waes, L., & Torrance, M
(2007) Introduction. In M. Torrance, L. Van Waes, & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Writing and cognition. Research and applications (pp. 1–10). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Hayes, J.R
(1996) A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C.M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing (pp. 1–27). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(2006) New directions in writing theory. In C.A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 28–40). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
(2012a) Modelling and remodeling writing. Written Communication, 29, 369–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012b) Evidence from language bursts, revision, and transcription for translation and its relation to other writing processes. In M. Fayol, D. Alamargot, & V.W. Berninger (Eds.), Translation of thought to written text while composing. Advancing theory, knowledge, research, methods, tools, and applications (pp. 15–25). London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Hayes J.R., & Nash, J.G
(1996) On the nature of planning in writing. In C.M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing (pp. 29–55). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F
(Eds.) (2006)  Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ishikawa¸ T
(2011) Examining the influence of intentional reasoning demands on learner perceptions of task difficulty and L2 monologic speech. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity. Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 307–329). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y., & Tracy-Ventura, N
(2011) Task complexity, language anxiety, and the development of the simple past. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity. Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 207–306). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, H., & Rinnert, C
(2012) Understanding L2 writing development from a multicompetence perspective: Dynamic repertoires of knowledge and text construction. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 101–134). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) L1/L2/L3 writing development: Longitudinal case study of a Japanese multicompetent writer. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 4–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J
(2012) The role of individual differences in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 390–403. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J., & Trebits, A
(2011) Working memory capacity and narrative task performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity. Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 267–285). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) The role of task complexity, modality, and aptitude in narrative task performance. Language Learning, 62, 439–472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I
(2011) Task performance in L2 writing and speaking: The effect of mode. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 91–104). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Speaking and writing tasks and their effects on second language performance. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 364–377). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lillis, T
(2012) English medium writing for academic purposes: Foundational categories, certainty and contingency. In R. Tang (Ed.), Academic writing in a second or foreign language. Issues and challenges facing ESL/EFL academic writers in higher education contexts (pp. 235–247). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Manchón, R.M
(2009) Introduction. Broadening the perspective of L2 writing scholarship: The contribution of research on foreign language writing. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching and research (pp. 1–19). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011a) Writing to learn the language: Issues in theory and research. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 61–82). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (2011b)  Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013a) Teaching writing. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), Encyclopedia of applied linguistics . Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013b) Writing. In F. Grosjean & Li Ping (Eds.), The psycholinguistics of bilingualism (pp. 100–115). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) Learning and teaching writing in the FL classroom: Fostering writing-to-learn approaches. In P. Driscoll, E. Macaro, & A. Swarbrick (Eds.), Debates in modern language education (pp. 96–107). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Manchón, R.M., & Roca de Larios, J
(2007) Writing-to-learn in instructed language learning contexts. In E.A. Soler & M.P.S. Jordá (Eds.), Intercultural language use and language learning (pp. 101–121). Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Writing to learn in FL contexts: Exploring learners’ perceptions of the language learning potential of L2 writing. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 181–207). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R.M., Roca de Larios, J., & Murphy, L
(2009) The temporal dimension of foreign language writing processes: Implications for theory. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts. Learning, teaching and research (pp. 102–129). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Nicolás-Conesa, F., Roca de Larios, J., & Coyle, Y
(2014) Development of EFL students’ mental models of writing and their effects on performance. Journal of Second Language Writing , 23,1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ong, J
(2014) How do planning time and task conditions affect metacognitive process of L2 writers? Journal of Second Language Writing, 23, 17–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ong, J., & Zhang, L.J
(2010) Effects of task complexity on the fluency and lexical complexity in EFL students’ argumentative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19, 218–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Effects of the manipulation of cognitive processes in EFL writers’ text quality. TESOL Quarterly, 47, 375–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L
(2005) What do learners plan? Learner-driven attention to form during pre-task planning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Epilogue: Exploring L2 writing–SLA interfaces. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 404–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L., & Carson, J.G
(2010) Multicompetence, social context, and L2 writing research praxis. In T. Silva & P. Matsuda (Eds.), Practicing theory in second language writing (pp. 48–71). West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.Google Scholar
Parks, S
(2000) Professional writing and the role of incidental collaboration: Evidence from a medical setting. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 101–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming). Workplace writing: From text to context. In R.M. Manchón & P.K. Matsuda (Eds.) The handbook of second and foreign language writing Berlin De Gruyter Mouton
Parks, S., & Maguire, M
(1999) Coping with on-the-job writing in ESL: A constructivist-semiotic perspective. Language Learning, 49, 143–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quinlan, T., Loncke, M., Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L
(2012) Coordinating the cognitive processes of writing: The role of the monitor. Written Communication, 29, 345–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rinnert, C., & Kobayashi, H
Forthcoming). Multicompetence and multilingual writing. In R.M. Manchón & P.K. Matsuda (Eds.) The handbook of second and foreign language writing Berlin De Gruyter Mouton
Robinson, P
(2001) Task complexity, task difficult, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003) The Cognition Hypothesis of adult, task-based language learning. Second Language Studies, 21, 45–107.Google Scholar
(2005) Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework for second language task design. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 43, 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007a) Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: Effects on speech production, interaction, uptake and perceptions of task difficulty. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 193–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007b) Criteria for classifying and sequencing pedagogic tasks. In M.P. García-Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 7–26). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(2011a) Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity. Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 3–37). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P., & Gilabert, R
(2007) Task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis and second language learning and performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 161–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Task-based learning: Cognitive underpinnings. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), Encyclopedia of applied linguistics . Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roca de Larios, J., Manchón, R.M. & Murphy, L
(2008) The foreign language writer’s strategic behaviour in the allocation of time to writing processes. The Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(1), 30-47 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roca de Larios, J., Marín, J., & Murphy, L
(2001) A temporal analysis of formulation processes in L1 and L2 writing. Language Learning, 51, 497-538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roca de Larios, J., Murphy, L., & Marín, J
(2002) A critical examination of L2 writing process research. In S. Ransdell & M.L. Barbier (Eds.), New directions for research in L2 writing (pp.11–47). Amsterdam: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roca de Larios, J., Nicolás-Conesa, F., & Coyle, I
Forthcoming). Focus on writers: Processes and strategies. In R.M. Manchón & P.K. Matsuda (Eds.) The handbook of second and foreign language writing Berlin de Gruyter Mouton
Ruiz-Funes, M
(2001) Task representation in foreign language reading-to-write. Foreign Language Annals, 34, 226–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samuda, V., & Bygate, M
(2008)  Tasks in second language learning . Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sasayama, S., Malicka, A., & Norris, J.M
(2013)  Task complexity in TBLT research and beyond: A research synthesis . Presentation at the 23rd European Second Language Association (EUROSLA) conference, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands (August 30, 2013)
Schoonen, R., Snellings, P., Stevenson, M., & van Gelderen, A
(2009) Towards a blueprint of the foreign language writers: The linguistic and cognitive demands of foreign language writing. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching and research (pp. 77–101). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Slimani-Rolls, A
(2005) Rethinking task-based language learning: What we can learn from the learners. Language Teaching Research, 9, 195–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P
(1998)  A cognitive approach to language learning . Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Storch, N
(2013)  Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms: New perspectives on language and education . Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G
(2010) Learners’ processing, uptake, and retention of corrective feedback on writing. Case studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 303–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swales, J
(1990/2009). The concept of task. In J. Swales, Genre Analysis (Chapter 4). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reprinted in K. Van den Branden, K., M. Bygate, & J. M. Norris (Eds.) (2009). Task-based language teaching. A reader (pp. 41–55). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Tavakoli, P
(2009) Investigating task difficulty: Learners’ and teachers’ perceptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19, 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verheyden, L., Van den Branden, K., Rijlaarsdam, G., Van den Bergh, H., & De Maeijer, S
(2012) Translation skills and trade-off in young L2-learners’ written narrations. In M. Fayol, D. Alamargot, & V.W. Berninger (Eds.), Translation of thought to written text while composing. Advancing theory, knowledge, research, methods, tools, and applications (pp. 181-213). London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N
(2012) Feedback and writing development through collaboration: A socio-cultural approach. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 69–99). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, J
(2008) The speaking–writing connection in second language and academic literacy development. In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (Eds.), The oral–literate connection (pp. 10–25). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
(2012) The potential role (s) of writing in second language development. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 321–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfersberger, M.A
(2007) Second language writing from sources: An ethnographic study of an argument essay task. Unpublished PhD. Dissertation, University of Auckland.Google Scholar
Yuan, F., & Ellis, R
(2003) The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24, 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 25 other publications

Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud
2020. Differential Effects of Strategic Planning and Task Structure on L2 Writing Outcomes. Reading & Writing Quarterly 36:4 ► pp. 320 ff. DOI logo
Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud, Sima Khezrlou & Yu Tian
2024. Verb argument construction complexity indices and L2 written production: effects of task complexity and task repetition. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 18:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Tabari, Mahmoud Abdi, Sima Khezrlou & Yu Tian
2022. Task complexity, task repetition, and L2 writing complexity: exploring interactions in the TBLT domain. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 DOI logo
Allaw, Elissa
2021. A learner corpus analysis: Effects of task complexity, task type, and L1 & L2 similarity on propositional and linguistic complexity . International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 59:4 ► pp. 569 ff. DOI logo
Bagheri, Mohammad
2024. The effects of task design variables and corrective feedback on EFL learners’ writing complexity and accuracy. Cogent Education 11:1 DOI logo
CHO, MINYOUNG
2018. Task Complexity and Modality: Exploring Learners’ Experience From the Perspective of Flow. The Modern Language Journal 102:1 ► pp. 162 ff. DOI logo
Gilabert, Roger & Aleksandra Malicka
2021. From Needs Analysis to Task-Based Design: Methodology, Assessment and Programme Evaluation. In Task-Based Language Teaching and Assessment, ► pp. 93 ff. DOI logo
Khezrlou, Sima
2021. Effects of timing and availability of isolated FFI on learners’ written accuracy and fluency through task repetition. The Language Learning Journal 49:5 ► pp. 568 ff. DOI logo
Manchón, Rosa M.
2023. Writing and Language Learning. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Mochizuki, Naoko
2017. Contingent Needs Analysis for Task Implementation: An Activity Systems Analysis of Group Writing Conferences. TESOL Quarterly 51:3 ► pp. 607 ff. DOI logo
Mostafaei Alaei, Mahnaz & Abbas Mansouri
2024. Unraveling the differential effects of task rehearsal and task repetition on L2 task performance: the mediating role of task modality. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 DOI logo
NICOLÁS–CONESA, FLORENTINA, ROSA MARÍA MANCHÓN & LOURDES CEREZO
2019. The Effect of Unfocused Direct and Indirect Written Corrective Feedback on Rewritten Texts and New Texts: Looking into Feedback for Accuracy and Feedback for Acquisition. The Modern Language Journal 103:4 ► pp. 848 ff. DOI logo
Oliva Parera, Pablo M. & María Pilar Núñez Delgado
2016. Lengua y contenido significativo para motivar al aprendiente de lengua extranjera. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 29:1 ► pp. 270 ff. DOI logo
Rahimi, Muhammad
2019. Effects of increasing the degree of reasoning and the number of elements on L2 argumentative writing. Language Teaching Research 23:5 ► pp. 633 ff. DOI logo
Roca de Larios, Julio
2023. Chapter 10. Exploring the generation, development, and integration of argumentative goals in L1 and L2 composition processes. In Research Methods in the Study of L2 Writing Processes [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 5], ► pp. 202 ff. DOI logo
Roothooft, Hanne, Amparo Lázaro-Ibarrola & Bram Bulté
2022. Task repetition and corrective feedback via models and direct corrections among young EFL writers: Draft quality and task motivation. Language Teaching Research ► pp. 136216882210820 ff. DOI logo
Ruiz-Funes, Marcela
2015. Exploring the potential of second/foreign language writing for language learning: The effects of task factors and learner variables. Journal of Second Language Writing 28 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Shintani, Natsuko & Scott Aubrey
2023. Chapter 15. Methodological considerations in the analysis of synchronous and asynchronous written corrective feedback. In Research Methods in the Study of L2 Writing Processes [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 5], ► pp. 315 ff. DOI logo
Silva, Breno B., Katarzyna Kutyłowska & Agnieszka Otwinowska
2021. Learning academic words through writing sentences and compositions: Any signs of an increase in cognitive load?. Language Teaching Research ► pp. 136216882110204 ff. DOI logo
Tao, Na & Ying Wang
2022. Effects of prior knowledge and reasoning demands on Chinese EFL writing performance. Language Teaching Research ► pp. 136216882210898 ff. DOI logo
Torres, Julio
2023. Heritage language learners’ written texts across pair types and interaction mode. Language Teaching Research 27:1 ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Vasylets, Olena, Roger Gilabert & Rosa M. Manchón
2017. The Effects of Mode and Task Complexity on Second Language Production. Language Learning 67:2 ► pp. 394 ff. DOI logo
Yang, Weiwei & YouJin Kim
2020. The effect of topic familiarity on the complexity, accuracy, and fluency of second language writing . Applied Linguistics Review 11:1 ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Çiftçi, Hatime & Erhan Aslan
2019. Computer-Mediated Communication in the L2 Writing Process. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching 9:2 ► pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Child L2 Writers [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 32], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.